Stable gene replacement in barley by targeted double-strand break induction
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
26712824
PubMed Central
PMC4762383
DOI
10.1093/jxb/erv537
PII: erv537
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Barley, Hordeum vulgare, double-strand break induction, gene replacement, gene targeting, homology-directed DNA integration, precision genome engineering.,
- MeSH
- dvouřetězcové zlomy DNA * MeSH
- genetické lokusy MeSH
- geneticky modifikované rostliny MeSH
- genový targeting metody MeSH
- ječmen (rod) genetika MeSH
- kvantitativní polymerázová řetězová reakce MeSH
- modely genetické MeSH
- reprodukovatelnost výsledků MeSH
- rostlinné geny MeSH
- transformace genetická MeSH
- typy dědičnosti genetika MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
Gene targeting is becoming an important tool for precision genome engineering in plants. During gene replacement, a variant of gene targeting, transformed DNA integrates into the genome by homologous recombination (HR) to replace resident sequences. We have analysed gene targeting in barley (Hordeum vulgare) using a model system based on double-strand break (DSB) induction by the meganuclease I-SceI and a transgenic, artificial target locus. In the plants we obtained, the donor construct was inserted at the target locus by homology-directed DNA integration in at least two transformants obtained in a single experiment and was stably inherited as a single Mendelian trait. Both events were produced by one-sided integration. Our data suggest that gene replacement can be achieved in barley with a frequency suitable for routine application. The use of a codon-optimized nuclease and co-transfer of the nuclease gene together with the donor construct are probably the components important for efficient gene targeting. Such an approach, employing the recently developed synthetic nucleases/nickases that allow DSB induction at almost any sequence of a genome of interest, sets the stage for precision genome engineering as a routine tool even for important crops such as barley.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Ainley WM, Sastry-Dent L, Welter ME, et al. 2013. Trait stacking via targeted genome editing. Plant Biotechnology Journal 11, 1126–1134. PubMed
Belhaj K, Chaparro-Garcia A, Kamoun S, Nekrasov V. 2013. Plant genome editing made easy: targeted mutagenesis in model and crop plants using the CRISPR/Cas system. Plant Methods 9, 39. PubMed PMC
Beumer KJ, Trautman JK, Christian M, Dahlem TJ, Lake CM, Hawley RS, Grunwald DJ, Voytas DF, Carroll D. 2013. Comparing zinc finger nucleases and transcription activator-like effector nucleases for gene targeting in Drosophila. G3-Genes Genomes Genetics 3, 1717–1725. PubMed PMC
Cai C, Doyon Y, Ainley WM, et al. 2009. Targeted transgene integration in plant cells using designed zinc finger nucleases. Plant Molecular Biology 69, 699–709. PubMed
Chilton M-DM, Que Q. 2003. Targeted integration of T-DNA into the tobacco genome at double-stranded breaks: new insights on the mechanism of T-DNA integration. Plant Physiology 133, 956–965. PubMed PMC
Christensen A, Quail P. 1996. Ubiquitin promoter-based vectors for high-level expression of selectable and/or screenable marker genes in monocotyledonous plants. Transgenic Research 5, 213–218. PubMed
Degroot MJA, Offringa R, Groet J, Does MP, Hooykaas PJJ, Van den Elzen PJM. 1994. Nonrecombinant background in gene targeting—illegitimate recombination between a Hpt gene and a defective 5' deleted NptII gene can restore a Km(R) phenotype in tobacco. Plant Molecular Biology 25, 721–733. PubMed
D’Halluin K, Vanderstraeten C, Stals E, Cornelissen M, Ruiter R. 2008. Homologous recombination: a basis for targeted genome optimization in crop species such as maize. Plant Biotechnology Journal 6, 93–102. PubMed
De Pater S, Neuteboom LW, Pinas JE, Hooykaas PJJ, Van Der Zaal BJ. 2009. ZFN-induced mutagenesis and gene-targeting in Arabidopsis through Agrobacterium-mediated floral dip transformation. Plant Biotechnology Journal 7, 821–835. PubMed
De Semir D, Aran JM. 2003. Misleading gene conversion frequencies due to a PCR artifact using small fragment homologous replacement. Oligonucleotides 13, 261–269. PubMed
Endo M, Osakabe K, Ono K, Handa H, Shimizu T, Toki S. 2007. Molecular breeding of a novel herbicide-tolerant rice by gene targeting. The Plant Journal 52, 157–166. PubMed
Fauser F, Schiml S, Puchta H. 2014. Both CRISPR/Cas-based nucleases and nickases can be used efficiently for genome engineering in Arabidopsis thaliana. The Plant Journal 79, 348–359. PubMed
Feng Z, Mao Y, Xu N, et al. 2014. Multigeneration analysis reveals the inheritance, specificity, and patterns of CRISPR/Cas-induced gene modifications in Arabidopsis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 111, 4632–4637. PubMed PMC
Gottwald S, Bauer P, Komatsuda T, Lundqvist U, Stein N. 2009. TILLING in the two-rowed barley cultivar ‘Barke’ reveals preferred sites of functional diversity in the gene HvHox1. BMC Research Notes 2, 258. PubMed PMC
Gurushidze M, Hensel G, Hiekel S, Schedel S, Valkov V, Kumlehn J. 2014. True-breeding targeted gene knock-out in barley using designer TALE-nuclease in haploid cells. PLoS One 9, e92046. PubMed PMC
Hanin M, Volrath S, Bogucki A, Briker M, Ward E, Paszkowski J. 2001. Gene targeting in Arabidopsis. The Plant Journal 28, 671–677. PubMed
Hensel G, Kastner C, Oleszczuk S, Riechen J, Kumlehn J. 2009. Agrobacterium-mediated gene transfer to cereal crop plants: current protocols for barley, wheat, triticale, and maize. International Journal of Plant Genomics 2009, 835608. PubMed PMC
IntBarleySeqCon. 2012. A physical, genetic and functional sequence assembly of the barley genome. Nature 491, 711–716. PubMed
Jacobsen J, Venables I, Wang M-B, Matthews P, Ayliffe M, Gubler F. 2006. Barley (Hordeium vulgare L.). Methods in Molecular Biology 343, 171–183. PubMed
Johnson RA, Gurevich V, Filler S, Samach A, Levy AA. 2015. Comparative assessments of CRISPR-Cas nucleases’ cleavage efficiency in planta. Plant Molecular Biology 87, 143–156. PubMed
Jovtchev G, Watanabe K, Pecinka A, Rosin FM, Mette MF, Lam E, Schubert I. 2008. Size and number of tandem repeat arrays can determine somatic homologous pairing of transgene loci mediated by epigenetic modifications in Arabidopsis thaliana nuclei. Chromosoma 117, 267–276. PubMed
Judo MSB, Wedel AB, Wilson C. 1998. Stimulation and suppression of PCR-mediated recombination. Nucleic Acids Research 26, 1819–1825. PubMed PMC
Lundqvist U. 2014. Scandinavian mutation research in barley—a historical review. Hereditas 151, 123–131. PubMed
Lundqvist U, Franckowiak JD. 2003. Diversity of barley mutants. In: von Bothmer R, van Hintum T, Knüpffer H, Sato K. eds. Diversity in barley (Hordeum vulgare). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science BV, 77–96.
Markmann-Mulisch U, Wendeler E, Zobell O, Schween G, Steinbiss HH, Reiss B. 2007. Differential requirements for RAD51 in Physcomitrella patens and Arabidopsis thaliana development and DNA damage repair. The Plant Cell 19, 3080–3089. PubMed PMC
Mayer KFX, Martis M, Hedley PE, et al. 2011. Unlocking the barley genome by chromosomal and comparative genomics. The Plant Cell 23, 1249–1263. PubMed PMC
Mikami M, Toki S, Endo M. 2015. Comparison of CRISPR/Cas9 expression constructs for efficient targeted mutagenesis in rice. Plant Molecular Biology 88, 561–572. PubMed PMC
Offringa R, De GMJA, Haagsman HJ, Does MP, Van Den Elzen PJM, Hooykaas PJJ. 1990. Extrachromosomal homologous recombination and gene targeting in plant cells after Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. EMBO Journal 9, 3077–3084. PubMed PMC
Osakabe Y, Osakabe K. 2014. Genome editing with engineered nucleases in plants. Plant and Cell Physiology 56, 389–400. PubMed
Puchta H. 1998. Repair of genomic double-strand breaks in somatic plant-cells by one-sided invasion of homologous sequences. The Plant Journal 13, 331–339.
Puchta H, Dujon B, Hohn B. 1996. 2 different but related mechanisms are used in plants for the repair of genomic double-strand breaks by homologous recombination. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 93, 5055–5060. PubMed PMC
Puchta H, Fauser F. 2013. Gene targeting in plants: 25 years later. International Journal of Developmental Biology 57, 629–637. PubMed
Puchta H, Fauser F. 2014. Synthetic nucleases for genome engineering in plants: prospects for a bright future. The Plant Journal 78, 727–741. PubMed
Qi Y, Zhang Y, Zhang F, Baller JA, Cleland SC, Ryu Y, Starker CG, Voytas DF. 2013. Increasing frequencies of site-specific mutagenesis and gene targeting in Arabidopsis by manipulating DNA repair pathways. Genome Research 23, 547–554. PubMed PMC
Reiss B. 2003. Homologous recombination and gene targeting in plant cells. International Review of Cytology 228, 85–139. PubMed
Reiss B, Schubert I, Kopchen K, Wendeler E, Schell J, Puchta H. 2000. RecA stimulates sister chromatid exchange and the fidelity of double-strand break repair, but not gene targeting, in plants transformed by Agrobacterium. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 97, 3358–3363. PubMed PMC
Shukla VK, Doyon Y, Miller JC, et al. 2009. Precise genome modification in the crop species Zea mays using zinc-finger nucleases. Nature 459, 437–441. PubMed
Tingay S, McElroy D, Kalla R, Fieg S, Wang M, Thornton S, Brettell R. 1997. Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated barley transformation. The Plant Journal 11, 1369–1376.
Townsend JA, Wright DA, Winfrey RJ, Fu F, Maeder ML, Joung JK, Voytas DF. 2009. High-frequency modification of plant genes using engineered zinc-finger nucleases. Nature 459, 442–445. PubMed PMC
Voytas DF. 2013. Plant genome engineering with sequence-specific nucleases. Annual Review of Plant Biology 64, 327–350. PubMed
Vu GTH, Cao HX, Watanabe K, Hensel G, Blattner FR, Kumlehn J, Schubert I. 2014. Repair of site-specific DNA double-strand breaks in barley occurs via diverse pathways primarily involving the sister chromatid. The Plant Cell 26, 2156–2167. PubMed PMC
Wang M-B, Waterhouse P. 2000. High-efficiency silencing of a β-glucuronidase gene in rice is correlated with repetitive transgene structure but is independent of DNA methylation. Plant Molecular Biology 43, 67–82. PubMed
Wood AJ, Lo T-W, Zeitler B, et al. 2011. Targeted genome editing across species using ZFNs and TALENs. Science 333, 307. PubMed PMC
Zobell O. 2006. The family of CONSTANS-like genes in the moss Physcomitrella patens , PhD thesis, Universität zu Köln, Cologne, Germany.
Zobell O, Reiss B. 2010. Gene targeting as a precise tool for plant mutagenesis. In: Meksem K, Kahl G, eds. The handbook of plant mutation screening (Mining of natural and induced alleles). Weinheim: Wiley-Blackwell-VCH, 263–285.