Risk of early relapse following the switch from injectables to oral agents for multiple sclerosis
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
26782663
DOI
10.1111/ene.12929
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- dimethyl fumarate, fingolimod, multiple sclerosis, progression, relapse, teriflunomide, treatment switching,
- MeSH
- aplikace orální MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- glatiramer acetát aplikace a dávkování farmakologie MeSH
- hodnocení výsledků zdravotní péče * MeSH
- imunologické faktory aplikace a dávkování farmakologie MeSH
- interferon beta aplikace a dávkování farmakologie MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- longitudinální studie MeSH
- progrese nemoci * MeSH
- recidiva MeSH
- registrace * MeSH
- relabující-remitující roztroušená skleróza farmakoterapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- Názvy látek
- glatiramer acetát MeSH
- imunologické faktory MeSH
- interferon beta MeSH
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Early relapse outcomes in long-term stable patients switching from interferon β/glatiramer acetate (IFNβ/GA) to oral therapy are unknown. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare early relapse and progression in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients switching to oral therapy following a period of stable disease on IFNβ/GA, relative to a propensity-matched comparator of patients remaining on IFNβ/GA. METHODS: The MSBase cohort study is a global, longitudinal registry for MS. Time to first 6-month relapse in previously stable MS patients switching from platform injectables ('switchers') to oral agents were compared with propensity-matched patients remaining on IFNβ/GA ('stayers') using a Cox marginal model. RESULTS: Three-hundred and ninety-six switchers were successfully matched to 396 stayers on a 1:1 basis. There was no difference in the proportion of patients recording at least one relapse in the first 1-6 months by treatment arm (7.3% switchers, 6.6% stayers; P = 0.675). The mean annualized relapse rate (P = 0.493) and the rate of first 6-month relapse by treatment arm (hazard ratio 1.22, 95% confidence interval 0.70, 2.11) were also comparable. There was no difference in the rate of disability progression by treatment arm (hazard ratio 1.43, 95% confidence interval 0.63, 3.26). CONCLUSION: This is the first study to compare early relapse switch probability in the period immediately following switch to oral treatment in a population previously stable on injectable therapy. There was no evidence of disease reactivation within the first 6 months of switching to oral therapy.
Amiri Hospital Kuwait City Kuwait
Brain and Mind Research Institute Sydney NSW Australia
Center de réadaptation déficience physique Chaudière Appalache Levis QC Canada
Charles University Prague Czech Republic
Department of Basic Medical Sciences Neuroscience and Sense Organs University of Bari Bari Italy
Department of Medicine University of Melbourne Parkville Vic Australia
Department of Neurology Royal Melbourne Hospital Parkville Vic Australia
Department of Neurosciences University of Parma Parma Italy
Hôpital Notre Dame Montreal QC Canada
Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena Sevilla Spain
John Hunter Hospital Newcastle NSW Australia
Liverpool Hospital Sydney NSW Australia
Neuro Rive Sud Hôpital Charles LeMoyne Quebec QC Canada
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org