Brief Report: Association of Rheumatoid Factor and Anti-Citrullinated Protein Antibody Positivity With Better Effectiveness of Abatacept: Results From the Pan-European Registry Analysis
Language English Country United States Media print
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
PubMed
26815727
DOI
10.1002/art.39595
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Abatacept therapeutic use MeSH
- Antirheumatic Agents therapeutic use MeSH
- Autoantibodies blood MeSH
- Peptides, Cyclic immunology MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Predictive Value of Tests MeSH
- Registries MeSH
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid blood drug therapy MeSH
- Rheumatoid Factor blood MeSH
- Treatment Outcome MeSH
- Check Tag
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Geographicals
- Europe MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Abatacept MeSH
- Antirheumatic Agents MeSH
- Autoantibodies MeSH
- cyclic citrullinated peptide MeSH Browser
- Peptides, Cyclic MeSH
- Rheumatoid Factor MeSH
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the role of rheumatoid factor (RF) status and anti-citrullinated peptide antibody (ACPA) status as predictors of abatacept (ABA) effectiveness in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: We conducted a pooled analysis of data from 9 observational RA registries in Europe (ARTIS [Sweden], ATTRA [Czech Republic], BIOBADASER [Spain], DANBIO [Denmark], GISEA [Italy], NOR-DMARD [Norway], ORA [France], Reuma.pt [Portugal], and SCQM-RA [Switzerland]). Inclusion criteria were a diagnosis of RA, initiation of ABA treatment, and available information on RF and/or ACPA status. The primary end point was continuation of ABA treatment. Secondary end points were ABA discontinuation for ineffectiveness or adverse events and response rates at 1 year (good or moderate response according to the European League Against Rheumatism criteria with LUNDEX adjustment for treatment continuation). Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for the study end points in relation to RF and ACPA status were calculated. RESULTS: We identified 2,942 patients with available data on RA-associated autoantibodies; data on RF status were available for 2,787 patients (77.0% of whom were RF positive), and data on ACPA status were available for 1,903 patients (71.3% of whom were ACPA positive). Even after adjustment for sociodemographic and disease- and treatment-related confounders, RF and ACPA positivity were each associated with a lower risk of ABA discontinuation for any reason (HR 0.79 [95% CI 0.69-0.90], P < 0.001 and HR 0.78 [95% CI 0.68-0.90], P < 0.001, respectively), compared to RF-negative and ACPA-negative patients. Similar associations with RF and ACPA were observed for discontinuation of ABA treatment due to ineffectiveness, with HRs of 0.72 (95% CI 0.61-0.84) and 0.74 (95% CI 0.62-0.88), respectively (both P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our results strongly suggest that positivity for RF or ACPA is associated with better effectiveness of ABA therapy.
DANBIO Registry and University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark and Rigshospitalet Glostrup Denmark
Diakonhjemmet Hospital Oslo Norway
Hospital Clinic of Barcelona and IDIBAPS Barcelona Spain
Institute of Rheumatology and University Hospital Prague Czech Republic
Lund University and Skåne University Hospital Malmö Sweden
University of Bari and University Hospital Bari Italy
University of Geneva and University Hospital of Geneva Geneva Switzerland
University of Lisbon and Santa Maria Hospital Lisbon Portugal
References provided by Crossref.org