The generic impact scoring system (GISS): a standardized tool to quantify the impacts of alien species
Jazyk angličtina Země Nizozemsko Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
27129597
DOI
10.1007/s10661-016-5321-4
PII: 10.1007/s10661-016-5321-4
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Biological invasion, Environmental impact, Management prioritization, Policy, Socio-economic impact,
- MeSH
- monitorování životního prostředí metody normy MeSH
- rostliny MeSH
- zavlečené druhy * MeSH
- životní prostředí MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
Alien species can exert negative environmental and socio-economic impacts. Therefore, administrations from different sectors are trying to prevent further introductions, stop the spread of established species, and apply or develop programs to mitigate their impact, to contain the most harmful species, or to eradicate them if possible. Often it is not clear which of the numerous alien species are most important in terms of damage, and therefore, impact scoring systems have been developed to allow a comparison and thus prioritization of species. Here, we present the generic impact scoring system (GISS), which relies on published evidence of environmental and socio-economic impact of alien species. We developed a system of 12 impact categories, for environmental and socio-economic impact, comprising all kinds of impacts that an alien species may exert. In each category, the intensity of impact is quantified by a six-level scale ranging from 0 (no impact detectable) to 5 (the highest impact possible). Such an approach, where impacts are grouped based on mechanisms for environmental impacts and receiving sectors for socio-economy, allows for cross-taxa comparisons and prioritization of the most damaging species. The GISS is simple and transparent, can be conducted with limited funds, and can be applied to a large number of alien species across taxa and environments. Meanwhile, the system was applied to 349 alien animal and plant species. In a comparison with 22 other impact assessment methods, the combination of environmental and socio-economic impact, as well as the possibility of weighting and ranking of the scoring results make GISS the most broadly applicable system.
Department of Biology Unit of Ecology and Evolution University of Fribourg Fribourg Switzerland
Institute of Ecology and Evolution University of Bern Bern Switzerland
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Risk Anal. 2009 Mar;29(3):457-67 PubMed
J Invertebr Pathol. 2011 Nov;108(3):214-6 PubMed
J Environ Sci (China). 2008;20(8):989-97 PubMed
Ecol Lett. 2012 Dec;15(12):1475-93 PubMed
Trends Ecol Evol. 2011 Jul;26(7):333-9 PubMed
PLoS Biol. 2014 May 06;12(5):e1001850 PubMed
Mar Pollut Bull. 2007;55(7-9):379-94 PubMed
Trends Ecol Evol. 2013 Jan;28(1):58-66 PubMed
Trends Ecol Evol. 2013 Apr;28(4):212-8 PubMed
PLoS Biol. 2015 Apr 15;13(4):e1002130 PubMed
Ecol Evol. 2014 Jul;4(14):2957-67 PubMed
Conserv Biol. 2010 Feb;24(1):302-11 PubMed
Risk Anal. 2010 Feb;30(2):285-92 PubMed
Conserv Biol. 2014 Oct;28(5):1188-94 PubMed
Environ Manage. 2009 Jun;43(6):1244-55 PubMed
PLoS One. 2014 Sep 19;9(9):e108296 PubMed
Scientists' warning on invasive alien species