Molecular detection and phylogenetic analysis of Hepatozoon spp. in questing Ixodes ricinus ticks and rodents from Slovakia and Czech Republic
Jazyk angličtina Země Německo Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
27245074
DOI
10.1007/s00436-016-5156-5
PII: 10.1007/s00436-016-5156-5
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Apicomplexa, Apodemus spp., Central Europe, Hepatozoon canis, Myodes glareolus, Ticks,
- MeSH
- arachnida jako vektory parazitologie MeSH
- Arvicolinae parazitologie MeSH
- Eucoccidiida klasifikace genetika izolace a purifikace MeSH
- fylogeneze MeSH
- klíště parazitologie MeSH
- kokcidióza epidemiologie parazitologie MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- Murinae parazitologie MeSH
- ribozomální DNA chemie genetika MeSH
- sekvenční analýza DNA MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Česká republika epidemiologie MeSH
- Slovenská republika epidemiologie MeSH
- Názvy látek
- ribozomální DNA MeSH
By amplification and sequencing of 18S rRNA gene fragments, Hepatozoon spp. DNA was detected in 0.08 % (4/5057) and 0.04 % (1/2473) of questing Ixodes ricinus ticks from Slovakia and Czech Republic, respectively. Hepatozoon spp. DNA was also detected in spleen and/or lungs of 4.45 % (27/606) of rodents from Slovakia. Prevalence of infection was significantly higher in Myodes glareolus (11.45 %) than in Apodemus spp. (0.28 %) (P < 0.001). Sequencing of 18S rRNA Hepatozoon spp. gene amplicons from I. ricinus showed 100 % identity with Hepatozoon canis isolates from red foxes or dogs in Europe. Phylogenetic analysis showed that at least two H. canis 18S rRNA genotypes exist in Slovakia of which one was identified also in the Czech Republic. The finding of H. canis in questing I. ricinus suggests the geographical spread of the parasite and a potential role of other ticks as its vectors in areas where Rhipicephalus sanguineus is not endemic. Sequencing of 18S rRNA gene amplicons from M. glareolus revealed the presence of two closely related genetic variants, Hepatozoon sp. SK1 and Hepatozoon sp. SK2, showing 99-100 % identity with isolates from M. glareolus from other European countries. Phylogenetic analysis demonstrates that 18S rRNA variants SK1 and SK2 correspond to previously described genotypes UR1 and UR2 of H. erhardovae, respectively. The isolate from Apodemus flavicollis (Hepatozoon sp. SK3b) was 99 % identical with isolates from reptiles in Africa and Asia. Further studies are necessary to identify the taxonomic status of Hepatozoon spp. parasitizing rodents in Europe and the host-parasite interactions in natural foci.
CONICET C1033AAJ Buenos Aires Argentina
Institute of Vertebrate Biology v v i Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic Brno Czech Republic
Institute of Zoology Slovak Academy of Sciences Dúbravská cesta 9 Bratislava Slovakia
Instituto de Patobiologia CICVyA INTA Castelar 1686 Hurlingham Prov de Buenos Aires Argentina
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2013 Feb;4(1-2):133-7 PubMed
Parasit Vectors. 2014 Nov 21;7:521 PubMed
Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2010 Nov;10(9):855-9 PubMed
Mol Biol Evol. 1992 Jul;9(4):678-87 PubMed
Trends Parasitol. 2003 Jan;19(1):27-31 PubMed
Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2013 Sep;4(5):391-4 PubMed
Vet Parasitol. 2003 Jun 11;114(3):173-94 PubMed
Parasit Vectors. 2014 Jul 02;7:303 PubMed
Parasit Vectors. 2015 Feb 08;8:88 PubMed
Acta Trop. 1964;21:114-54 PubMed
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010 May;76(9):2923-31 PubMed
Folia Parasitol (Praha). 1980;27(4):295-301 PubMed
Vet Parasitol. 2002 Jun 26;106(3):265-71 PubMed
Int J Parasitol. 2009 Aug;39(10):1129-36 PubMed
J Parasitol. 1996 Aug;82(4):565-85 PubMed
J Vet Med Sci. 1993 Oct;55(5):867-8 PubMed
Parasitology. 2001 Jan;122 Pt 1:43-54 PubMed
Z Parasitenkd. 1977 Nov 10;53(3):251-4 PubMed
Microb Ecol. 2014 Aug;68(2):196-211 PubMed
Vet Parasitol. 2003 May 1;113(3-4):189-201 PubMed
J Parasitol. 2006 Feb;92(1):93-9 PubMed
Mol Biol Evol. 2013 Dec;30(12):2725-9 PubMed
Parasitol Res. 2012 Sep;111(3):1331-42 PubMed
Nucleic Acids Res. 2004 Mar 19;32(5):1792-7 PubMed
Parasitol Res. 2004 Mar;92(4):270-84 PubMed
Vet Parasitol. 2015 Sep 30;213(1-2):12-23 PubMed
Vet Parasitol. 2013 Sep 1;196(1-2):189-93 PubMed
Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2016 Feb;7(1):107-112 PubMed
Z Parasitenkd. 1982;67(3):261-71 PubMed
Parasit Vectors. 2015 May 17;8:276 PubMed
Folia Parasitol (Praha). 2001;48(4):263-7 PubMed
Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2007 Summer;7(2):199-202 PubMed
Parasit Vectors. 2016 May 20;9(1):292 PubMed
Parasitology. 1981 Aug;83(Pt 1):179-89 PubMed
J Parasitol. 2015 Aug;101(4):490-1 PubMed
Vet Parasitol. 2013 Sep 1;196(1-2):1-5 PubMed
Parasitol Res. 2016 Jun;115(6):2409-13 PubMed
Vet Parasitol. 2010 Sep 20;172(3-4):333-6 PubMed
Parasitol Res. 2014 Jul;113(7):2679-85 PubMed
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1981;75(1):155-7 PubMed
Ann Agric Environ Med. 2006;13(1):65-70 PubMed