Classification of Aeromonas spp. isolated from water and clinical sources and distribution of virulence genes
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
27416863
DOI
10.1007/s12223-016-0464-9
PII: 10.1007/s12223-016-0464-9
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- Aeromonas klasifikace genetika izolace a purifikace patogenita MeSH
- faktory virulence genetika MeSH
- gramnegativní bakteriální infekce mikrobiologie MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mikrobiologie vody * MeSH
- multiplexová polymerázová řetězová reakce MeSH
- techniky typizace bakterií MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- Názvy látek
- faktory virulence MeSH
In this work, 84 isolates of aeromonads were isolated from water and clinical samples, identified, and characterized. Identification was based on routine phenotyping combined with multiplex PCR. In this study, multiplex PCR was retested and reevaluated and its identification key was enhanced by 17 newly described species and five subspecies. Identification score increased from 36 % (only phenotyping) to 90 % when supported with multiplex PCR. Further description of isolates included detection of eight virulence genes. These genes were overall present in 46 % (act), 2.4 % (ast), 80 % (alt), 40 % (ahh1), 20 % (asa1), 69 % (pla/lip/lipH3/alp-1), 69 % (ser), and 81 % (fla), and no significant differences between water and clinical isolates were found. Results of this work show that the proper combination of different approaches is necessary for final identification of Aeromonas spp. at the species level. Multiplex PCR was shown to have limits in final identification, specifically inability to distinguish four species pairs and one triplet as their gene profiles are identical. However, it seems to be rapid and easy to do method able to support routine biochemical identification in laboratories. Moreover, our results supported previous proposal of reclassification of "Aeromonas hydrophila subsp. dhakensis" and "Aeromonas aquariorum" as identical species.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Infect Immun. 1999 Aug;67(8):4008-13 PubMed
J Clin Microbiol. 2009 Nov;47(11):3742-6 PubMed
Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2008 Nov;94(4):573-9 PubMed
Syst Appl Microbiol. 2010 Apr;33(3):149-53 PubMed
J Appl Microbiol. 2002;93(4):675-80 PubMed
Syst Appl Microbiol. 2013 May;36(3):171-6 PubMed
Infect Immun. 2004 Apr;72(4):1939-45 PubMed
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999 Dec;65(12):5293-302 PubMed
Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1997 Apr;47(2):590-2 PubMed
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2006 Oct;56(Pt 10):2481-7 PubMed
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014 Nov;33(11):1889-95 PubMed
J Clin Microbiol. 2003 Mar;41(3):1048-54 PubMed
Int J Food Microbiol. 2011 Jan 5;144(3):538-45 PubMed
Can J Microbiol. 2005 Nov;51(11):957-66 PubMed
J Clin Microbiol. 2003 Jun;41(6):2348-57 PubMed
J Appl Microbiol. 2002;92(2):221-7 PubMed
J Appl Microbiol. 2004;97(5):1077-86 PubMed
J Clin Microbiol. 1992 May;30(5):1262-6 PubMed
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010 Jan;76(2):425-33 PubMed
ISRN Microbiol. 2012 Sep 04;2012:256261 PubMed
J Clin Microbiol. 2000 Oct;38(10):3785-90 PubMed
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2010 Jan;23(1):35-73 PubMed
Can J Microbiol. 2007 Jul;53(7):877-87 PubMed
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014 Jul;20(7):O428-34 PubMed
J Microbiol. 2007 Aug;45(4):297-304 PubMed
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010 Apr;76(7):2313-25 PubMed
PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e30205 PubMed
J Clin Microbiol. 2011 Aug;49(8):3006-8 PubMed
Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2003;84(4):269-78 PubMed
J Clin Microbiol. 1997 Jul;35(7):1671-4 PubMed
