GEC-ESTRO multicenter phase 3-trial: Accelerated partial breast irradiation with interstitial multicatheter brachytherapy versus external beam whole breast irradiation: Early toxicity and patient compliance
Language English Country Ireland Media print-electronic
Document type Clinical Trial, Phase III, Comparative Study, Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Randomized Controlled Trial
PubMed
27422584
DOI
10.1016/j.radonc.2016.06.019
PII: S0167-8140(16)31179-3
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- Accelerated partial breast irradiation, Breast cancer, Early toxicity, GEC-ESTRO APBI trial, Multicatheter brachytherapy, Randomized trial,
- MeSH
- Patient Compliance * MeSH
- Brachytherapy adverse effects methods MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Breast Neoplasms radiotherapy MeSH
- Breast radiation effects MeSH
- Aged, 80 and over MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Aged, 80 and over MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Clinical Trial, Phase III MeSH
- Multicenter Study MeSH
- Randomized Controlled Trial MeSH
- Comparative Study MeSH
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To compare early side effects and patient compliance of accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) with multicatheter brachytherapy to external beam whole breast irradiation (WBI) in a low-risk group of patients with breast cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between April 2004 and July 2009, 1328 patients with UICC stage 0-IIA breast cancer were randomized to receive WBI with 50Gy and a boost of 10Gy or APBI with either 32.0Gy/8 fractions, or 30.1Gy/7 fractions (HDR-brachytherapy), or 50Gy/0.60-0.80Gy per pulse (PDR-brachytherapy). This report focuses on early side-effects and patient compliance observed in 1186 analyzable patients. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00402519. RESULTS: Patient compliance was excellent in both arms. Both WBI and APBI were well tolerated with moderate early side-effects. No grade 4 toxicity had been observed. Grade 3 side effects were exclusively seen for early skin toxicity (radiation dermatitis) with 7% vs. 0.2% (p<0.0001), and breast infection with 0% vs. 0.2% (p=n.s.) for patients treated with WBI and APBI. The incidence of grades 1-2 early side effects for WBI and APBI was 86% vs. 21% (p<0.0001) for skin toxicity, 2% vs. 20% (p<0.0001) for mild hematoma, and 2% vs. 5% (p=0.01) for mild breast infection rates, respectively. No differences had been found regarding grades 1-2 early breast pain (26% vs. 29%, p=0.23). CONCLUSIONS: APBI with interstitial multicatheter brachytherapy was tolerated very well and dramatically reduced early skin toxicity in comparison to standard WBI.
Brachytherapy Department Centrum Onkologii Instytut im Marii Skłodowskej Warsaw Poland
Center of Radiotherapy National Institute of Oncology Budapest Hungary
Department of Medical Informatics Biometry and Epidemiology University Erlangen Nuremberg Germany
Department of Radiation Oncology Catalan Institute of Oncology Barcelona Spain
Department of Radiation Oncology Clemenshospital Münster Germany
Department of Radiation Oncology Hospital Barmherzige Brüder Regensburg Germany
Department of Radiation Oncology Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute Brno Czech Republic
Department of Radiation Oncology University Hospital AKH Wien Austria
Department of Radiation Oncology University Hospital Erlangen Germany
Department of Radiation Oncology University Hospital Inselspital Bern Switzerland
Department of Radiation Oncology University Hospital Jena Germany
Department of Radiation Oncology University Hospital Kiel Germany
Department of Radiation Oncology University Hospital Leipzig Germany
Department of Radiation Oncology University Hospital Rostock Germany
Department of Radiation Oncology University Hospital Würzburg Germany
Department of Radiation Oncology Valencian Institute of Oncology Spain
Interdisciplinary Brachytherapy Unit University Hospital Lübeck UKSH Campus Lübeck Germany
References provided by Crossref.org
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT00402519