The role of narrow-band imaging (NBI) endoscopy in optical biopsy of vocal cord leukoplakia

. 2017 Jan ; 274 (1) : 355-359. [epub] 20160811

Jazyk angličtina Země Německo Médium print-electronic

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid27515705
Odkazy

PubMed 27515705
DOI 10.1007/s00405-016-4244-6
PII: 10.1007/s00405-016-4244-6
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje

The aim of this study was to investigate whether observing microvascular changes by narrow-band imaging (NBI) endoscopy in the area surrounding leukoplakia is sufficient for discriminating between benign and malignant patterns of vocal cord leukoplakia. A total of 282 patients were investigated using white-light high-definition TV laryngoscopy and NBI endoscopy from 6/2013 to 8/2015, and 63 patients with a primary case of laryngeal leukoplakia were enrolled. Patients were divided into two groups based on leukoplakia with surrounding malignant intraepithelial papillary capillary loops (group I; 26/63) and leukoplakia with a surrounding benign vascular network (group II; 37/63), both by NBI endoscopy. All 63 patients were evaluated by blinded histological examination, and results were compared with NBI optical biopsy. Carcinoma in situ or invasive squamous cell carcinoma was confirmed in 22/26 cases (84.6 %) in group I. Hyperkeratosis or low-grade dysplasia was confirmed histologically in 31/37 (83.8 %) and squamous cell carcinoma in 2/37 (5.4 %) cases in group II. Accordance of NBI endoscopy and histopathological features of vocal cord leukoplakia lesions was statistically significant (kappa index 0.77, p < 0.001), with a sensitivity of 88.0 % (95 % CI 67.8-97.5 %) and specificity of 89.5 % (95 % CI 71.2-97.1 %). NBI is convenient for improving evaluation of laryngeal leukoplakias based on optic prehistological diagnosis. The close accordance between NBI features and histological results suggests that a negative NBI endoscopy may be an indication for long-term endoscopy follow-up without histological evaluation.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Jun;42(6):693-701 PubMed

Head Neck. 1991 Nov-Dec;13(6):488-97 PubMed

Histopathology. 2009 May;54(6):639-56 PubMed

J Laryngol Otol. 2011 Mar;125(3):288-96 PubMed

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2009 Jul;266(7):1017-23 PubMed

Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012 Dec;20(6):472-6 PubMed

Z Laryngol Rhinol Otol. 1963 May;42:339-62 PubMed

Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2014 Oct;18(4):352-6 PubMed

Laryngoscope. 2012 Feb;122(2):336-42 PubMed

Head Neck. 2012 Nov;34(11):1574-9 PubMed

Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:285486 PubMed

Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2008 Jan;117(1):74-9 PubMed

Laryngoscope. 2002 Mar;112(3):488-93 PubMed

Klin Onkol. 2015;28(2):116-20 PubMed

Laryngoscope. 2015 Feb;125(2):E62-6 PubMed

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2010 Mar;267(3):409-14 PubMed

Head Neck. 2001 Jan;23(1):42-7 PubMed

Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 1997;527:142-4 PubMed

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 May;273(5):1207-14 PubMed

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2015 Jul;272(7):1719-24 PubMed

Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2003 Oct;23(5):362-7 PubMed

Laryngoscope. 2012 Dec;122(12):2754-61 PubMed

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...