Blinatumomab vs historical standard therapy of adult relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia
Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Language English Country United States Media electronic
Document type Journal Article
PubMed
27662202
PubMed Central
PMC5056974
DOI
10.1038/bcj.2016.84
PII: bcj201684
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
We compared outcomes from a single-arm study of blinatumomab in adult patients with B-precursor Ph-negative relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia (R/R ALL) with a historical data set from Europe and the United States. Estimates of complete remission (CR) and overall survival (OS) were weighted by the frequency distribution of prognostic factors in the blinatumomab trial. Outcomes were also compared between the trial and historical data using propensity score methods. The historical cohort included 694 patients with CR data and 1112 patients with OS data compared with 189 patients with CR and survival data in the blinatumomab trial. The weighted analysis revealed a CR rate of 24% (95% CI: 20-27%) and a median OS of 3.3 months (95% CI: 2.8-3.6) in the historical cohort compared with a CR/CRh rate of 43% (95% CI: 36-50%) and a median OS of 6.1 months (95% CI: 4.2-7.5) in the blinatumomab trial. Propensity score analysis estimated increased odds of CR/CRh (OR=2.68, 95% CI: 1.67-4.31) and improved OS (HR=0.536, 95% CI: 0.394-0.730) with blinatumomab. The analysis demonstrates the application of different study designs and statistical methods to compare novel therapies for R/R ALL with historical data.
Blood Disease Department Hôpital Saint Louis Paris France
Blood Diseases Service Center Hospitalier Universitaire Angers France
Center for Observational Research Thousand Oaks CA Amgen USA
Department of Biostatistics Amgen Inc Rockville MD USA
Department of Biostatistics Uxbridge Amgen Ltd UK
Department of Clinical Development Amgen Inc Thousand Oaks CA USA
Department of Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation Rambam Medical Center Haifa Israel
Department of Hematology and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation City of Hope Duarte CA USA
Department of Hematology Oncology Cleveland Clinic Cleveland OH USA
Department of Internal Medicine Hematology and Oncology University Hospital Brno Czech Republic
Department of Leukemia University of Texas MD Cancer Center Houston TX USA
Department of Medicine Dana Farber Cancer Institute Boston MA USA
Department of Medicine University Hospital Goethe University Frankfurt Germany
Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik 2 Universitätsklinikums Würzburg Würzburg Germany
Research Department of Haematology UCL Cancer Institute London UK
Unità Operativa Complessa di Ematologia Ospedale dell'Angelo Mestre Venezia Italy
See more in PubMed
Katz AJ, Chia VM, Schoonen WM, Kelsh MA. Acute lymphoblastic leukemia: an assessment of international incidence, survival, and disease burden. Cancer Causes Control 2015; 26: 1627–1642. PubMed
Bassan R, Hoelzer D. Modern therapy of acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Clin Oncol 2011; 29: 532–543. PubMed
Fielding AK, Richards SM, Chopra R, Lazarus HM, Litzow MR, Buck G et al. Outcome of 609 adults after relapse of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL); an MRC UKALL12/ECOG 2993 study. Blood 2007; 109: 944–950. PubMed
Tavernier E, Boiron JM, Huguet F, Bradstock K, Vey N, Kovacsovics T et al. Outcome of treatment after first relapse in adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia initially treated by the LALA-94 trial. Leukemia 2007; 21: 1907–1914. PubMed
O'Brien S, Thomas D, Ravandi F, Faderl S, Cortes J, Borthakur G et al. Outcome of adults with acute lymphocytic leukemia after second salvage therapy. Cancer 2008; 113: 3186–3191. PubMed PMC
Oriol A, Vives S, Hernandez-Rivas JM, Tormo M, Heras I, Rivas C et al. Outcome after relapse of acute lymphoblastic leukemia in adult patients included in four consecutive risk-adapted trials by the PETHEMA Study Group. Haematologica 2010; 95: 589–596. PubMed PMC
Gokbuget N, Stanze D, Beck J, Tormo M, Heras I, Rivas C et al. Outcome of relapsed adult lymphoblastic leukemia depends on response to salvage chemotherapy, prognostic factors, and performance of stem cell transplantation. Blood 2012; 120: 2032–2041. PubMed
Klinger M, Brandl C, Zugmaier G, Hijazi Y, Bargou RC, Topp MS et al. Immunopharmacologic response of patients with B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia to continuous infusion of T cell-engaging CD19/CD3-bispecific BiTE antibody blinatumomab. Blood 2012; 119: 6226–6233. PubMed
Przepiorka D, Ko CW, Deisseroth A, Yancey CL, Candau-Chacon R, Chiu HJ et al. FDA approval: blinatumomab. Clin Cancer Res 2015; 21: 4035–4039. PubMed
Topp MS, Gokbuget N, Stein AS, Zugmaier G, O'Brien S, Bargou RC et al. Safety and activity of blinatumomab for adult patients with relapsed or refractory B-precursor acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: a multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol 2015; 16: 57–66. PubMed
Simon R, Blumenthal GM, Rothenberg ML, Sommer J, Roberts SA, Armstrong DK et al. The role of nonrandomized trials in the evaluation of oncology drugs. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2015; 97: 502–507. PubMed
ICH E10. 2000 Choice of Control Groups and Related Issues in Clinical Trials. International Conference on Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Regulation of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use. Available at: http://www.ich.org/fileadmin/Public_Web_Site/ICH_Products/Guidelines/Efficacy/E10/Step4/E10_Guideline.pdf (accessed 10 September 2015).
FDA Blincyto drug approval package. Available at: http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/nda/2014/125557Orig1s000TOC.cfm (accessed 25 February 2016).
Blinatumomab EPAR. Available at: http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/EPAR-_Public_assessment_report/human/003731/WC500198227.pdf (accessed 25 February 2016).
Gökbuget N, Dombret H, Ribera JM, Fielding AK, Advani A, Bassan R et al. International reference analysis of outcomes in adults with B-precursor Ph-negative relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Haematologica 2016, e-pub ahead of print 1 September 2016; pii:haematol.2016.144311.. PubMed PMC
Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB. Reducing bias in observational studies using subclassification on the propensity score. J Am Stat Assoc 1984; 79: 516–524.
Greenland S, Rothman K. Modern Epidemiology, 3rd edn. Wolfers Kluen/Lippincott: Philadelphia, 2008.
Efron B, Tibshirani RJ. An Introduction to the Bootstrap. Chapman & Hall/CRC: Boca Raton, London, New York, Washington, DC, 1993.
Brookmeyer R, Crowley JA. Confidence interval for the median survival time. Biometrics 1982; 38: 29–41.
Kalbfleisch JD, Prentice RL. The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: New York, 1980.
Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 1983; 70: 41–55.
D'Agostino Jr RB, D'Agostino RB Sr. Estimating treatment effects using observational data. JAMA 2007; 297: 314–316. PubMed
Rosenbaum PR. Model-based direct adjustment. Am Stat 1987; 82: 387–394.
Lunceford JK, Davidian M. Stratification and weighting via the propensity score in estimation of causal treatment effects: a comparative study. Stat Med 2004; 23: 2937–2960. PubMed
Robins JM, Herna' n MA, Brumback B. Marginal structural models and causal inference in epidemiology. Epidemiology 2000; 11: 550–560. PubMed
Hernan MA, Brumback B, Robbins JM. Marginal structural models to estimate the causal effect of zidovudine on the survival of HIV-positive men. Epidemiology 2000; 11: 561–570. PubMed
Koller CA, Kantarjian HM, Thomas D, O'Brien S, Rios MB, Kornblau S et al. The hyper-CVAD regimen improves outcome in relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Leukemia 1997; 11: 2039–2044. PubMed
Kantarjian HM, Thomas D, Ravandi F, Faderl S, Jabbour E, Garcia-Manero G et al. Defining the course and prognosis of adults with acute lymphocytic leukemia in first salvage after induction failure or short first remission duration. Cancer 2010; 116: 5568–5574. PubMed PMC
Maude SL, Frey N, Shaw PA, Aplenc R, Barrett DM, Bunin NJ et al. Chimeric antigen receptor T cells for sustained remissions in leukemia. N Engl J Med 2014; 371: 1507–1517. PubMed PMC
Kantarjian H, Thomas D, Jorgensen J, Jabbour E, Kebriaei P, Rytting M et al. Inotuzumab ozogamicin, an anti-CD22-calecheamicin conjugate, for refractory and relapsed acute lymphocytic leukaemia: a phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol 2012; 13: 403–411. PubMed
Topp MS, Stein A, Gökbuget N, Fielding AK, Schuh A, Ribera JM et al. Blinatumomab improved overall survival in patients with relapsed or refractory Philadelphia negative B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia in a randomized, open-label phase 3 study (TOWER). Haematologica 2016; 101(s1): S149.