The structure of the desiccated Richtersius coronifer (Richters, 1903)
Language English Country Austria Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article
PubMed
27677802
DOI
10.1007/s00709-016-1027-2
PII: 10.1007/s00709-016-1027-2
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- Anhydrobiosis, Cryptobiosis, Tardigrades, Tun, Ultrastructure,
- MeSH
- Dehydration MeSH
- Epidermal Cells MeSH
- Epidermis anatomy & histology MeSH
- Microscopy, Electron, Scanning MeSH
- Ovary anatomy & histology cytology MeSH
- Tardigrada anatomy & histology ultrastructure MeSH
- Microscopy, Electron, Transmission MeSH
- Digestive System anatomy & histology cytology MeSH
- Desiccation * MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Check Tag
- Female MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
Tun formation is an essential morphological adaptation for entering the anhydrobiotic state in tardigrades, but its internal structure has rarely been investigated. We present the structure and ultrastructure of organs and cells in desiccated Richtersius coronifer by transmission and scanning electron microscopy, confocal microscopy, and histochemical methods. A 3D reconstruction of the body organization of the tun stage is also presented. The tun formation during anhydrobiosis of tardigrades is a process of anterior-posterior body contraction, which relocates some organs such as the pharyngeal bulb. The cuticle is composed of epicuticle, intracuticle and procuticle; flocculent coat; and trilaminate layer. Moulting does not seem to restrict the tun formation, as evidenced from tardigrade tuns that were in the process of moulting. The storage cells of desiccated specimens filled up the free inner space and surrounded internal organs, such as the ovary and digestive system, which were contracted. All cells (epidermal cells, storage cells, ovary cells, cells of the digestive system) underwent shrinkage, and their cytoplasm was electron dense. Lipids and polysaccharides dominated among reserve material of storage cells, while the amount of protein was small. The basic morphology of specific cell types and organelles did not differ between active and anhydrobiotic R. coronifer.
Department of Animal Histology and Embryology Silesian University Katowice Poland
Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czech Republic
Institute of Automatic Control Silesian University of Technology Gliwice Poland
Institute of Physiology Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic Prague Czech Republic
School of Education and Environment Kristianstad University Kristianstad Sweden
See more in PubMed
Tissue Cell. 1998 Jun;30(3):312-23 PubMed
J Morphol. 2003 Aug;257(2):246-53 PubMed
Tissue Cell. 2005 Oct;37(5):385-92 PubMed
Biol Bull. 2006 Dec;211(3):275-85 PubMed
Atti Accad Fisiocrit Siena Med Fis. 1968;17(2):1439-52 PubMed
Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1959 Mar 17;150(939):149-91 PubMed
Curr Biol. 2008 Sep 9;18(17):R729-R731 PubMed
Parazitologiia. 2004 Jan-Feb;38(1):3-11 PubMed
Folia Biol (Krakow). 2005;53(3-4):173-7 PubMed
In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim. 2001 Jun;37(6):348-52 PubMed
Protoplasma. 2015 Jul;252(4):1019-29 PubMed
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2008 Dec;1783(12):2398-414 PubMed
Protoplasma. 2015 May;252(3):857-65 PubMed
Microbiol Rev. 1994 Dec;58(4):755-805 PubMed
J Cell Biol. 1963 Apr;17:208-12 PubMed
Prog Histochem Cytochem. 1985;16(2):1-84 PubMed
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 31;8(12):e85091 PubMed
Integr Comp Biol. 2005 Nov;45(5):810-20 PubMed
Arch Insect Biochem Physiol. 2001 Jun;47(2):47-61 PubMed
Micron. 2015 Mar;70:26-33 PubMed
Integr Comp Biol. 2005 Nov;45(5):710-4 PubMed
J Struct Biol. 2010 Jul;171(1):11-7 PubMed
J Ultrastruct Res. 1971 Feb;34(3):214-43 PubMed
Cell Tissue Res. 1976 Feb 25;166(3):339-51 PubMed
Folia Biol (Krakow). 2010;58(3-4):217-27 PubMed