Carfilzomib-dexamethasone vs bortezomib-dexamethasone in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma by cytogenetic risk in the phase 3 study ENDEAVOR
Language English Country England, Great Britain Media print-electronic
Document type Clinical Trial, Phase III, Comparative Study, Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
PubMed
28025582
PubMed Central
PMC5467042
DOI
10.1038/leu.2016.390
PII: leu2016390
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Bortezomib administration & dosage MeSH
- Drug Resistance, Neoplasm drug effects genetics MeSH
- Chromosome Aberrations MeSH
- Cytogenetic Analysis MeSH
- Dexamethasone administration & dosage MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Remission Induction MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local drug therapy genetics pathology MeSH
- Survival Rate MeSH
- Multiple Myeloma drug therapy genetics pathology MeSH
- Biomarkers, Tumor MeSH
- Follow-Up Studies MeSH
- Oligopeptides administration & dosage MeSH
- Prognosis MeSH
- Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols therapeutic use MeSH
- Neoplasm Grading MeSH
- Salvage Therapy * MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Clinical Trial, Phase III MeSH
- Multicenter Study MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Randomized Controlled Trial MeSH
- Comparative Study MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Bortezomib MeSH
- carfilzomib MeSH Browser
- Dexamethasone MeSH
- Biomarkers, Tumor MeSH
- Oligopeptides MeSH
The randomized phase 3 study ENDEAVOR demonstrated a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) for carfilzomib and dexamethasone (Kd) vs bortezomib and dexamethasone (Vd) in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM). We conducted a preplanned subgroup analysis of ENDEAVOR to evaluate Kd vs Vd by cytogenetic risk. Of 785 patients with known cytogenetics, 210 (27%) had high-risk cytogenetics (Kd, n=97 (25%); Vd, n=113 (28%)) and 575 (73%) had standard-risk cytogenetics (Kd, n=284 (75%); Vd, n=291 (72%)). Median PFS in the high-risk group was 8.8 months for Kd vs 6.0 months for Vd (hazard ratio (HR), 0.65; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.45-0.92; P=0.0075). Median PFS in the standard-risk group was not estimable for Kd vs 10.2 months for Vd (HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.33-0.58; P<0.0001). Overall response rates were 72.2% (Kd) vs 58.4% (Vd) in the high-risk group and 79.2% (Kd) vs 66.0% (Vd) in the standard-risk group. In the high-risk group, 15.5% (Kd) vs 4.4% (Vd) achieved a complete response (CR) or better. In the standard-risk group, 13.0% (Kd) vs 7.9% (Vd) achieved ⩾CR. This preplanned subgroup analysis found that Kd was superior to Vd in relapsed or refractory MM, regardless of cytogenetic risk.
Department of Haematology CHRU Lille Hôpital Claude Huriez Lille France
Department of Haematology Hospital Clínic de Barcelona Barcelona Spain
Department of Haematology Royal Prince Alfred Hospital Camperdown New South Wales Australia
Department of Haematology University of Nantes Nantes France
Department of Hematooncology University Hospital Olomouc Olomouc Czech Republic
Department of Internal Medicine Heidelberg Medical University Heidelberg Germany
Department of Medicine Wilhelminen Cancer Research Institute Wilhelminenspital Vienna Austria
Department of Oncology University of Torino Torino Italy
Hematological Department 1st Republican Clinical Hospital of Udmurtia Izhevsk Russia
Multiple Myeloma Center Weill Cornell Medical College New York Presbyterian Hospital New York NY USA
Myeloma Clinic Universitatsklinikum Tubingen Tubingen Germany
Myeloma Group University Hospital Brno Brno Czech Republic
Onyx Pharmaceuticals Inc an Amgen subsidiary South San Francisco CA USA
School of Medicine National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Athens Greece
See more in PubMed
Dimopoulos MA, Weisel KC, Song KW, Delforge M, Karlin L, Goldschmidt H et al. Cytogenetics and long-term survival of patients with refractory or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma treated with pomalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone. Haematologica 2015; 100: 1327–1333. PubMed PMC
Avet-Loiseau H, Attal M, Moreau P, Charbonnel C, Garban F, Hulin C et al. Genetic abnormalities and survival in multiple myeloma: the experience of the Intergroupe Francophone du Myélome. Blood 2007; 109: 3489–3495. PubMed
Avet-Loiseau H, Hulin C, Campion L, Rodon P, Marit G, Attal M et al. Chromosomal abnormalities are major prognostic factors in elderly patients with multiple myeloma: the Intergroupe Francophone du Myélome experience. J Clin Oncol 2013; 31: 2806–2809. PubMed PMC
Chng WJ, Dispenzieri A, Chim CS, Fonseca R, Goldschmidt H, Lentzsch S et alIMWG consensus on risk stratification in multiple myeloma. Leukemia 2014; 28: 269–277. PubMed
Avet-Loiseau H, Soulier J, Fermand JP, Yakoub-Agha I, Attal M, Hulin C et al. Impact of high-risk cytogenetics and prior therapy on outcomes in patients with advanced relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma treated with lenalidomide plus dexamethasone. Leukemia 2010; 24: 623–628. PubMed
Klein U, Jauch A, Hielscher T, Hillengass J, Raab MS, Seckinger A et al. Chromosomal aberrations +1q21 and del(17p13) predict survival in patients with recurrent multiple myeloma treated with lenalidomide and dexamethasone. Cancer 2011; 117: 2136–2144. PubMed
Neben K, Lokhorst HM, Jauch A, Bertsch U, Hielscher T, van der Holt B et al. Administration of bortezomib before and after autologous stem cell transplantation improves outcome in multiple myeloma patients with deletion 17p. Blood 2012; 119: 940–948. PubMed
Chang H, Trieu Y, Qi X, Xu W, Stewart KA, Reece D. Bortezomib therapy response is independent of cytogenetic abnormalities in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Leuk Res 2007; 31: 779–782. PubMed
Avet-Loiseau H, Leleu X, Roussel M, Moreau P, Guerin-Charbonnel C, Caillot D et al. Bortezomib plus dexamethasone induction improves outcome of patients with t(4;14) myeloma but not outcome of patients with del(17p). J Clin Oncol 2010; 28: 4630–4634. PubMed
Cavo M, Tacchetti P, Patriarca F, Petrucci MT, Pantani L, Galli M et al. Bortezomib with thalidomide plus dexamethasone compared with thalidomide plus dexamethasone as induction therapy before, and consolidation therapy after, double autologous stem-cell transplantation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a randomised phase 3 study. Lancet 2010; 376: 2075–2085. PubMed
Sonneveld P, Avet-Loiseau H, Lonial S, Usmani S, Siegel D, Anderson KC et al. Treatment of multiple myeloma with high-risk cytogenetics: a consensus of the International Myeloma Working Group. Blood 2016; 127: 2955–2962. PubMed PMC
Dimopoulos MA, Moreau P, Palumbo A, Joshua D, Pour L, Hajaek R et al. Carfilzomib and dexamethasone versus bortezomib and dexamethasone for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (ENDEAVOR): a randomised, phase 3, open-label, multicentre study. Lancet Oncol 2016; 17: 27–38. PubMed
Klein JP, Moeschberger ML. Survival Analysis: Techniques for Censored and Truncated Data, Springer-Verlag: New York, NY, USA, 1997.
Avet-Loiseau H, Fonesca R, Siegel D, Dimopoulos MA, Spicka I, Masszi T et al. Efficacy and safety of carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone vs lenalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma based on cytogenetic risk status: subgroup analysis from the phase 3 study ASPIRE (NCT01080391). Blood 2015; 126: 731.
Jakubowiak AJ, Siegel DS, Martin T, Wang M, Vij R, Lonial S et al. Treatment outcomes in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma and high-risk cytogenetics receiving single agent carfilzomib in the PX-171-003-A1 study. Leukemia 2013; 27: 2351–2356. PubMed PMC
Bringhen S, Petrucci MT, Larocca A, Conticello C, Rossi D, Magarotto V et al. Carfilzomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a multicenter, phase 2 study. Blood 2014; 124: 63–69. PubMed
Sonneveld P, Asselbergs E, Zweegman S, van der Holt B, Kersten MJ, Vellenga E et al. Phase 2 study of carfilzomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone as induction/consolidation therapy for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Blood 2015; 125: 449–456. PubMed PMC
Korde N, Roschewski M, Zingone A, Kwok M, Manasanch EE, Bhutani M et al. Treatment with carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone with lenalidomide extension in patients with smoldering or newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. JAMA Oncol 2015; 1: 746–754. PubMed PMC
Jakubowiak AJ, Dytfeld D, Griffith KA, Lebovic D, Vesole DH, Jagannath S et al. A phase 1/2 study of carfilzomib in combination with lenalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone as a frontline treatment for multiple myeloma. Blood 2012; 120: 1801–1809. PubMed PMC
Stewart AK, Rajkumar SV, Dimopoulos MA, Masszi T, Spicka I, Oriol A et al. Carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone for relapsed multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 2015; 372: 142–152. PubMed
Leleu X, Karlin L, Macro M, Hulin C, Garderet L, Roussel M et al. Pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone in multiple myeloma with deletion 17p and/or translocation (4;14): IFM 2010-02 trial results. Blood 2015; 125: 1411–1417. PubMed
Moreau P, Masszi T, Grzasko N, Bahlis NJ, Hansson M, Pour L et al. Oral ixazomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone for multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 2016; 374: 1621–1634. PubMed
van de Donk NW, Moreau P, Plesner T, Palumbo A, Gay F, Laubach JP et al. Clinical efficacy and management of monoclonal antibodies targeting CD38 and SLAMF7 in multiple myeloma. Blood 2016; 127: 681–695. PubMed
Lonial S, Dimopoulos M, Palumbo A, White D, Grosicki S, Spicka I et al. Elotuzumab therapy for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 2015; 373: 621–631. PubMed