Once- versus twice-weekly carfilzomib in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma by select patient characteristics: phase 3 A.R.R.O.W. study subgroup analysis

. 2020 Mar 09 ; 10 (3) : 35. [epub] 20200309

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium electronic

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid32152297
Odkazy

PubMed 32152297
PubMed Central PMC7062899
DOI 10.1038/s41408-020-0300-y
PII: 10.1038/s41408-020-0300-y
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje

The phase 3 A.R.R.O.W. study demonstrated that treatment with once-weekly carfilzomib (70 mg/m2) and dexamethasone (once-weekly Kd70 mg/m2) improved progression-free survival compared with twice-weekly carfilzomib (27 mg/m2) and dexamethasone (twice-weekly Kd27 mg/m2) in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM; median, 11.2 versus 7.6 months; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.69; 95% confidence interval, 0.54-0.88; P = 0.0029). Once-weekly dosing also improved response rates and depth of response. We performed a subgroup analysis from A.R.R.O.W. according to age (<65, 65-74, or ≥75 years), renal function (creatinine clearance <50, ≥50-<80, or ≥80 mL/min), number of prior therapies (2 or 3), and bortezomib-refractory status (yes or no). Compared with twice-weekly Kd27 mg/m2, once-weekly Kd70 mg/m2 reduced the risk of progression or death (HR = 0.60-0.85) and increased overall response rates in nearly all the examined subgroups, consistent with reports in the overall A.R.R.O.W. population. The safety profiles of once-weekly Kd70 mg/m2 across subgroups were also generally consistent with those in the overall population. Findings from this subgroup analysis generally demonstrate a favorable benefit-risk profile of once-weekly Kd70 mg/m2, further supporting once-weekly carfilzomib dosing as an appropriate treatment option for patients with RRMM, regardless of baseline patient and disease characteristics.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Kumar SK, et al. Multiple myeloma. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers. 2017;3:17046. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2017.46. PubMed DOI

Ferlay J, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int. J. Cancer. 2015;136:E359–E386. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29210. PubMed DOI

Cook G, Zweegman S, Mateos MV, Suzan F, Moreau P. A question of class: treatment options for patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 2018;121:74–89. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2017.11.016. PubMed DOI

Sonneveld P, et al. Treatment of multiple myeloma with high-risk cytogenetics: a consensus of the International Myeloma Working Group. Blood. 2016;127:2955–2962. doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-01-631200. PubMed DOI PMC

Dingli D, et al. Therapy for relapsed multiple myeloma: guidelines from the Mayo stratification for myeloma and risk-adapted therapy. Mayo Clin. Proc. 2017;92:578–598. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2017.01.003. PubMed DOI PMC

Kumar SK, et al. Clinical course of patients with relapsed multiple myeloma. Mayo Clin. Proc. 2004;79:867–874. doi: 10.4065/79.7.867. PubMed DOI

Tandon N, et al. Clinical utility of the Revised International Staging System in unselected patients with newly diagnosed and relapsed multiple myeloma. Blood Cancer J. 2017;7:e528. doi: 10.1038/bcj.2017.13. PubMed DOI PMC

Eleutherakis-Papaiakovou V, et al. Renal failure in multiple myeloma: incidence, correlations, and prognostic significance. Leuk. Lymphoma. 2007;48:337–341. doi: 10.1080/10428190601126602. PubMed DOI

Willan J, et al. Multiple myeloma in the very elderly patient: challenges and solutions. Clin. Interv. Aging. 2016;11:423–435. PubMed PMC

Laubach J, et al. Management of relapsed multiple myeloma: recommendations of the International Myeloma Working Group. Leukemia. 2016;30:1005–1017. doi: 10.1038/leu.2015.356. PubMed DOI

Kim H, et al. Efficacy and safety of once-weekly bortezomib infusion in the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Blood. 2011;118:5141. doi: 10.1182/blood.V118.21.5141.5141. PubMed DOI

Hainsworth JD, et al. Weekly treatment with bortezomib for patients with recurrent or refractory multiple myeloma: a phase 2 trial of the Minnie Pearl Cancer Research Network. Cancer. 2008;113:765–771. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23606. PubMed DOI

Moreau Philippe, Kumar Shaji, Boccia Ralph, Iida Shinsuke, Goldschmidt Hartmut, Cocks Kim, Trigg Andrew, Zahlten-Kumeli Anita, Yucel Emre, Panjabi Sumeet S., Dimopoulos Meletios. Convenience, satisfaction, health-related quality of life of once-weekly 70 mg/m2 vs. twice-weekly 27 mg/m2 carfilzomib (randomized A.R.R.O.W. study) Leukemia. 2019;33(12):2934–2946. doi: 10.1038/s41375-019-0480-2. PubMed DOI

Siegel DS, et al. A phase 2 study of single-agent carfilzomib (PX-171-003-A1) in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. Blood. 2012;120:2817–2825. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-05-425934. PubMed DOI PMC

KYPROLIS®. KYPROLIS® (carfilzomib) [prescribing information] (Onyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc, South San Francisco, CA, 2018).

Dimopoulos MA, et al. Carfilzomib and dexamethasone versus bortezomib and dexamethasone for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (ENDEAVOR): a randomised, phase 3, open-label, multicentre study. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17:27–38. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00464-7. PubMed DOI

Stewart AK, et al. Carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone for relapsed multiple myeloma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2015;372:142–152. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1411321. PubMed DOI

Siegel DS, et al. Improvement in overall survival with carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. J. Clin. Oncol. 2018;36:728–734. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.76.5032. PubMed DOI

Dimopoulos MA, et al. Carfilzomib or bortezomib in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (ENDEAVOR): an interim overall survival analysis of an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18:1327–1337. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30578-8. PubMed DOI

Dimopoulos MA, et al. Carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma categorised by age: secondary analysis from the phase 3 ASPIRE study. Br. J. Haematol. 2017;177:404–413. doi: 10.1111/bjh.14549. PubMed DOI PMC

Ludwig H, et al. Carfilzomib and dexamethasone vs bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma: results of the phase 3 study ENDEAVOR (NCT01568866) according to age subgroup. Leuk. Lymphoma. 2017;58:2501–2504. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2017.1298755. PubMed DOI

Dimopoulos MA, et al. Carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone vs lenalidomide-dexamethasone in relapsed multiple myeloma by previous treatment. Blood Cancer J. 2017;7:e554. doi: 10.1038/bcj.2017.31. PubMed DOI PMC

Moreau P, et al. Impact of prior treatment on patients with relapsed multiple myeloma treated with carfilzomib and dexamethasone vs bortezomib and dexamethasone in the phase 3 ENDEAVOR study. Leukemia. 2017;31:115–122. doi: 10.1038/leu.2016.186. PubMed DOI PMC

Avet-Loiseau H, et al. Carfilzomib significantly improves the progression-free survival of high-risk patients in multiple myeloma. Blood. 2016;128:1174–1180. doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-03-707596. PubMed DOI PMC

Chng WJ, et al. Carfilzomib-dexamethasone vs bortezomib-dexamethasone in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma by cytogenetic risk in the phase 3 study ENDEAVOR. Leukemia. 2017;31:1368–1374. doi: 10.1038/leu.2016.390. PubMed DOI PMC

Dimopoulos MA, et al. Superior efficacy of carfilzomib and dexamethasone (Kd56) vs bortezomib and dexamethasone (Vd) in multiple myeloma (MM) patients with moderate or serious renal failure: a subgroup analysis of the phase 3 ENDEAVOR study. Blood. 2017;130:1845. doi: 10.1182/blood-2017-05-786004. PubMed DOI PMC

Moreau P, et al. Once weekly versus twice weekly carfilzomib dosing in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (A.R.R.O.W.): interim analysis results of a randomised, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19:953–964. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30354-1. PubMed DOI

Durie BG, et al. International uniform response criteria for multiple myeloma. Leukemia. 2006;20:1467–1473. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2404284. PubMed DOI

Rajkumar SV, et al. Consensus recommendations for the uniform reporting of clinical trials: report of the International Myeloma Workshop Consensus Panel 1. Blood. 2011;117:4691–4695. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-10-299487. PubMed DOI PMC

Repetto L. Greater risks of chemotherapy toxicity in elderly patients with cancer. J. Support. Oncol. 2003;1(4 Suppl 2):18–24. PubMed

Yancik R, Ganz PA, Varricchio CG, Conley B. Perspectives on comorbidity and cancer in older patients: approaches to expand the knowledge base. J. Clin. Oncol. 2001;19:1147–1151. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.4.1147. PubMed DOI

Qian Y, et al. Renal impairment and use of nephrotoxic agents in patients with multiple myeloma in the clinical practice setting in the United States. Cancer Med. 2017;6:1523–1530. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1075. PubMed DOI PMC

Gabardi S, Abramson S. Drug dosing in chronic kidney disease. Med. Clin. North Am. 2005;89:649–687. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2004.11.007. PubMed DOI

Kurtin SE. Relapsed or relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. J. Adv. Pract. Oncol. 2013;4(Suppl 1):5–14.

Ziogas DC, Terpos E, Kastritis E, Dimopoulos MA. An overview of the role of carfilzomib in the treatment of multiple myeloma. Expert Opin. Pharmacother. 2017;18:1883–1897. doi: 10.1080/14656566.2017.1404575. PubMed DOI

Muchtar E, et al. Efficacy and safety of salvage therapy using Carfilzomib for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma patients: a multicentre retrospective observational study. Br. J. Haematol. 2016;172:89–96. doi: 10.1111/bjh.13799. PubMed DOI

Facon T, et al. Final analysis of survival outcomes in the phase 3 FIRST trial of up-front treatment for multiple myeloma. Blood. 2018;131:301–310. doi: 10.1182/blood-2017-07-795047. PubMed DOI PMC

Pulte ED, et al. FDA approval summary: lenalidomide as maintenance therapy after autologous stem cell transplant in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Oncologist. 2018;23:734–739. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0440. PubMed DOI PMC

Dimopoulos MA, Terpos E, Niesvizky R, Palumbo A. Clinical characteristics of patients with relapsed multiple myeloma. Cancer Treat. Rev. 2015;41:827–835. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2015.07.005. PubMed DOI

Palumbo A, et al. International Myeloma Working Group consensus statement for the management, treatment, and supportive care of patients with myeloma not eligible for standard autologous stem-cell transplantation. J. Clin. Oncol. 2014;32:587–600. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.48.7934. PubMed DOI PMC

National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). NCCN Clinical practice guidelines in oncology: multiple myeloma version 2.2019. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/myeloma.pdf (2019). Accessed 15 October (2019). PubMed

Mikhael J, et al. Treatment of multiple myeloma: ASCO and CCO Joint Clinical Practice Guideline. J. Clin. Oncol. 2019;10:1228–1263. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.02096. PubMed DOI

Dimopoulos MA, et al. Daratumumab, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone for multiple myeloma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016;375:1319–1331. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1607751. PubMed DOI

Dimopoulos MA, et al. Daratumumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone versus lenalidomide and dexamethasone in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: updated analysis of POLLUX. Haematologica. 2018;103:2088–2096. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2018.194282. PubMed DOI PMC

Palumbo A, et al. Daratumumab, bortezomib, and dexamethasone for multiple myeloma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016;375:754–766. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1606038. PubMed DOI

Spencer A, et al. Daratumumab plus bortezomib and dexamethasone versus bortezomib and dexamethasone in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: updated analysis of CASTOR. Haematologica. 2018;103:2079–2087. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2018.194118. PubMed DOI PMC

Mateos Maria-Victoria, Spencer Andrew, Nooka Ajay K., Pour Ludek, Weisel Katja, Cavo Michele, Laubach Jacob P., Cook Gordon, Iida Shinsuke, Benboubker Lotfi, Usmani Saad Z., Yoon Sung-Soo, Bahlis Nizar J., Chiu Christopher, Ukropec Jon, Schecter Jordan M., Qin Xiang, O’Rourke Lisa, Dimopoulos Meletios A. Daratumumab-based regimens are highly effective and well tolerated in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma regardless of patient age: subgroup analysis of the phase 3 CASTOR and POLLUX studies. Haematologica. 2019;105(2):468–477. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2019.217448. PubMed DOI PMC

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...