Carfilzomib significantly improves the progression-free survival of high-risk patients in multiple myeloma
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu klinické zkoušky, fáze III, srovnávací studie, časopisecké články, multicentrická studie, randomizované kontrolované studie
Grantová podpora
P50 CA186781
NCI NIH HHS - United States
PubMed
27439911
PubMed Central
PMC5009511
DOI
10.1182/blood-2016-03-707596
PII: S0006-4971(20)34180-X
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- dexamethason aplikace a dávkování MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- lenalidomid MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- míra přežití MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- mnohočetný myelom farmakoterapie mortalita MeSH
- oligopeptidy aplikace a dávkování MeSH
- přežití bez známek nemoci MeSH
- protokoly protinádorové kombinované chemoterapie aplikace a dávkování MeSH
- recidiva MeSH
- rizikové faktory MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- thalidomid aplikace a dávkování analogy a deriváty MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- klinické zkoušky, fáze III MeSH
- multicentrická studie MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
- srovnávací studie MeSH
- Názvy látek
- carfilzomib MeSH Prohlížeč
- dexamethason MeSH
- lenalidomid MeSH
- oligopeptidy MeSH
- thalidomid MeSH
The presence of certain high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities, such as translocations (4;14) and (14;16) and deletion (17p), are known to have a negative impact on survival in multiple myeloma (MM). The phase 3 study ASPIRE (N = 792) demonstrated that progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly improved with carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (KRd), compared with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Rd) in relapsed MM. This preplanned subgroup analysis of ASPIRE was conducted to evaluate KRd vs Rd by baseline cytogenetics according to fluorescence in situ hybridization. Of 417 patients with known cytogenetic risk status, 100 patients (24%) were categorized with high-risk cytogenetics (KRd, n = 48; Rd, n = 52) and 317 (76%) were categorized with standard-risk cytogenetics (KRd, n = 147; Rd, n = 170). For patients with high-risk cytogenetics, treatment with KRd resulted in a median PFS of 23.1 months, a 9-month improvement relative to treatment with Rd. For patients with standard-risk cytogenetics, treatment with KRd led to a 10-month improvement in median PFS vs Rd. The overall response rates for KRd vs Rd were 79.2% vs 59.6% (high-risk cytogenetics) and 91.2% vs 73.5% (standard-risk cytogenetics); approximately fivefold as many patients with high- or standard-risk cytogenetics achieved a complete response or better with KRd vs Rd (29.2% vs 5.8% and 38.1% vs 6.5%, respectively). KRd improved but did not abrogate the poor prognosis associated with high-risk cytogenetics. This regimen had a favorable benefit-risk profile in patients with relapsed MM, irrespective of cytogenetic risk status, and should be considered a standard of care in these patients. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01080391.
Charles University Faculty Hospital and Faculty of Medicine Hradec Králové Czech Republic;
Department of Hemato oncology University Hospital Olomouc Olomouc Czech Republic;
Department of Internal Medicine University Hospital Praha Czech Republic;
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center Seattle WA;
Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center Jerusalem Israel;
Hospital Clínic de Barcelona Barcelona Spain;
Institut Català d'Oncologia Institut Josep Carreras Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol Barcelona Spain;
John Theurer Cancer Center at Hackensack University Hackensack NJ;
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Athens Greece;
Onyx Pharmaceuticals Inc South San Francisco CA; and
Princess Margaret Cancer Centre Toronto ON Canada;
Queen Joanna University Hospital Sofia Bulgaria;
St István and St Laszlo Hospital Budapest Hungary;
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston TX;
University Hospital of Salamanca Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca Salamanca Spain;
University Hospital Ostrava and Faculty of Medicine University of Ostrava Ostrava Czech Republic;
University of Chicago Medical Center Chicago IL;
University of Nantes Nantes France
University of Torino Torino Italy;
Weill Cornell Medical College New York Presbyterian Hospital New York NY;
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Pulte D, Gondos A, Brenner H. Improvement in survival of older adults with multiple myeloma: results of an updated period analysis of SEER data. Oncologist. 2011;16(11):1600–1603. PubMed PMC
Stewart AK, Rajkumar SV, Dimopoulos MA, et al. ASPIRE Investigators. Carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone for relapsed multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(2):142–152. PubMed
Dimopoulos MA, Weisel KC, Song KW, et al. Cytogenetics and long-term survival of patients with refractory or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma treated with pomalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone. Haematologica. 2015;100(10):1327–1333. PubMed PMC
Avet-Loiseau H, Attal M, Moreau P, et al. Genetic abnormalities and survival in multiple myeloma: the experience of the Intergroupe Francophone du Myélome. Blood. 2007;109(8):3489–3495. PubMed
Avet-Loiseau H, Hulin C, Campion L, et al. Chromosomal abnormalities are major prognostic factors in elderly patients with multiple myeloma: the intergroupe francophone du myélome experience. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(22):2806–2809. PubMed PMC
Avet-Loiseau H, Hulin C, Benboubker L, et al. Impact of cytogenetics on outcomes of transplant-ineligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma treated with continuous lenalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone in the FIRST (MM-020) trial [abstract]. Blood. 2015;126(23) Abstract 730.
Avet-Loiseau H, Soulier J, Fermand JP, et al. IFM and MAG groups. Impact of high-risk cytogenetics and prior therapy on outcomes in patients with advanced relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma treated with lenalidomide plus dexamethasone. Leukemia. 2010;24(3):623–628. PubMed
Kumar SK, Lee JH, Lahuerta JJ, et al. International Myeloma Working Group. Risk of progression and survival in multiple myeloma relapsing after therapy with IMiDs and bortezomib: a multicenter international myeloma working group study [published correction appears in Leukemia. 2012;26(5):1153]. Leukemia. 2012;26(1):149–157. PubMed PMC
Jakubowiak AJ, Siegel DS, Martin T, et al. Treatment outcomes in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma and high-risk cytogenetics receiving single-agent carfilzomib in the PX-171-003-A1 study. Leukemia. 2013;27(12):2351–2356. PubMed PMC
Klein U, Jauch A, Hielscher T, et al. Chromosomal aberrations +1q21 and del(17p13) predict survival in patients with recurrent multiple myeloma treated with lenalidomide and dexamethasone. Cancer. 2011;117(10):2136–2144. PubMed
Chang H, Trieu Y, Qi X, Xu W, Stewart KA, Reece D. Bortezomib therapy response is independent of cytogenetic abnormalities in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Leuk Res. 2007;31(6):779–782. PubMed
Avet-Loiseau H, Leleu X, Roussel M, et al. Bortezomib plus dexamethasone induction improves outcome of patients with t(4;14) myeloma but not outcome of patients with del(17p). J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(30):4630–4634. PubMed
Cavo M, Tacchetti P, Patriarca F, et al. GIMEMA Italian Myeloma Network. Bortezomib with thalidomide plus dexamethasone compared with thalidomide plus dexamethasone as induction therapy before, and consolidation therapy after, double autologous stem-cell transplantation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a randomised phase 3 study. Lancet. 2010;376(9758):2075–2085. PubMed
Munshi NC, Anderson KC, Bergsagel PL, et al. International Myeloma Workshop Consensus Panel 2. Consensus recommendations for risk stratification in multiple myeloma: report of the International Myeloma Workshop Consensus Panel 2. Blood. 2011;117(18):4696–4700. PubMed PMC
Paiva B, van Dongen JJ, Orfao A. New criteria for response assessment: role of minimal residual disease in multiple myeloma. Blood. 2015;125(20):3059–3068. PubMed PMC
Landgren O, Owen RG. Better therapy requires better response evaluation: paving the way for minimal residual disease testing for every myeloma patient. Cytometry B Clin Cytom. 2016;90(1):14–20. PubMed
Sonneveld P, Avet-Loiseau H, Lonial S, et al. Treatment of multiple myeloma with high-risk cytogenetics: a consensus of the International Myeloma Working Group. Blood. 2016;127(24):2955–2962. PubMed PMC
Leleu X, Karlin L, Macro M, et al. Intergroupe Francophone du Myélome (IFM) Pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone in multiple myeloma with deletion 17p and/or translocation (4;14): IFM 2010-02 trial results. Blood. 2015;125(9):1411–1417. PubMed
Lonial S, Dimopoulos M, Palumbo A, et al. ELOQUENT-2 Investigators. Elotuzumab therapy for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(7):621–631. PubMed
Moreau P, Masszi T, Grzasko N, et al. TOURMALINE-MM1 Study Group. Oral ixazomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone for multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(17):1621–1634. PubMed
Jakubowiak AJ, Dytfeld D, Griffith KA, et al. A phase 1/2 study of carfilzomib in combination with lenalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone as a frontline treatment for multiple myeloma. Blood. 2012;120(9):1801–1809. PubMed PMC
Korde N, Roschewski M, Zingone A, et al. Treatment with carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone with lenalidomide extension in patients with smoldering or newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. JAMA Oncol. 2015;1(6):746–754. PubMed PMC
Interpreting clinical trial data in multiple myeloma: translating findings to the real-world setting
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT01080391