Factors Associated with the Need for Intensive Care Unit Admission Following Supratentorial Intracerebral Hemorrhage: The Triage ICH Model
Language English Country United States Media print
Document type Journal Article, Observational Study
PubMed
28028788
DOI
10.1007/s12028-016-0346-7
PII: 10.1007/s12028-016-0346-7
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- Intensive care, Intracerebral hemorrhage, Triage,
- MeSH
- Cerebral Hemorrhage diagnosis diagnostic imaging therapy MeSH
- Glasgow Outcome Scale * MeSH
- Cerebral Intraventricular Hemorrhage diagnosis therapy MeSH
- Intensive Care Units statistics & numerical data MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Models, Neurological MeSH
- Patient Admission statistics & numerical data MeSH
- Retrospective Studies MeSH
- Aged, 80 and over MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Triage methods standards MeSH
- Check Tag
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged, 80 and over MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Observational Study MeSH
BACKGROUND: Providing the correct level of care for patients with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is crucial, but the level of care needed at initial presentation may not be clear. This study evaluated factors associated with admission to intensive care unit (ICU) level of care. METHODS: This is an observational study of all adult patients admitted to our institution with non-traumatic supratentorial ICH presenting within 72 h of symptom onset between 2009-2012 (derivation cohort) and 2005-2008 (validation cohort). Factors associated with neuroscience ICU admission were identified via logistic regression analysis, from which a triage model was derived, refined, and retrospectively validated. RESULTS: For the derivation cohort, 229 patients were included, of whom 70 patients (31 %) required ICU care. Predictors of neuroscience ICU admission were: younger age [odds ratio (OR) 0.94, 95 % CI 0.91-0.97; p = 0.0004], lower Full Outline of UnResponsiveness (FOUR) score (0.39, 0.28-0.54; p < 0.0001) or Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score (0.55, 0.45-0.67; p < 0.0001), and larger ICH volume (1.04, 1.03-1.06; p < 0.0001). The model was further refined with clinician input and the addition of intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH). GCS was chosen for the model rather than the FOUR score as it is more widely used. The proposed triage ICH model utilizes three variables: ICH volume ≥30 cc, GCS score <13, and IVH. The triage ICH model predicted the need for ICU admission with a sensitivity of 94.3 % in the derivation cohort [area under the curve (AUC) = 0.88; p < 0.001] and 97.8 % (AUC = 0.88) in the validation cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Presented are the derivation, refinement, and validation of the triage ICH model. This model requires prospective validation, but may be a useful tool to aid clinicians in determining the appropriate level of care at the time of initial presentation for a patient with a supratentorial ICH.
Department of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics Mayo Clinic Rochester MN USA
Department of Emergency Medicine Mayo Clinic Rochester MN USA
Department of Neurology Mayo Clinic 200 1st Street SW Rochester MN 55905 USA
International Clinical Research Center St Anne's University Hospital Brno Czech Republic
See more in PubMed
Ann Neurol. 2005 Oct;58(4):585-93 PubMed
Stroke. 1997 Mar;28(3):491-9 PubMed
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2013 May;22(4):491-9 PubMed
Crit Care Med. 2001 Mar;29(3):635-40 PubMed
Lancet Neurol. 2010 Feb;9(2):167-76 PubMed
Neurology. 2013 Jul 9;81(2):107-12 PubMed
Stroke. 2015 Jul;46(7):2032-60 PubMed
Neurology. 2009 Oct 6;73(14):1088-94 PubMed
Neurology. 2011 Oct 25;77(17 ):1599-604 PubMed
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2005 Jun;76(6):839-44 PubMed
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1990 Dec;53(12 ):1080-3 PubMed
Stroke. 2007 Apr;38(4):1257-62 PubMed
Lancet Neurol. 2009 Apr;8(4):355-69 PubMed
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2001;11(3):183-9 PubMed
Neurology. 2004 Aug 10;63(3):461-7 PubMed
JAMA Neurol. 2014 Feb;71(2):158-64 PubMed
Stroke. 2001 Apr;32(4):891-7 PubMed
Stroke. 2008 Aug;39(8):2304-9 PubMed
Stroke. 1998 Jun;29(6):1160-6 PubMed
Neurocrit Care. 2013 Dec;19(3):299-305 PubMed
N Engl J Med. 2013 Aug 15;369(7):669-70 PubMed
Lancet. 1974 Jul 13;2(7872):81-4 PubMed
Brain. 2013 Feb;136(Pt 2):658-64 PubMed
Lancet Neurol. 2012 Apr;11(4):307-14 PubMed
Stroke. 1996 Aug;27(8):1304-5 PubMed