Effects of Spinal Cord Stimulation on Cardiac Sympathetic Nerve Activity in Patients with Heart Failure
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, randomizované kontrolované studie
PubMed
28206674
DOI
10.1111/pace.13050
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- heart failure, imaging, spinal cord stimulation, sympathetic nervous system,
- MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mícha diagnostické zobrazování patofyziologie MeSH
- míšní stimulace metody MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- srdce diagnostické zobrazování inervace patofyziologie MeSH
- srdeční selhání patofyziologie terapie MeSH
- sympatický nervový systém patofyziologie MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
BACKGROUND: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) reduces sympathetic activity in animal models of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HF) but limited data exist of SCS in patients with HF. The aim of the present study was to test the primary hypothesis that SCS reduces cardiac sympathetic nerve activity in HF patients. Secondary hypotheses were that SCS improves left ventricular function and dimension, exercise capacity, and clinical variables relevant to HF. METHODS: HF patients with a SCS device previously participating in the DEFEAT-HF trial were included in this crossover study with 6-week intervention periods (SCS-ON and SCS-OFF). SCS (50 Hz, 210-μs pulse duration, aiming at T2-T4 segments) was delivered for 12 hours daily. Indices of myocardial sympathetic neuronal function (heart-to-mediastinum ratio, HMR) and activity (washout rate, WR) were assessed using 123 I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) scintigraphy. Echocardiography, exercise testing, and clinical data collection were also performed. RESULTS: We included 13 patients (65.3 ± 8.0 years, nine males) and MIBG scintigraphy data were available in 10. HMR was not different comparing SCS-ON (1.37 ± 0.16) and SCS-OFF (1.41 ± 0.21, P = 0.46). WR was also unchanged comparing SCS-ON (41.5 ± 5.3) and SCS-OFF (39.1 ± 5.8, P = 0.30). Similarly, average New York Heart Association class (2.4 ± 0.5 vs 2.3 ± 0.6, P = 0.34), quality of life score (24 ± 16 vs 24 ± 16, P = 0.94), and left ventricular dimension and function as well as exercise capacity were all unchanged comparing SCS-ON and SCS-OFF. CONCLUSION: In patients with HF, SCS (12 hours daily, targeting the T2-T4 segments of the spinal cord) does not appear to influence cardiac sympathetic neuronal activity or function as assessed by MIBG scintigraphy.
Cardiac Rhythm and Heart Failure Medtronic Plc Minneapolis Minnesota
Department of Cardiology Leiden University Medical Center Leiden the Netherlands
Department of Cardiology Na Homolce Hospital Prague Czech Republic
Department of Clinical Physiology Sunderby Hospital Luleå Sweden
Department of Nuclear Medicine University Hospital Královské Vinohrady Prague Czech Republic
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org