Tract Sizes in Miniaturized Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Systematic Review from the European Association of Urology Urolithiasis Guidelines Panel
Language English Country Switzerland Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article, Systematic Review
PubMed
28237786
DOI
10.1016/j.eururo.2017.01.046
PII: S0302-2838(17)30084-2
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- Mini-perc, Percutaneous nephrolithotomy, Residual fragments, Stenting, Stone surgery, Systematic review, Urinary calculi,
- MeSH
- Surgical Instruments * standards MeSH
- Equipment Design MeSH
- Child MeSH
- Guideline Adherence MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Infant MeSH
- Kidney Calculi diagnosis surgery MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Miniaturization MeSH
- Adolescent MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Nephrolithotomy, Percutaneous adverse effects instrumentation standards MeSH
- Child, Preschool MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Practice Guidelines as Topic * standards MeSH
- Societies, Medical * standards MeSH
- Urology standards MeSH
- Treatment Outcome MeSH
- Check Tag
- Child MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Infant MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Adolescent MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Child, Preschool MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Systematic Review MeSH
CONTEXT: Miniaturized instruments for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL), utilizing tracts sized ≤22 Fr, have been developed in an effort to reduce the morbidity and increase the efficiency of stone removal compared with standard PNL (>22 Fr). OBJECTIVE: We systematically reviewed all available evidence on the efficacy and safety of miniaturized PNL for removing renal calculi. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: The review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses statement. Since it was not possible to perform a meta-analysis, the data were summarized in a narrative synthesis. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: After screening 2945 abstracts, 18 studies were included (two randomized controlled trials [RCTs], six nonrandomized comparative studies, and 10 case series). Thirteen studies were full-text articles and five were only available as congress abstracts. The size of tracts used in miniaturized procedures ranged from 22 Fr to 4.8 Fr. The largest mean stone size treated using small instruments was 980mm2. Stone-free rates were comparable in miniaturized and standard PNL procedures. Procedures performed with small instruments tended to be associated with significantly lower blood loss, while the procedure duration tended to be significantly longer. Other complications were not notably different between PNL types. Study designs and populations were heterogeneous. Study limitations included selection and outcome reporting bias, as well as a lack of information on relevant confounding factors. CONCLUSIONS: The studies suggest that miniaturized PNL is at least as efficacious and safe as standard PNL for the removal of renal calculi. However, the quality of the evidence was poor, drawn mainly from small studies, the majority of which were single-arm case series, and only two of which were RCTs. Furthermore, the tract sizes used and types of stones treated were heterogeneous. Hence, the risks of bias and confounding were high, highlighting the need for more reliable data from RCTs. PATIENT SUMMARY: Removing kidney stones via percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) using smaller sized instruments (mini-PNL) appears to be as effective and safe as using larger (traditional) instruments, but more clinical research is needed.
2nd Department of Urology Sismanoglio Hospital Athens Medical School Athens Greece
Academic Urology Unit University of Aberdeen Aberdeen UK
Department of Medicine McMaster University Hamilton Canada
Department of Urology Dr Lutfi Kirdar Kartal Research and Training Hospital Istanbul Turkey
Department of Urology Hospital of the Sisters of Charity Vienna Austria
Department of Urology Medical University Vienna Vienna Austria
Department of Urology Sen Jorj Austria Hospital Istanbul Turkey
Department of Urology Skåne University Hospital Malmö Sweden
Department of Urology Technical University Munich Munich Germany
References provided by Crossref.org