Existing theories of empathic response to visual art works postulate the primacy of automatic embodied reaction to images based on mirror neuron mechanisms. Arguing for a more inclusive concept of empathy-related response and integrating four distinct bodies of literature, we discuss contextual, and personal factors which modulate empathic response to depicted people. We then present an integrative model of empathy-related responses to depicted people in art works. The model assumes that a response to empathy-eliciting figural artworks engages the dynamic interaction of two mutually interlinked sets of processes: socio-affective/cognitive processing, related to the person perception, and esthetic processing, primarily concerned with esthetic appreciation and judgment and attention to non-social aspects of the image. The model predicts that the specific pattern of interaction between empathy-related and esthetic processing is co-determined by several sets of factors: (i) the viewer's individual characteristics, (ii) the context variables (which include various modes of priming by narratives and other images), (iii) multidimensional features of the image, and (iv) aspects of a viewer's response. Finally we propose that the model is implemented by the interaction of functionally connected brain networks involved in socio-cognitive and esthetic processing.

Applied Neurosciences and Brain Imaging National Institute of Mental Health Klecany Czechia

Applied Neurosciences and Brain Imaging National Institute of Mental HealthKlecany Czechia; Department of Art History Masaryk University BrnoBrno Czechia

See more in PubMed

Adams R. B., Kveraga K. (2015). Social vision: functional forecasting and the integration of compound social cues. Rev. Philos. Psychol. 6, 591–610. 10.1007/s13164-015-0256-1 PubMed DOI PMC

Adolphs R. (2010). Conceptual challenges and directions for social neuroscience. Neuron 65, 752–767. 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.03.006 PubMed DOI PMC

Ando A., Salatino A., Giromini L., Ricci R., Pignolo C., Cristofanelli S., et al. . (2015). Embodied simulation and ambiguous stimuli: the role of the mirror neuron system. Brain Res. 1629, 135–142. 10.1016/j.brainres.2015.10.025 PubMed DOI

Auvray M., Myin E., Spence C. (2010). The sensory-discriminative and affective- motivational aspects of pain. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 34, 214–223. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.07.008 PubMed DOI

Avenanti A., Minio-Paluello I., Bufalari I., Aglioti S. M. (2009). The pain of a model in the personality of an onlooker: influence of state-reactivity and personality traits on embodied empathy for pain. NeuroImage 44, 275–283. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.08.001 PubMed DOI

Baird A. D., Scheffer I. E., Wilson S. J. (2011). Mirror neuron system involvement in empathy: a critical look at the evidence. Soc. Neurosci. 6, 327–335. 10.1080/17470919.2010.547085 PubMed DOI

Bal P. M., Veltkamp M. (2013). How does fiction reading influence empathy? An experimental investigation on the role of emotional transportation. PLoS ONE 8:e55341. 10.1371/journal.pone.0055341 PubMed DOI PMC

Ball T. M., Sullivan S., Flagan T., Hitchcock C. A., Simmons A., Paulus M. P., et al. . (2012). Selective effects of social anxiety, anxiety sensitivity, and negative affectivity on the neural bases of emotional face processing. NeuroImage 59, 1879–1887. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.08.074 PubMed DOI

Barrett L. F. (2015). The conceptual act theory: a road map, in The Psychological Construction of Emotion, eds Barett L. F., Russell J. A. (New York, NY: The Guildford Publications; ), 83–110.

Barrett L. F., Mesquita B., Gendron M. (2011). Context in emotion perception. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 20, 286–290. 10.1177/0963721411422522 DOI

Barrett L. F., Satpute A. B. (2013). Large-scale brain networks in affective and social neuroscience: towards an integrative functional architecture of the brain. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 23, 361–372. 10.1016/j.conb.2012.12.012 PubMed DOI PMC

Batson C. D. (1991). The Altrusim Question. Toward a Social Psychological Answer Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Batson C. D. (2009). These things called empathy: eight related but distinct phenomena, in The Social Neuroscience of Empathy, eds Decety J., Ickes W. (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; ), 3–15.

Bebko G. M., Franconeri S. L., Ochsner K. N., Chiao J. Y. (2011). Look before you regulate: differential perceptual strategies underlying expressive suppression and cognitive reappraisal. Emotion 11, 732–742. 10.1037/a0024009 PubMed DOI

Belting H. (1981). Das Bild und sein Publikum im Mittelalter. Form und Funktion früher Bildtafeln der Passion Berlin: Gebr. Mann Verlag.

Bennett J. (2001). Stigmata and sense memory: St. Francis and the affective image. Art Hist. 24, 1–16. 10.1111/1467-8365.00247 DOI

Bergeron V., Lopes D. (2014). Aesthetic theory and aesthetic science: prospects for integration, in Aesthetic Science. Connecting Minds, Brains, and Experience, eds Shimamura A., Palmer S. (Oxford: Oxford University Press; ), 63–79.

Bernhardt B. C., Singer T. (2012). The neural basis of empathy. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 35, 1–23. 10.1146/annurev-neuro-062111-150536 PubMed DOI

Betti V., Aglioti S. (2016). Dynamic construction of the neural networks underpinning empathy for pain. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 63, 191–206. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.02.009 PubMed DOI

Blakemore S.-J., Frith U. (2003). How does the brain deal with the social world? Neuroreport 15, 119–128. 10.1097/00001756-200401190-0002 PubMed DOI

Brieber D., Nadal M., Leder H. (2015). In the white cube: Museum context enhances the valuation and memory of art. Acta Psychol. 154, 36–42. 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.11.004 PubMed DOI

Brieber D., Nadal M., Leder H., Rosenberg R. (2014). Art in time and space: context modulates the relation between art appreciation and viewing time. PLoS ONE 9:e99019 10.1371/journal.pone.0099019 PubMed DOI PMC

Bruneau E. G., Pluta A., Saxe R. (2012). The role of the ‘shared pain’ and ‘theory of mind’ networks in processing others' emotional suffering. Neuropsychologia 50, 219–231. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.11.008 PubMed DOI

Bullot N. J., Reber R. (2013). The Artful Mind Meets Art History: toward a psycho-historical framework for the science of art appreciation. Behav. Brain Sci. 36, 123–137. 10.1017/S0140525X12000489 PubMed DOI

Calder A. J., Ewbank M., Passamonti L. (2011). Personality influences the neural responses to viewing facial expressions of emotion. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 366, 1684–1701. 10.1098/rstb.2010.0362 PubMed DOI PMC

Candidi M., Aglioti S. (2015). Visual and sensorimotor contributions to the esthetic appraisal of body form, motion and emotion. Eur. Psychol. 20, 16–26. 10.1027/1016-9040/a000221 DOI

Caramazza A., Anzellotti S., Strnad L., Lingnau A. (2014) Embodied cognition mirror neurons: a critical assessment. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 37, 1–15. 10.1146/annurev-neuro-071013-013950 PubMed DOI

Casati R., Pignocchi A. (2007). Mirror and canonical neurons are not constitutive of aesthetic responses. Trends Cogn. Sci. 11:411. 10.1016/j.tics.2007.07.007 PubMed DOI

Cela-Conde C., Ayala F. (2015). Art and brain co-evolution, in Art, Aesthetics, and the Brain. eds Huston J., Nadal M., Mora F., Agnati L., Cela-Conde C. (Oxford: Oxford University Press; ), 408–425.

Cheetham M., Pedroni A. F., Antley A., Slater M., Jäncke L. (2009). Virtual milgram: empathic concern or personal distress? Evidence from functional MRI and dispositional measures. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 3:29. 10.3389/neuro.09.029.2009 PubMed DOI PMC

Clark K. (1966). Rembrandt and the Italian Renaissance. London: Murray.

Clarke E., DeNora T., Vuoskoski J. (2015). Music, empathy and cultural understanding. Phys. Life Rev. 15, 61–88. 10.1016/j.plrev.2015.09.001. PubMed DOI

Coplan A. (2004). Empathic engagement with narrative fictions. J. Aesthet. Art Criticism 62, 141–152. 10.1111/j.1540-594X.2004.00147.x DOI

Coplan A., Goldie P. (Eds.) (2011). Empathy. Philosophical and Psychological Perspectives Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Cox C. L., Uddin L. Q., Di Martino A., Castellanos F. X., Milham M. P., Kelly C. (2012). The balance between feeling and knowing: affective and cognitive empathy are reflected in the brain's intrinsic functional dynamics. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 7, 727–737. 10.1093/scan/nsr051 PubMed DOI PMC

Cuff B., Brown S. J., Taylor L., Howat D. (2014). Empathy: a review of the concept. Emotion Rev. 8, 144–153. 10.1177/1754073914558466 DOI

Curtis R., Koch G. (2009). Einfühlung: Zu Geschichte und Gegenwart Eines Ästhetischen Konzepts. München: Wilhelm Fink.

Davies D. (2014). ‘This is your brain on art’: what can philosophy of art learn from neuroscience?, in Aesthetics and The Sciences of Mind, eds Currie G., Kieran M., Meskin A., Robson J. (Oxford: Oxford University Press; ), 57–74.

Davis M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: evidence for a multidimensional approach. J. Person. Soc. Psychol. 44, 113–126.

Davis M. H. (1996). Empathy: A Social Psychological Approach. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

Decety J. (2010a). The neurodevelopment of empathy in humans. Dev. Neurosci. 32, 257–267. 10.1159/000317771 PubMed DOI PMC

Decety J. (2010b). To what extend is the experience of empathy mediated by shared neural circuits? Emotion Rev. 2, 204–207. 10.1177/1754073910361981 DOI

Decety J. (2011). Dissecting the neural mechanisms mediating empathy. Emotion Rev. 3, 92–108. 10.1177/1754073910374662 DOI

Decety J., Jackson P. (2004). The functional architecture of human empathy. Behav. Cogn. Neurosci. Rev. 3, 71–100. 10.1177/1534582304267187 PubMed DOI

Decety J., Meyer M. (2008). From emotion resonance to empathic understanding: A social developmental neuroscience account. Dev. Psychopathol. 20, 1053–1080. 10.1017/S0954579408000503 PubMed DOI

De Greck M., Wang G., Yang X., Wang X., Northoff G., Han S. (2012). Neural substrates underlying intentional empathy. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 7, 135–144. 10.1093/scan/nsq093 PubMed DOI PMC

De Vignemont F., Jacob P. (2012). What is it like to feel another's pain? Philos. Sci. 79, 295–316. 10.1086/664742 DOI

De Wied M., Zillmann D., Ordman V. (1994). The role of empathic distress in the enjoyment of cinematic tragedy. Poetics 23, 91–106.

Eisenberg N. I. (2015). Social pain and the brain: controversies, questions, an where to go from here, Ann. Rev. Psychol. 66, 601–629. 10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115146 PubMed DOI

Else J. E., Ellis J., Orme E. (2015). Art expertise modulates the emotional response to modern art, especially abstract: an ERP investigation. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 9:525. 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00525 PubMed DOI PMC

Eres R., Molenberghs P. (2013). The influence of group membership on the neural correlates involved in empathy. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 7:176. 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00176 PubMed DOI PMC

Etkin A., Klemenhagen K., Dudman J., Rogan M., Hen R., Kandel E., et al. . (2004). Individual differences in trait anxiety predict the response of the basolateral amygdala to unconsciously processed fearful faces. Neuron 44, 1043–1055. 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.12.006 PubMed DOI

Fan Y., Duncan N. W., De Greck M., Northoff G. (2011). Is there a core neural network in empathy? An fMRI based quantitative meta-analysis. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 35, 903–911. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.10.009 PubMed DOI

Freedberg D. (1989). The Power of Images. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

Freedberg D. (2007). Empathy, motion and emotion, in Wie Sich Gefühle Ausdruck Verschaffen: Emotionen in Nahsicht, eds Herding K., Krause-Wahl A. (Berlin: Driesen; ), 17–51.

Freedberg D. (2011). Memory in art: history and the neuroscience of response, in The Memory Process: Neuroscientific and Humanistic Perspectives, eds Nalbantian S., Matthews P., McClelland J. (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; ), 337–358.

Freedberg D., Gallese V. (2007). Motion, emotion and empathy in esthetic experience. Trends Cogn. Sci. 11, 197–203. 10.1016/j.tics.2007.02.003 PubMed DOI

Freeman J. B., Johnson K. L., Adams R. B., Jr., Ambady N. (2012). The social-sensory interface: category interactions in person perception. Front. Integr. Neurosci. 6:81. 10.3389/fnint.2012.00081 PubMed DOI PMC

Fried M. (2002). Menzel's Realism: Art and Embodiment in Nineteenth-Century. Berlin: New Haven; London: Yale University Press.

Fuchs T., Koch S. C. (2014). Embodied affectivity: on moving and being moved. Front. Psychol. 5:508. 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00508 PubMed DOI PMC

Gallagher S. (2011). Aesthetics and kinaesthetics, in Sehen und Handeln, eds Bredekamp H., Krois J. M. (Berlin: Akademie Verlag; ), 99–113.

Gallagher S. (2012). Empathy, simulation, and narrative. Sci. Context 25, 355–381. 10.1017/S0269889712000117 DOI

Gallese V. (2003). The roots of empathy: the shared manifold hypothesis and the neural basis of intersubjectivity. Psychopathology 36, 171–180. 10.1159/000072786 PubMed DOI

Gallese V. (2010). Mirror neurons and art, in Art and the Senses, eds Bacci F., Melcher D. (Oxford: Oxford University Press; ), 441–449.

Gallese V., Caruana F. (2016). Embodied simulation. Beyond the expression/experience dualism of emotions. Trends Cogn. Sci. 20, 397–398. 10.1016/j.tics.2016.03.010 PubMed DOI

Gallese V., Keysers C., Rizzolatti G. (2004). A unifying view of the basis of social cognition. Trends Cogn. Sci. 8, 396–403. 10.1016/j.tics.2004.07.002 PubMed DOI

Gallese V., Sinigaglia C. (2011). What is so special about embodied simulation? Trends Cogn. Sci. 15, 512–519. 10.1016/j.tics.2011.09.003 PubMed DOI

Gerger G., Leder H., Kremer A. (2014). Context effects on emotional and aesthetic evaluations of artwortks and IAPS pictures. Acta Psychol. 151, 174–183. 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.06.008 PubMed DOI

Getsy D. (2014). Acts of stilness: statues, performativity, and passive resistance. Criticism 56, 1–20.

Gonzalez-Liencres C., Shamay-Tsoory S. G., Brüne M. (2013). Towards a neuroscience of empathy: ontogeny, phylogeny, brain mechanisms, context and psychopathology. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 37, 1537–1548. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.05.001 PubMed DOI

Gopnik B. (2014). Aesthetic science and artistic knowledge, in Aesthetic Science. Connecting Minds, Brains, and Experience, eds Shimamura A., Palmer S. (Oxford: Oxford University Press; ), 129–162.

Graham R., LaBar K. (2012). Neurocognitive mechanisms of gaze-expression interactions in face processing and social attention. Neuropsychologia 50, 553–566. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.01.019 PubMed DOI PMC

Green M. C. (2004). Transportation into narrative worlds. The role of prior knowledge and perceived realism. Discourse Processes 38, 247–266. 10.1207/s15326950dp3802_5 DOI

Gu X., Han S. (2007). Attention and reality constraints on the neural processes of empathy for pain. Neuroimage 36, 256–267. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.02.025 PubMed DOI

Gutsell J. N., Inzlicht M. (2012). Intergroup differences in the sharing of emotive states: neural evidence of an empathy gap. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 7, 596–603. 10.1093/scan/nsr035 PubMed DOI PMC

Hamburger J. F. (1998). The Visual and the Visionary: Art and Female Spirituality in Late Medieval GERMANY. New York, NY: Zone Books.

Han S., Jiang Y., Humphreys G. W., Zhou T., Cai P. (2005). Distinct neural substrates for the perception of real and virtual visual worlds. Neuroimage 24, 928–935. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.09.046 PubMed DOI

Hanich J., Wagner V., Shah M., Jacobsen T., Menninghaus W. (2014). Why we like to watch sad films. The pleasure of being moved in aesthetic experiences. Psychol. Aesthetics Creativity Arts 8, 130–143. 10.1037/a0035690 DOI

Hein G., Singer T. (2008). I feel how you feel but not always: the empathic brain and its modulation. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 18, 153–158. 10.1016/j.conb.2008.07.012 PubMed DOI

Herder J. G. (1778). Plastik. Einige Wahrnehmungen über Form und Gestalt aus Pygmalions Bildendem Traume Leipzig: Breitkopf.

Hickok G. (2013). Do mirror neurons subserve action understanding? Neurosci. Lett. 540, 56–58. 10.1016/j.neulet.2012.11.001 PubMed DOI PMC

Humphrey K., Underwood G., Lambert T. (2012). Salience of the lambs: a test of the saliency map hypothesis with pictures of emotive objects. J. Vision 12, 1–15. 10.1167/12.1.22 PubMed DOI

Ibañez A., Manes F. (2012). Contextual social cognition and the behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia, Neurology 24, 1354–1362. 10.1212/WNL PubMed DOI PMC

Immordino-Yang M. H., McColl A., Damasio H., Damasio A. (2009). Neural correlates of admiration and compassion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 8021–8026. 10.1073/pnas.0810363106 PubMed DOI PMC

Jacobsen T. (2006). Bridging the art and the sciences: a framework for the psychology of aesthetics. Leonardo 39, 155–162. 10.1162/leon.2006.39.2.155 DOI

Jezler P. (1983). Bildwerke im Dienste der dramatischen Ausgestaltung der Osterliturgie – Befürworter und Gegner, in Von der Macht der Bilder. Beitrage des C. I. H. A. -Kolloquiums Kunst und Reformation, ed Ullmann E. (Leipzig: Karl-Marx-Universität; ), 236–249.

Kandel E. (2012). The Age of Insight: The Quest to Understand the Unconscious in Art, Mind, and Brain, from Vienna 1900 to the Present. New York, NY: The Random House.

Kanske P., Böckler A., Trautwein F.-M., Singer T. (2015). Dissecting the social brain: introducing the EmpaToM to reveal distinct neural networks and brain-behavior relations for empathy and Theory of Mind. Neuroimage 122, 6–19. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.07.082 PubMed DOI

Kapoula Z., Daunys G., Herbez O., Yang Q. (2009). Effect of title on eye-movement exploration of Cubist painting by Fernand Léger. Perception 38, 479–491. 10.1068/p6080 PubMed DOI

Keen S. (2006). A theory of narrative empathy. Narrative 14, 207–236.

Kesner L. (2006). The role of cognitive competence in the art museum experience. Museum Manag. Curatorship 21, 4–19. 10.1080/09647770600302101 DOI

Kesner L. (2010). Neuroaesthetics: real promise or real delusion?, in The Aesthetic Dimension of Visual Culture, eds Dadejdík O., Stejskal J. (Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing; ), 17–32.

Kesner L. (2014). The predictive mind and the experience of visual art work. Front. Psychol. 5:1417. 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01417 PubMed DOI PMC

Kesner L. (2016). Against the affectless iconology of modern art. Umění/Art 64, 2–18.

Keysers C., Gazzola V. (2009). Expanding the mirror: vicarious activity for actions, emotions, and sensations. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 19, 666–671. 10.1016/j.conb.2009.10.006 PubMed DOI

Kirk U., Skov M., Hulme O., Christensen M., Zeki S. (2009). Modulation of aesthetic value by semantic context: an fMRI study. Neuroimage 44, 1125–1132. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.10.009 PubMed DOI

Kirsch L. P., Urgesi C., Cross E. S. (2016). Shaping and reshaping the aesthetic brain: Emerging perspectives on the neurobiology of embodied aesthetics. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 62, 56–68. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.12.005 PubMed DOI

Klimecki O. M., Leiberg S., Lamm C., Singer T. (2013). Functional neural plasticity and associated changes in positive affect after compassion training. Cerebral Cortex, 23, 1552–1561. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.12.005 PubMed DOI

Krach S., Cohrs J. C. H., de Echeverria Loebell N. C., Kircher T., Sommer J., Jansen A., et al. . (2011). Your flaws are my pain: linking empathy to vicarious embarrassment, PLoS ONE 6:e18675. 10.1371/journal.pone.0018675 PubMed DOI PMC

Kret M. E., Stekelenburg J. J., Roelofs K., De Gelder B. (2013). Perception of face and body expressions using electromyography, pupillometry and gaze measures. Front. Psychol. 4:28. 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00028 PubMed DOI PMC

Krois J. (2011). Enactivism and embodiment in picture acts. the chirality of images, in John, M. Krois. Bildkörper und Körperschema: Schriften zur Verkörperungstheorie Ikonischer Formen, eds Bredekamp H., Laischke M. (Berlin: Akademie Verlag; ), 272–289.

Krukar J. (2014). Walk, look, remember: the influence of the gallery's spatial layout on human memory for an art exhibition. Behav. Sci. 4, 181–201. 10.3390/bs4030181 PubMed DOI PMC

Kunz M., Lautenbacher S., Leblanc N., Rainville P. (2012). Are both the sensory and the affective dimensions of pain encoded in the face?. Pain 153, 350–358. 10.1016/j.pain.2011.10.027 PubMed DOI

Lai M.-C., Lombardo M. V., Chakrabarti B., Ecker C., Sadek S. A., Wheelwright S. J., et al. . (2012). Individual differences in brain structure underpin empathizing–systemizing cognitive styles in male adults. Neuroimage 61, 1347–1354. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.03.018 PubMed DOI PMC

Lamm C., Majdandžic J. (2015). The role of shared neural activations, mirror neurons, and morality in empathy – A critical comment. Neurosci. Res. 90, 15–24. 10.1016/j.neures.2014.10.008 PubMed DOI

Lamm C., Batson C. D., Decety J. (2007a). The neural substrate of human empathy: effects of perspective-taking and cognitive appraisal. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 19, 42–58. 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.1.42 PubMed DOI

Lamm C., Nusbaum H. C., Meltzoff A. N., Decety J. (2007b). What are you feeling? Using functional magnetic resonance imaging to assess the modulation of sensory and affective responses during empathy for pain. PLoS ONE 2:e1292. 10.1371/journal.pone.0001292 PubMed DOI PMC

Lanzoni S. (2012). Introduction: emotion and the Sciences: varieties of empathy in science, art and history. Sci. Context 25, 287–300. 10.1017/S0269889712000105 DOI

Leder H., Carbon C., Ripsas A. (2006). Entitling art: influence of title information on understanding and appreciation of paintings. Acta Psychol. 121, 176–198. 10.1016/j.actpsy.2005.08.005 PubMed DOI

Leder H., Gerger G., Dressler S. G., Schabmann A. (2012). How art is appreciated. Psychol. Aesthetics Creativity Arts 6, 1–10. 10.1037/a0026396 DOI

Lentes T. (2000). Auf der Suche nach dem Ort des Gedächtnisses, in Imagination und Wirklichkeit. Zum Verhältnis von Mentalen und Realen Bildern in der Frühen Neuzeit, eds Krüger K., NovaNova A. (Mainz: Phillip von Zabern; ), 1–35.

Lidov A. (2006). Hierotopy. The creation of sacred spaces as a form of creativity and subject of cultural history, in Hierotopy. Creation of Sacred Spaces in Byzantium and Medieval Russia, ed Lidov A. (Moscow: Progress-Tradition; ), 32–58.

Lieberman M. (2007). Social cognitive neuroscience: a review of core processes. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 58, 259–289. 10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085654 PubMed DOI

Lieberman M. (2013). Social. Why Our Brains Are Wired to Connect. New York, NY: Broadway Books.

Lindquist K. A., Gendron M. (2013). What's in a word? Language constructs emotion perception. Emotion Rev. 5, 66–71. 10.1177/1754073912451351 DOI

Lipps T. (1903). Einfühlung, innere nachahmung und organempfindung. Arch. Gesamte Psychol. 1, 465–519.

Mar R. A., Oatley K., Djikic M., Mullin J. (2011). Emotion and narrative fiction: interactive influences before, during, and after reading. Cogn. Emotion 25, 818–833. 10.1080/02699931.2010.515151 PubMed DOI

Mar R., Oatley K. (2008). The function of fiction is the abstraction and simulation of social experience. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 3, 173–192. 10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00073.x PubMed DOI

Marchi F., Newen A. (2015). Cognitive penetrability and emotion recognition in human facial expressions. Front. Psychol. 6:828. 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00828 PubMed DOI PMC

Martín-Loeches M., Hernández-Tamames J. A., Martín A., Urrutia M. (2014). Beauty and ugliness in the bodies and faces of others: an fMRI study of person esthetic judgement. Neuroscience 26, 486–497. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.07.040 PubMed DOI

Massaro D., Savazzi F., Di Dio C., Freedberg D., Gallese V., Gilli G., et al. . (2012). When art moves the eyes: a behavioral and eye-tracking study. PLoS ONE 7:e37285. 10.1371/journal.pone.0037285 PubMed DOI PMC

Masten C. L., Morelli S. A., Eisenberger N. I. (2011). An fMRI investigation of empathy for ‘social pain’ and subsequent prosocial behaviour. Neuroimage 55, 381–388. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.11.060 PubMed DOI

Mathur V. A., Harada T., Lipke T., Chiao J. Y. (2010). Neural basis of extraordinary empathy and altruistic motivation. Neuroimage 51, 1468–1475. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.03.025 PubMed DOI

McTeague L. M., Shumen J. R., Wieser M. J., Lang P. J., Keil A. (2011). Social vision: sustained perceptual enhancement of affective facial cues in social anxiety. Neuroimage 54, 1615–1624. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.08.080 PubMed DOI PMC

Meeren H. K., van Heijnsbergen C. C., de Gelder B. (2005). Rapid perceptual integration of facial expression and emotional body language. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102, 16518–16523. 10.1073/pnas.0507650102 PubMed DOI PMC

Melloni M., Lopez V., Ibanez A. (2014). Empathy and contextual social cognition. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 14, 407–442. 10.3758/s13415-013-0205-3 PubMed DOI

Meyer M. L., Masten C. L., Ma Y., Wang C., Shi Z., Eisenberger N. I., et al. . (2013). Empathy for the social suffering of friends and strangers recruits distinct patterns of brain activation. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 8, 446–454. 10.1093/scan/nss019 PubMed DOI PMC

Meyer M. L., Masten C. L., Ma Y., Wang C., Shi Z., Eisenberger N. I., et al. (2015). Differential neural activation to friends and strangers links interdependence to empathy. Culture Brain 3, 21–38. 10.1007/s40167-014-0023-7 DOI

Mikulan E. P., Reynaldo L., Ibánez A. (2014). Homuncular mirrors: misunderstanding causality in embodied cognition. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 8:299. 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00299 PubMed DOI PMC

Millis K. (2001). Making meaning brings pleasure: the influence of titles on aesthetic experiences. Emotion 1, 320–329. 10.1037/1528-3542.1.3.320 PubMed DOI

Minissale G. (2013). The Psychology of Contemporary Art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mitchell R., Phillips L. (2015). The overlapping relationship between emotion perception and theory of mind. Neuropsychologia 70, 1–10. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.02.018 PubMed DOI

Mocaiber I., Perakakis P., Pereira M. G., Pinheiro W. M., Volchan E., de Oliveira L., et al. . (2011). Stimulus appraisal modulates cardiac reactivity to briefly presented mutilation pictures. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 81, 299–304. 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.07.014 PubMed DOI

Mocaiber I., Pereira M. G., Erthal F. S., Machado-Pinheiro W., David I. A., Cagy M. (2010). Fact or fiction? An event-related potential study of implicit emotion regulation. Neurosci. Lett. 476, 84–88. 10.1016/j.neulet.2010.04.008 PubMed DOI

Moors A., De Houwer J. (2006). Automaticity: a theoretical and conceptual analysis. Psycholl. Bull. 132, 297–326. 10.1037/0033-2909.132.2.297 PubMed DOI

Niu Y., Todd R. M., Anderson A. K. (2012). Affective salience can reverse the effects of stimulus-driven salience on eye movements in complex scenes. Front. Psychol. 3:336. 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00336 PubMed DOI PMC

Noguchi Y., Murota M. (2013). Temporal dynamics of neural activity in an integration of visual and contextual information in an esthetic preference task. Neuropsychologia 51, 1077–1084. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia PubMed DOI

Oatley K. (1999). Why fiction may be twice as true as fact: fiction as cognitive and emotional simulation. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 3, 101–117. 10.1037/1089-2680.3.2.101 DOI

Ochsner K. (2008). The social-emotional processing stream: five core constructs and their translational potential for schizophrenia and beyond. Biol. Psychiatry 64, 48–61. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2008.04.024 PubMed DOI PMC

Ochsner K. N., Ray R. D., Cooper J. C., Robertson E. R., Chopra S., Gabrieli J. D., et al. . (2004). For better or for worse: neural systems supporting the cognitive down-and up-regulation of negative emotion. Neuroimage 23, 483–499. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.06.030 PubMed DOI

Ogino Y., Nemoto H., Inui K., Saito S., Kakigi R., Goto F. (2007). Inner experience of pain: imagination of pain while viewing images showing painful events forms subjective pain representation in human brain. Cereb. Cortex 17, 1139–1146. 10.1093/cercor/bhl023 PubMed DOI

Oosterwijk S., Lindquist K. A., Adebayo M., Barrett L. F. (2016). The neural representation of typical and atypical experiences of negative images: comparing fear, disgust and morbid fascination. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 11, 11–22. 10.1093/scan/nsv088 PubMed DOI PMC

Palmer S., Schloss K., Sammartino J. (2013). Visual Aesthetics and Human Preference Ann. Rev. Psychol. 64, 77–107. 10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100504 PubMed DOI

Pang C., Nadal M., Müller-Paul J., Rosenberg R., Klein C. (2013). Electrophysiological correlates of looking at paintings and its association with art expertise. Biol. Psychol. 93, 246–254. 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2012.10.013 PubMed DOI

Papoulias C., Callard F. (2010). Biology's gift: interrogating the turn to affect. Body Soc. 16, 29–56. 10.1177/1357034X09355231 DOI

Pelowski M. (2015) Tears transformation: feeling like crying as an indicator of insightful or “aesthetic” experience with art. Front. Psychol. 6:1006 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01006. PubMed DOI PMC

Pelowski M., Akiba F. (2011). A model of art perception, evaluation and emotion in transformative aesthetic experience. New Ideas Psychol. 29, 80–97. 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2010.04.001 DOI

Perlove S., Silver L. (2009). Rembrandt's Faith: Church and Temple in the Dutch Golden Age. University Park, PA: The Penn State Press.

Pihko E., Virtanen A., Saarinen V., Pannasch S., Hirvenkari L., Tossavainen T., et al. . (2011) Experiencing art: the influence of expertise painting abstraction level. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 5:94. 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00094 PubMed DOI PMC

Preston S. D., de Waal F. (2002). Empathy: its ultimate and proximate bases. Behav. Brain Sci. 25, 1–20. discussion: 20–71. PubMed

Price D. D. (2000). Psychological and neural mechanisms of the affective dimension of pain. Science 288, 1769–1772. 10.1126/science.288.5472.1769 PubMed DOI

Rameson L. T., Morelli S. A., Lieberman M. D. (2012). The neural correlates of empathy: experience, automaticity, and prosocial behavior. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 24, 235–245. 10.1162/jocn_a_00130 PubMed DOI

Redies C. (2015). Combining universal beauty and cultural context in a unifying model of visual aesthetic experience. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 9:218. 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00218 PubMed DOI PMC

Riegl A. (1902). Das holländische Gruppenporträt. Jahrbuch der Allerhöchsten Kaiser Hauses Jahrbuch des allerhöchsten Kaiserhauses 22, 71–278.

Rigato S., Farroni T. (2013). The role of gaze in the processing of emotional facial expressions. Emotion Rev. 5, 36–40. 10.1177/1754073912457225 DOI

Righart R., De Gelder B. (2008). Recognition of facial expressions is influenced by emotional scene gist. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 8, 264–272. 10.3758/CABN.8.3.264 PubMed DOI

Ringbom S. (1984). Icon to Narrative: the Rise of the Dramatic Close-Up in Fifteenth-Century Devotional Painting. Doornspijk: DAVACO Publishers.

Russell J. A. (2003). Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion. Psychol. Rev. 110, 145–172. 10.1037/0033-295X.110.1.145 PubMed DOI

Schlaffke L., Lissek S., Lenz M., Juckel G., Schultz T., Tegenthoff M., et al. (2015). Shared and non-shared neural networks of cognitive and affective theory-of-mind: a neuroimaging study using cartoon picture stories. Hum. Brain Mapp. 36, 29–39. 10.1002/hbm.22610 PubMed DOI PMC

Schott G. D. (2015). Pictures of pain: their contribution to the neuroscience of empathy. Brain 138, 812–820. 10.1093/brain/awu395 PubMed DOI PMC

Sebastian C., Fontaine N., Bird G., Blakemore S., Brito S., McCrory E., et al. . (2012). Neural processing associated with cognitive and affective theory of mind in adolescents and adults. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 7, 53–63. 10.1093/scan/nsr023 PubMed DOI PMC

Shamay-Tsoory S. G., Aharon-Peretz J., Perry D. (2009). Two systems for empathy: a double dissociation between emotional and cognitive empathy in inferior frontal gyrus versus ventromedial prefrontal lesions. Brain 132, 617–627. 10.1093/brain/awn279 PubMed DOI

Sidlauskas S. (2009). Cézanne's Other: The Portraits of Hortense. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Silveira S., Fehse K., Vedder A., Elvers K., Hennig-Fast K. (2015) Is it the picture or is it the frame? An fMRI study on the neurobiology of framing effects. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 9:528. 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00528 PubMed DOI PMC

Singer T., Klimecki O. M. (2014). Empathy and Compassion. Curr. Biol. 24, 875–878. 10.1016/j.cub.2014.06.054 PubMed DOI

Slater M., Antley A., Davison A., Swapp D., Guger C., Barker C., et al. . (2006). A virtual reprise of the Stanley Milgram obedience experiments. PLoS ONE 1:e39. 10.1371/journal.pone.0000039 PubMed DOI PMC

Smith L., Bousquet S., Chang G., Smith J. (2006). Effects of time and information on perception of art. Empirical Studies of the Arts 24, 229–242. 10.2190/DJM0-QBDW-03V7-BLRM DOI

Spaulding S. (2013). Mirror neurons and social cognition. Mind Lang. 28, 233–257. 10.1111/mila.12017 DOI

Spunt R. P., Lieberman M. D. (2012). An integrative model of the neural systems supporting the comprehension of observed emotional behavior. NeuroImage 59, 3050–3059. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.005 PubMed DOI

Stanley D., Adolphs R. (2013). Toward a neural basis for social behavior. Neuron 80, 816–826. 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.10.038 PubMed DOI PMC

Steinberg L. (1988). The Philosophical Brothel. October 44, 7–74. 10.2307/778974 DOI

Štech V. V. (1966). Rembrandt. Praha: Odeon.

Steinberg L. (2001). Leonardo's Incessant Last Supper. New York, NY: Zone Books.

Stevenson J. (2010). Performance, Cognitive Theory, and Devotional Culture: Sensual Piety in Late Medieval York, Cognitive Studies in Literature and Performance Series. New York, NY: Palgrave.

Stoichita V. (2008). The Pygmalion Effect: From Ovid to Hitchcock. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Swami V. (2013). Context matters: investigating the impact of contextual information on aesthetic appreciation of paintings by Max Ernst and Pablo Picasso. Psychol. Aesthet. Creat. Arts 7, 285–295. 10.1037/a0030965 DOI

Tamir D. I., Bricker A. B., Dodell-Feder D., Mitchell J. P. (2016). Reading fiction and reading minds: the role of simulation in the default network. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 11, 215–224. 10.1093/scan/nsv114 PubMed DOI PMC

Vemuri K., Surampudi B. (2015). Evidence of stimulus correlated empathy modes – Group ICA of fMRI data. Brain Cogn. 94, 32–43. 10.1016/j.bandc.2014.12.006 PubMed DOI

Vischer R. (1873). On the optical sense of form: a contribution to aesthetics, in Empathy, Form, and Space, eds Mallgrave H. F., Ikonomou E. (Santa Monica, CA: The Getty Center for the History of Art and the Humanities; ), 89–123.

Walter H. (2012). Social cognitive neuroscience of empathy: concepts, circuits, and genes. Emotion Rev. 4, 9–17. 10.1177/1754073911421379 DOI

Walton K. L. (1990). Mimesis as Make-Believe. On the Foundations of the Representational Arts Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Wangelin B. C., Bradley M. M., Kastner A., Lang P. J. (2012). Affective engagement for facial expressions and emotional scenes: the influence of social anxiety. Biol. Psychol. 91, 103–110. 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2012.05.002 PubMed DOI PMC

Watt D. F. (2005). Social bonds and the nature of empathy. J. Conscious. Stud. 12, 185–209.

Wieser M. J., Brosch T. (2012). Faces in context: a review and systematization of contextual influences on affective face processing. Front. Psychol. 3:471. 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00471 PubMed DOI PMC

Wu L., Winkler M. H., Andreatta M., Hajcak G., Pauli P. (2012). Appraisal frames of pleasant and unpleasant pictures alter emotional responses as reflected in self-report and facial electromyographic activity. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 85, 224–229. 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2012.04.010 PubMed DOI

Zaki J. (2013). Cue integration: a common framework for social cognition and physical perception. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 8, 296–312. 10.1177/1745691613475454 PubMed DOI

Zaki J., Ochsner K. N. (2012). The neuroscience of empathy: progress, pitfalls and promise. Nat. Neurosci. 15, 675–680. 10.1038/nn.3085 PubMed DOI

Zanon M., Novembre G., Zangrando N., Chittaro L., Silani G. (2014). Brain activity and prosocial behaviour in a simulated life-threatening situation. Neuroimage 98, 134–146. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.04.053 PubMed DOI

Zillmann D. (1991). Empathy: affect from bearing witness to the emotions of others, in Responding to the Screen: Reception and Reaction Processes, eds Bryant J., Zillmann D. (Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates; ), 135–167.

Zillmann D. (1994). Mechanisms of emotional involvement with drama, Poetics 23, 33–51.

How Neuroimaging Can Aid the Interpretation of Art