A Successful Strategy for Linking Anonymous Data from Students' and Parents' Questionnaires Using Self-Generated Identification Codes
Language English Country United States Media print
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
PubMed
28337692
DOI
10.1007/s11121-017-0772-6
PII: 10.1007/s11121-017-0772-6
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- Anonymity, Children, Codes, Linking, Parents, Prevention, Students,
- MeSH
- Child MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Surveys and Questionnaires MeSH
- Parents psychology MeSH
- Students psychology MeSH
- Check Tag
- Child MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
We conducted a feasibility study for matching children (N = 2571, average age 12 years, 50.4% female) and their parents (N = 1931, average age 41 years, 83.3% female) represented by an anonymous self-generated identification code (SGIC) and assessed its methodological properties. We used a nine-character SGIC with the children and a mirrored version of the same code with the parents. The average overall error rate in generating the SGIC was 9.7% (4.0% in the parents and 13.9% in the children). We were able to link a total of 1765 parents' and children's codes uniquely (94.9% of all possible dyads) with any four-character combination and the employment of the "school" variable. The overall matching quality of linking using the SGIC only is characterized by precision (positive predictive value) of 0.979, recall (sensitivity, true positive rate) of 0.934, and an F-measure (harmonic mean of precision and recall) of 0.956. The analysis of the discrepant characters in the dyads identified the paternal grandmother's name and eye color as those varying most often. This study is the first to look at SGIC match rates and error and omission rates in linking different subjects into dyads in prevention research. We identified a high number of unique child-parent matches while guaranteeing anonymity to the participants. We provided evidence that our SGIC is a suitable tool for between-group linking procedures and has a highly successful matching rate, while maintaining anonymity in the school-based prevention study samples.
See more in PubMed
Science. 1973 Sep 14;181(4104):1067-70 PubMed
Addict Behav. 1989;14(2):159-71 PubMed
Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2008 Nov;82(11):822-9 PubMed
Am J Public Health. 2004 Oct;94(10):1743-9 PubMed
Prev Med. 2007 Feb;44(2):174-7 PubMed
J Drug Educ. 2013;43(2):155-72 PubMed
Eval Rev. 2010 Oct;34(5):391-418 PubMed
Ann Epidemiol. 2010 Dec;20(12):931-8 PubMed
Prev Sci. 2014 Apr;15(2):205-212 PubMed
Exploring Health Literacy in Individuals with Alcohol Addiction: A Mixed Methods Clinical Study