Animal home ranges typically characterized by their size, shape and a given time interval can be affected by many different biotic and abiotic factors. However, despite the fact that many studies have addressed home ranges, our knowledge of the factors influencing the size of area occupied by different animals is, in many cases, still quite poor, especially among raptors. Using radio-telemetry (VHF; 2.1 g tail-mounted tags) we studied movements of 20 Tengmalm's owl (Aegolius funereus) males during the breeding season in a mountain area of Central Europe (the Czech Republic, the Ore Mountains: 50° 40' N, 13° 35' E) between years 2006-2010, determined their average hunting home range size and explored what factors affected the size of home range utilised. The mean breeding home range size calculated according to 95% fixed kernel density estimator was 190.7 ± 65.7 ha (± SD) with a median value of 187.1 ha. Home range size was affected by prey abundance, presence or absence of polygyny, the number of fledglings, and weather conditions. Home range size increased with decreasing prey abundance. Polygynously mated males had overall larger home range than those mated monogamously, and individuals with more fledged young possessed larger home range compared to those with fewer raised fledglings. Finally, we found that home ranges recorded during harsh weather (nights with strong wind speed and/or heavy rain) were smaller in size than those registered during better weather. Overall, the results provide novel insights into what factors may influence home range size and emphasize the prey abundance as a key factor for breeding dynamics in Tengmalm's owl.

Department of Animal Science and Ethology Faculty of Agrobiology Food and Natural Resources Czech University of Life Sciences Prague Prague Czech Republic

Department of Applied Geoinformatics and Spatial Planning Faculty of Environmental Sciences Czech University of Life Sciences Prague Prague Czech Republic

Department of Ecology Faculty of Environmental Sciences Czech University of Life Sciences Prague Prague Czech Republic

Department of Ethology Institute of Animal Science Prague Czech Republic

Nature Conservation Agency of the Czech Republic Prague Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Darwin C (1861) On the origin of species by means of natural selection. London: Murray.

Powell RA (2000) Animal home ranges and territories and home range estimators In: Boitani L, Fuller T, eds. Research techniques in animal ecology: controversies and consequences. New York, USA: Columbia University Press, New York; 65–110.

Burt WH (1943) Territoriality and home range concepts as applied to mammals. J Mammal 24: 346–352.

White GC, Garrott RA (1990) Analysis of wildlife radio-tracking data. San Diego: Academic Press.

Seaman DE, Powell RA (1996) An evaluation of the accuracy of kernel density estimators for home range analysis. Ecology 77: 2075–2085.

Hansteen TL, Andreassen HP, Ims RA (1997) Effects of spatiotemporal scale on autocorrelation and home range estimators. J Wildl Manage 61: 280–290.

Kenward RE (2001) A manual for wildlife radio tagging. London: Academic Press.

Harris S, Cresswell WJ, Forde PG, Trewhella WJ, Woollard T, Wray S (1990) Home-range analysis using radio-tracking data: A review of problems and techniques particularly as applied to the study of mammals. Mammal Rev 20: 97–123.

Laver PN, Kelly MJ (2008) A critical review of home range studies. J Wildl Manage 72: 290–298.

McLoughlin PD, Ferguson SH (2000) A hierarchical pattern of limiting factors helps explain variation in home range size. Ecoscience 7: 123–130.

Mace GM, Harvey PH (1983) Energetic constraints on home-range size. Am Nat 121: 120–132.

Adams ES (2001) Approaches to the study of territory size and shape. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 32: 277–303.

Allen TFH, Starr TB (1982) Hierarchy: perspectives for ecological complexity. Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press.

McNab BK (1963) Bioenergetics and determination of home range size. Am Nat 97: 133–140.

Schoener TW (1968) Sizes of feeding territories among birds. Ecology 49: 123–141.

Turner FB, Jennrich RI, Weintraub JD (1969) Home ranges and body size of lizards. Ecology 50: 1076–1081.

Mace GM, Harvey PH, Clutton-Brock TH (1984) Vertebrate home range size and energetic requirements In: Swingland IR, Greenwood PJ, eds. The ecology of animal movement. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 32–53.

Hixon MA (1980) Food-production and competitor density as the determinants of feeding territory size. Am Nat 115: 510–530.

Taitt MJ, Krebs CJ (1982) Manipulation of female behavior in field populations of Microtus townsendii. J Anim Ecol 51: 681–690.

Tufto J, Andersen R, Linnell JDC (1996) Habitat use and ecological correlates of home range size in a small cervid: The Roe Deer. J Anim Ecol 65: 715–724.

Powell RA, Zimmerman JW, Seaman DE (1997) Ecology and behaviour of North American Black Bears. New York: Chapman and Hall.

Macdonald DW (1983) The ecology of carnivore social behaviour. Nature 301: 379–384.

Kruuk H, Parish T (1982) Factors affecting population density, group size and territory size of the European badger, Meles meles. J Zool 196: 31–39.

Ross S, Munkhtsog B, Harris S (2012) Determinants of mesocarnivore range use: relative effects of prey and habitat properties on Pallas's cat home range size. J Mammal 93: 1292–1300.

Dahle B, Støen OG, Swenson JE (2006) Factors influencing home range size in subadult brown bears. J Mammal 87: 859–865.

Anderson DP, Forester JD, Turner MG, Frair JL, Merrill EH, Fortin D, et al. (2005) Factors influencing female home range sizes in elk (Cervus elaphus) in North American landscapes. Landsc Ecol 20: 257–271.

Jerina K (2012) Roads and supplemental feeding affect home range size of Slovenian red deer more than natural factors. J Mammal 93: 1139–1148.

Scillitani L, Sturaro E, Monaco A, Rossi L, Ramanzin M (2012) Factors affecting home range size of male Alpine ibex (Capra ibex ibex) in the Marmolada massif. Hystrix 23: 19–27.

Hubbs AH, Boonstra R (1998) Effects of food and predators on the home range sizes of Arctic ground squirrels (Spermophilus parryii). Can J Zool 76: 592–596.

Breininger DR, Bolt MR, Legare ML, Drese JH, Stolen ED (2011) Factors influencing home range sizes of eastern indigo snakes in Central Florida. J Herpetol 45: 484–490.

Belthoff JR, Sparks EJ, Ritchison G (1993) Home ranges of adult and juvenile Eastern Screech-Owls: size, seasonal variation and extent of overlap. J Raptor Res 27: 8–15.

Grzywaczewski G (2009) Home range size and habitat use of the Little Owl Athene noctua in East Poland. Ardea 97: 541–545.

Schilling JW, Dugger KM, Anthony RG (2013) Survival and home-range size of Northern Spotted Owls in southwestern Oregon. J Raptor Res 47: 1–14.

Santangeli A, Hakkarainen H, Laaksonen T, Korpimäki E (2012) Home range size is determined by habitat composition but feeding rate by food availability in male Tengmalm's Owls. Anim Behav 83: 1115–1123.

Zabel CJ, McKelvey K, Ward JP (1995) Influence of primary prey on home-range size and habitat-use patterns of Northern Spotted Owls (Strix occidentalis caurina). Can J Zool-Rev Can Zool 73: 433–439.

Pfeiffer T, Meyburg BU (2015) GPS tracking of Red Kites (Milvus milvus) reveals fledgling number is negatively correlated with home range size. J Ornithol 156: 963–975.

Forsman ED, Kaminski TJ, Lewis JC, Maurice KJ, Sovern SG, Ferland C, et al. (2005) Home range and habitat use of Northern Spotted Owls on the Olympic Peninsula, Washington. J Raptor Res 39: 365–377.

Sokolov V, Lecomte N, Sokolov A, Rahman ML, Dixon A (2014) Site fidelity and home range variation during the breeding season of Peregrine Falcons (Falco peregrinus) in Yamal, Russia. Polar Biol 37: 1621–1631.

Redpath SM (1995) Habitat fragmentation and the individual—Tawny Owls Strix aluco in woodland patches. J Anim Ecol 64: 652–661.

Hinam HL, Clair CCS (2008) High levels of habitat loss and fragmentation limit reproductive success by reducing home range size and provisioning rates of Northern Saw-Whet Owls. Biol Conserv 141: 524–535.

Cramp S (1985) The birds of the western Palaearctic, Vol. IV Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Korpimäki E (1981) On the ecology and biology of Tengmalm's Owl (Aegolius funereus) in southern Ostrobothnia and Soumenselkä, western Finland: Acta Univ Oul A 118 Biol 13: 1–84.

Korpimäki E, Hakkarainen H (2012) The Boreal Owl: ecology, behaviour and conservation of a forest-dwelling predator. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

König C, Weick F (2008) Owls of the world. Second edition New Haven and London: Yale University Press.

Kouba M, Bartoš L, Korpimäki E, Zárybnická M (2015) Factors affecting the duration of nestling period and fledging order in Tengmalm's Owl (Aegolius funereus): Effect of wing length and hatching sequence. PLoS One 10(3): e0121641 10.1371/journal.pone.0121641 PubMed DOI PMC

Eldegard K, Sonerud GA (2009) Female offspring desertion and male-only care increase with natural and experimental increase in food abundance. Proc R Soc B-Biol Sci 276: 1713–1721. PubMed PMC

Eldegard K, Sonerud GA (2010) Experimental increase in food supply influences the outcome of within-family conflicts in Tengmalm's Owl. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 64: 815–826.

Eldegard K, Sonerud GA (2012) Sex roles during post-fledging care in birds: female Tengmalm's Owls contribute little to food provisioning. J Ornithol 153: 385–398.

Kouba M, Bartoš L, Šťastný K (2013) Differential movement patterns of juvenile Tengmalm's Owls (Aegolius funereus) during the post-fledging dependence period in two years with contrasting prey abundance. PLoS One 8(7): e67034 10.1371/journal.pone.0067034 PubMed DOI PMC

Zárybnická M (2009) Parental investment of female Tengmalm's Owls Aegolius funereus: correlation with varying food abundance and reproductive success. Acta Ornithol 44: 81–88.

Norberg RA (1970) Hunting technique of Tengmalm’s Owl Aegolius funereus. Ornis Scand 1: 51–64.

Bye FN, Jacobsen BV, Sonerud GA (1992) Auditory prey location in a pause-travel predator—search height, search time, and attack range of Tengmalm's Owls (Aegolius funereus). Behav Ecol 3: 266–276.

Andersson M (1981) On optimal predator search. Theor Popul Biol 19: 58–86.

Mohr CO (1947) Table of equivalent populations of north american small mammals. Am Midl Nat 37: 223–249.

Sonerud GA, Solheim R, Jacobsen BV (1986) Home-range use and habitat selection during hunting in a male Tengmalm's Owl Aegolius funereus. Fauna norv Ser C, Cinclus 9: 100–106.

Jacobsen BV, Sonerud GA (1987) Home range of Tengmalm´s Owl: A comparison between nocturnal hunting and diurnal roosting. USDA For Serv Gen Tech Rep RM 142: 189–192.

Sorbi S (2003) Size and use of Tengmalm's Owl Aegolius funereus home range in the high Belgian Ardennes: Results from radio-tracking (In French with English summary). Alauda 71: 215–220.

Silverman BW (1986) Density estimation for statistics and data analysis. London: Chapman and Hall.

Hakkarainen H, Mykra S, Kurki S, Korpimäki E, Nikula A, Koivunen V (2003) Habitat composition as a determinant of reproductive success of Tengmalm's Owls under fluctuating food conditions. Oikos 100: 162–171.

Klaus S, Mikkola H, Wiesner J (1975) Aktivität und Ernährung des Rauhfusskauzes Aegolius funeres (L.) während der Fortpflanzungsperiode. Zool Jb Syst Bd 102: 485–507.

Zárybnická M, Riegert J, Sťastný K (2015) Non-native spruce plantations represent a suitable habitat for Tengmalm's Owl (Aegolius funereus) in the Czech Republic, Central Europe. J Ornithol 156: 457–468.

Hörnfeldt B, Carlsson BG, Nordstrom A (1988) Molt of primaries and age-determination in Tengmalm's Owl (Aegolius funereus). Auk 105: 783–789.

Withey JC, Bloxton TD, Marzluff JM (2001) Effects of tagging and location error in wildlife radiotelemetry studies In: Millspaugh JJ, Marzluff JM, eds. Radio tracking and animal populations. San Diego: Academic Press; 43–70.

Hayne DW (1949) Calculation of size of home range. J Mammal 30: 1–18.

Worton BJ (1989) Kernel methods for estimating the utilization distribution in home-range studies. Ecology 70: 164–168.

Seaman DE, Millspaugh JJ, Kernohan BJ, Brundige GC, Raedeke KJ, Gitzen RA (1999) Effects of sample size on kernel home range estimates. J Wildl Manage 63: 739–747.

Börger L, Franconi N, De Michele G, Gantz A, Meschi F, Manica A, et al. (2006) Effects of sampling regime on the mean and variance of home range size estimates. J Anim Ecol 75: 1393–1405. 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2006.01164.x PubMed DOI

Rodgers AR, Carr AP, Beyer HL, Smith L, Kie JG (2007) HRT: Home Range Tools for ArcGIS. Version 1.1 Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada: Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Centre for Northern Forest Ecosystem Research.

Rodgers AR, Kie JG (2011) HRT: Home Range tools for ArcGIS, A User’s Manual. Ontario: Centre for Northern Forest Ecosystem Research.

De Solla SR, Bonduriansky R, Brooks RJ (1999) Eliminating autocorrelation reduces biological relevance of home range estimates. J Anim Ecol 68: 221–234.

Cushman SA, Chase M, Griffin C (2005) Elephants in space and time. Oikos 109: 331–341.

Hurlbert SH (1984) Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments. Ecol Monogr 54: 187–211.

Belsley DA, Kuh E, Welsch RE (1980) Regression diagnostics: Identifying influential data and sources of collinearity. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Tao J, Littel R, Patetta M, Truxillo C, Wolfinger R (2002) Mixed model analyses using the SAS system course notes. Carry, NC, USA: SAS Institute Inc.

Newton I (1986) The Sparrowhawk. Calton: Poyser.

Leary AW, Mazaika R, Bechard MJ (1998) Factors affecting the size of Ferruginous Hawk home ranges. Wilson Bull 110: 198–205.

Ferguson-Lees J, Christie DA (2001) Raptors of the world. London: Christopher Helm.

Zárybnická M, Korpimäki E, Griesser M (2012) Dark or short nights: differential latitudinal constraints in nestling provisioning patterns of a nocturnally hunting bird species. PLoS One 7(5): e36932 10.1371/journal.pone.0036932 PubMed DOI PMC

Kouba M, Bartoš L, Šťastný K (2014) Factors affecting vocalization in Tengmalm's Owl (Aegolius funereus) fledglings during post-fledging dependence period: scramble competition or honest signalling of need? PLoS One 9(4): e95594 10.1371/journal.pone.0095594 PubMed DOI PMC

Rivers JW, Johnson JM, Haig SM, Schwarz CJ, Burnett LJ, Brandt J, et al. (2014) An analysis of monthly home range size in the critically endangered California Condor Gymnogyps californianus. Bird Conserv Int 24: 492–504.

Wiktander U, Olsson O, Nilsson SG (2001) Seasonal variation in home-range size, and habitat area requirement of the Lesser Spotted Woodpecker (Dendrocopos minor) in southern Sweden. Biol Conserv 100: 387–395.

Fledgling Sex Ratio Is Determined by Egg Loss, Hatching Order, Nestling Mortality, and Inter-Annual Food Fluctuations for Boreal Owls, Aegolius funereus

Forest structure determines nest box use by Central European boreal owls