In diurnal bird species, individuals breeding at high latitudes have larger broods than at lower latitudes, which has been linked to differences in the daily time available for foraging. However, it remains unclear how latitude is linked with parental investment in nocturnal species. Here, we investigate nestling provisioning rates of male Tengmalm's owls in two populations at different latitudes (Czech Republic 50 °N; Finland 63 °N) with the help of cameras integrated into nest boxes. Clutch sizes were smaller in the Czech population (CZ: 5.1 ± 0.1; FIN: 6.6 ± 0.1), but given the higher nestling mortality in the Finnish population, the number of fledglings did not differ between the two populations (CZ: 3.5 ± 0.3; FIN: 3.9 ± 0.2). Nestling provisioning patterns varied within days, over the reproductive season and between the two sites. Males delivered most food at dusk and dawn, having peak delivery rates at sun angles of -11° to -15° at both sites, and males increased the prey delivery rates with higher nestling requirements. Given the longer nights during summer in the Czech Republic compared to Finland, Czech males only showed a small shift in their delivery peak during the night from -17° in April to -14° in July. In contrast, Finnish males shifted their peak of prey delivery from -11° in April to -1° in July. Consequently, Czech males had a longer hunting time per night around midsummer when feeding young (360 min) than Finnish males (270 min). This suggests that nocturnal owl species in northern populations are constrained by the short nights during the breeding season, which can limit the number of young they can raise. Moreover, owls in northern populations are additionally constrained through the unpredictable changes in food availability between years, and both these factors are likely to influence the reproductive investment between populations.

Department of Ecology Faculty of Environmental Sciences Czech University of Life Sciences Prague Prague Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Martin TE. Food as a limit on breeding birds – a life-history perspective. Ann Rev Ecol Syst. 1987;18:453–487.

Clutton-Brock T. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1991. The evolution of parental care.

Richner H. The Effect of Extra Food on Fitness in Breeding Carrion Crows. Ecology. 1992;73:330–335.

Metcalfe NB, Monaghan P. Compensation for a bad start: grow now, pay later? TREE. 2001;16:254–260. PubMed

Martin TE. Avian life-history evolution has an eminent past: Does it have a bright future? Auk. 2004;121:289–301.

Martin TE, Bassar RD, Bassar SK, Fontaine JJ, Lloyd P, et al. Life-history and ecological correlates of geographic variation in egg and clutch mass among passerine species. Evolution. 2006;60:390–398. PubMed

Russell EM, Yom-Tov Y, Geffen E. Extended parental care and delayed dispersal: northern, tropical, and southern passerines compared. Behav Ecol. 2004;15:831–838.

Sanz JJ. Geographic variation in breeding parameters of the pied flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca. Ibis. 1997;139:107–114.

Ashmole NP. The regulation of numbers of tropical oceanic birds. Ibis. 1963;103b:458–473.

Evans KL, Duncan RP, Blackburn TM, Crick HQP. Investigating geographic variation in clutch size using a natural experiment. Func Ecol. 2005;19:616–624.

Sanz JJ, Tinbergen JM, Moreno J, Orell M, Verhulst S. Latitudinal variation in parental energy expenditure during brood rearing in the great tit. Oecologia. 2000;122:149–154. PubMed

Korpimäki E. On the ecology and biology of Tengmalm's Owl (Aegolius funereus) in Southern Ostrobothnia and Suomenselkä, western Finland. Acta Universitatis Ouluensis. 1981;13:1–84.

Mikkola H. Calton: Poyser; 1983. The owls of Europe.

Zárybnická M, Sedláček O, Korpimäki E. Do Tengmalm's Owls alter parental feeding effort under varying conditions of main prey availability? J Ornithology. 2009;150:231–237.

Korpimäki E. Mating system and mate choice of tengmalm owls Aegolius funerus. Ibis. 1989;131:41–50.

Zárybnická M. Parental investment of female Tengmalm's Owls Aegolius funereus: correlation with varying food abundance and reproductive success. Acta Ornithologica. 2009;44:81–88.

Korpimäki E, Hakkarainen H. Fluctuating food-supply affects the clutch size of Tengmalm's Owl independent of laying date. Oecologia. 1991;85:543–552. PubMed

Hakkarainen H, Korpimäki E. Enviromental, parental and adaptive variation in egg size of Tengmalms owls under fluctuating food conditions. Oecologia. 1994;98:362–368. PubMed

Sunde P, Bolstad MS, Desfor KB. Diurnal exposure as a risk sensitive behaviour in tawny owls Strix aluco? J Avian Biol. 2003;34:409–418.

Martin G. London: Poyser; 1990. Birds by night.

Drdáková M. Breeding biology of the Tengmalm's Owl (Aegolius funereus) in air-pollution damaged areas of the Ore Mts. Sylvia. 2003;39:35–51.

Korpimäki E. Fluctuating food abundance determines the lifetime reproductive success of male Tengmalm's Owls. J Anim Ecol. 1992;61:103–111.

Korpimäki E, Hakkarainen H, Laaksonen T, Vasko V. Responses of owls and Eurasian Kestrels to natural and human induced spatio-temporal variation. Scottish Birds. 2008;28:19–27.

Tkadlec E, Bejček V, Flousek J, Šťastný K, Zima J, et al. Bryja J, Řehák Z, Zukal J, editors. Population cycles of Field Vole in Czech Republic. Zoological days; 2011; Brno. 2011.

Bezouška V, Děd P, Drdáková M. 2005; Praha. CZU TF Praha; 2005. The automatic system for monitoring of owls' nests. pp. 173–182.

Korpimäki E. Effects of Age on Breeding Performance of Tengmalm's Owl Aegolius funereus in Western Finland. Ornis Scandinavica. 1988;19:21–26.

Norrdahl K, Korpimäki E. Changes in population structure and reproduction during a 3-year population cycle of voles. (vol 96, pg 331, 2002). Oikos. 2002;97:469–470.

Hudec K, editor. Ptáci – Aves Praha: Academia Praha. 1983.

Koivunen V, Korpimäki E, Hakkarainen H, Norrdahl K. Prey choice of Tengmalm's owls (Aegolius funereus funereus): Preference for substandard individuals? Can J Zool. 1996;74:816–823.

SAS . Cary, NC, USA: SAS Institute Inc; 2006. The GLIMMIX Procedure.

Burnham KP, Anderson DR. Multimodel inference – understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Sociol Meth Res. 2004;33:261–304.

Lack D. The significance of clutch-size. Ibis. 1947;89:302–352.

Martin TE, Martin PR, Olson CR, Heidinger BJ, Fontaine JJ. Parental care and clutch sizes in North and South American birds. Science. 2000;287:1482–1485. PubMed

Pavey CR, Smyth AK. Effects of avian mobbing on roost use and diet of powerful owls, Ninox strenua. Anim Behav. 1998;55:313–318. PubMed

Bye F, Jacobsen B, Sonerud G. Auditory prey location in a pause-travel predator: search height, search time, and attack range of Tengmalm's owls (Aegolius funereus). Behav Ecol. 1992;3:266–276.

Norberg RÅ. Hunting Technique of Tengmalm's Owl Aegolius funereus (L.). Ornis Scandinavica. 1970;1:51–64.

Sergio F, Marchesi L, Pedrini P, Penteriani V. Coexistence of a generalist owl with its intraguild predator: distance-sensitive or habitat-mediated avoidance? Anim Behav. 2007;74:1607–1616.

Franz A, Mebs T, Seibt E. Zur Populationsbiologie des Rauhfusskauzes (Aegolius funereus) im südlichen Westfalen und in angrenzenden Gebiet anhand von Beringungsergebnissen. Vogelwarte. 1984;32:260–269.

Hakkarainen H, Korpimäki E. Competitive and predatory interactions among raptors: an observational and experimental study. Ecology. 1996;77:1134–1142.

Korpimäki E, Huhtala K. Nest visit frequencies and activity patterns of Ural Owls Strix uralensis. Ornis Fennica. 1986;63:42–46.

Penteriani V, Delgado MD, Alonso-Alvarez C, Sergio F. The importance of visual cues for nocturnal species: eagle owls signal by badge brightness. Behav Ecol. 2007;18:143–147.

Šťastný K, Bejček V, Hudec K. Prague: Aventinum; 2006. The atlas of breeding birds in the Czech Republic 2001–2003.

Santangeli A, Hakkarainen H, Laaksonen T, Korpimäki E. Home range size is determined by habitat composition but feeding rate by food availability in male Tengmalm's owls. Anim Behav. 2012;83:1115–1123.

Jacob J, Brown JS. Microhabitat use, giving-up densities and temporal activity as short- and long-term anti-predator behaviors in common voles. Oikos. 2000;91:131–138.

Korpimäki E, Norrdahl K, Huitu O, Klemola T. Predator-induced synchrony in population oscillations of coexisting small mammal species. Proc R Soc B. 2005;272:193–202. PubMed PMC

Pucek Z, Jedrzejewski W, Jedrzejewska B, Pucek M. Rodent population dynamics in a primeval deciduous forest (Białowieza National Park) in relation to weather, seed crop, and predation. Acta Theriologica. 1993;38:199–232.

Valkama J, Korpimäki E, Holm A, Hakkarainen H. Hatching asynchrony and brood reduction in Tengmalm's owl Aegolius funereus: the role of temporal and spatial variation in food abundance. Oecologia. 2002;133:334–341. PubMed

Clark AB, Wilson DS. Avian breeding adaptations – hatching asynchrony, brood reduction, and nest failure. Quart Rev Biol. 1981;56:253–277.

Laaksonen T, Korpimäki E, Hakkarainen H. Interactive effects of parental age and environmental variation on the breeding performance of Tengmalm's owls. J Anim Ecol. 2002;71:23–31.

Ferretti V, Llambias PE, Martin TE. Life-history variation of a neotropical thrush challenges food limitation theory. Proc R Soc B. 2005;272:769–773. PubMed PMC

Eggers S, Griesser M, Nystrand M, Ekman J. Predation risk induces changes in nest-site selection and clutch size in the Siberian jay. Proc R Soc B. 2006;273:701–706. PubMed PMC

Home range size of Tengmalm's owl during breeding in Central Europe is determined by prey abundance

A Webcast of Bird Nesting as a State-of-the-Art Citizen Science

Factors Affecting Growth of Tengmalm's Owl (Aegolius funereus) Nestlings: Prey Abundance, Sex and Hatching Order

Factors affecting the duration of nestling period and fledging order in Tengmalm's owl (Aegolius funereus): effect of wing length and hatching sequence

Perching of Tengmalm's owl (Aegolius funereus) nestlings at the nest box entrance: effect of time of the day, age, wing length and body weight