The behaviour of the nestlings of nocturnal cavity-nesting species has relatively rarely been studied in detail because of problems connected with use of the technical devices required to provide long-term monitoring of individuals. However, long-term observation of nestling behaviour is crucial in order to identify different types of behaviour which may be caused by sibling competition at the end of nesting period. We studied behaviour of 43 Tengmalm's owl (Aegolius funereus) nestlings at 14 nests using a camera and a chip system. The nestlings perched at the nest box entrance from an average age of 28 days from hatching (range 24-34 days) until fledging, spending around 2 hours per day here in total, in periods ranging from a few seconds to 147 min (7.6±10.9 min, mean ± SD). We found that individual duration of perching at the nest box entrance was significantly influenced by nestlings' age and wing length and that the duration of perching at the nest box entrance significantly decreased with time of night. However, during daylight hours, time of day had no effect on either probability or duration of nestlings' perching. We suggest daylight perching at the nest box entrance results from nestlings' preparation for fledging, while individuals perching here during the night may gain an advantageous position for obtaining food from the parents; another possibility at all times of day is that nestlings can reaffirm their social dominance status by monopolizing the nest box entrance.

Czech University of Life Sciences Prague Faculty of Agrobiology Food and Natural Resources Department of Animal Science and Ethology Suchdol Czech Republic; Institute of Animal Science Department of Ethology Uhříněves Czech Republic

Czech University of Life Sciences Prague Faculty of Environmental Sciences Department of Ecology Suchdol Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Mock DW, Parker GA (1997) The evolution of sibling rivalry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Stamps J, Clark A, Arrowood P, Kus B (1985) Parent-offspring conflict in budgerigars. Behaviour 94: 1–40.

Stamps J, Clark A, Arrowood P, Kus B (1989) Begging behavior in budgerigars. Ethology 81: 177–192.

Wright J, Cuthill I (1989) Manipulation of sex-differences in parental care. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 25: 171–181.

Hofstetter SH, Ritchison G (1998) The begging behavior of nestling Eastern Screech-Owls. Wilson Bull 110: 86–92.

Dreiss A, Lahlah N, Roulin A (2010) How siblings adjust sib-sib communication and begging signals to each other. Anim Behav 80: 1049–1055.

Smith HG, Montgomerie R (1991) Nestling american robins compete with siblings by begging. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 29: 307–312.

Teather KL (1992) An experimental-study of competition for food between male and female nestlings of the red-winged blackbird. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 31: 81–87.

Roulin A, Dreiss A, Fioravanti C, Bize P (2009) Vocal sib-sib interactions: how siblings adjust signalling level to each other. Anim Behav 77: 717–725.

Rydén O, Bengtsson H (1980) Differential begging and locomotory behavior by early and late hatched nestlings affecting the distribution of food in asynchronously hatched broods of altricial birds. Zeits Tierpsychol 53: 209–224.

McRae SB, Weatherhead PJ, Montgomerie R (1993) American robin nestlings compete by jockeying for position. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 33: 101–106.

Kacelnik A, Cotton PA, Stirling L, Wright J (1995) Food allocation among nestling starlings – sibling competition and the scope of parental choice. Proc R Soc B-Biol Sci 259: 259–263.

Kilner R (1995) When do canary parents respond to nestling signals of need. Proc R Soc B-Biol Sci 260: 343–348.

Kilner RM (2002) Sex differences in canary (Serinus canaria) provisioning rules. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 52: 400–407.

Ostreiher R (2001) The importance of nestling location for obtaining food in open cup-nests. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 49: 340–347.

Stein MF (1986) Parental care and offspring competition in tree swallows: M.Sc. thesis, University of Michigan, Michigan.

Gottlander K (1987) Parental feeding-behavior and sibling competition in the Pied flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca . Ornis Scand 18: 269–276.

Tanner M, Kolliker M, Richner H (2007) Parental influence on sibling rivalry in great tit, Parus major, nests. Anim Behav 74: 977–983.

Roulin A (2001) On the cost of begging vocalization: implications of vigilance. Behav Ecol 12: 506–511.

Ricklefs RE (1966) Behavior of young Cactus Wrens and Curve-billed Thrashers. Wilson Bull 78: 47–56.

Dreiss AN, Calcagno M, van den Brink V, Laurent A, Almasi B, et al. (2013) The vigilance components of begging and sibling competition. J Avian Biol 44: 359–368.

Klaus S, Mikkola H, Wiesner J (1975) Aktivität und Ernährung des Rauhfusskauzes Aegolius funeres (L.) während der Fortpflanzungsperiode. Zool Jb Syst Bd 102: 485–507.

Korpimäki E (1981) On the ecology and biology of Tengmalm's Owl (Aegolius funereus) in southern Ostrobothnia and Soumenselkä, western Finland: Acta Univ Oul A 118 Biol. 13: 1–84.

Zárybnická M, Korpimäki E, Griesser M (2012) Dark or short nights: differential latitudinal constraints in nestling provisioning patterns of a nocturnally hunting bird species. PLoS One 7(5): e36932 doi:36910.31371/journal.pone.0036932 PubMed PMC

Korpimäki E (1984) Clutch size and breeding success of Tengmalm's Owl Aegolius funereus in natural cavities and nest-boxes. Ornis Fenn: 80–83.

Vacík R (1991) Breeding biology of Tengmalm's owl, Aegolius funereus, in Bohemia and Moravia, (In Czech with English summary). Sylvia 28: 95–113.

Drdáková-Zárybnická M (2003) Breeding biology of the Tengmalm's owl (Aegolius funereus) in air-pollution damaged areas of the Krušné hory Mts. (In Czech with English summary). Sylvia 39: 35–51.

López BC, Potrony D, López A, Badosa E, Bonada A, et al. (2010) Nest-box use by boreal owls (Aegolius funereus) in the Pyrenees Mountains in Spain. J Raptor Res 44: 40–49.

Kloubec B, Vacík R (1990) Náčrt potravní ekologie sýce rousného (Aegolius funereus) v Československu. Tichodroma 3: 103–125.

Pykal J, Kloubec B (1994) Feeding ecology of Tengmalm's owl Aegolius funereus in the Šumava National Park, Czechoslovakia. In: Meyburg B-U, Chancellor RD, eds. Raptor Conservation Today. Berlin, Germany: WWGBP/The Pica Press. 537–541.

Pokorný J (2000) Potrava sýce rousného (Aegolius funereus) v imisemi poškozených oblastech Jizerských hor a Krkonoš. Buteo 11: 107–114.

Zárybnická M, Sedláček O, Korpimäki E (2009) Do Tengmalm's Owls alter parental feeding effort under varying conditions of main prey availability? J Ornithol 150: 231–237.

Eldegard K, Sonerud GA (2010) Experimental increase in food supply influences the outcome of within-family conflicts in Tengmalm's owl. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 64: 815–826.

Eldegard K, Sonerud GA (2012) Sex roles during post-fledging care in birds: female Tengmalm's Owls contribute little to food provisioning. J Ornithol 153: 385–398.

Kouba M, Bartoš L, Šťastný K (2013) Differential movement patterns of juvenile Tengmalm's owls (Aegolius funereus) during the post-fledging dependence period in two years with contrasting prey abundance. PLoS One 8(7): e67034 doi:67010.61371/journal.pone.0067034 PubMed PMC

Zárybnická M (2009) Activity patterns of male Tengmalm's owls, Aegolius funereus under varying food conditions. Folia Zool 58: 104–112.

Zárybnická M (2009) Parental investment of female Tengmalm's Owls Aegolius funereus: correlation with varying food abundance and reproductive success. Acta Ornithol 44: 81–88.

König C, Weick F (2008) Owls of the world. Second edition. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.

Glutz BUN, Bauer KM (1980) Handbuch der Vögel Mitteleuropas, Band 9. Wiesbaden, Germany: Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft.

Kouba M, Šťastný K (2012) Home ranges of Tengmalm's Owl (Aegolius funereus) fledglings during post-fledging dependence period in polluted areas of the Krušné hory Mts., (In Czech with English summary). Sylvia 48: 115–125.

Drdáková-Zárybnická M (2005) Růst mláďat sýce rousného (Aegolius funereus) v Krušných horách. Buteo 14: 37–50.

Kouba M, Bartoš L, Šťastný K (2014) Factors affecting vocalization in Tengmalm's owl (Aegolius funereus) fledglings during post-fledging dependence period: scramble competition or honest signalling of need? PLoS One 9(4): e95594 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0095594 PubMed DOI PMC

Roulin A, Kolliker M, Richner H (2000) Barn owl (Tyto alba) siblings vocally negotiate resources. Proc R Soc B-Biol Sci 267: 459–463. PubMed PMC

Penteriani V, Delgado MM, Maggio C, Aradis A, Sergio F (2005) Development of chicks and predispersal behaviour of young in the Eagle Owl Bubo bubo . Ibis 147: 155–168.

Roulin A, Bersier LF (2007) Nestling barn owls beg more intensely in the presence of their mother than in the presence of their father. Anim Behav 74: 1099–1106.

Pedersen D, Thorup K, Sunde P, Jacobsen LB, Rahbek C (2013) Post-fledging behaviour of juveniles in the Little Owl (Athene noctua). Ornis Fenn 90: 117–128.

Hayward GD, Hayward PH, Garton EO (1993) Ecology of boreal owls in the Northern Rocky Mountains, USA. Wildl Monogr 124: 1–59.

Korpimäki E, Hakkarainen H (1991) Fluctuating food suplly affects the cluch size of Tengmalm's owl independent of laying date. Oecologia 85: 543–552. PubMed

Korpimäki E (1992) Fluctuating food abundance determines the lifetime reproductive success of male Tengmalm's Owls. J Anim Ecol 61: 103–111.

Bezouška V, Děd P, Drdáková M (2005) The automatic system for monitoring of owls' nests. ITCE 2005 Conference Abstracts: 173–182.

Belsley DA, Kuh E, Welsch RE (1980) Regression diagnostics: Identifying influential data and sources of collinearity. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Tao J, Littell R, Patetta M, Truxillo C, Wolfinger R (2002) Mixed model analyses using the SAS system course notes. Cary, NC, USA: SAS Institute Inc.

Čtyroký P (1971/72) Observation of the nocturnal activity of the Little owl (Athene noctua noctua Scop.) at the nest, (In Czech with English summary). Sylvia 19: 83–88.

Zárybnická M (2008) Circadian activity of the Tengmalm's owl (Aegolius funereus) in the Krušné hory Mts.: the effect of different parental roles (In Czech with English summary). Sylvia 44: 51–61.

Wuntke B (2003) The development of daily rhythmicity in Barn Owls (Tyto alba). J Ornithol 144: 81–85.

Dreiss AN, Ruppli CA, Faller C, Roulin A (2013) Big brother is watching you: eavesdropping to resolve family conflicts. Behav Ecol 24: 717–722.

Dreiss AN, Ruppli CA, Roulin A (2014) Individual vocal signatures in barn owl nestlings: does individual recognition have an adaptive role in sibling vocal competition? J Evol Biol 27: 63–75. PubMed

Factors affecting the duration of nestling period and fledging order in Tengmalm's owl (Aegolius funereus): effect of wing length and hatching sequence