The behaviour of the nestlings of nocturnal cavity-nesting species has relatively rarely been studied in detail because of problems connected with use of the technical devices required to provide long-term monitoring of individuals. However, long-term observation of nestling behaviour is crucial in order to identify different types of behaviour which may be caused by sibling competition at the end of nesting period. We studied behaviour of 43 Tengmalm's owl (Aegolius funereus) nestlings at 14 nests using a camera and a chip system. The nestlings perched at the nest box entrance from an average age of 28 days from hatching (range 24-34 days) until fledging, spending around 2 hours per day here in total, in periods ranging from a few seconds to 147 min (7.6±10.9 min, mean ± SD). We found that individual duration of perching at the nest box entrance was significantly influenced by nestlings' age and wing length and that the duration of perching at the nest box entrance significantly decreased with time of night. However, during daylight hours, time of day had no effect on either probability or duration of nestlings' perching. We suggest daylight perching at the nest box entrance results from nestlings' preparation for fledging, while individuals perching here during the night may gain an advantageous position for obtaining food from the parents; another possibility at all times of day is that nestlings can reaffirm their social dominance status by monopolizing the nest box entrance.

Czech University of Life Sciences Prague Faculty of Agrobiology Food and Natural Resources Department of Animal Science and Ethology Suchdol Czech Republic; Institute of Animal Science Department of Ethology Uhříněves Czech Republic

Czech University of Life Sciences Prague Faculty of Environmental Sciences Department of Ecology Suchdol Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Mock DW, Parker GA (1997) The evolution of sibling rivalry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Stamps J, Clark A, Arrowood P, Kus B (1985) Parent-offspring conflict in budgerigars. Behaviour 94: 1–40.

Stamps J, Clark A, Arrowood P, Kus B (1989) Begging behavior in budgerigars. Ethology 81: 177–192.

Wright J, Cuthill I (1989) Manipulation of sex-differences in parental care. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 25: 171–181.

Hofstetter SH, Ritchison G (1998) The begging behavior of nestling Eastern Screech-Owls. Wilson Bull 110: 86–92.

Dreiss A, Lahlah N, Roulin A (2010) How siblings adjust sib-sib communication and begging signals to each other. Anim Behav 80: 1049–1055.

Smith HG, Montgomerie R (1991) Nestling american robins compete with siblings by begging. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 29: 307–312.

Teather KL (1992) An experimental-study of competition for food between male and female nestlings of the red-winged blackbird. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 31: 81–87.

Roulin A, Dreiss A, Fioravanti C, Bize P (2009) Vocal sib-sib interactions: how siblings adjust signalling level to each other. Anim Behav 77: 717–725.

Rydén O, Bengtsson H (1980) Differential begging and locomotory behavior by early and late hatched nestlings affecting the distribution of food in asynchronously hatched broods of altricial birds. Zeits Tierpsychol 53: 209–224.

McRae SB, Weatherhead PJ, Montgomerie R (1993) American robin nestlings compete by jockeying for position. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 33: 101–106.

Kacelnik A, Cotton PA, Stirling L, Wright J (1995) Food allocation among nestling starlings – sibling competition and the scope of parental choice. Proc R Soc B-Biol Sci 259: 259–263.

Kilner R (1995) When do canary parents respond to nestling signals of need. Proc R Soc B-Biol Sci 260: 343–348.

Kilner RM (2002) Sex differences in canary (

Ostreiher R (2001) The importance of nestling location for obtaining food in open cup-nests. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 49: 340–347.

Stein MF (1986) Parental care and offspring competition in tree swallows: M.Sc. thesis, University of Michigan, Michigan.

Gottlander K (1987) Parental feeding-behavior and sibling competition in the Pied flycatcher

Tanner M, Kolliker M, Richner H (2007) Parental influence on sibling rivalry in great tit,

Roulin A (2001) On the cost of begging vocalization: implications of vigilance. Behav Ecol 12: 506–511.

Ricklefs RE (1966) Behavior of young Cactus Wrens and Curve-billed Thrashers. Wilson Bull 78: 47–56.

Dreiss AN, Calcagno M, van den Brink V, Laurent A, Almasi B, et al. (2013) The vigilance components of begging and sibling competition. J Avian Biol 44: 359–368.

Klaus S, Mikkola H, Wiesner J (1975) Aktivität und Ernährung des Rauhfusskauzes

Korpimäki E (1981) On the ecology and biology of Tengmalm's Owl (

Zárybnická M, Korpimäki E, Griesser M (2012) Dark or short nights: differential latitudinal constraints in nestling provisioning patterns of a nocturnally hunting bird species. PLoS One 7(5): e36932 doi:36910.31371/journal.pone.0036932 PubMed PMC

Korpimäki E (1984) Clutch size and breeding success of Tengmalm's Owl

Vacík R (1991) Breeding biology of Tengmalm's owl,

Drdáková-Zárybnická M (2003) Breeding biology of the Tengmalm's owl (

López BC, Potrony D, López A, Badosa E, Bonada A, et al. (2010) Nest-box use by boreal owls (

Kloubec B, Vacík R (1990) Náčrt potravní ekologie sýce rousného (

Pykal J, Kloubec B (1994) Feeding ecology of Tengmalm's owl

Pokorný J (2000) Potrava sýce rousného (

Zárybnická M, Sedláček O, Korpimäki E (2009) Do Tengmalm's Owls alter parental feeding effort under varying conditions of main prey availability? J Ornithol 150: 231–237.

Eldegard K, Sonerud GA (2010) Experimental increase in food supply influences the outcome of within-family conflicts in Tengmalm's owl. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 64: 815–826.

Eldegard K, Sonerud GA (2012) Sex roles during post-fledging care in birds: female Tengmalm's Owls contribute little to food provisioning. J Ornithol 153: 385–398.

Kouba M, Bartoš L, Šťastný K (2013) Differential movement patterns of juvenile Tengmalm's owls ( PubMed PMC

Zárybnická M (2009) Activity patterns of male Tengmalm's owls,

Zárybnická M (2009) Parental investment of female Tengmalm's Owls

König C, Weick F (2008) Owls of the world. Second edition. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.

Glutz BUN, Bauer KM (1980) Handbuch der Vögel Mitteleuropas, Band 9. Wiesbaden, Germany: Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft.

Kouba M, Šťastný K (2012) Home ranges of Tengmalm's Owl (

Drdáková-Zárybnická M (2005) Růst mláďat sýce rousného (

Kouba M, Bartoš L, Šťastný K (2014) Factors affecting vocalization in Tengmalm's owl ( PubMed DOI PMC

Roulin A, Kolliker M, Richner H (2000) Barn owl ( PubMed PMC

Penteriani V, Delgado MM, Maggio C, Aradis A, Sergio F (2005) Development of chicks and predispersal behaviour of young in the Eagle Owl

Roulin A, Bersier LF (2007) Nestling barn owls beg more intensely in the presence of their mother than in the presence of their father. Anim Behav 74: 1099–1106.

Pedersen D, Thorup K, Sunde P, Jacobsen LB, Rahbek C (2013) Post-fledging behaviour of juveniles in the Little Owl (

Hayward GD, Hayward PH, Garton EO (1993) Ecology of boreal owls in the Northern Rocky Mountains, USA. Wildl Monogr 124: 1–59.

Korpimäki E, Hakkarainen H (1991) Fluctuating food suplly affects the cluch size of Tengmalm's owl independent of laying date. Oecologia 85: 543–552. PubMed

Korpimäki E (1992) Fluctuating food abundance determines the lifetime reproductive success of male Tengmalm's Owls. J Anim Ecol 61: 103–111.

Bezouška V, Děd P, Drdáková M (2005) The automatic system for monitoring of owls' nests. ITCE 2005 Conference Abstracts: 173–182.

Belsley DA, Kuh E, Welsch RE (1980) Regression diagnostics: Identifying influential data and sources of collinearity. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Tao J, Littell R, Patetta M, Truxillo C, Wolfinger R (2002) Mixed model analyses using the SAS system course notes. Cary, NC, USA: SAS Institute Inc.

Čtyroký P (1971/72) Observation of the nocturnal activity of the Little owl (

Zárybnická M (2008) Circadian activity of the Tengmalm's owl (

Wuntke B (2003) The development of daily rhythmicity in Barn Owls (

Dreiss AN, Ruppli CA, Faller C, Roulin A (2013) Big brother is watching you: eavesdropping to resolve family conflicts. Behav Ecol 24: 717–722.

Dreiss AN, Ruppli CA, Roulin A (2014) Individual vocal signatures in barn owl nestlings: does individual recognition have an adaptive role in sibling vocal competition? J Evol Biol 27: 63–75. PubMed

Factors affecting the duration of nestling period and fledging order in Tengmalm's owl (Aegolius funereus): effect of wing length and hatching sequence