Maintenance of remission with combination etanercept-DMARD therapy versus DMARDs alone in active rheumatoid arthritis: results of an international treat-to-target study conducted in regions with limited biologic access
Language English Country Germany Media print-electronic
Document type Comparative Study, Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Randomized Controlled Trial
PubMed
28597306
DOI
10.1007/s00296-017-3749-7
PII: 10.1007/s00296-017-3749-7
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- Biologic-free treatment, DMARD, Etanercept, Remission, Rheumatoid arthritis,
- MeSH
- Antirheumatic Agents administration & dosage adverse effects MeSH
- Biological Products administration & dosage adverse effects MeSH
- Time Factors MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Double-Blind Method MeSH
- Etanercept administration & dosage adverse effects MeSH
- Remission Induction MeSH
- Drug Therapy, Combination MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Methotrexate administration & dosage adverse effects MeSH
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid diagnosis drug therapy physiopathology MeSH
- Drug Administration Schedule MeSH
- Severity of Illness Index MeSH
- Treatment Outcome MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Multicenter Study MeSH
- Randomized Controlled Trial MeSH
- Comparative Study MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Antirheumatic Agents MeSH
- Biological Products MeSH
- Etanercept MeSH
- Methotrexate MeSH
In this transglobal, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, treat-to-target study, the maintenance of efficacy was compared between biologic-and biologic-free-disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) combination regimens after low disease activity (LDA) was achieved with biologic DMARD induction therapy. Patients with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis despite methotrexate therapy received open-label etanercept 50 mg subcutaneously once weekly plus methotrexate with or without other conventional synthetic (cs) DMARDs for 24 weeks. Patients achieving LDA [disease activity score in 28 joints based on erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) <3.2] at week 24 were randomized to receive etanercept-methotrexate combination therapy or placebo-methotrexate combination therapy, with or without other csDMARDs, for 28 weeks. In the open-label period, 72% of patients achieved DAS28-ESR LDA at week 24. Patients enrolled in the double-blind period had long-standing rheumatoid arthritis and high disease activity at baseline (mean duration, 8.1 years; DAS28-ESR, 6.4). In the etanercept and placebo combination groups, 44% versus 17% achieved DAS28-ESR LDA and 34 versus 13% achieved DAS28-ESR remission at week 52 (p < 0.001). Adverse events were reported in 37 and 43%, serious adverse events in 0 and 4%, and serious infections in 0 and 2% in these groups, respectively, in the double-blind period. After induction of response with etanercept combination therapy following a treat-to-target approach in patients with long-standing rheumatoid arthritis and high disease activity at baseline, the etanercept combination regimen was significantly more effective in maintaining LDA and remission than a biologic-free regimen. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier. NCT01578850.
5 A Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology Moscow Russia
Department of Rheumatology Centro Paulista de Investigação Clinica São Paulo Brazil
Division of Rheumatology Dokuz Eylul University School of Medicine Izmir Turkey
Division of Rheumatology University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia PA USA
Institute and Clinic of Rheumatology 1st Medical Faculty Charles University Prague Czech Republic
Pfizer Global Innovative Pharma Business Brussels Belgium
Rheumatology Allergy and Clinical Immunology Division Mafraq Hospital Abu Dhabi United Arab Emirates
See more in PubMed
J Rheumatol. 1998 Mar;25(3):417-26 PubMed
Arthritis Rheum. 2006 Jan;54(1):26-37 PubMed
Ann Rheum Dis. 2009 Jun;68(6):823-7 PubMed
J Rheumatol. 1991 Sep;18(9):1285-9 PubMed
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016 Jan;68(1):1-26 PubMed
Arthritis Rheum. 2010 Mar;62(3):674-82 PubMed
Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Mar;73(3):492-509 PubMed
Ann Rheum Dis. 2010 Jan;69(1):222-5 PubMed
Arthritis Rheum. 1988 Mar;31(3):315-24 PubMed
N Engl J Med. 2014 Nov 6;371(19):1781-92 PubMed
Int J Rheum Dis. 2015 Sep;18(7):685-713 PubMed
Lancet. 2013 Mar 16;381(9870):918-29 PubMed
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT01578850