[Purpose] Low back pain is a pervasive problem in modern societies. Physical rehabilitation in treatment of low back pain should reduce pain, muscle tension and restore spine stability and balance. The INFINITY® rehabilitation method that is based on a figure of eight movement pattern was proved to be effective in low back pain treatment. The aim of the paper is to estimate the effect of a figure of eight motion on the L5/S1 load and lumbar spine muscle activation in comparison to other motion patterns. [Subjects and Methods] Three-dimensional model of lumbar spine musculoskeletal system is used to simulate effect of various load motion pattern induced by displacement of the center of gravity of the upper body. Four motion patterns were examined: lateral and oblique pendulum-like motion, elliptical motion and figure of eight motion. [Results] The simple pendulum-like and elliptical-like patterns induce harmonic muscle activation and harmonic spinal load. The figure of eight motion pattern creates high-frequency spinal loading that activates remodeling of bones and tendons. The figure of eight pattern also requires muscle activity that differs from harmonic frequency and is more demanding on muscle control and could also improve muscle coordination. [Conclusion] The results of the study indicate that complex motion pattern during INFINITY® rehabilitation might enhance the spine stability by influencing its passive, active and neural components.

Czech Institute of Informatics Robotics and Cybernetics Czech Technical University Prague Czech Republic

Department of Mechanics Biomechanics and Mechatronics Faculty of Mechanical Engineering Czech Technical University Prague Czech Republic

Rehabilitation Clinic Bradýs nad Orlicí Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Burton AK, Balagué F, Cardon G, et al. COST B13 Working Group on Guidelines for Prevention in Low Back Pain: Chapter 2. European guidelines for prevention in low back pain: November 2004. Eur Spine J, 2006, 15: S136–S168. PubMed PMC

Guzmán J, Esmail R, Karjalainen K, et al. : Multidisciplinary rehabilitation for chronic low back pain: systematic review. BMJ, 2001, 322: 1511–1516. PubMed PMC

Laird RA, Gilbert J, Kent P, et al. : Comparing lumbo-pelvic kinematics in people with and without back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2014, 15: 229. PubMed PMC

Hayden JA, van Tulder MW, Tomlinson G: Systematic review: strategies for using exercise therapy to improve outcomes in chronic low back pain. Ann Intern Med, 2005, 142: 776–785. PubMed

Anderson MK, Parr GP, Hall SJ: Lumbar Spinal Conditions. In Found. Athl. Train, 4th ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2009,. pp 306–347.

Janda V: On the concept of postural muscles and posture in man. Aust J Physiother, 1983, 29: 83–84. PubMed

Liebenson C: Musculoskeletal myths. J Bodyw Mov Ther, 2012, 16: 165–182. PubMed

Luque-Suárez A, Díaz-Mohedo E: Stabilization exercise for the management of low back pain. In Norasteh, AA (ed.), Low Back Pain, chapter 12. InTech 2010.

Hauggaard A, Persson AL: Specific spinal stabilisation exercises in patients with low back pain a systematic review. Phys Ther Rev, 2007, 12: 233–248.

Kogure A, Kotani K, Katada S, et al. : A randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled study on the efficacy of the arthrokinematic approach-hakata method in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain. PLoS One, 2015, 10: e0144325. PubMed PMC

Gordon R, Bloxham S: A systematic review of the effects of exercise and physical activity on non-specific chronic low back pain. Healthc (Amst), 2016, 4: 22. PubMed PMC

Tomanova M, Lippert-Grüner M, Lhotska L: Specific rehabilitation exercise for the treatment of patients with chronic low back pain. J Phys Ther Sci, 2015, 27: 2413–2417. PubMed PMC

Daniel M: Role of optimization criterion in static asymmetric analysis of lumbar spine load. Wien Med Wochenschr, 2011, 161: 477–485. PubMed

Dreischarf M, Zander T, Shirazi-Adl A, et al. : Comparison of eight published static finite element models of the intact lumbar spine: predictive power of models improves when combined together. J Biomech, 2014, 47: 1757–1766. PubMed

Stokes IA, Gardner-Morse M: Quantitative anatomy of the lumbar musculature. J Biomech, 1999, 32: 311–316. PubMed

Tsirakos D, Baltzopoulos V, Bartlett R: Inverse optimization: functional and physiological considerations related to the force-sharing problem. Crit Rev Biomed Eng, 1997, 25: 371–407. PubMed

Crowninshield RD, Brand RA: A physiologically based criterion of muscle force prediction in locomotion. J Biomech, 1981, 14: 793–801. PubMed

Stokes IA, Gardner-Morse M: Lumbar spinal muscle activation synergies predicted by multi-criteria cost function. J Biomech, 2001, 34: 733–740. PubMed

Stokes IA: Three-dimensional terminology of spinal deformity. A report presented to the Scoliosis Research Society by the Scoliosis Research Society Working Group on 3-D terminology of spinal deformity. Spine, 1994, 19: 236–248. PubMed

Schneck DJ: Engineering principles of physiologic function. New York: New York University Press, 1990.

Mieritz RM, Hartvigsen J, Boyle E, et al. : Lumbar motion changes in chronic low back pain patients: a secondary analysis of data from a randomized clinical trial. Spine J, 2014, 14: 2618–2627. PubMed

Cho Y: Effects of tai chi on pain and muscle activity in young males with acute low back pain. J Phys Ther Sci, 2014, 26: 679–681. PubMed PMC

Albert WJ, Sleivert GG, Neary JP, et al. : Monitoring individual erector spinae fatigue responses using electromyography and near infrared spectroscopy. Can J Appl Physiol, 2004, 29: 363–378. PubMed

Potvin JR: Occupational spine biomechanics: a journey to the spinal frontier. J Electromyogr Kinesiol, 2008, 18: 891–899. PubMed

Marras WS, Davis KG, Ferguson SA, et al. : Spine loading characteristics of patients with low back pain compared with asymptomatic individuals. Spine, 2001, 26: 2566–2574. PubMed

Snodgrass SJ, Heneghan NR, Tsao H, et al. : Recognising neuroplasticity in musculoskeletal rehabilitation: a basis for greater collaboration between musculoskeletal and neurological physiotherapists. Man Ther, 2014, 19: 614–617. PubMed

Klika V, Marsik F: A thermodynamic model of bone remodelling: the influence of dynamic loading together with biochemical control. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact, 2010, 10: 220–230. PubMed

Nordin M, Frankel VH, eds.: Basic biomechanics of the musculoskeletal system. Philadelphia: Lea & Fibiger, 1989.

Wallwork TL, Stanton WR, Freke M, et al. : The effect of chronic low back pain on size and contraction of the lumbar multifidus muscle. Man Ther, 2009, 14: 496–500. PubMed

Oliveira AS, Gonçalves M: Lumbar muscles recruitment during resistance exercise for upper limbs. J Electromyogr Kinesiol, 2009, 19: 737–745. PubMed

Waddell G, Feder G, Lewis M: Systematic reviews of bed rest and advice to stay active for acute low back pain. Br J Gen Pract, 1997, 47: 647–652. PubMed PMC

Bronfort G, Maiers MJ, Evans RL, et al. : Supervised exercise, spinal manipulation, and home exercise for chronic low back pain: a randomized clinical trial. Spine J, 2011, 11: 585–598. PubMed

Szpala A, Rutkowska-Kucharska A, Drapala J: Electromechanical delay of abdominal muscles is modified by low back pain prevention exercise. Acta Bioeng Biomech, 2014, 16: 95–102. PubMed

Marras WS, Granata KP: Spine loading during trunk lateral bending motions. J Biomech, 1997, 30: 697–703. PubMed

Hwang J, Knapik GG, Dufour JS, et al. : A biologically-assisted curved muscle model of the lumbar spine: model validation. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon), 2016, 37: 153–159. PubMed

Vilimek M: An artificial neural network approach and sensitivity analysis in predicting skeletal muscle forces. Acta Bioeng Biomech, 2014, 16: 119–127. PubMed

Cadova M, Vilimek M, Daniel M: A comparative study of muscle force estimates using Huxley’s and Hill’s muscle model. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin, 2014, 17: 311–317. PubMed

Knapik GG, Marras WS: Spine loading at different lumbar levels during pushing and pulling. Ergonomics, 2009, 52: 60–70. PubMed

Panjabi MM: The stabilizing system of the spine. Part II. Neutral zone and instability hypothesis. J Spinal Disord, 1992, 5: 390–396, discussion 397. PubMed