The common cuckoo is an effective indicator of high bird species richness in Asia and Europe
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie Médium electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
28663558
PubMed Central
PMC5491505
DOI
10.1038/s41598-017-04794-3
PII: 10.1038/s41598-017-04794-3
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- biodiverzita * MeSH
- ekosystém MeSH
- ptáci * MeSH
- ROC křivka MeSH
- zeměpis MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Asie MeSH
- Evropa MeSH
Common cuckoo Cuculus canorus is a charismatic bird species with a dominant presence in human culture: from folklore legends to nowadays there is evidence of cuckoos being a prime candidate as a surrogate of bird diversity. Recent studies demonstrated that the cuckoo can predict hotspots of taxonomic diversity and functional diversity of bird communities in European countries. In this study, we demonstrated that the cuckoo is an excellent bioindicator at multi-spatial scale, extending cuckoo surrogacy from Europe to Asia. Even using three different survey methods (transect, square, point counts), comparing the new findings with results of our research in Europe, sites where the cuckoo is present were characterized by greater species richness, while the cuckoo was absent from sites with low species richness. The goodness of fit of models based on point counts ranged between 71 and 92%. Furthermore, the cuckoo population trend mirrors the average population trend and climate suitability of overall bird communities in Europe. The common cuckoo is therefore a suitable intercontinental bioindicator of hotspots of bird richness, even under climate change scenarios or in areas where the species co-occurs with other cuckoo species, opening a new avenue for standardized citizen science on bird biodiversity surveys worldwide.
Institute of Zoology Poznan University of Life Sciences Wojska Polskiego 71C PL 60 625 Poznań Poland
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Lai CM. Messenger of Spring and Morality: Cuckoo Lore in Chinese Sources. J. Am. Orient. Soc. 1998;118:530–542. doi: 10.2307/604785. DOI
Hardy J. Popular History of the Cuckoo. Folk. Rec. 1879;2:47–91.
Mulry M. ‘A Voice, A Mystery’: Wordsworth’s Cuckoo. Explic. 2009;68:5–8. doi: 10.1080/00144940903423618. DOI
Moksnes A, Røskaft E. Egg-morphs and host preference in the common cuckoo (Cuculus canorus): An analysis of cuckoo and host eggs from European museum collections. J. Zool. Lond. 1995;236:625–648. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1995.tb02736.x. DOI
Payne, R. B. The Cuckoos. (Oxford University Press, 2005).
Sugar O. Historical perspective. Coccyx: The bone named for a bird. Spine (Phila. Pa. 1976) 1995;20:379–383. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199502000-00024. PubMed DOI
Møller AP, Morelli F, Mousseau TA, Tryjanowski P. The number of syllables in Chernobyl cuckoo calls reliably indicate habitat, soil and radiation levels. Ecol. Indic. 2016;66:592–597. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.02.037. DOI
Møller AP, Morelli F, Tryjanowski P. Cuckoo folklore and human well-being: Cuckoo calls predict how long farmers live. Ecol. Indic. 2017;72:766–768. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.09.006. DOI
Brooke MDL, Davies N. Recent Changes in Host Usage by Cuckoos Cuculus canorus in Britain. J. Anim. Ecol. 1987;56:873–883. doi: 10.2307/4954. DOI
Møller AP, et al. Rapid change in host use of the common cuckoo Cuculus canorus linked to climate change. Proc. R. Soc. London B - Biol. Sci. 2011;278:733–8. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2010.1592. PubMed DOI PMC
Tryjanowski P, Morelli F. Presence of Cuckoo reliably indicates high bird diversity: A case study in a farmland area. Ecol. Indic. 2015;55:52–58. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.03.012. DOI
Morelli F, et al. Cuckoo and biodiversity: Testing the correlation between species occurrence and bird species richness in Europe. Biol. Conserv. 2015;190:123–132. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.06.003. DOI
Morelli F, et al. Cuckoo as indicator of high functional diversity of bird communities: A new paradigm for biodiversity surrogacy. Ecol. Indic. 2017;72:565–573. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.08.059. DOI
Stephens PA, et al. Consistent response of bird populations to climate change on two continents. Science. 2016;352:84–87. doi: 10.1126/science.aac4858. PubMed DOI
Laaksonen T, Lehikoinen A. Population trends in boreal birds: Continuing declines in agricultural, northern, and long-distance migrant species. Biol. Conserv. 2013;168:99–107. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2013.09.007. DOI
Reif J, et al. Changes in bird community composition in the Czech Republic from 1982 to 2004: increasing biotic homogenization, impacts of warming climate, but no trend in species richness. J. Ornithol. 2013;154:359–370. doi: 10.1007/s10336-012-0900-9. DOI
Báldi A. Using higher taxa as surrogates of species richness: a study based on 3700 Coleoptera, Diptera, and Acari species in Central-Hungarian reserves. Basic Appl. Ecol. 2003;593:589–593. doi: 10.1078/1439-1791-00193. DOI
Yong DL, Barton PS, Okada S, Crane M, Lindenmayer DB. Birds as surrogates for mammals and reptiles: Are patterns of cross-taxonomic associations stable over time in a human-modified landscape? Ecol. Indic. 2016;69:152–164. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.04.013. DOI
Mellin C, et al. Effectiveness of biological surrogates for predicting patterns of marine biodiversity: a global meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2011;6:e20141. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020141. PubMed DOI PMC
Rodrigues ASLL, Brooks TM, Rodrigues ASLL, Brooks TM. Shortcuts for Biodiversity Conservation Planning: The Effectiveness of Surrogates. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2007;38:713–737. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.38.091206.095737. DOI
Padoa-Schioppa E, Baietto M, Massa R, Bottoni L. Bird communities as bioindicators: The focal species concept in agricultural landscapes. Ecol. Indic. 2006;6:83–93. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2005.08.006. DOI
Burger J. Bioindicators: A Review of Their Use in the Environmental Literature 1970–2005. Environ. Bioindic. 2006;1:136–144. doi: 10.1080/15555270600701540. DOI
Morelli F, Jerzak L, Tryjanowski P. Birds as useful indicators of high nature value (HNV) farmland in Central Italy. Ecol. Indic. 2014;38:236–242. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.11.016. DOI
Yang C, et al. Diversity of parasitic cuckoos and their hosts in China. Chinese Birds. 2012;3:9–32. doi: 10.5122/cbirds.2012.0004. DOI
Jarvinen O. Estimating relative densities of land birds by point counts. Ann. Zool. Fennici. 1978;15:290–293.
Budka M, Kokociński P. The efficiency of territory mapping, point-based censusing, and point-counting methods in censusing and monitoring a bird species with long-range acoustic communication – the Corncrake Crex crex. Bird Study. 2015;62:153–160. doi: 10.1080/00063657.2015.1011078. DOI
Pearman PB, Weber D. Common species determine richness patterns in biodiversity indicator taxa. Biol. Conserv. 2007;138:109–119. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2007.04.005. DOI
Lee J-WW, et al. Spatial patterns, ecological niches, and interspecific competition of avian brood parasites: Inferring from a case study of Korea. Ecol. Evol. 2014;4:3689–3702. doi: 10.1002/ece3.1209. PubMed DOI PMC
Ducatez S. Brood parasitism: a good strategy in our changing world? Proc. R. Soc. London B - Biol. Sci. 2014;281:20132404. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2013.2404. PubMed DOI PMC
Hochberg ME, van Baalen M. Antagonistic coevolution over productivity gradients. Am. Nat. 1998;152:620–34. doi: 10.1086/286194. PubMed DOI
Erritzøe, J., Mann, C. F., Brammer, F. P. & Fuller, R. A. Cuckoos of the World (Helm Identification Guides). (Christopher Helm Publishers Ltd, 2012).
Shakespeare, W. Love’s Labour’s Lost: The Oxford Shakespeare (Cambridge University Press, 2008).
Cooper CB, Dickinson J, Phillips T, Bonney R. Citizen science as a tool for conservation in residential ecosystems. Ecol. Soc. 2007;12:11. doi: 10.5751/ES-02197-120211. DOI
Jiguet F, Devictor V, Julliard R, Couvet D. French citizens monitoring ordinary birds provide tools for conservation and ecological sciences. Acta Oecologica. 2012;44:58–66. doi: 10.1016/j.actao.2011.05.003. DOI
Devictor V, Whittaker RJ, Beltrame C. Beyond scarcity: citizen science programmes as useful tools for conservation biogeography. Divers. Distrib. 2010;16:354–362. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2009.00615.x. DOI
Ottinger G. Buckets of Resistance: Standards and the Effectiveness of Citizen Science. Sci. Technol. Hum. Values. 2010;35:244–270. doi: 10.1177/0162243909337121. DOI
Lindenmayer DB, et al. A new framework for selecting environmental surrogates. Sci. Total Environ. 2015;538:1029–1038. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.08.056. PubMed DOI
Morelli F, et al. Taxonomic diversity, functional diversity and evolutionary uniqueness in bird communities of Beijing’s urban parks: effects of land use and vegetation structure. Urban For. Urban Green. 2017;23:84–92. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2017.03.009. DOI
Home R, Keller C, Nagel P, Bauer N, Hunziker M. Selection criteria for flagship species by conservation organizations. Environ. Conserv. 2009;36:139. doi: 10.1017/S0376892909990051. DOI
Entwistle, A. C., Mickleburgh, S. & Dunstone, N. In Priorities for the Conservation of Mammalian Diversity. Has the Panda had its Day? (eds Dunstone, N. & Entwistle, A. C.) 1–7 (Cambridge Press, Cambridge University, 2000).
Lorimer J. Nonhuman charisma: which species trigger our emotions and why? ECOS. 2006;27:20–27.
Rota CT, Fletcher RJ, Evans JM, Hutto RL. Does accounting for imperfect detection improve species distribution models? Ecography (Cop.). 2011;34:659–670. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2010.06433.x. DOI
Magurran, A. Measuring Biological Diversity. (Blackwell Science: Oxford; UK, 2004).
Wesołowski T, Mokwa T. Żywiciele i pora rozrodu kukułek Cuculus canorus w Polsce: analiza danych obrączkowania i kart gniazdowych. Ornis Pol. 2013;54:159–169.
Morelli F, et al. Landscape heterogeneity metrics as indicators of bird diversity: determining the optimal spatial scales in different landscapes. Ecol. Indic. 2013;34:372–379. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.05.021. DOI
Green RE, et al. Performance of climate envelope models in retrodicting recent changes in bird population size from observed climatic change. Biol. Lett. 2008;4:599–602. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2008.0052. PubMed DOI PMC
Huntley B, Collingham YC, Willis SG, Green RE. Potential impacts of climatic change on European breeding birds. PLoS One. 2008;3:e1439. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001439. PubMed DOI PMC
Mantel N. The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Res. 1967;27:209–220. PubMed
Legendre P, Fortin M-J. Comparison of the Mantel test and alternative approaches for detecting complex multivariate relationships in the spatial analysis of genetic data. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2010;10:831–844. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02866.x. PubMed DOI
Oksanen, J. et al. vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.3–4 291 (2016).
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B. & Walker, S. lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4 - R Package (2014).
Burnham, K. P. & Anderson, D. R. Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach. (Springer, Verlag, 2002).
Sing, T., Sander, O., Beerenwinkel, N. & Lengauer, T. ‘ROCR’ R Package - Visualizing the Performance of Scoring Classifiers. (2015).
DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a non parametric approach. Biometrics. 1988;44:837–845. doi: 10.2307/2531595. PubMed DOI
Swets JA. Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science. 1988;240:1285–1293. doi: 10.1126/science.3287615. PubMed DOI
R Development Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. (2017).
ESRI. ArcGIS Desktop: Release 10.1. Redlands, CA: Environmental Systems Research Institute. (2012).