The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of subjective ultrasound evaluation of myometrial invasion of endometrial cancer and to compare its accuracy to objective methods. All consecutive patients with histologically proven endometrial cancer, who underwent ultrasound evaluation followed by surgical staging between January 2009 and December 2011, were prospectively enrolled. Myometrial invasion was evaluated by subjective assessment using ultrasound (<50% or ≥50%) and calculated as deepest invasion/normal myometrium ratio (Gordon's ratio) and as tumor/uterine anteroposterior diameter ratio (Karlsson's ratio). Histological assessment from hysterectomy was considered the gold standard. Altogether 210 patients were prospectively included. Subjective assessment and two objective ratios were found to be statistically significant predictors of the myometrial invasion (AUC = 0.65, p value < 0.001). Subjective assessment was confirmed as the most reliable method to assess myometrial invasion (79.3% sensitivity, 73.2% specificity, and 75.7% overall accuracy). Deepest invasion/normal myometrium (Gordon's) ratio (cut-off 0.5) reached 69.6% sensitivity, 65.9% specificity, and 67.3% overall accuracy. Tumor/uterine anteroposterior diameter (Karlsson's) ratio with the same cut-off reached 56.3% sensitivity, 76.4% specificity, and 68.1% overall accuracy. The subjective ultrasound evaluation of myometrial invasion performed better than objective methods in nearly all measures but showed statistically significantly better outcomes only in case of sensitivity.

Department of Pathology 1st Faculty of Medicine Charles University General University Hospital Prague Czech Republic

Gynecologic Oncology Centre Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1st Faculty of Medicine Charles University General University Hospital Prague Czech Republic

Institute for Biostatistics and Analyses Faculty of Medicine Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

International Agency for Research on Cancer (World Health Organization) Globocan 2012: estimated cancer incidence, mortality and prevalence worldwide in 2012. http://globocan.iarc.fr.

Larson D. M., Patrick Connor G., Broste S. K., Krawisz B. R., Johnson K. K. Prognostic significance of gross myometrial invasion with endometrial cancer. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1996;88(3):394–398. doi: 10.1016/0029-7844(96)00161-5. PubMed DOI

Morice P., Leary A., Creutzberg C., Abu-Rustum N., Darai E. Endometrial cancer. The Lancet. 2016;387(10023):1094–1108. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00130-0. PubMed DOI

Benedetti P. P., Basile S., Maneschi F., et al. Systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy vs. no lymphadenectomy in early-stage endometrial carcinoma: randomized clinical trial. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 2008;100(23):1707–1716. PubMed

Kitchener H., Swart A. M., Qian Q., Amos C., Parmar M. K. Efficacy of systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer (MRC ASTEC trial): a randomised study. The Lancet. 2009;373(9658):125–136. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61766-3. PubMed DOI PMC

Antonsen S. L., Jensen L. N., Loft A., et al. MRI, PET/CT and ultrasound in the preoperative staging of endometrial cancer - a multicenter prospective comparative study. Gynecologic Oncology. 2013;128(2):300–308. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.11.025. PubMed DOI

Savelli L., Ceccarini M., Ludovisi M., etal. Preoperative local staging of endometrial cancer: transvaginal sonography vs. magnetic resonance imaging. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2008;31(5):560–566. doi: 10.1002/uog.5295. PubMed DOI

Özdemir S., Çelik C., Kiresi D., Emlik D., Tazegül A., Esen H. Evaluation of cervical involvement in endometrial cancer by transvaginal sonography, magnetic resonance imaging and frozen section. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2010;30(3):302–307. doi: 10.3109/01443610903521890. PubMed DOI

Colombo N., Creutzberg C., Amant F., etal. ESMO–ESGO–ESTRO consensus conference on endometrial cancer: diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Radiotherapy and Oncology. 2015;117(3):559–581. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2015.11.013. PubMed DOI

Akbayir O., Corbacioglu A., Numanoglu C., etal. Preoperative assessment of myometrial and cervical invasion in endometrial carcinoma by transvaginal ultrasound. Gynecologic Oncology. 2011;122(3):600–603. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.05.041. PubMed DOI

Sawicki W., Śpiewankiewicz B., Stelmachów J., Cendrowski K. The value of ultrasonography in preoperative assessment of selected prognostic factors in endometrial cancer. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2003;24(3-4):293–298. PubMed

Mascilini F., Testa A. C., Van Holsbeke C., Ameye L., Timmerman D., Epstein E. Evaluating myometrial and cervical invasion in women with endometrial cancer: comparing subjective assessment with objective measurement techniques. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2013;43(3):353–358. doi: 10.1002/uog.12499. PubMed DOI

Alcázar J. L., Galván R., Albela S., etal. Assessing myometrial infiltration by endometrial cancer: uterine virtual navigation with three-dimensional US. Radiology. 2009;250(3):776–783. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2503080877. PubMed DOI

Alcazar J. L., Pineda L., Corral T. M.-A. Transvaginal/transrectal ultrasound for assessing myometrial invasion in endometrial cancer: a comparison of six different approaches. Journal of Gynecologic Oncology. 2015;26(3):201–207. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2015.26.3.201. PubMed DOI PMC

De Smet F., De Brabanter J., Van Den Bosch T., etal. New models to predict depth of infiltration in endometrial carcinoma based on transvaginal sonography. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2006;27(6):664–671. doi: 10.1002/uog.2806. PubMed DOI

Van Holsbeke C., Ameye L., Testa A. C., etal. Development and external validation of new ultrasound-based mathematical models for preoperative prediction of high-risk endometrial cancer. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2014;43(5):586–595. doi: 10.1002/uog.13216. PubMed DOI

Gordon A. N., Fleischer A. C., Reed G. W. Depth of myometrial invasion in endometrial cancer: preoperative assessment by transvaginal ultrasonography. Gynecologic Oncology. 1990;39(3):321–327. PubMed

Karlsson B., Norström A., Granberg S., Wikland M. The use of endovaginal ultrasound to diagnose invasion of endometrial carcinoma. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1992;2(1):35–39. PubMed

Alcázar J. L., Orozco R., Martinez-Astorquiza Corral T., etal. Transvaginal ultrasound for preoperative assessment of myometrial invasion in patients with endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2015;46(4):405–413. PubMed

Weber G., Merz E., Bahlmann F., Mitze M., Weikel W., Knapstein P. G. Assessment of myometrial infiltration and preoperative staging by transvaginal ultrasound in patients with endometrial carcinoma. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1995;6(5):362–367. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1995.06050362.x. PubMed DOI

Gabrielli S., Marabini A., Bevini M., et al. Transvaginal sonography vs. hysteroscopy in the preoperative staging of endometrial carcinoma. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1996;7(6):443–446. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1996.07060443.x. PubMed DOI

Olaya F. J. M., Dualde D., García E., et al. Transvaginal sonography in endometrial carcinoma: preoperative assessment of the depth of myometrial invasion in 50 cases. European Journal of Radiology. 1998;26(3):274–279. doi: 10.1016/S0720-048X(96)01129-1. PubMed DOI

Alcázar J. L., Jurado M., López-García G. Comparative study of transvaginal ultrasonography and CA 125 in the preoperative evaluation of myometrial invasion in endometrial carcinoma. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1999;14(3):210–214. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1999.14030210.x. PubMed DOI

Arko D., Takac I. High frequency transvaginal ultrasonography in preoperative assessment of myometrial invasion in endometrial cancer. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine. 2000;19(9):639–643. doi: 10.7863/jum.2000.19.9.639. PubMed DOI

Fishman A., Altaras M., Bernheim J., Cohen I., Beyth Y., Tepper R. The value of transvaginal sonography in the preoperative assessment of myometrial invasion in high and low grade endometrial cancer and in comparison to frozen section in grade 1 disease. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2000;21(2):128–130. PubMed

Szánthó A., Szabó I., Csapó Z., Bálega J., Demeter A., Papp Z. Assessment of myometrial and cervical invasion of endometrial cancer by transvaginal sonography. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2001;22(3):209–212. PubMed

Van Doorn H. C., Van Der Zee A. G. J., Peeters P. H. M., Kroeks M. V. A. M., Van Eijkeren M. A. Preoperative selection of patients with low-stage endometrial cancer at high risk of pelvic lymph node metastases. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer. 2002;12(2):144–148. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1438.2002.01083.x. PubMed DOI

Takač I. Transvaginal ultrasonography with and without saline infusion in assessment of myometrial invasion of endometrial cancer. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine. 2007;26(7):949–955. doi: 10.7863/jum.2007.26.7.949. PubMed DOI

Yahata T., Aoki Y., Tanaka K. Prediction of myometrial invasion in patients with endometrial carcinoma: Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging, transvaginal ultrasonography, and gross visual inspection. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2007;28(3):193–195. PubMed

Özdemir S., Çelik Ç., Emlik D., Kiresi D., Esen H. Assessment of myometrial invasion in endometrial cancer by transvaginal sonography, doppler ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging and frozen section. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer. 2009;19(6):1085–1090. doi: 10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181ad3eb6. PubMed DOI

Akbayir O., Corbacioglu A., Numanoglu C., et al. Combined use of preoperative transvaginal ultrasonography and intraoperative gross examination in the assessment of myometrial invasion in endometrial carcinoma. European Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 2012;165(2):284–288. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.07.005. PubMed DOI

Savelli L., Testa A. C., Mabrouk M., et al. A prospective blinded comparison of the accuracy of transvaginal sonography and frozen section in the assessment of myometrial invasion in endometrial cancer. Gynecologic Oncology. 2012;124(3):549–552. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.11.016. PubMed DOI

Ørtoft G., Dueholm M., Mathiesen O., et al. Preoperative staging of endometrial cancer using TVS, MRI, and hysteroscopy. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 2013;92(5):536–545. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12103. PubMed DOI

Christensen J. W., Dueholm M., Hansen E. S., Marinovskij E., Lundorf E., Ørtoft G. Assessment of myometrial invasion in endometrial cancer using three-dimensional ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 2016;95(1):55–64. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12806. PubMed DOI

Fischerova D. Ultrasound scanning of the pelvis and abdomen for staging of gynecological tumors: a review. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2011;38(3):246–266. doi: 10.1002/uog.10054. PubMed DOI

Leone F. P. G., Timmerman D., Bourne T., etal. Terms, definitions and measurements to describe the sonographic features of the endometrium and intrauterine lesions: a consensus opinion from the international endometrial tumor analysis (ieta) group. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2010;35(1):103–112. doi: 10.1002/uog.7487. PubMed DOI

Pecorelli S. Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the vulva, cervix, and endometrium. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2009;105(2):103–104. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.02.012. PubMed DOI

Silverberg S. G., Fattaneh P. D., Tavassoli A., etal. Tumor of The Uterine Corpus, in Pathology and Genetics of Tumor of The Breast and Female Genital Organs. France: IARC Press: Lyon; 2003.

Hanley J. A., McNeil B. J. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology. 1982;143(1):29–36. doi: 10.1148/radiology.143.1.7063747. PubMed DOI

Statistical package for social sciences (SPSS fo Windows) 2003, SPSS Inc., Chicago, USA.

Eriksson L. S. E., Lindqvist P. G., Flöter Rådestad A., et al. Transvaginal ultrasound assessment of myometrial and cervical stromal invasion in women with endometrial cancer: Interobserver reproducibility among ultrasound experts and gynecologists. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2015;45(4):476–482. doi: 10.1002/uog.14645. PubMed DOI

Epstein E., Van Holsbeke C., Mascilini F., et al. Gray-scale and color Doppler ultrasound characteristics of endometrial cancer in relation to stage, grade and tumor size. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2011;38(5):586–593. doi: 10.1002/uog.9038. PubMed DOI

Fischerova D., Frühauf F., Zikan M., et al. Factors affecting sonographic preoperative local staging of endometrial cancer. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2014;43(5):575–585. doi: 10.1002/uog.13248. PubMed DOI

A Novel Approach to Preoperative Risk Stratification in Endometrial Cancer: The Added Value of Immunohistochemical Markers