• This record comes from PubMed

Suitability of selected bioindicators of atmospheric pollution in the industrialised region of Ostrava, Upper Silesia, Czech Republic

. 2017 Aug 29 ; 189 (9) : 478. [epub] 20170829

Language English Country Netherlands Media electronic

Document type Journal Article

Links

PubMed 28852908
DOI 10.1007/s10661-017-6199-5
PII: 10.1007/s10661-017-6199-5
Knihovny.cz E-resources

This study is a continuation of our preceding research identifying suitable environmental samples for the tracing of atmospheric pollution in industrial areas. Three additional types of environmental samples were used to characterise contamination sources in the industrial area of Ostrava city, Czech Republic. The region is known for its extensive metallurgical and mining activities. Fingerprinting of stable Pb isotopes was applied to distinguish individual sources of anthropogenic Pb. A wide range of 206Pb/207Pb ratios was observed in the investigated samples: 206Pb/207Pb = 1.168-1.198 in mosses; 206Pb/207Pb = 1.167-1.215 in soils and 206Pb/207Pb = 1.158-1.184 in tree cores. Black and brown coal combustion, as well as metallurgical activities, is the two main sources of pollution in the area. Fossil fuel burning in industry and households seems to be a stronger source of Pb emissions than from the metallurgical industry. Concentration analyses of tree rings showed that a significant increase in As concentrations occurred between 1999 and 2016 (from 0.38 mg kg-1 to 13.8 mg kg-1). This shift corresponds to the use of brown coal from Bílina, Czech Republic, with an increased As concentration. The burning of low-quality fuels in households remains a problem in the area, as small ground sources have a greater influence on the air quality than do industrial sources.

See more in PubMed

Environ Pollut. 1999 Sep;106(3):391-403 PubMed

Environ Pollut. 2003;121(1):39-48 PubMed

Environ Pollut. 2001;114(3):443-51 PubMed

Environ Int. 2008 May;34(4):562-77 PubMed

Chemosphere. 2009 Jun;76(1):91-7 PubMed

Sci Total Environ. 1998 Nov 3;223(1):37-52 PubMed

Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2015 Oct;120:74-9 PubMed

Environ Pollut. 2006 Aug;142(3):409-17 PubMed

Environ Pollut. 2002;118(1):153-63 PubMed

Environ Pollut. 2017 Jan;220(Pt A):286-297 PubMed

Sci Total Environ. 2004 Feb 5;319(1-3):173-83 PubMed

Environ Pollut. 2001;115(2):239-52 PubMed

Environ Pollut. 1997;98(1):61-71 PubMed

Environ Sci Technol. 2003 Feb 1;37(3):437-45 PubMed

ScientificWorldJournal. 2012;2012:294927 PubMed

Sci Total Environ. 2011 May 1;409(11):2281-97 PubMed

Environ Pollut. 2002;116(2):279-87 PubMed

Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2015 Oct;120:377-85 PubMed

Sci Total Environ. 2011 Sep 15;409(20):4344-50 PubMed

Chemosphere. 2000 Nov;41(9):1333-6 PubMed

Sci Total Environ. 2012 Sep 1;433:264-72 PubMed

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...