Since sperm size and form do not necessarily provide information on internal sperm structures, novel sperm markers need to be found in order to conduct assisted reproductive therapies (ART) successfully. Currently, the priority of andrologists is not only to select those sperm able to fertilize the oocyte, but also a high quality of sperm that will guarantee a healthy embryo. Evidence of this shows us the importance of studying sperm intensively on genetic and epigenetic levels, because these could probably be the cause of a percentage of infertility diagnosed as idiopathic. Thus, more attention is being paid to posttranslational modifications as the key for better understanding of the fertilization process and its impact on embryo and offspring. Advances in the discovery of new sperm markers should go hand in hand with finding appropriate techniques for selecting the healthiest sperm, guaranteeing its non-invasiveness. To date, most sperm selection techniques can be harmful to sperm due to centrifugation or staining procedures. Some methods, such as microfluidic techniques, sperm nanopurifications, and Raman spectroscopy, have the potential to make selection gentle to sperm, tracking small abnormalities undetected by methods currently used. The fact that live cells could be analyzed without harmful effects creates the expectation of using them routinely in ART. In this review, we focus on the combination of sperm epigenetic status (modifications) as quality markers, with non-invasive sperm selection methods as novel approaches to improve ART outcomes.

Department of Histology and Embryology Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen Charles University Pilsen Czech Republic

Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine of Biomedical Centre Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen Charles University Pilsen Czech Republic

See more in PubMed

Jenkins TG, Aston KI, Trost C, et al. Intra-sample heterogeneity of sperm DNA methylation. Mol Hum Reprod. 2015;21:313–19. PubMed

Holt WV, Van Look KJ. Concepts in sperm heterogeneity, sperm selection and sperm competition as biological foundations for laboratory tests of semen quality. Reproduction. 2004;127:527–35. PubMed

Jenkins TG, Aston KI, Pflueger C, et al. Age-associated sperm DNA methylation alterations, possible implications in offspring disease susceptibility. PLoS Genet. 2014;10:e1004458. PubMed PMC

Laurentino S, Borgmann J, Gromoll J. On the origin of sperm epigenetic heterogeneity. Reproduction. 2016;151:R71–78. PubMed

Schagdarsurengin U, Steger K. Epigenetics in male reproduction, effect of paternal diet on sperm quality and offspring health. Nat Rev Urol. 2016;13:584–95. PubMed

Rodgers AB, Morgan CP, Leu NA, Bale TL. Transgenerational epigenetic programming via sperm microRNA recapitulates effects of paternal stress. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112:13699–704. PubMed PMC

Sharma U, Conine CC, Shea JM, et al. Biogenesis and function of tRNA fragments during sperm maturation and fertilization in mammals. Science. 2016;351:391–96. PubMed PMC

Siklenka K, Erkek S, Godmann M, et al. Disruption of histone methylation in developing sperm impairs offspring health transgenerationally. Science. 2015;350:aab2006. PubMed

Tang D, Huang Y, Liu W, Zhang X. Up-regulation of microRNA-210 is associated with spermatogenesis by targeting IGF2 in male infertility. Med Sci Monit. 2016;18:2905–10. PubMed PMC

Carrell DT. Epigenetics of the male gamete. Fertil Steril. 2012;97:267–74. PubMed

Yu B, Zhou H, Liu M, et al. Epigenetic alterations in density selected human spermatozoa for assisted reproduction. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0145585. PubMed PMC

Han JY, Park J, Jang W, et al. A twin sibling with Prader-Willi syndrome caused by type 2 microdeletion following assisted reproductive technology. A case report. Biomed Rep. 2016;5:18–22. PubMed PMC

Hiura H, Okae H, Chiba H, et al. Imprinting methylation errors in ART. Reprod Med Biol. 2014;13:193–202. PubMed PMC

Kurinczuk JJ, Bhattacharya S. Rare chromosomal, genetic, and epigenetic-related risks associated with infertility treatment. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014;19:250–53. PubMed

Pinborg A, Loft A, Romundstad LB, et al. Epigenetics and assisted reproductive technologies. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016;95:10–15. PubMed

Stuppia L, Franzago M, Ballerini P, et al. Epigenetics and male reproduction: The consequences of paternal lifestyle on fertility, embryo development, and children lifetime health. Clin Epigenetics. 2015;7:120. PubMed PMC

Boomsma CM, Heineman MJ, Cohlen BJ, Farquhar C. Semen preparation techniques for intrauterine insemination. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;17:CD004507. PubMed

Henkel RR, Schill WB. Sperm preparation for ART. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2003;1:108. PubMed PMC

Mortimer JJ. Sperm preparation methods. J Androl. 2000;21:357–66. PubMed

Ricci G, Perticarari S, Boscolo R, et al. Semen preparation methods and sperm apoptosis, swim-up versus gradient-density centrifugation technique. Fertil Steril. 2009;91:632–38. PubMed

Xue X, Wang WS, Shi JZ, et al. Efficacy of swim-up versus density gradient centrifugation in improving sperm deformity rate and DNA fragmentation index in semen samples from teratozoospermic patients. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2014;31:1161–66. PubMed PMC

Henkel R. Sperm preparation, state-of-the-art-physiological aspects and application of advanced sperm preparation methods. Asian J Androl. 2012;14:260–69. PubMed PMC

Avendaño C, Oehniger S. DNA fragmentation in morphologically normal spermatozoa, how much should we be concerned in the ICSI era? J Androl. 2011;32:356–63. PubMed

Samuel R, Badamjav O, Murphy KE, et al. Microfluidics: The future of microdissection TESE? Syst Biol Reprod Med. 2016;62:161–70. PubMed

Krejčí J, Stixová L, Pagáčová E, et al. Post-translational modifications of histones in human sperm. Cell Biochem. 2015;116:2195–209. PubMed

Suarez SS. Mammalian sperm interactions with the female reproductive tract. Cell Tissue Res. 2016;363:185–94. PubMed PMC

Holt WV, Fazeli A. The oviduct as a complex mediator of mammalian sperm function and selection. Mol Reprod Dev. 2010;77:934–43. PubMed

Almiñana C, Caballero I, Heath PR, et al. The battle of the sexes starts in the oviduct, modulation of oviductal transcriptome by X and Y-bearing spermatozoa. BMC Genomics. 2014;15:293. PubMed PMC

Wheeler MB, Rubessa M. Integration of microfluidics and mammalian IVF. Mol Hum Reprod. 2016 [Epub ahead of print]

Asghar W, Velasco V, Kingsley JL, et al. Selection of functional human sperm with higher DNA integrity and fewer reactive oxygen species. Adv Healthc Mater. 2014;3:1671–79. PubMed PMC

Knowlton SM, Sadasivam M, Tasoglu S. Microfluidics for sperm research. Trends Biotechnol. 2015;33:221–29. PubMed

de Wagenaar B, Berendsen JT, Bomer JG, et al. Microfluidic single sperm entrapment and analysis. Lab Chip. 2015;15:1294–301. PubMed

Cho BS, Schuster TG, Zhu X, et al. Passively driven integrated microfluidic system for separation of motile sperm. Anal Chem. 2003;75:1671–75. PubMed

Taken K, Alp HH, Eryilmaz R, et al. Oxidative DNA damage to sperm cells and peripheral blood leukocytes in infertile men. Med Sci Monit. 2016;22:4289–96. PubMed PMC

Matsuura K, Uozumi T, Furuichi T, et al. Microfluidic device to reduce treatment time of intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil Steril. 2013;99:400–7. PubMed

Shirota K, Yotsumoto F, Itoh H, et al. Separation efficiency of a microfluidic sperm sorter to minimize sperm DNA damage. Fertil Steril. 2016;105:315–21. PubMed

Wang W, Liang GT, Peng YY, et al. Effects of a microfluidic sperm sorter on sperm routine parameters and DNA integrity. Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue. 2011;17:301–4. PubMed

Nosrati R, Vollmer M, Eamer L, et al. Rapid selection of sperm with high DNA integrity. Lab Chip. 2014;14:1142–50. PubMed

Tunc O, Tremellen K. Oxidative DNA damage impairs global sperm DNA methylation in infertile men. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2009;26:537–44. PubMed PMC

Hammadeh ME, Hamad MF, Montenarh M, Fischer-Hammadeh C. Protamine contents and P1/P2 ratio in human spermatozoa from smokers and non-smokers. Hum Reprod. 2010;25:2708–20. PubMed

Yu B, Qi Y, Liu D, et al. Cigarette smoking is associated with abnormal histone-to-protamine transition in human sperm. Fertil Steril. 2014;101:51–57. PubMed

Houshdaran S, Cortessis VK, Siegmund K, et al. Widespread epigenetic abnormalities suggest a broad DNA methylation erasure defect in abnormal human sperm. PLoS One. 2007;2:e1289. PubMed PMC

Rappa KL, Rodriguez HF, Hakkarainen GC, et al. Sperm processing for advanced reproductive technologies, Where are we today? Biotechnol Adv. 2016;34:578–87. PubMed

Doane TL, Burda C. The unique role of nanoparticles in nanomedicine: Imaging, drug delivery and therapy. Chem Soc Rev. 2012;41:2885–911. PubMed

Vasquez ES, Feugang JM, Willard ST, et al. Bioluminescent magnetic nanoparticles as potential imaging agents for mammalian spermatozoa. J Nanobiotechnology. 2016;4:20. PubMed PMC

Odhiambo JF, Sutovsky M, DeJarnette JM, et al. Adaptation of ubiquitin-PNA based sperm quality assay for semen evaluation by a conventional flow cytometer and a dedicated platform for flow cytometric semen analysis. Theriogenology. 2011;76:1168–76. PubMed

Sutovsky P, Aarabi M, Miranda-Vizuete A, Oko R. Negative biomarker based male fertility evaluation: Sperm phenotypes associated with molecular-level anomalies. Asian J Androl. 2015;17:554–60. PubMed PMC

Lafuente D, Garcia T, Blanco J, et al. Effects of oral exposure to silver nanoparticles on the sperm of rats. Reprod Toxicol. 2016;60:133–39. PubMed

Moretti E, Terzuoli G, Renieri T, et al. In vitro effect of gold and silver nanoparticles on human spermatozoa. Andrologia. 2013;45:392–96. PubMed

Degheidy T, Abdelfattah H, Seif A, et al. Magnetic activated cell sorting: An effective method for reduction of sperm DNA fragmentation in varicocele men prior to assisted reproductive techniques. Andrologia. 2015;47:892–96. PubMed

Romany L, Garrido N, Cobo A, et al. Obstetric and perinatal outcome of babies born from sperm selected by MACS from a randomized controlled trial. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2016;34:201–7. PubMed PMC

Odhiambo JF, DeJarnette JM, Geary TW, et al. Increased conception rates in beef cattle inseminated with nanopurified bull semen. Biol Reprod. 2014;91:97. PubMed

Cross NL, Watson SK. Assessing acrosomal status of bovine sperm using fluoresceinated lectins. Theriogenology. 1994;42:89–98. PubMed

Mulugeta Achame E, Wassenaar E, Hoogerbrugge JW, et al. The ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme HR6B is required for maintenance of X chromosome silencing in mouse spermatocytes and spermatids. BMC Genomics. 2010;11:367. PubMed PMC

Conaway RC, Brower CS, Conaway JW. Emerging roles of ubiquitin in transcription regulation. Science. 2002;296:1254–58. PubMed

Da Silva N, Barton CR. Macrophages and dendritic cells in the post-testicular environment. Cell Tissue Res. 2016;363:97–104. PubMed PMC

Richburg JH, Myers JL, Bratton SB. The role of E3 ligases in the ubiquitin-dependent regulation of spermatogenesis. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2014;30:27–35. PubMed PMC

Sutovsky P, Moreno R, Ramalho-Santos J, et al. A putative, ubiquitin-dependent mechanism for the recognition and elimination of defective spermatozoa in the mammalian epididymis. J Cell Sci. 2011;114:1665–75. PubMed

Sutovsky P, Terada Y, Schatten G. Ubiquitin-based sperm assay for the diagnosis of male factor infertility. Hum Reprod. 2001;16:250–58. PubMed

Ozanon C, Chouteau J, Sutovsky P. Clinical adaptation of the sperm ubuquitin tag immunoassay (SUTI): relationship of sperm ubiquitylation with sperm quality in gradient-purified semen samples from 93 men from a general infertility clinic population. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:2271–78. PubMed

Eskandari-Shahraki M, Tavalaee M, et al. Proper ubiquitination effect on the fertilization outcome post-ICSI. Andrologia. 2013;45:204–10. PubMed

Kitamura A, Miyauchi N, Hamada H, et al. Epigenetic alterations in sperm associated with male infertility. Congenit Anom (Kyoto) 2015;55:133–44. PubMed

Manochantr S, Chiamchanya C, Sobhon P. Relationship between chromatin condensation, DNA integrity and quality of ejaculated spermatozoa from infertile men. Andrologia. 2012;44:187–99. PubMed

Setti AS, Braga DP, Vingris L, et al. Sperm morphological abnormalities visualised at high magnification predict embryonic development, from fertilization to the blastocyst stage, in couples undergoing ICSI. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2014;31:1533–39. PubMed PMC

Zhang Y, Hong H, Cai W. Imaging with Raman spectroscopy. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2010;11:654–61. PubMed PMC

Huang Z, Chen G, Chen X, et al. Rapid and label-free identification of normal spermatozoa based on image analysis and micro-Raman spectroscopy. J Biophotonics. 2014;7:671–75. PubMed

Huser T, Orme CA, Hollars CW, et al. Raman spectroscopy of DNA packaging in individual human sperm cells distinguishes normal from abnormal cells. J Biophotonics. 2009;2:322–32. PubMed

Swain RJ, Stevens MM. Raman microspectroscopy for non-invasive biochemical analysis of single cells. Biochem Soc Trans. 2007;35:544–49. PubMed

Mallidis C, Sanchez V, Wistuba J, et al. Raman microspectroscopy: Shining a new light on reproductive medicine. Hum Reprod Update. 2014;20:403–14. PubMed

Liu Y, Zhu Y, Li Z. Application of Raman spectroscopy in Andrology: Non-invasive analysis of tissue and single cell. Transl Androl Urol. 2014;3:125–33. PubMed PMC

De Luca AC, Managó S, Ferrara MA, et al. Non-invasive sex assessment in bovine semen by Raman spectroscopy. Laser Physics Letters. 2014:11.

Li XX, Wang M, Chen HH, et al. Flow cytometric and near-infrared Raman spectroscopic investigation of quality in stained, sorted, and frozen-thawed buffalo sperm. Anim Reprod Sci. 2016;170:90–99. PubMed

Meister K, Schmidt DA, Bründermann E, Havenith M. Confocal Raman microspectroscopy as an analytical tool to assess the mitochondrial status in human spermatozoa. Analyst. 2010;135:1370–74. PubMed

Sánchez V, Redmann K, Wistuba J, et al. Oxidative DNA damage in human sperm can be detected by Raman microspectroscopy. Fertil Steril. 2012;98:1124–29. PubMed

Ferrara MA, Di Caprio G, Managò S, et al. Label-free imaging and biochemical characterization of bovine sperm cells. Biosensors (Basel) 2015;5:141–57. PubMed PMC

Anel-López L, García-Álvarez O, Parrilla I, et al. Effect of sex-sorting and cryopreservation on the post-thaw sperm quality of Iberian red deer spermatozoa. Theriogenology. 2017;89:206–13. PubMed

Liu F, Zhu Y, Liu Y, et al. Real-time Raman microspectroscopy scanning of the single live sperm bound to human zona pellucida. Fertil Steril. 2013;99:684–89. PubMed

Poplineau M, Trussardi-Régnier A, Happillon T, et al. Raman microspectroscopy detects epigenetic modifications in living Jurkat leukemic cells. Epigenomics. 2011;3:785–94. PubMed

Schulze HG, Konorov SO, Caron NJ, et al. Assesing differentiation status of human embryonic stem cells noninvasively using Raman microspectroscopy. Anal Chem. 2010;82:5020–27. PubMed

Sundararajan N, Mao D, Chan S, et al. Ultrasensitive detection and characterization of posttranslational modifications using surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Anal Chem. 2006;78:3543–50. PubMed

van der Heijden GW, Ramos L, Baart EB, et al. Sperm-derived histones contribute to zygotic chromatin in humans. BMC Dev Biol. 2008;8:34. PubMed PMC

Yuan S, Schuster A, Tang C, et al. Sperm-borne miRNAs and endo-siRNAs are important for fertilization and preimplantation embryonic development. Development. 2016;143:635–47. PubMed PMC

Berdasco M, Esteller M. Genetic syndromes caused by mutations in epigenetic genes. Hum Genet. 2013;132:359–83. PubMed

Hirasawa R, Feil R. Genomic imprinting and human disease. Essays Biochem. 2010;48:187–200. PubMed

Chrimes AF, Khoshmanesh K, Stoddart PR, et al. Microfluidics and Raman microscopy: Current applications and future challenges. Chem Soc Rev. 2013;42:5880–906. PubMed

Eamer L, Vollmer M, Nosrati R, et al. Turning the corner in fertility: High DNA integrity of boundary-following sperm. Lab Chip. 2016;16:2418–22. PubMed

Lopez-Garcia MD, Monson RL, Haubert K, et al. Sperm motion in a microfluidic fertilization device. Biomed Microdevices. 2008;10:709–18. PubMed

Zhong HZ, Lv FT, Deng XL, et al. Evaluating γH2AX in spermatozoa from male infertility patients. Fertil Steril. 2015;104:574–81. PubMed

Aston KI, Uren PJ, Jenkins TG, et al. Aberrant sperm DNA methylation predicts male fertility status and embryo quality. Fertil Steril. 2015;104:1388–97. PubMed