2016 ACR-EULAR adult dermatomyositis and polymyositis and juvenile dermatomyositis response criteria-methodological aspects
Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie, Anglie Médium print
Typ dokumentu konsensus - konference, časopisecké články
Grantová podpora
MR/N003322/1
Medical Research Council - United Kingdom
MR/P020941/1
Medical Research Council - United Kingdom
PubMed
28977549
PubMed Central
PMC5850656
DOI
10.1093/rheumatology/kex226
PII: 4061132
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- 1000Minds software, conjoint analysis, dermatomyositis, hybrid measure, juvenile dermatomyositis, outcome assessment, polymyositis, response criteria,
- MeSH
- dermatomyozitida terapie MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- logistické modely MeSH
- minimální klinicky významný rozdíl MeSH
- plocha pod křivkou MeSH
- polymyozitida terapie MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- konsensus - konference MeSH
OBJECTIVE: The objective was to describe the methodology used to develop new response criteria for adult DM/PM and JDM. METHODS: Patient profiles from prospective natural history data and clinical trials were rated by myositis specialists to develop consensus gold-standard ratings of minimal, moderate and major improvement. Experts completed a survey regarding clinically meaningful improvement in the core set measures (CSM) and a conjoint-analysis survey (using 1000Minds software) to derive relative weights of CSM and candidate definitions. Six types of candidate definitions for response criteria were derived using survey results, logistic regression, conjoint analysis, application of conjoint-analysis weights to CSM and published definitions. Sensitivity, specificity and area under the curve were defined for candidate criteria using consensus patient profile data, and selected definitions were validated using clinical trial data. RESULTS: Myositis specialists defined the degree of clinically meaningful improvement in CSM for minimal, moderate and major improvement. The conjoint-analysis survey established the relative weights of CSM, with muscle strength and Physician Global Activity as most important. Many candidate definitions showed excellent sensitivity, specificity and area under the curve in the consensus profiles. Trial validation showed that a number of candidate criteria differentiated between treatment groups. Top candidate criteria definitions were presented at the consensus conference. CONCLUSION: Consensus methodology, with definitions tested on patient profiles and validated using clinical trials, led to 18 definitions for adult PM/DM and 14 for JDM as excellent candidates for consideration in the final consensus on new response criteria for myositis.
3rd Department of Internal Medicine Division of Immunology University of Debrecen Debrecen Hungary
Department of Biostatistics University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh PA USA
Department of Dermatology Stanford University Redwood City CA USA
Department of Economics University of Otago Dunedin New Zealand
Department of Neurology Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School Boston MA USA
Department of Paediatric Rheumatology Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust London UK
Department of Pediatrics Duke University Durham NC USA
Division of Rheumatology Hospital for Sick Children Toronto Ontario
Division of Rheumatology Stanford University Redwood City CA USA
Environmental Autoimmunity Group NIEHS National Institutes of Health Bethesda MD USA
Hospital General de Occidente de la Secretaría de Salud Guadalajara Jalisco Mexico
Institute of Ageing and Chronic Disease University of Liverpool Liverpool UK
Institute of Rheumatology and Department of Rheumatology Charles University Prague Czech Republic
Istituto Giannina Gaslini Pediatria 2 Reumatologia PRINTO
Istituto Giannina Gaslini Servizio di Epidemiologia e Biostatistica Genoa Italy
Manchester Academic Health Science Centre The University of Manchester Manchester
Pediatric Rheumatology Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Meyer University of Florence Florence Italy
Rheumatology Department Izaak Walton Killam Health Centre Halifax Nova Scotia Canada
Rheumatology Unit Karolinska University Hospital Karolinska Institute Stockholm Sweden
Social and Scientific Systems Inc Durham NC
Università degli Studi di Genova Dipartimento di Pediatria Genoa Italy
Wilhelmina Children's Hospital University Medical Center Utrecht The Netherlands
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Rider LG, Werth VP, Huber AM. et al. Measures of adult and juvenile dermatomyositis, polymyositis, and inclusion body myositis: Physician and Patient/Parent Global Activity, Manual Muscle Testing (MMT), Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ)/Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (C-HAQ), Childhood Myositis Assessment Scale (CMAS), Myositis Disease Activity Assessment Tool (MDAAT), Disease Activity Score (DAS), Short Form 36 (SF-36), Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ), Physician Global Damage, Myositis Damage Index (MDI), Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT), Myositis Functional Index-2 (FI-2), Myositis Activities Profile (MAP), Inclusion Body Myositis Functional Rating Scale (IBMFRS), Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Disease Area and Severity Index (CDASI), Cutaneous Assessment Tool (CAT), Dermatomyositis Skin Severity Index (DSSI), Skindex, and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). Arthritis Care Res 2011;63 (Suppl 11):S118–57. PubMed PMC
Ruperto N, Martini A.. Networking in paediatrics: the example of the Paediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organisation (PRINTO). Arch Dis Child 2011;96:596–601. PubMed
Miller FW, Rider LG, Chung YL. et al. Proposed preliminary core set measures for disease outcome assessment in adult and juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathies. Rheumatology 2001;40:1262–73. PubMed
Ruperto N, Ravelli A, Pistorio A. et al. The provisional Paediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organisation/American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism Disease activity core set for the evaluation of response to therapy in juvenile dermatomyositis: a prospective validation study. Arthritis Rheum 2008;59:4–13. PubMed
Ruperto N, Ravelli A, Murray KJ. et al. Preliminary core sets of measures for disease activity and damage assessment in juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus and juvenile dermatomyositis. Rheumatology 2003;42:1452–9. PubMed
Rider LG, Giannini EH, Harris-Love M. et al. Defining clinical improvement in adult and juvenile myositis. J Rheumatol 2003;30:603–17. PubMed
Rider LG, Giannini EH, Brunner HI. et al. International consensus on preliminary definitions of improvement in adult and juvenile myositis. Arthritis Rheum 2004;50:2281–90. PubMed
Ruperto N, Pistorio A, Ravelli A. et al. The Pediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organisation provisional criteria for the evaluation of response to therapy in juvenile dermatomyositis. Arthritis Care Res 2010;62:1533–41. PubMed PMC
Lazarevic D, Pistorio A, Palmisani E. et al. The PRINTO criteria for clinically inactive disease in juvenile dermatomyositis. Ann Rheum Dis 2013;72:686–93. PubMed PMC
Hasija R, Pistorio A, Ravelli A. et al. Therapeutic approaches in the treatment of juvenile dermatomyositis in patients with recent-onset disease and in those experiencing disease flare: an international multicenter PRINTO study. Arthritis Rheum 2011;63:3142–52. PubMed
Hansen P, Ombler F.. A new method for scoring additive multi-attribute value models using pairwise rankings of alternatives. J Multi-Crit Decis Anal 2008;15:87–107.
Neogi T, Jansen TL, Dalbeth N. et al. 2015 Gout Classification Criteria: an American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative. Arthritis Rheumatol 2015;67:2557–68. PubMed PMC
Utz KS, Hoog J, Wentrup A. et al. Patient preferences for disease-modifying drugs in multiple sclerosis therapy: a choice-based conjoint analysis. Ther Adv Neurol Disord 2014;7:263–75. PubMed PMC
Amaya-Amaya M, Gerard K, Ryan M. Discrete choice experiments in a nutshell In: Ryan M, Gerard K, Amaya-Amaya M, eds. Using discrete choice experiments to value health and health care. Dordrecht: Springer, 2008.
de Bekker-Grob E, Ryan M, Gerard K.. Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature. Health Econ 2012;21:145–72. PubMed
Singh JA, Solomon DH, Dougados M. et al. Development of classification and response criteria for rheumatic diseases. Arthritis Rheum 2006;55:348–52. PubMed
Ruperto N, Meiorin S, Iusan SM. et al. Consensus procedures and their role in pediatric rheumatology. Curr Rheumatol Rep 2008;10:142–6. PubMed
Delbecq A, Van de Ven A, Gustafson D.. Group techniques for program planning. a guide to nominal group and Delphi processes. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman and Company, 1975.
Ruperto N, Pistorio A, Oliveira S. et al. Prednisone versus prednisone plus ciclosporin versus prednisone plus methotrexate in new-onset juvenile dermatomyositis: a randomised trial. Lancet 2016;387:671–8. PubMed
Rider LG, Lee J, Jansen A. et al. Defining clinically relevant changes in core set activity measures for adult and juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM). Arthritis Rheum 2011;63 (Suppl):S89.
Lundberg IE, Svensson J.. Registries in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2013;25:729–34. PubMed
Zong M, Dorph C, Dastmalchi M. et al. Anakinra treatment in patients with refractory inflammatory myopathies and possible predictive response biomarkers: a mechanistic study with 12 months follow-up. Ann Rheum Dis 2014;73:913–20. PubMed
Oddis CV, Reed AM, Aggarwal R. et al. Rituximab in the treatment of refractory adult and juvenile dermatomyositis and adult polymyositis: a randomized, placebo-phase trial. Arthritis Rheum 2013;65:314–24. PubMed PMC
Chung L, Genovese MC, Fiorentino DF.. A pilot trial of rituximab in the treatment of patients with dermatomyositis. Arch Dermatol 2007;143:763–7. PubMed
Dastmalchi M, Grundtman C, Alexanderson H. et al. A high incidence of disease flares in an open pilot study of infliximab in patients with refractory inflammatory myopathies. Ann Rheum Dis 2008;67:1670–7. PubMed
Bohan A, Peter JB.. Polymyositis and dermatomyositis (first of two parts). New Engl J Med 1975;292:344–7. PubMed
Bohan A, Peter JB.. Polymyositis and dermatomyositis (second of two parts). New Engl J Med 1975;292:403–7. PubMed
Youden W. Index for rating diagnostic tests. Cancer 1950;3:32–5. PubMed
American College of Rheumatology Committee to Reevaluate Improvement Criteria. A proposed revision to the ACR20: the hybrid measure of American College of Rheumatology response. Arthritis Rheum 2007;57:193–202. PubMed
Rider LG, Aggarwal R, Pistorio A. et al. International Myositis Assessment and Clinical Studies Group and the Paediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organisation. 2016 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism Criteria for Minimal, Moderate, and Major Clinical Response in Juvenile Dermatomyositis: An International Myositis Assessment and Clinical Studies Group/Paediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organisation Collaborative Initiative. Ann Rheum Dis 2017;76:782–91. PubMed PMC
Aggarwal R, Rider LG, Ruperto N. et al. International Myositis Assessment and Clinical Studies Group and the Paediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organisation. 2016 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism criteria for minimal, moderate, and major clinical response in adult dermatomyositis and polymyositis: An International Myositis Assessment and Clinical Studies Group/Paediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organisation Collaborative Initiative. Ann Rheum Dis 2017;76:792–801. PubMed PMC
Neogi T, Aletaha D, Silman AJ. et al. The 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis: Phase 2 methodological report. Arthritis Rheum 2010;62:2582–91. PubMed PMC
Johnson SR, Naden RP, Fransen J. et al. Multicriteria decision analysis methods with 1000Minds for developing systemic sclerosis classification criteria. J Clin Epidemiol 2014;67:706–14. PubMed PMC
Van Den Hoogen F, Khanna D, Fransen J. et al. 2013 classification criteria for systemic sclerosis: an American College of Rheumatology/European League against Rheumatism collaborative initiative. Arthritis Rheum 2013;65:2737–47. PubMed PMC
Streiner DL. Breaking up is hard to do: the heartbreak of dichotomizing continuous data. Can J Psychiatry 2002;47:262–6. PubMed
Villalba L, Hicks JE, Adams EM. et al. Treatment of refractory myositis: a randomized crossover study of two new cytotoxic regimens. Arthritis Rheum 1998;41:392–9. PubMed
Cherin P, Herson S, Wechsler B. et al. Efficacy of intravenous gammaglobulin therapy in chronic refractory polymyositis and dermatomyositis: an open study with 20 adult patients. Am J Med 1991;91:162–8. PubMed
Lundberg IE, Miller FW, Tjärnlund A, Bottai M.. Diagnosis and classification of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies. J Intern Med 2016;280:39–51. PubMed PMC
Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies