t(6;11) renal cell carcinoma: a study of seven cases including two with aggressive behavior, and utility of CD68 (PG-M1) in the differential diagnosis with pure epithelioid PEComa/epithelioid angiomyolipoma
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
29052596
DOI
10.1038/modpathol.2017.144
PII: S0893-3952(22)01197-8
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- angiomyolipom chemie patologie MeSH
- antigeny diferenciační myelomonocytární analýza MeSH
- CD antigeny analýza MeSH
- diferenciální diagnóza MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- hybridizace in situ fluorescenční MeSH
- imunohistochemie MeSH
- karcinom z renálních buněk chemie genetika sekundární MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- lidské chromozomy, pár 11 genetika MeSH
- lidské chromozomy, pár 6 genetika MeSH
- nádorové biomarkery analýza MeSH
- nádory ledvin chemie genetika patologie MeSH
- nádory z perivaskulárních epiteloidních buněk chemie patologie MeSH
- transkripční faktory BHLH-Zip genetika MeSH
- translokace genetická MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- Názvy látek
- antigeny diferenciační myelomonocytární MeSH
- CD antigeny MeSH
- CD68 antigen, human MeSH Prohlížeč
- nádorové biomarkery MeSH
- TFEB protein, human MeSH Prohlížeč
- transkripční faktory BHLH-Zip MeSH
Renal cell carcinomas with t(6;11) chromosome translocation involving the TFEB gene are indolent neoplasms which often occur in young patients. In this study, we report seven cases of renal cell carcinoma with TFEB rearrangement, two of whom had histologically proven metastasis. Patients (4F, 3M) ranged in age from 19 to 55 years (mean 37). One patient developed paratracheal and pleural metastases 24 months after surgery and died of disease after 46 months; another one recurred with neoplastic nodules in the perinephric fat and pelvic soft tissue. Histologically, either cytological or architectural appearance was peculiar in each case whereas one tumor displayed the typical biphasic morphology. By immunohistochemistry, all tumors labelled for cathepsin K, Melan-A and CD68 (KP1 clone). HMB45 and PAX8 staining were detected in six of seven tumors. All tumors were negative for CD68 (PG-M1 clone), CKAE1-AE3, CK7, CAIX, and AMACR. Seven pure epithelioid PEComa/epithelioid angiomyolipomas, used as control, were positive for cathepsin K, melanocytic markers, and CD68 (PG-M1 and KP1) and negative for PAX8. Fluorescence in situ hybridization results showed the presence of TFEB gene translocation in all t(6;11) renal cell carcinomas with a high frequency of split TFEB fluorescent signals (mean 74%). In the primary and metastatic samples of the two aggressive tumors, increased gene copy number was observed (3-5 fluorescent signals per neoplastic nuclei) with a concomitant increased number of CEP6. Review of the literature revealed older age and larger tumor size as correlating with aggressive behavior in these neoplasms. In conclusion, we present the clinical, morphological and molecular features of seven t(6;11) renal cell carcinomas, two with histologically demonstrated metastasis. We report the high frequency of split signals by FISH in tumors with t(6;11) chromosomal rearrangement and the occurrence of TFEB gene copy number gains in the aggressive cases, analyzing either the primary or metastatic tumor. Finally, we demonstrate the usefulness of CD68 (PG-M1) immunohistochemical staining in distinguishing t(6;11) renal cell carcinoma from pure epithelioid PEComa/epithelioid angiomyolipoma.
Department of Diagnostic and Public Health Section of Pathology University of Verona Verona Italy
Department of Pathology Charles University Hospital Plzen Plzen Czech Republic
Department of Pathology Hospital 'Mater Salutis' Legnago Italy
Department of Pathology Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions Baltimore USA
Department of Pathology Pederzoli Hospital Peschiera del Garda Italy
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Pathol Int. 2011 Sep;61(9):539-45 PubMed
Am J Surg Pathol. 2012 Oct;36(10):1516-26 PubMed
Int Urol Nephrol. 2009;41(3):553-7 PubMed
Int J Surg Case Rep. 2015;7C:16-9 PubMed
Hum Pathol. 2012 May;43(5):726-36 PubMed
J Clin Oncol. 2006 Apr 1;24(10):1529-34 PubMed
Mod Pathol. 2017 Jul;30(7):998-1012 PubMed
Ann Diagn Pathol. 2014 Dec;18(6):351-7 PubMed
Clin Lab Med. 2005 Jun;25(2):363-78 PubMed
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Feb 10;28(5):e65-8 PubMed
Am J Pathol. 2001 Jun;158(6):2089-96 PubMed
Am J Surg Pathol. 2014 May;38(5):604-14 PubMed
Am J Surg Pathol. 2010 May;34(5):715-22 PubMed
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 May 13;100(10):6051-6 PubMed
J Med Case Rep. 2015 Dec 09;9:281 PubMed
Am J Surg Pathol. 2012 Jan;36(1):35-42 PubMed
Mod Pathol. 2009 Aug;22(8):1016-22 PubMed
Histopathology. 2014 Jan;64(2):306-9 PubMed
Am J Surg Pathol. 2017 Mar;41(3):287-298 PubMed
J Urol. 2011 Jan;185(1):24-9 PubMed
Am J Surg Pathol. 2008 May;32(5):656-70 PubMed
Am J Surg Pathol. 2012 May;36(5):654-62 PubMed
Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2013 Jun 15;6(7):1452-7 PubMed
Int J Surg Pathol. 2011 Aug;19(4):506-9 PubMed
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Dec 1;28(34):e709-13 PubMed
Mod Pathol. 2012 Jan;25(1):100-11 PubMed
Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2007 May;46(5):419-26 PubMed
Hum Pathol. 2017 Apr;62:175-179 PubMed
Semin Diagn Pathol. 2015 Mar;32(2):140-59 PubMed
Science. 2009 Jul 24;325(5939):473-7 PubMed
Am J Surg Pathol. 2016 Nov;40(11):1484-1495 PubMed
Cancer. 2008 Apr 1;112(7):1607-16 PubMed
Hum Mol Genet. 2003 Jul 15;12(14):1661-9 PubMed
Am J Surg Pathol. 2012 Sep;36(9):1327-38 PubMed
Semin Diagn Pathol. 2015 Mar;32(2):103-13 PubMed
TFEB Expression Profiling in Renal Cell Carcinomas: Clinicopathologic Correlations
