Everolimus in advanced, progressive, well-differentiated, non-functional neuroendocrine tumors: RADIANT-4 lung subgroup analysis
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu klinické zkoušky, fáze III, časopisecké články, multicentrická studie, randomizované kontrolované studie
PubMed
29055056
PubMed Central
PMC5765303
DOI
10.1111/cas.13427
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- RADIANT-4, everolimus, lung carcinoid, neuroendocrine tumors, progression-free survival,
- MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- dvojitá slepá metoda MeSH
- everolimus aplikace a dávkování škodlivé účinky MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- nádory plic farmakoterapie MeSH
- neuroendokrinní nádory farmakoterapie MeSH
- přežití bez známek nemoci MeSH
- prospektivní studie MeSH
- protinádorové látky aplikace a dávkování škodlivé účinky MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- klinické zkoušky, fáze III MeSH
- multicentrická studie MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
- Názvy látek
- everolimus MeSH
- protinádorové látky MeSH
In the phase III RADIANT-4 study, everolimus improved median progression-free survival (PFS) by 7.1 months in patients with advanced, progressive, well-differentiated (grade 1 or grade 2), non-functional lung or gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) vs placebo (hazard ratio, 0.48; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.35-0.67; P < .00001). This exploratory analysis reports the outcomes of the subgroup of patients with lung NETs. In RADIANT-4, patients were randomized (2:1) to everolimus 10 mg/d or placebo, both with best supportive care. This is a post hoc analysis of the lung subgroup with PFS, by central radiology review, as the primary endpoint; secondary endpoints included objective response rate and safety measures. Ninety of the 302 patients enrolled in the study had primary lung NET (everolimus, n = 63; placebo, n = 27). Median PFS (95% CI) by central review was 9.2 (6.8-10.9) months in the everolimus arm vs 3.6 (1.9-5.1) months in the placebo arm (hazard ratio, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.28-0.88). More patients who received everolimus (58%) experienced tumor shrinkage compared with placebo (13%). Most frequently reported (≥5% incidence) grade 3-4 drug-related adverse events (everolimus vs. placebo) included stomatitis (11% vs. 0%), hyperglycemia (10% vs. 0%), and any infections (8% vs. 0%). In patients with advanced, progressive, well-differentiated, non-functional lung NET, treatment with everolimus was associated with a median PFS improvement of 5.6 months, with a safety profile similar to that of the overall RADIANT-4 cohort. These results support the use of everolimus in patients with advanced, non-functional lung NET. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (no. NCT01524783).
Charité University Medicine Berlin Campus Virchow Klinikum Berlin Germany
Dana Farber Cancer Institute Boston MA USA
European Institute of Oncology IRCCS Milan Italy
Faculty of Medicine Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic
Fondazione IRCCS Foundation The National Institute of Tumors Milan Italy
Hospital Sant'Andrea La Sapienza University Rome Italy
Moffitt Cancer Center Tampa FL USA
Montefiore Einstein Center for Cancer Care Bronx NY USA
Netherlands Cancer Institute Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Amsterdam the Netherlands
Novartis Pharma AG Basel Switzerland
Novartis Pharma S A S Rueil Malmaison France
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation East Hanover NJ USA
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre Toronto ON Canada
University Hospitals Gasthuisberg Leuven and KU Leuven Leuven Belgium
University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston TX USA
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Yao JC, Hassan M, Phan A, et al One hundred years after “carcinoid”: epidemiology of and prognostic factors for neuroendocrine tumors in 35,825 cases in the United States. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:3063–3072. PubMed
Detterbeck FC. Clinical presentation and evaluation of neuroendocrine tumors of the lung. Thorac Surg Clin. 2014;24:267–276. PubMed
Taal BG, Visser O. Epidemiology of neuroendocrine tumours. Neuroendocrinology. 2004;80(Suppl 1):3–7. PubMed
Rekhtman N. Neuroendocrine tumors of the lung: an update. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2010;134:1628–1638. PubMed
Oberg K, Hellman P, Ferolla P, Papotti M, Group EGW. Neuroendocrine bronchial and thymic tumors: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow‐up. Ann Oncol. 2012;23(Suppl 7):vii120–vii123. PubMed
Granberg D. Neuroendocrine tumors of the lung In:Yalcin S, Öberg K, eds. Neuroendocrine Tumors: Diagnosis and Management. Berlin, Heidelberg:Springer‐Verlag;2015:143–164.
Filosso PL, Ferolla P, Guerrera F, et al Multidisciplinary management of advanced lung neuroendocrine tumors. J Thorac Dis. 2015;7:S163–S171. PubMed PMC
Krug LM, Kris MG, Rosenzweig K, et al Cancer of the Lung: small cell and other neuroendocrine tumors of the lung In:DeVita VT, Lawrence TS, Rosenberg SA, Weinberg RA, Depinho RA, eds. Cancer Principles and Practice of Oncology. Alphen aan den Rijn:Wolters Kluwer, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins;2008:946–971.
Pavel M, O'Toole D, Costa F, et al ENETS consensus guidelines update for the management of distant metastatic disease of intestinal, pancreatic, bronchial neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) and NEN of unknown primary site. Neuroendocrinology. 2016;103:172–185. PubMed
Filosso PL, Ruffini E, Oliaro A, Papalia E, Donati G, Rena O. Long‐term survival of atypical bronchial carcinoids with liver metastases, treated with octreotide. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2002;21:913–917. PubMed
Waldherr C, Pless M, Maecke HR, Haldemann A, Mueller‐Brand J. The clinical value of [90Y‐DOTA]‐D‐Phe1‐Tyr3‐octreotide (90Y‐DOTATOC) in the treatment of neuroendocrine tumours: a clinical phase II study. Ann Oncol. 2001;12:941–945. PubMed
Mariniello A, Bodei L, Tinelli C, et al Long‐term results of PRRT in advanced bronchopulmonary carcinoid. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43:441–452. PubMed
Kulke MH, Lenz HJ, Meropol NJ, et al Activity of sunitinib in patients with advanced neuroendocrine tumors. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:3403–3410. PubMed
Grande E, Capdevila J, Castellano D, et al Pazopanib in pretreated advanced neuroendocrine tumors: a phase II, open‐label trial of the Spanish Task Force Group for Neuroendocrine Tumors (GETNE). Ann Oncol. 2015;26:1987–1993. PubMed
Yao JC, Phan A, Hoff PM, et al Targeting vascular endothelial growth factor in advanced carcinoid tumor: a random assignment phase II study of depot octreotide with bevacizumab and pegylated interferon alpha‐2b. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:1316–1323. PubMed
Brizzi MP, Berruti A, Ferrero A, et al Continuous 5‐fluorouracil infusion plus long acting octreotide in advanced well‐differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas. A phase II trial of the Piemonte oncology network. BMC Cancer. 2009;9:388. PubMed PMC
Bajetta E, Catena L, Procopio G, et al Are capecitabine and oxaliplatin (XELOX) suitable treatments for progressing low‐grade and high‐grade neuroendocrine tumours? Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2007;59:637–642. PubMed
Ekeblad S, Sundin A, Janson ET, et al Temozolomide as monotherapy is effective in treatment of advanced malignant neuroendocrine tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13:2986–2991. PubMed
Fazio N, Granberg D, Grossman A, et al Everolimus plus octreotide long‐acting repeatable in patients with advanced lung neuroendocrine tumors: analysis of the phase 3, randomized, placebo‐controlled RADIANT‐2 study. Chest. 2013;143:955–962. PubMed
Yao JC, Lombard‐Bohas C, Baudin E, et al Daily oral everolimus activity in patients with metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors after failure of cytotoxic chemotherapy: a phase II trial. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:69–76. PubMed PMC
Yao JC, Shah MH, Ito T, et al Everolimus for advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:514–523. PubMed PMC
Yao JC, Fazio N, Singh S, et al Everolimus for the treatment of advanced, non‐functional neuroendocrine tumours of the lung or gastrointestinal tract (RADIANT‐4): a randomised, placebo‐controlled, phase 3 study. Lancet. 2016;387:968–977. PubMed PMC
Klimstra DS, Modlin IR, Coppola D, Lloyd RV, Suster S. The pathologic classification of neuroendocrine tumors: a review of nomenclature, grading, and staging systems. Pancreas. 2010;39:707–712. PubMed
Rindi G, Arnold R, Bosman FT, et al Nomenclature and classification of neuroendocrine neoplasm of the digestive system In:Bosman FT, Carniero F, Hruban RH, Theise ND, eds. WHO Classification of Tumours of the Digestive System, 4th edn Lyon:International Agency for Research on Cancer;2010:13–14.
Hendifar AE, Marchevsky AM, Tuli R. Neuroendocrine tumors of the lung: current challenges and advances in the diagnosis and management of well‐differentiated disease. J Thorac Oncol. 2017;12:425–436. PubMed
Pelosi GFA, Cossa M, et al What clinicians are asking pathologists when dealing with lung neuroendocrine neoplasms? Semin Diagn Pathol. 2015;32:469–479. PubMed
Ferolla P, Brizzi MP, Meyer T, et al Efficacy and safety of pasireotide LAR or everolimus alone, or in combination in patients with advanced carcinoids (NET) of the lung/thymus: results from the randomized, phase 2 LUNA study. Ann Oncol. 2016;27:136–148.
Yao JC, Fazio N, Singh S, et al Everolimus (EVE) in advanced, nonfunctional, well‐differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NET) of gastrointestinal (GI) or lung origin: second interim overall survival (OS) results from the RADIANT‐4 study. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34:4090.
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT01524783