The prognostic effect of salvage surgery and radiotherapy in patients with recurrent primary urethral carcinoma
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
Grantová podpora
K12 CA090625
NCI NIH HHS - United States
PubMed
29055518
PubMed Central
PMC10184495
DOI
10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.09.012
PII: S1078-1439(17)30475-1
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Primary urethral carcinoma, Radiotherapy, Recurrence, Salvage, Surgery,
- MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- lokální recidiva nádoru patologie MeSH
- míra přežití MeSH
- nádory močové trubice mortalita patologie radioterapie MeSH
- prognóza MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- záchranná terapie metody MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
BACKGROUND: To evaluate the impact of salvage therapy (ST) on overall survival (OS) in recurrent primary urethral cancer (PUC). PATIENTS: A series of 139 patients (96 men, 43 women; median age = 66, interquartile range: 57-77) were diagnosed with PUC at 10 referral centers between 1993 and 2012. The modality of ST of recurrence (salvage surgery vs. radiotherapy) was recorded. Kaplan-Meier analysis with log-rank was used to estimate the impact of ST on OS (median follow-up = 21, interquartile range: 5-48). RESULTS: The 3-year OS for patients free of any recurrence (I), with solitary or concomitant urethral recurrence (II), and nonurethral recurrence (III) was 86.5%, 74.5%, and 48.2%, respectively (P = 0.002 for I vs. III and II vs. III; P = 0.55 for I vs. II). In the 80 patients with recurrences, the modality of primary treatment of recurrence was salvage surgery in 30 (37.5%), salvage radiotherapy (RT) in 8 (10.0%), and salvage surgery plus RT in 5 (6.3%) whereas 37 patients did not receive ST for recurrence (46.3%). In patients with recurrences, those who underwent salvage surgery or RT-based ST had similar 3-year OS (84.9%, 71.6%) compared to patients without recurrence (86.7%, P = 0.65), and exhibited superior 3-year OS compared to patients who did not undergo ST (38.0%, P<0.001 compared to surgery, P = 0.045 to RT-based ST, P = 0.29 for surgery vs. RT-based ST). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, patients who underwent ST for recurrent PUC demonstrated improved OS compared to those who did not receive ST and exhibited similar survival to those who never developed recurrence after primary treatment.
Department of Urology 2nd Medical School Charles University Prague Czech Republic
Department of Urology Julius Maximillians University Würzburg Germany
Department of Urology University Hospital Bern Switzerland
Department of Urology University Hospital Regensburg Regensburg Germany
Department of Urology University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf Hamburg Eppendorf Germany
Department of Urology University of Michigan Ann Arbor MI
Department of Urology University of Tübingen Tübingen Germany
Institute of Urology USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center Los Angeles CA
Mansoura Clinic Urology and Nephrology Center Mansoura Egypt
Massachusetts General Hospital Harvard Medical School Boston MA
Vanderbilt University Medical Center Department of Urologic Surgery Nashville TN
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Visser O, Adolfsson J, Rossi S, et al. Incidence and survival of rare urogenital cancers in Europe. Eur J Cancer 2012;48:456–64. PubMed
Swartz MA, Porter MP, Lin DW, Weiss NS. Incidence of primary urethral carcinoma in the United States. Urology 2006;68:1164–8. PubMed
Gakis G, Morgan TM, Efstathiou JA, et al. Prognostic factors and outcomes in primary urethral cancer: results from the international collaboration on primary urethral carcinoma. World J Urol 2016;34:97–103. PubMed PMC
Gakis G, Morgan TM, Daneshmand S, et al. Impact of perioperative chemotherapy on survival in patients with advanced primary urethral cancer: results of the international collaboration on primary urethral carcinoma. Ann Oncol 2015;26:1754–9. PubMed
Dayyani F, Pettaway CA, Kamat AM, et al. Retrospective analysis of survival outcomes and the role of cisplatin-based chemotherapy in patients with urethral carcinomas referred to medical oncologists. Urol Oncol 2013;31:1171–7. PubMed PMC
Gakis G, Witjes JA, Comperat E, et al. EAU guidelines on primary urethral carcinoma. Eur Urol 2013;64:823–30. PubMed
Comperat E, Varinot J. Immunochemical and molecular assessment of urothelial neoplasms and aspects of the 2016 WHO classification. Histopathology 2016;69:717–26. PubMed
Derksen JW, Visser O, de la Riviere GB, et al. Primary urethral carcinoma in females: an epidemiologic study on demographical factors, histological types, tumour stage and survival. World J Urol 2013;31:147–53. PubMed
Rabbani F Prognostic factors in male urethral cancer. Cancer 2011;117:2426–34. PubMed
Fahmy O, Scharpf M, Fend F, et al. Feasibility of penis-preserving surgery for urethral melanoma: proposal for a therapeutic algorithm. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2015;13:e411–3. PubMed
Gakis G, Efstathiou J, Lerner SP, et al. ICUD-EAU International Consultation on Bladder Cancer 2012: radical cystectomy and bladder preservation for muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. Eur Urol 2013;63:45–57. PubMed