2017 European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology Classification Criteria for Adult and Juvenile Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathies and Their Major Subgroups

. 2017 Dec ; 69 (12) : 2271-2282. [epub] 20171027

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, Research Support, N.I.H., Intramural, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid29106061

Grantová podpora
MR/P020941/1 Medical Research Council - United Kingdom
ZIA ES101074-11 Intramural NIH HHS - United States
ZIA ES101074-15 Intramural NIH HHS - United States
ZIA ES101074-12 Intramural NIH HHS - United States
18474 Versus Arthritis - United Kingdom
MR/N003322/1 Medical Research Council - United Kingdom
ZIA ES101074-14 Intramural NIH HHS - United States
ZIA ES101074-10 Intramural NIH HHS - United States
18474 Arthritis Research UK - United Kingdom
ZIA ES101074-13 Intramural NIH HHS - United States
Z99 ES999999 Intramural NIH HHS - United States

OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate new classification criteria for adult and juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) and their major subgroups. METHODS: Candidate variables were assembled from published criteria and expert opinion using consensus methodology. Data were collected from 47 rheumatology, dermatology, neurology, and pediatric clinics worldwide. Several statistical methods were utilized to derive the classification criteria. RESULTS: Based on data from 976 IIM patients (74% adults; 26% children) and 624 non-IIM patients with mimicking conditions (82% adults; 18% children), new criteria were derived. Each item is assigned a weighted score. The total score corresponds to a probability of having IIM. Subclassification is performed using a classification tree. A probability cutoff of 55%, corresponding to a score of 5.5 (6.7 with muscle biopsy) "probable IIM," had best sensitivity/specificity (87%/82% without biopsies, 93%/88% with biopsies) and is recommended as a minimum to classify a patient as having IIM. A probability of ≥90%, corresponding to a score of ≥7.5 (≥8.7 with muscle biopsy), corresponds to "definite IIM." A probability of <50%, corresponding to a score of <5.3 (<6.5 with muscle biopsy), rules out IIM, leaving a probability of ≥50-<55% as "possible IIM." CONCLUSION: The European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology (EULAR/ACR) classification criteria for IIM have been endorsed by international rheumatology, dermatology, neurology, and pediatric groups. They employ easily accessible and operationally defined elements, and have been partially validated. They allow classification of "definite," "probable," and "possible" IIM, in addition to the major subgroups of IIM, including juvenile IIM. They generally perform better than existing criteria.

Academic Medical Centre Amsterdam The Netherlands

Brigham and Women's Hospital and Boston VA Healthcare Boston Massachusetts

Brigham and Women's Hospital Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts

Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust University of Manchester Manchester UK

Charles University Prague Czech Republic

Duke University Durham North Carolina

Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust London UK

Hospital General de Occidente Secretaría de Salud and University of Guadalajara Guadalajara Mexico

Institute of Rheumatology Warsaw Poland

IWK Health Centre and Dalhousie University Halifax Nova Scotia Canada

Karolinska Institutet Stockholm Sweden

Karolinska University Hospital and Karolinska Institutet Stockholm Sweden

King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust London UK

Mayo Clinic College of Medicine Rochester Minnesota

Mayo Clinic College of Medicine Rochester Minnesota and University of Alabama and Birmingham VA Medical Center Birmingham Alabama

National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases NIH Bethesda Maryland

National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences NIH Bethesda Maryland

National Institute of Geriatrics Rheumatology and Rehabilitation Warsaw Poland

Oregon State University Corvallis

Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet Oslo Norway

People's Hospital of Beijing University Beijing China

Philadelphia VA Medical Center and Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia

Seoul National University College of Medicine Seoul Republic of Korea

Tokyo Medical and Dental University Tokyo Japan

University of Debrecen Debrecen Hungary

University of Kansas Medical Center Kansas City

University of Liverpool Liverpool UK

University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine Pittsburgh Pennsylvania

University of Toronto and The Hospital for Sick Children Toronto Ontario Canada

University of Tsukuba Tsukuba Japan

Vall d'Hebron General Hospital Barcelona Spain

Komentář v

PubMed

Komentář v

PubMed

Komentář v

PubMed

Komentář v

PubMed

Erratum v

PubMed

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Plotz PH, Rider GL, Targoff IN, et al. NIH conference. Myositis: immunologic contributions to understanding cause, pathogenesis, and therapy. Ann Intern Med. 1995;122:715–24. PubMed

Dalakas MC. Inflammatory muscle diseases. N Eng J Med. 2015;372:1734–47. PubMed

Rider LG, Giannini EH, Brunner HI, et al. International Myositis Assessment and Clinical Studies Group. International consensus on preliminary definitions of improvement in adult and juvenile myositis. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;50:2281–90. PubMed

Oddis CV, Rider LG, Reed AM, et al. International consensus guidelines for trials of therapies in the idiopathic inflammatory myopathies. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;52:2607–15. PubMed

Medsger TA, Jr, Dawson WN, Jr, Masi AT. The epidemiology of polymyositis. Am J Med. 1970;48:715–23. PubMed

DeVere R, Bradley WG. Polymyositis: its presentation, morbidity and mortality. Brain. 1975;98:637–66. PubMed

Bohan A, Peter JB. Polymyositis and dermatomyositis (First of two parts) N Engl J Med. 1975;292:344–7. PubMed

Bohan A, Peter JB. Polymyositis and dermatomyositis (Second of two parts) N Engl J Med. 1975;292:403–7. PubMed

Griggs RC, Askanas V, DiMauro S, et al. Inclusion body myositis and myopathies. Ann Neurol. 1995;38:705–13. PubMed

Tanimoto K, Nakano K, Kano S, et al. Classification criteria for polymyositis and dermatomyositis. J Rheumatol. 1995;22:668–74. PubMed

Targoff IN, Miller FW, Medsger TA, et al. Classification criteria for the idiopathic inflammatory myopathies. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 1997;9:527–35. PubMed

Mastaglia FL, Phillips BA. Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: epidemiology, classification and diagnostic criteria. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2002;28:723–41. PubMed

van der Meulen MF, Bronner IM, Hoogendijk JE, et al. Polymyositis: an overdiagnosed entity. Neurology. 2003;61:316–21. PubMed

Dalakas M, Hohlfeld R. Polymyositis and dermatomyositis. Lancet. 2003;362:971–982. PubMed

Hoogendijk JE, Amato AA, Lecky BR, et al. 119th ENMC international workshop: trial design in adult idiopathic inflammatory myopathies, with the exception of inclusion body myositis, 10–12 October 2003, Naarden, The Netherlands. Neuromuscul Disord. 2004;14:337–45. PubMed

Troyanov Y, Targoff IN, Tremblay JL, et al. Novel classification of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies based on overlap syndrome features and autoantibodies: analysis of 100 French Canadian patients. Medicine. 2005;84:231–49. PubMed

Miller FW, Rider LG, Plotz PH, et al. Polymyositis: an overdiagnosed entity. Neurology. 2004;63:402. PubMed

Bradley WG. Polymyositis: an overdiagnosed entity. Neurology. 2004;63:402. PubMed

Hengstman GJ, van Engelen BG. Polymyositis: an overdiagnosed entity. Neurology. 2004;63:402–3. PubMed

Engel AG, Arahata K. Mononuclear cells in myopathies: Quantitation of functionally distinct subsets, recognition of antigen-specific cell-mediated cytotoxicity in some diseases, and implications for the pathogenesis of the different inflammatory myopathies. Hum Pathol. 1986;17:704–21. PubMed

Betteridge Z, McHugh N. Myositis-specific autoantibodies: an important tool to support diagnosis of myositis. J Intern Med. 2016;280:8–23. PubMed

Rider LG, Nistala K. The juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: pathogenesis, clinical and autoantibody phenotypes, and outcomes. J Intern Med. 2016;280:24–38. PubMed PMC

Love LA, Leff RL, Fraser DD, et al. A new approach to the classification of idiopathic inflammatory myopathy: Myositis-specific autoantibodies define useful homogeneous patient groups. Medicine (Baltimore) 1991;70:360–74. PubMed

Singh JA, Solomon DH, Dougados M, et al. Development of classification and response criteria for rheumatic diseases. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;55:348–52. PubMed

Dougados M, Gossec L. Classification criteria for rheumatic diseases: why and how? Arthritis Rheum. 2007;57:1112–5. PubMed

Van de Ven AH, Delbecq AL. The Effectiveness of Nominal, Delphi, and Interacting Group Decision Making Processes. Acad Manage J. 1974;17:605–21.

Fink A, Kosecoff J, Chassin M, et al. Consensus Methods: Characteristics and Guidelines for Use. Am J Public Health. 1984;74:979–83. PubMed PMC

Ruperto N, Meiorin S, Iusan SM, et al. Consensus procedures and their role in pediatric rheumatology. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2008;10:142–6. PubMed

Totikidis V. Applying the Nominal Group Technique (NGT) in Community Based Action Research for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention. The Australian Community Psychologist. 2010;22:18–29.

ARA Glossary Committee. Dictionary of the Rheumatic Diseases 1982; Vol I: Signs and Symptoms [monograph] New York, NY: Contact Associates International Ltd;

ARA Glossary Committee. Dictionary of the Rheumatic Diseases 1985; Vol II: Diagnostic Testing [monograph] New York, NY: Contact Associates International Ltd;

Efron B, Tibshirani RJ. Improvements on Cross-Validation: The 632+ Bootstrap Method. J Am Stat Assoc. 1997;92:548–60.

Hsiung SH, Chan EF, Elenitsas R, et al. Multicentric reticulohistiocytosis presenting with clinical features of dermatomyositis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003;48(2 Suppl):S11–4. PubMed

Fett N, Liu RH. Multicentric reticulohistiocytosis with dermatomyositis-like features: a more common disease presentation than previously thought. Dermatology. 2011;222:102–8. PubMed

Aggarwal R, Ringold S, Khanna D, et al. Distinctions between diagnostic and classification criteria? Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2015;67:891–7. PubMed PMC

Casciola-Rosen L, Mammen AL. Myositis autoantibodies. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2012;24:602–8. PubMed PMC

Lloyd TE, Mammen AL, Amato AA, et al. Evaluation and construction of diagnostic criteria for inclusion body myositis. Neurology. 2014;83:426–33. PubMed PMC

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...