Plants often grow in clusters of various sizes and have a variable number of flowers per inflorescence. This small-scale spatial clustering affects insect foraging strategies and plant reproductive success. In our study, we aimed to determine how visitation rate and foraging behaviour of pollinators depend on the number of flowers per plant and on the size of clusters of multiple plants using Dracocephalum moldavica (Lamiaceae) as a target species. We measured flower visitation rate by observations of insects visiting single plants and clusters of plants with different numbers of flowers. Detailed data on foraging behaviour within clusters of different sizes were gathered for honeybees, Apis mellifera, the most abundant visitor of Dracocephalum in the experiments. We found that the total number of flower visitors increased with the increasing number of flowers on individual plants and in larger clusters, but less then proportionally. Although individual honeybees visited more flowers in larger clusters, they visited a smaller proportion of flowers, as has been previously observed. Consequently, visitation rate per flower and unit time peaked in clusters with an intermediate number of flowers. These patterns do not conform to expectations based on optimal foraging theory and the ideal free distribution model. We attribute this discrepancy to incomplete information about the distribution of resources. Detailed observations and video recordings of individual honeybees also showed that the number of flowers had no effect on handling time of flowers by honeybees. We evaluated the implications of these patterns for insect foraging biology and plant reproduction.

Biology Centre of the Czech Academy of Sciences Institute of Entomology České Budějovice Czech Republic

Department of Zoology Faculty of Science University of South Bohemia České Budějovice Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Zimmerman M. Reproduction in Polemonium: competition for pollinators. Ecology. 1980;61(3):497–501. doi: 10.2307/1937414 DOI

Jennersten O, Nilsson SG. Insect flower visitation frequency and seed production in relation to patch size of Viscaria vulgaris (Caryophyllaceae). Oikos. 1993;68:283–292. doi: 10.2307/3544841 DOI

Emlen JM. The role of time and energy in food preference. The American Naturalist. 1966;100(916):611–617. doi: 10.1086/282455 DOI

MacArthur RH, Pianka ER. On optimal use of a patchy environment. The American Naturalist. 1966;100(916):603–609. doi: 10.1086/282454 DOI

Hegland SJ. Floral neighbourhood effects on pollination success in red clover are scale-dependent. Functional Ecology. 2014;28(3):561–568. doi: 10.1111/1365-2435.12223 DOI

Jha S, Vandermeer JH. Contrasting bee foraging in response to resource scale and local habitat management. Oikos. 2009;118(8):1174–1180. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2009.17523.x DOI

Schmid B, Nottebrock H, Esler K, Pagel J, Pauw A, Böhning-Gaese K, et al. Responses of nectar-feeding birds to floral resources at multiple spatial scales. Ecography. 2016;39:619–629. doi: 10.1111/ecog.01621 DOI

Giurfa M, Vorobyev M, Kevan P, Menzel R. Detection of coloured stimuli by honeybees: minimum visual angles and receptor specific contrasts. Journal of Comparative Physiology A. 1996;178(5):699–709. doi: 10.1007/BF00227381 DOI

Conner JK, Rush S. Effects of flower size and number on pollinator visitation to wild radish, Raphanus raphanistrum. Oecologia. 1996;105(4):509–516. doi: 10.1007/BF00330014 PubMed DOI

Dreisig H. Ideal free distributions of nectar foraging bumblebees. Oikos. 1995;72:161–172. doi: 10.2307/3546218 DOI

Danderson CA, Molano-Flores B. Effects of herbivory and inflorescence size on insect visitation to Eryngium yuccifolium (Apiaceae) a prairie plant. The American Midland Naturalist. 2010;163(1):234–246. doi: 10.1674/0003-0031-163.1.234 DOI

Grindeland JM, Sletvold N, Ims RA. Effects of floral display size and plant density on pollinator visitation rate in a natural population of Digitalis purpurea. Functional Ecology. 2005;19(3):383–390. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2005.00988.x DOI

Brunet J, Thairu MW, Henss JM, Link RI, Kluever JA, Diggle PK. The effects of flower, floral display, and reward sizes on bumblebee foraging behavior when pollen is the reward and plants are dichogamous. International Journal of Plant Sciences. 2015;176(9):811–819. doi: 10.1086/683339 DOI

Goulson D, Stout JC, Hawson SA, Allen JA. Floral display size in comfrey, Symphytum officinale L.(Boraginaceae): relationships with visitation by three bumblebee species and subsequent seed set. Oecologia. 1998;113(4):502–508. doi: 10.1007/s004420050402 PubMed DOI

Mitchell R, Karron J, Holmquist K, Bell J. The influence of Mimulus ringens floral display size on pollinator visitation patterns. Functional Ecology. 2004;18(1):116–124. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2004.00812.x DOI

Ohara M, Higashi S. Effects of inflorescence size on visits from pollinators and seed set of Corydalis ambigua (Papaveraceae). Oecologia. 1994;98(1):25–30. doi: 10.1007/BF00326086 PubMed DOI

Ohashi K, Yahara T. Visit larger displays but probe proportionally fewer flowers: counterintuitive behaviour of nectar-collecting bumble bees achieves an ideal free distribution. Functional Ecology. 2002;16(4):492–503. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2435.2002.00644.x DOI

Vaughton G, Ramsey M. Floral display, pollinator visitation and reproductive success in the dioecious perennial herb Wurmbea dioica (Liliaceae). Oecologia. 1998;115(1-2):93–101. doi: 10.1007/s004420050495 PubMed DOI

Ohashi K, Yahara T. Effects of variation in flower number on pollinator visits in Cirsium purpuratum (Asteraceae). American Journal of Botany. 1998;85(2):219–219. doi: 10.2307/2446309 PubMed DOI

Charnov EL. Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem. Theoretical Population Biology. 1976;9(2):129–136. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(76)90040-X PubMed DOI

Pyke GH. Optimal foraging: movement patterns of bumblebees between inflorescences. Theoretical Population Biology. 1978;13(1):72–98. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(78)90036-9 PubMed DOI

Goulson D. Why do pollinators visit proportionally fewer flowers in large patches? Oikos. 2000;91(3):485–492. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.910309.x DOI

Hassell M, Lawton J, Beddington J. The components of arthropod predation: I. The prey death-rate. Journal of Animal Ecology. 1976;45:135–164. doi: 10.2307/3772 DOI

Giller PS. The control of handling time and its effects on the foraging strategy of a heteropteran predator, Notonecta. Journal of Animal Ecology. 1980;49:699–712. doi: 10.2307/4222 DOI

Lucas JR. Partial prey consumption by antlion larvae. Animal Behaviour. 1985;33(3):945–958. doi: 10.1016/S0003-3472(85)80029-4 DOI

Astrom M, Lundberg P, Danell K. Partial prey consumption by browsers: trees as patches. Journal of Animal Ecology. 1990;59:287–300. doi: 10.2307/5173 DOI

Gende S, Quinn T, Willson M. Consumption choice by bears feeding on salmon. Oecologia. 2001;127(3):372–382. doi: 10.1007/s004420000590 PubMed DOI

Andersson S. Floral display and pollination success in Achillea ptarmica (Asteraceae). Ecography. 1991;14(3):186–191. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.1991.tb00651.x DOI

de Jong TJ, Waser NM, Price MV, Ring RM. Plant size, geitonogamy and seed set in Ipomopsis aggregata. Oecologia. 1992;89(3):310–315. doi: 10.1007/BF00317407 PubMed DOI

Ruane LG, Rotzin AT, Congleton PH. Floral display size, conspecific density and florivory affect fruit set in natural populations of Phlox hirsuta, an endangered species. Annals of Botany. 2014;113(5):887–893. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcu007 PubMed DOI PMC

Ishihama F, Washitani I. Behavior of queen bumblebee pollinators on Primula sieboldii (Primulaceae) in response to different patch sizes and spacing. Plant Species Biology. 2007;22(3):167–174. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-1984.2007.00189.x DOI

Krushelnycky PD. Evaluating the interacting influences of pollination, seed predation, invasive species and isolation on reproductive success in a threatened alpine plant. PLOS ONE. 2014;9(2):e88948 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088948 PubMed DOI PMC

Garbuzov M, Madsen A, Ratnieks FL. Patch size has no effect on insect visitation rate per unit area in garden-scale flower patches. Acta Oecologica. 2015;62:53–57. doi: 10.1016/j.actao.2014.12.002 DOI

Blaauw BR, Isaacs R. Larger patches of diverse floral resources increase insect pollinator density, diversity, and their pollination of native wildflowers. Basic and Applied Ecology. 2014;15(8):701–711. doi: 10.1016/j.baae.2014.10.001 DOI

Kunin WE. Population size and density effects in pollination: pollinator foraging and plant reproductive success in experimental arrays of Brassica kaber. Journal of Ecology. 1997;85:225–234. doi: 10.2307/2960653 DOI

Anic V, Henríquez C, Abades S, Bustamante R. Number of conspecifics and reproduction in the invasive plant Eschscholzia californica (Papaveraceae): is there a pollinator-mediated Allee effect? Plant Biology. 2015;17(3):720–727. doi: 10.1111/plb.12293 PubMed DOI

Hegland SJ, Boeke L. Relationships between the density and diversity of floral resources and flower visitor activity in a temperate grassland community. Ecological Entomology. 2006;31(5):532–538. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2311.2006.00812.x DOI

García-Meneses PM, Ramsay PM. Pollinator response to within-patch spatial context determines reproductive output of a giant rosette plant. Basic and Applied Ecology. 2012;13(6):516–523. doi: 10.1016/j.baae.2012.08.011 DOI

Milberg P, Bertilsson A. What determines seed set in Dracocephalum ryuschiana L. an endangered grassland plant? Flora. 1997;192(4):361–367. doi: 10.1016/S0367-2530(17)30806-X DOI

Wood S. Generalized additive models: an introduction with R. CRC press; 2006.

R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; 2013. Available from: http://www.R-project.org/.

Cribari-Neto F, Zeileis A. Beta regression in R. Journal of Statistical Software. 2009;34(2):1–24.

Stoffel MA, Nakagawa S, Schielzeth H. rptR: Repeatability estimation and variance decomposition by generalized linear mixed-effects models. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. in press;.

Fretwell SD, Calver JS. On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds. Acta Biotheoretica. 1969;19(1):37–44. doi: 10.1007/BF01601954 DOI

Seeley TD. Social foraging by honeybees: how colonies allocate foragers among patches of flowers. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 1986;19(5):343–354. doi: 10.1007/BF00295707 DOI

Spaethe J, Tautz J, Chittka L. Visual constraints in foraging bumblebees: flower size and color affect search time and flight behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2001;98(7):3898–3903. doi: 10.1073/pnas.071053098 PubMed DOI PMC

Giurfa M, Lehrer M. Honeybee vision and floral displays: from detection to close-up recognition In: Chittka L, Thomson JD, editors. Cognitive ecology of pollination. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2001. p. 61–82.

Abrahams MV. Patch choice under perceptual constraints: a cause for departures from an ideal free distribution. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 1986;19(6):409–415. doi: 10.1007/BF00300543 DOI

Stephens DW. Learning and behavioral ecology: incomplete information and environmental predictability In: Papaj D, Lewis A, editors. Insect Learning. Chapman & Hall, New York; 1993. p. 195–218.

Olsson O, Brown JS. The foraging benefits of information and the penalty of ignorance. Oikos. 2006;112(2):260–273. doi: 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2006.13548.x DOI

Eliassen S, Jørgensen C, Mangel M, Giske J. Exploration or exploitation: life expectancy changes the value of learning in foraging strategies. Oikos. 2007;116(3):513–523. doi: 10.1111/j.2006.0030-1299.15462.x DOI

Bernstein C, Kacelnik A, Krebs JR. Individual decisions and the distribution of predators in a patchy environment. Journal of Animal Ecology. 1988;57:1007–1026. doi: 10.2307/5108 DOI

Thomson JD. Effects of variation in inflorescence size and floral rewards on the visitation rates of traplining pollinators of Aralia hispida. Evolutionary Ecology. 1988;2(1):65–76. doi: 10.1007/BF02071589 DOI

Schmitt J. Flowering plant density and pollinator visitation in Senecio. Oecologia. 1983;60(1):97–102. doi: 10.1007/BF00379326 PubMed DOI

Paton DC. Honeybees in the Australian environment. Bioscience. 1993;43(2):95–103. doi: 10.2307/1311970 DOI

Brody AK, Mitchell RJ. Effects of experimental manipulation of inflorescence size on pollination and pre-dispersal seed predation in the hummingbird-pollinated plant Ipomopsis aggregata. Oecologia. 1997;110(1):86–93. doi: 10.1007/s004420050136 PubMed DOI

Water stress and nitrogen supply affect floral traits and pollination of the white mustard, Sinapis alba (Brassicaceae)

Experimental loss of generalist plants reveals alterations in plant-pollinator interactions and a constrained flexibility of foraging

Flower visitation by hoverflies (Diptera: Syrphidae) in a temperate plant-pollinator network

Vertical stratification of plant-pollinator interactions in a temperate grassland