Pregnancy outcomes in women on metformin for diabetes or other indications among those seeking teratology information services
Language English Country Great Britain, England Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Observational Study, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
PubMed
29215149
PubMed Central
PMC5809340
DOI
10.1111/bcp.13481
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- diabetes, metformin, observational study, pregnancy, spontaneous abortion, teratogen,
- MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Hypoglycemic Agents administration & dosage adverse effects MeSH
- Cohort Studies MeSH
- Pregnancy Complications drug therapy MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Metformin administration & dosage adverse effects MeSH
- Stillbirth epidemiology MeSH
- Prospective Studies MeSH
- Pregnancy Trimester, First MeSH
- Abortion, Spontaneous epidemiology MeSH
- Pregnancy in Diabetics drug therapy MeSH
- Pregnancy MeSH
- Pregnancy Outcome * MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Pregnancy MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Multicenter Study MeSH
- Observational Study MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Hypoglycemic Agents MeSH
- Metformin MeSH
AIMS: Metformin is used to treat type 2 diabetes, polycystic ovary syndrome associated infertility, and gestational diabetes. This study aims to evaluate the safety of metformin in early pregnancy. METHOD: We evaluated the risk of major birth defects and pregnancy losses in a cohort of pregnant women exposed to metformin during the first trimester for different indications relative to a matched unexposed reference group. RESULTS: The risk of major birth defects was 5.1% (20/392) in pregnancies exposed to metformin during the first trimester and 2.1% (9/431) in the reference group [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 1.70; 95% CI 0.70-4.38]. Among metformin users, this risk was 7.8% (17/219) in patients with pre-gestational diabetes and 1.7% (3/173) in those without this diagnosis. Compared to the unexposed reference, the OR for metformin user with diabetes was 3.95 (95% CI 1.77-9.41) and for metformin with other indications it was 0.83 (95% CI 0.18-2.81). The risk of pregnancy losses (spontaneous abortions and stillbirths) was 20.8% in women on metformin during the first trimester and 10.8% in the reference group [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.57; 95% CI 0.90-2.74]. The risks for women on metformin with and without pre-gestational diabetes were 24.0% and 16.8% respectively, with adjusted HR of 2.51 (95% CI 1.44-4.36) and 1.38 (95% CI 0.74-2.59) when compared to the reference. CONCLUSION: Pregnant women with pre-gestational diabetes on metformin are at a higher risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes than the general population. This appears to be due to the underlying diabetes since women on metformin for other indications do not present meaningfully increased risks.
CZTIS 3rd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czech Republic
Department of Epidemiology Harvard School of Public Health Boston Massachusetts USA
Faculty of Medicine Department of Pharmacology Karadeniz Technical University Trabzon Turkey
Pharmacovigilance Center of Dijon CHU Dijon France
Pharmacovigilance Center of Lyon Hospices Civils de Lyon France
Pharmacovigilance Center of Tours CHRU Tours France
Poison Control Center Bergamo Italy
Registre des Malformations en Rhone Alpes Faculté Laennec Lyon France
School of Pharmaceutical Sciences University of Geneva and Lausanne Geneva Switzerland
Teratology Information Service Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb The Netherlands
UKTIS Regional Drug and Therapeutics Centre Newcastle upon Tyne UK
See more in PubMed
Foretz M, Guigas B, Bertrand L, Pollak M, Viollet B. Metformin: from mechanisms of action to therapies. Cell Metab 2014; 20: 953–966. PubMed
Inzucchi SE, Bergenstal RM, Buse JB, Diamant M, Ferrannini E, Nauck M, et al Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes: a patient‐centered approach: position statement of the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetes Care 2012; 35: 1364–1379. PubMed PMC
Nicholson W, Bolen S, Witkop CT, Neale D, Wilson L, Bass E. Benefits and risks of oral diabetes agents compared with insulin in women with gestational diabetes: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 113: 193–205. PubMed
Zhao LP, Sheng XY, Zhou S, Yang T, Ma LY, Zhou Y, et al Metformin versus insulin for gestational diabetes mellitus: a meta‐analysis. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2015; 80: 1224–1234. PubMed PMC
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) . Diabetes in Pregnancy: Management of Diabetes and its Complications from Preconception to the Postnatal Period. London: NICE, 2015. PubMed
Rowan JA, Hague WM, Gao W, Battin MR, Moore MP, MiG Trial Investigators . Metformin versus insulin for the treatment of gestational diabetes. N Engl J Med 2008; 358: 2003–2015. PubMed
Li G, Zhao S, Cui S, Li L, Xu Y, Li Y. Effect comparison of metformin with insulin treatment for gestational diabetes: a meta‐analysis based on RCTs. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2015; 292: 111–120. PubMed
Beyuo T, Obed SA, Adjepong‐Yamoah KK, Bugyei KA, Oppong SA, Marfoh K. Metformin versus insulin in the management of pre‐gestational diabetes mellitus in pregnancy and gestational diabetes mellitus at the Korle Bu Teaching Hospital: a randomized clinical trial. PloS One 2015; 10: e0125712. PubMed PMC
Ainuddin JA, Karim N, Zaheer S, Ali SS, Hasan AA. Metformin treatment in type 2 diabetes in pregnancy: an active controlled, parallel‐group, randomized, open label study in patients with type 2 diabetes in pregnancy. J Diabetes Res 2015; 2015: 325851. PubMed PMC
Tertti K, Laine K, Ekblad U, Rinne V, Ronnemaa T. The degree of fetal metformin exposure does not influence fetal outcome in gestational diabetes mellitus. Acta Diabetol 2014; 51: 731–738. PubMed
Tuchmann‐Duplessis H, Mercier‐Parot L. Repercussions of a hypoglycemic drug, N‐N‐dimethylbiguanide HCl, on gestation and fetal development in rats. C R Hebd Seances Acad Sci 1961; 253: 321–323. PubMed
Denno KM, Sadler TW. Effects of the biguanide class of oral hypoglycemic agents on mouse embryogenesis. Teratology 1994; 49: 260–266. PubMed
Gilbert C, Valois M, Koren G. Pregnancy outcome after first‐trimester exposure to metformin: a meta‐analysis. Fertil Steril 2006; 86: 658–663. PubMed
Cassina M, Dona M, Di Gianantonio E, Litta P, Clementi M. First‐trimester exposure to metformin and risk of birth defects: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Hum Reprod Update 2014; 20: 656–669. PubMed
Schaefer C, Hannemann D, Meister R. Post‐marketing surveillance system for drugs in pregnancy – 15 years experience of ENTIS. Reprod Toxicol 2005; 20: 331–343. PubMed
Schaefer C, Ornoy A, Clementi M, Meister R, Weber‐Schoendorfer C. Using observational cohort data for studying drug effects on pregnancy outcome – methodological considerations. Reprod Toxicol 2008; 26: 36–41. PubMed
Panchaud A, Csajka C, Merlob P, Schaefer C, Berlin M, De Santis M, et al Pregnancy outcome following exposure to topical retinoids: a multicenter prospective study. J Clin Pharmacol 2012; 52: 1844–1851. PubMed
Winterfeld U, Klinger G, Panchaud A, Stephens S, Arnon J, Malm H, et al Pregnancy outcome following maternal exposure to mirtazapine: a multicenter, prospective study. J Clin Psychopharmacol 2015; 35: 250–259. PubMed
Klieger‐Grossmann C, Weitzner B, Panchaud A, Pistelli A, Einarson T, Koren G, et al Pregnancy outcomes following use of escitalopram: a prospective comparative cohort study. J Clin Pharmacol 2012; 52: 766–770. PubMed
Merks JH, van Karnebeek CD, Caron HN, Hennekam RC. Phenotypic abnormalities: terminology and classification. Am J Med Genet A 2003; 123A: 211–230. PubMed
Rasmussen SA, Olney RS, Holmes LB, Lin AE, Keppler‐Noreuil KM, Moore CA, et al Guidelines for case classification for the National Birth Defects Prevention Study. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 2003; 67: 193–201. PubMed
Meister R, Schaefer C. Statistical methods for estimating the probability of spontaneous abortion in observational studies – analyzing pregnancies exposed to coumarin derivatives. Reprod Toxicol 2008; 26: 31–35. PubMed
Latouche A, Allignol A, Beyersmann J, Labopin M, Fine JP. A competing risks analysis should report results on all cause‐specific hazards and cumulative incidence functions. J Clin Epidemiol 2013; 66: 648–653. PubMed
Scheen AJ, Van Gaal LF. Combating the dual burden: therapeutic targeting of common pathways in obesity and type 2 diabetes. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2014; 2: 911–922. PubMed
Dunne F, Brydon P, Smith K, Gee H. Pregnancy in women with type 2 diabetes: 12 years outcome data 1990–2002. Diabet Med 2003; 20: 734–738. PubMed
Casson IF, Clarke CA, Howard CV, McKendrick O, Pennycook S, Pharoah PO, et al Outcomes of pregnancy in insulin dependent diabetic women: results of a five year population cohort study. BMJ 1997; 315: 275–278. PubMed PMC
Towner D, Kjos SL, Leung B, Montoro MM, Xiang A, Mestman JH, et al Congenital malformations in pregnancies complicated by NIDDM. Diabetes Care 1995; 18: 1446–1451. PubMed
Reece EA. Diabetes‐induced birth defects: What do we know? What can we do? Curr Diab Rep 2012; 12: 24–32. PubMed
Mills JL, Simpson JL, Driscoll SG, Jovanovic‐Peterson L, Van Allen M, Aarons JH, et al Incidence of spontaneous abortion among normal women and insulin‐dependent diabetic women whose pregnancies were identified within 21 days of conception. N Engl J Med 1988; 319: 1617–1623. PubMed
Miodovnik M, Lavin JP, Knowles HC, Holroyde J, Stys SJ. Spontaneous abortion among insulin‐dependent diabetic women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984; 150: 372–376. PubMed
Miodovnik M, Skillman C, Holroyde JC, Butler JB, Wendel JS, Siddiqi TA. Elevated maternal glycohemoglobin in early pregnancy and spontaneous abortion among insulin‐dependent diabetic women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985; 153: 439–442. PubMed
Miodovnik M, Mimouni F, Tsang RC, Ammar E, Kaplan L, Siddiqi TA. Glycemic control and spontaneous abortion in insulin‐dependent diabetic women. Obstet Gynecol 1986; 68: 366–369. PubMed
Sutherland HW, Pritchard CW. Increased incidence of spontaneous abortion in pregnancies complicated by maternal diabetes mellitus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987; 156: 135–138. PubMed
Wright AD, Nicholson HO, Pollock A, Taylor KG, Betts S. Spontaneous abortion and diabetes mellitus. Postgrad Med J 1983; 59: 295–298. PubMed PMC
Palomba S, Falbo A, Orio F Jr, Zullo F. Effect of preconceptional metformin on abortion risk in polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials. Fertil Steril 2009; 92: 1646–1658. PubMed
van Gelder MM, Van Bennekom CM, Louik C, Werler MM, Roeleveld N, Mitchell AA. Maternal hypertensive disorders, antihypertensive medication use, and the risk of birth defects: a case‐control study. BJOG 2015; 122: 1002–1009. PubMed
Stothard KJ, Tennant PW, Bell R, Rankin J. Maternal overweight and obesity and the risk of congenital anomalies: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. JAMA 2009; 301: 636–650. PubMed
Ehrenberg HM, Durnwald CP, Catalano P, Mercer BM. The influence of obesity and diabetes on the risk of cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 191: 969–974. PubMed
Beck E, Lechner A, Schaefer C. Who seeks Teratology Information Service's advice? Assessing the risk of selection bias in observational cohort studies on drug risks in pregnancy. Reprod Toxicol 2017; 67: 79–84. PubMed