Characterization of a xylanolytic bacterial strain C10 isolated from the rumen of a red deer (Cervus elaphus) closely related of the recently described species Actinomyces succiniciruminis, A. glycerinitolerans, and A. ruminicola
Language English Country United States Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article
Grant support
16-12431S
the Czech Science Foundation (project no. 16-12431S)
PubMed
29270873
DOI
10.1007/s12223-017-0577-9
PII: 10.1007/s12223-017-0577-9
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Actinomyces classification genetics isolation & purification metabolism MeSH
- Rumen microbiology MeSH
- Genes, Bacterial genetics MeSH
- Cellulose metabolism MeSH
- DNA, Bacterial genetics MeSH
- Phenotype MeSH
- Phylogeny MeSH
- Fatty Acids analysis MeSH
- Peptidoglycan analysis MeSH
- RNA, Ribosomal, 16S genetics MeSH
- Deer microbiology MeSH
- Xylans metabolism MeSH
- Base Composition MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Check Tag
- Animals MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Cellulose MeSH
- DNA, Bacterial MeSH
- Fatty Acids MeSH
- Peptidoglycan MeSH
- RNA, Ribosomal, 16S MeSH
- Xylans MeSH
Gram-stain-positive, catalase and oxidase-negative and short rod-shaped bacterium C10 with occasional branching was isolated under strictly anaerobic conditions from the rumen fluid of a red deer (Cervus elaphus) in the course of study attempting to uncover new xylanolytic and cellulolytic rumen bacteria inhabiting the digestive tract of wild ruminants in the Czech Republic. The anaerobic M10 medium containing bovine rumen fluid and carboxymethylcellulose as a defined source of organic carbon was used in the process of bacterial isolation. The 16S rRNA gene similarity revealed recently characterized new species Actinomyces succiniciruminis Am4T (GenBank accession number of the gene retrieved from the complete genome: LK995506) and Actinomyces glycerinitolerans G10T (GenBank accession number from the complete genome: NZFQTT01000017) as the closest relatives (99.7 and 99.6% gene pairwise identity, respectively), followed by the Actinomyces ruminicola DSM 27982T (97.2%, in all compared fragment of 41468 pb). Due to the taxonomic affinity of the examined strain to both species A. succiniciruminis and A. glycerinitolerans, its taxonomic status towards these species was evaluated using variable regions of rpsA (length of 519 bp) and rplB (597 bp) gene sequences amplified based on specific primers designed so as to be applicable in differentiation, classification, and phylogeny of Actinomyces species/strains. Comparative analyses using rpsA and rplB showed 98.5 and 97.9% similarities of C10 to A. succiniciruminis, respectively, and 97.5 and 97.6% similarities to A. glycerinitolerans, respectively. Thus, gene identities revealed that the evaluated isolate C10 (=DSM 100236 = LMG 28777) is a little more related to the species A. succiniciruminis isolated from the rumen of a Holstein-Friesian cow than A. glycerinitolerans. Phylogenetic analyses confirmed affinity of strain C10 to both recently characterized species. Unfortunately, they did not allow the bacterial strain to be classified into a particular species. Phenotypic characterization suggested similar conclusions. This brief contribution is aimed at classification and detailed phenotypic characterization of bacterial strain C10 isolated from the rumen of a wild red deer exhibiting, from the point of view of Actinomyces species, noteworthy cellulolytic and xylanolytic activities.
See more in PubMed
Mol Biol Evol. 2000 Apr;17(4):540-52 PubMed
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2014 May 27;64(9):2932-2938 PubMed
Enzyme Res. 2015;2015:279381 PubMed
Appl Microbiol. 1966 Sep;14(5):794-801 PubMed
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2014 Jun;88(3):528-37 PubMed
PLoS One. 2013 Oct 17;8(10):e77033 PubMed
Syst Appl Microbiol. 2010 Nov;33(7):359-66 PubMed
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2006 Sep;56(Pt 9):2043-8 PubMed
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2002 Sep;52(Pt 5):1551-8 PubMed
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1996 Sep;62(9):3165-70 PubMed
Anal Biochem. 1977 Jul;81(1):21-7 PubMed
Mol Biol Evol. 2013 Dec;30(12):2725-9 PubMed
FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2001 Nov 27;205(1):31-6 PubMed
Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2011 Apr;163(7):869-81 PubMed
Anal Biochem. 1984 May 1;138(2):481-7 PubMed
Genome Announc. 2017 Feb 16;5(7): PubMed
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2009 Aug;59(Pt 8):2020-4 PubMed
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2013 Dec;63(Pt 12):4439-46 PubMed
J Biosci Bioeng. 2001;92(5):434-41 PubMed
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2017 May;67(5):1613-1617 PubMed
Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:271728 PubMed
Syst Appl Microbiol. 2016 Oct;39(7):445-452 PubMed
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2017 Jul;67(7):2349-2356 PubMed
Genome Announc. 2017 Jul 20;5(29):null PubMed
Anal Biochem. 1976 May 7;72:248-54 PubMed
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2017 Jul;67(7):2403-2411 PubMed
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002 Oct;68(10):5064-81 PubMed
