Does laparoscopic intracorporeal ileocolic anastomosis decreases surgical site infection rate? A propensity score-matched cohort study
Language English Country Germany Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article, Multicenter Study
PubMed
29327167
DOI
10.1007/s00384-017-2957-7
PII: 10.1007/s00384-017-2957-7
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- Extracorporeal anastomosis, Ileocolic anastomosis, Intracorporeal anastomosis, Laparoscopic right colectomy, Surgical site infection,
- MeSH
- Anastomosis, Surgical adverse effects MeSH
- Ileum surgery MeSH
- Surgical Wound Infection epidemiology prevention & control MeSH
- Cohort Studies MeSH
- Colon surgery MeSH
- Laparoscopy * adverse effects MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Perioperative Care MeSH
- Postoperative Complications etiology MeSH
- Propensity Score * MeSH
- Check Tag
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Multicenter Study MeSH
AIM: Foreshortened mesentery or thick abdominal wall constitutes a rationale for laparoscopic intracorporeal ileocolic anastomoses (ICA). The aim of this study was to compare intracorporeal to extracorporeal ICA in terms of surgical site infections in patients with Crohn's ileitis and overweight patients with right colon tumors. METHOD: This was a prospective propensity score-matched cohort study enrolling consecutive patients with Crohn's terminal ileitis and overweight patients with right colon tumors undergoing elective laparoscopic right colon resection with intracorporeal or extracorporeal ICA. Propensity score matching with a 1:1 ratio was employed to compare diagnosis-matched patients for age, BMI, ASA, and previous abdominal surgery. RESULTS: Overall, 453 patients were enrolled: 233 intracorporeal vs. 220 extracorporeal. Propensity score matching left 195 intracorporeal and 195 extracorporeal patients comparable for age (p = 0.294), gender (p = 0.683), ASA (p = 0.545), BMI (p = 0.079), previous abdominal surgery (p = 0.348), and diagnosis (p = 0.301). Conversion rates (5.1 vs. 3.6%; p = 0.457) and intraoperative complications (1 vs. 2.1%; p = 0.45) were similar. Overall morbidity (5.1 vs. 12.8%; p = 0.008) and re-intervention rates (3.1 vs. 8.7%; p = 0.029) were significantly higher in extracorporeal patients. Anastomotic leak rates (0.5 vs. 1.5%; p = 0.623) did not differ. Incisional SSI rate was significantly higher in extracorporeal patients (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic intracorporeal ICA reduced incisional SSI rates as compared to its extracorporeal counterpart.
Department of Surgery University Hospital Ostrava Ostrava Czech Republic
Division of Colorectal surgery State University of New York Stony Brook NY USA
See more in PubMed
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2017 May;402(3):417-427 PubMed
Ann Surg. 2007 Oct;246(4):655-62; discussion 662-4 PubMed
Surg Endosc. 2016 Sep;30(9):3823-9 PubMed
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Nov;95(48):e5538 PubMed
Dis Colon Rectum. 1991 Nov;34(11):1030-1 PubMed
Dis Colon Rectum. 2000 Feb;43(2):267-71; discussion 271-3 PubMed
Surg Endosc. 2017 Jan;31(1):64-77 PubMed
World J Surg. 2010 Dec;34(12):2902-8 PubMed
Surg Endosc. 2016 Jan;30(1):65-72 PubMed
Surg Endosc. 2015 Aug;29(8):2314-20 PubMed
Surg Endosc. 2016 Sep;30(9):3933-42 PubMed
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2011 Dec;21(6):403-8 PubMed
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2013 May;23(5):418-24 PubMed
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2009 Feb;19(1):57-61 PubMed
J Am Coll Surg. 2004 Nov;199(5):675-9 PubMed
Tech Coloproctol. 2015 Dec;19(12):745-50 PubMed
J Gastrointest Surg. 2015 May;19(5):911-6 PubMed
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2017 Apr;27(4):348-357 PubMed
Ann Surg. 2004 Aug;240(2):205-13 PubMed
Tech Coloproctol. 2013 Feb;17 Suppl 1:S35-9 PubMed
Dis Colon Rectum. 2009 Apr;52(4):651-6 PubMed
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2016 May;26(5):343-8 PubMed
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1992 Oct;13(10):606-8 PubMed
Surg Endosc. 2015 Jun;29(6):1512-21 PubMed
J Surg Res. 2015 Jun 1;196(1):107-12 PubMed
JSLS. 2009 Jul-Sep;13(3):312-7 PubMed
Surg Endosc. 2013 Jul;27(7):2613-8 PubMed
Can J Surg. 2015 Feb;58(1):63-8 PubMed
Surg Endosc. 2013 Jun;27(6):1986-90 PubMed
Surg Endosc. 2010 Aug;24(8):1886-91 PubMed