• This record comes from PubMed

Does laparoscopic intracorporeal ileocolic anastomosis decreases surgical site infection rate? A propensity score-matched cohort study

. 2018 Mar ; 33 (3) : 291-298. [epub] 20180111

Language English Country Germany Media print-electronic

Document type Journal Article, Multicenter Study

Links

PubMed 29327167
DOI 10.1007/s00384-017-2957-7
PII: 10.1007/s00384-017-2957-7
Knihovny.cz E-resources

AIM: Foreshortened mesentery or thick abdominal wall constitutes a rationale for laparoscopic intracorporeal ileocolic anastomoses (ICA). The aim of this study was to compare intracorporeal to extracorporeal ICA in terms of surgical site infections in patients with Crohn's ileitis and overweight patients with right colon tumors. METHOD: This was a prospective propensity score-matched cohort study enrolling consecutive patients with Crohn's terminal ileitis and overweight patients with right colon tumors undergoing elective laparoscopic right colon resection with intracorporeal or extracorporeal ICA. Propensity score matching with a 1:1 ratio was employed to compare diagnosis-matched patients for age, BMI, ASA, and previous abdominal surgery. RESULTS: Overall, 453 patients were enrolled: 233 intracorporeal vs. 220 extracorporeal. Propensity score matching left 195 intracorporeal and 195 extracorporeal patients comparable for age (p = 0.294), gender (p = 0.683), ASA (p = 0.545), BMI (p = 0.079), previous abdominal surgery (p = 0.348), and diagnosis (p = 0.301). Conversion rates (5.1 vs. 3.6%; p = 0.457) and intraoperative complications (1 vs. 2.1%; p = 0.45) were similar. Overall morbidity (5.1 vs. 12.8%; p = 0.008) and re-intervention rates (3.1 vs. 8.7%; p = 0.029) were significantly higher in extracorporeal patients. Anastomotic leak rates (0.5 vs. 1.5%; p = 0.623) did not differ. Incisional SSI rate was significantly higher in extracorporeal patients (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic intracorporeal ICA reduced incisional SSI rates as compared to its extracorporeal counterpart.

See more in PubMed

Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2017 May;402(3):417-427 PubMed

Ann Surg. 2007 Oct;246(4):655-62; discussion 662-4 PubMed

Surg Endosc. 2016 Sep;30(9):3823-9 PubMed

Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Nov;95(48):e5538 PubMed

Dis Colon Rectum. 1991 Nov;34(11):1030-1 PubMed

Dis Colon Rectum. 2000 Feb;43(2):267-71; discussion 271-3 PubMed

Surg Endosc. 2017 Jan;31(1):64-77 PubMed

World J Surg. 2010 Dec;34(12):2902-8 PubMed

Surg Endosc. 2016 Jan;30(1):65-72 PubMed

Surg Endosc. 2015 Aug;29(8):2314-20 PubMed

Surg Endosc. 2016 Sep;30(9):3933-42 PubMed

Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2011 Dec;21(6):403-8 PubMed

J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2013 May;23(5):418-24 PubMed

Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2009 Feb;19(1):57-61 PubMed

J Am Coll Surg. 2004 Nov;199(5):675-9 PubMed

Tech Coloproctol. 2015 Dec;19(12):745-50 PubMed

J Gastrointest Surg. 2015 May;19(5):911-6 PubMed

J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2017 Apr;27(4):348-357 PubMed

Ann Surg. 2004 Aug;240(2):205-13 PubMed

Tech Coloproctol. 2013 Feb;17 Suppl 1:S35-9 PubMed

Dis Colon Rectum. 2009 Apr;52(4):651-6 PubMed

J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2016 May;26(5):343-8 PubMed

Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1992 Oct;13(10):606-8 PubMed

Surg Endosc. 2015 Jun;29(6):1512-21 PubMed

J Surg Res. 2015 Jun 1;196(1):107-12 PubMed

JSLS. 2009 Jul-Sep;13(3):312-7 PubMed

Surg Endosc. 2013 Jul;27(7):2613-8 PubMed

Can J Surg. 2015 Feb;58(1):63-8 PubMed

Surg Endosc. 2013 Jun;27(6):1986-90 PubMed

Surg Endosc. 2010 Aug;24(8):1886-91 PubMed

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...