Lung cancer and socioeconomic status in a pooled analysis of case-control studies
Language English Country United States Media electronic-ecollection
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Grant support
001
World Health Organization - International
PubMed
29462211
PubMed Central
PMC5819792
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0192999
PII: PONE-D-16-45229
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Smoking epidemiology MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Logistic Models MeSH
- Lung Neoplasms epidemiology pathology MeSH
- Odds Ratio MeSH
- Occupational Exposure MeSH
- Risk Factors MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Sex Factors MeSH
- Social Class MeSH
- Age Factors MeSH
- Check Tag
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Geographicals
- Europe MeSH
- Canada MeSH
BACKGROUND: An association between low socioeconomic status (SES) and lung cancer has been observed in several studies, but often without adequate control for smoking behavior. We studied the association between lung cancer and occupationally derived SES, using data from the international pooled SYNERGY study. METHODS: Twelve case-control studies from Europe and Canada were included in the analysis. Based on occupational histories of study participants we measured SES using the International Socio-Economic Index of Occupational Status (ISEI) and the European Socio-economic Classification (ESeC). We divided the ISEI range into categories, using various criteria. Stratifying by gender, we calculated odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) by unconditional logistic regression, adjusting for age, study, and smoking behavior. We conducted analyses by histological subtypes of lung cancer and subgroup analyses by study region, birth cohort, education and occupational exposure to known lung carcinogens. RESULTS: The analysis dataset included 17,021 cases and 20,885 controls. There was a strong elevated OR between lung cancer and low SES, which was attenuated substantially after adjustment for smoking, however a social gradient persisted. SES differences in lung cancer risk were higher among men (lowest vs. highest SES category: ISEI OR 1.84 (95% CI 1.61-2.09); ESeC OR 1.53 (95% CI 1.44-1.63)), than among women (lowest vs. highest SES category: ISEI OR 1.54 (95% CI 1.20-1.98); ESeC OR 1.34 (95% CI 1.19-1.52)). CONCLUSION: SES remained a risk factor for lung cancer after adjustment for smoking behavior.
Cancer Care Ontario Occupational Cancer Research Centre Toronto Canada
Epidemiology Unit Istituto Dermopatico dell'Immacolata Rome Italy
INRS Institut Armand Frappier Université du Québec Laval Québec Canada
Institute for Medical Informatics Biometry and Epidemiology University Hospital Essen Essen Germany
Institute for Statistics University Bremen Bremen Germany
Institute of Carcinogenesis Russian Cancer Research Centre Moscow Russia
Institute of Environmental Medicine Karolinska Institutet Stockholm Sweden
Institute of Epidemiology 1 Helmholtz Zentrum München Neuherberg Germany
Institute of Medical Statistics and Epidemiology Technical University Munich Munich Germany
International Agency for Research on Cancer Lyon France
Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology BIPS GmbH Bremen Germany
National Centre for Public Health Budapest Hungary
National Institute of Public Health Bucharest Romania
Palacky University Faculty of Medicine Olomouc Czech Republic
Public Health Ontario Toronto Canada
Regional Authority of Public Health Preventive Occupational Medicine Banska Bystrica Slovakia
The M Sklodowska Curie Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology Warsaw Poland
The Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine Lodz Poland
Unit of Cancer Epidemiology Department of Medical Sciences University of Turin Turin Italy
Unit of Epidemiology Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico Milan Italy
University of Montreal Hospital Research Center and School of Public Health Montreal Canada
See more in PubMed
GLOBOCAN 2012: Estimated Cancer Incidence, Mortality and Prevalence Worldwide in 2012 [Internet]: International Agency for Research on Cancer [cited 2015 Jul 27]. Available from: URL:http://globocan.iarc.fr/Default.aspx.
Ekberg-Aronsson M, Nilsson PM, Nilsson J, Pehrsson K, Löfdahl C. Socio-economic status and lung cancer risk including histologic subtyping—A longitudinal study. Lung Cancer 2006; 51(1):21–9. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2005.08.014 PubMed DOI
Hart CL, Hole DJ, Gillis CR, Davey Smith G, Watt GC, Hawthorne VM. Social class differences in lung cancer mortality: risk factor explanations using two Scottish cohort studies. Int J Epidemiol 2001; 30(2):268–74. PubMed
Mao Y, Hu J, Ugnat AM, Semenciw R, Fincham S. Socioeconomic status and lung cancer risk in Canada. Int J Epidemiol 2001; 30(4):809–17. PubMed
Clegg LX, Reichman ME, Miller BA, Hankey BF, Singh GK, Lin YD, et al. Impact of socioeconomic status on cancer incidence and stage at diagnosis: selected findings from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results: National Longitudinal Mortality Study. Cancer Causes Control 2009; 20(4):417–35. doi: 10.1007/s10552-008-9256-0 PubMed DOI PMC
Van der Heyden J H A, Schaap MM, Kunst AE, Esnaola S, Borrell C, Cox B, et al. Socioeconomic inequalities in lung cancer mortality in 16 European populations. Lung Cancer 2009; 63(3):322–30. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2008.06.006 PubMed DOI
Hruba F, Fabianova E, Bencko V, Cassidy A, Lissowska J, Mates D, et al. Socioeconomic indicators and risk of lung cancer in Central and Eastern Europe. Cent Eur J Public Health 2009; 17(3):115–21. PubMed
Sharpe KH, McMahon AD, McClements P, Watling C, Brewster DH, Conway DI. Socioeconomic inequalities in incidence of lung and upper aero-digestive tract cancer by age, tumor subtype and sex: a population-based study in Scotland (2000–2007). Cancer Epidemiol 2012; 36(3):e164–70. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2012.01.007 PubMed DOI
Braveman P, Egerter S, Williams DR. The Social Determinants of Health: Coming of Age. Annu Rev Public Health 2011; 32(1):381–98. PubMed
Adler NE, Ostrove JM. Socioeconomic status and health: what we know and what we don’t. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1999; 896:3–15. PubMed
Schaap MM, van Agt HM, Kunst AE. Identification of socioeconomic groups at increased risk for smoking in European countries: Looking beyond educational level. Nicotine & tobacco research: official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco 2008; 10(2):359–69. PubMed
Sidorchuk A, Agardh EE, Aremu O, Hallqvist J, Allebeck P, Moradi T. Socioeconomic differences in lung cancer incidence: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Causes Control 2009; 20(4):459–71. doi: 10.1007/s10552-009-9300-8 PubMed DOI
Menvielle G, Boshuizen H, Kunst AE, Dalton SO, Vineis P, Bergmann MM, et al. The role of smoking and diet in explaining educational inequalities in lung cancer incidence. J Natl Cancer Inst 2009; 101(5):321–30. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djn513 PubMed DOI PMC
Nkosi TM, Parent M, Siemiatycki J, Rousseau M. Socioeconomic position and lung cancer risk: how important is the modeling of smoking? Epidemiology 2012; 23(3):377–85. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e31824d0548 PubMed DOI
Ganzeboom HB, de Graaf PM, Treiman DJ. A standard international socio-economic index of occupational status. Soc Sci Res 1992; 21(1):1–56.
Rose D, Harrison E. The European Socio-economic Classification: A New Social Class Schema For Comparative European Research. Eur Soc 2007; 9(3):459–90.
Thomas L, Doyle LA, Edelman MJ. Lung cancer in women: emerging differences in epidemiology, biology, and therapy. Chest 2005; 128(1):370–81. doi: 10.1378/chest.128.1.370 PubMed DOI
Olsson AC, Gustavsson P, Kromhout H, Peters S, Vermeulen R, Brüske I, et al. Exposure to diesel motor exhaust and lung cancer risk in a pooled analysis from case-control studies in Europe and Canada. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2011; 183(7):941–8. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201006-0940OC PubMed DOI PMC
Pesch B, Kendzia B, Gustavsson P, Jöckel K, Johnen G, Pohlabeln H, et al. Cigarette smoking and lung cancer—relative risk estimates for the major histological types from a pooled analysis of case-control studies. Int J Cancer 2012; 131(5):1210–9. doi: 10.1002/ijc.27339 PubMed DOI PMC
Erikson R, Goldthorpe JH, Portocarero L. Intergenerational class mobility in three Western European societies: England, France and Sweden. Br J Sociol 1979; 30(4):415–41. PubMed
Harrison E, Rose D. The European Socio-economic Classification (ESeC) User Guide: Institute for Social and Economic Research, University of Essex (ISER); 2006. [cited 2018 Jan 4]. Available from: URL:https://www.iser.essex.ac.uk/files/esec/guide/docs/UserGuide.pdf.
Ganzeboom HBG, Treiman DJ. International Stratification and Mobility File: Conversion Tools.: Department of Social Research Methodology; 2012. [cited 2018 Jan 4]. Available from: URL:http://www.harryganzeboom.nl/ismf/index.htm.
Leffondre K, Abrahamowicz M, Xiao Y, Siemiatycki J. Modelling smoking history using a comprehensive smoking index: application to lung cancer. Stat Med 2006; 25(24):4132–46. doi: 10.1002/sim.2680 PubMed DOI
Ahrens W, Merletti F. A standard tool for the analysis of occupational lung cancer in epidemiologic studies. Int J Occup Environ Health 1998; 4(4):236–40. doi: 10.1179/oeh.1998.4.4.236 PubMed DOI
Mirabelli D, Chiusolo M, Calisti R, Massacesi S, Richiardi L, Nesti M, Merletti F. Database of occupations and industrial activities that involve the risk of pulmonary tumors. Epidemiol Prev 2001; 25(4–5):215–21. PubMed
Boing AF, Antunes JL, Carvalho MB de, Góis Filho JF de, Kowalski LP, Michaluart P, et al. How much do smoking and alcohol consumption explain socioeconomic inequalities in head and neck cancer risk? J Epidemiol Community Health 2011; 65(8):709–14. doi: 10.1136/jech.2009.097691 PubMed DOI
Martikainen P, Valkonen T. Bias related to the exclusion of the economically inactive in studies on social class differences in mortality. Int J Epidemiol 1999; 28(5):899–904. PubMed
Lopez AD, Collishaw NE, Piha T. A descriptive model of the cigarette epidemic in developed countries. Tob Control 1994; 3(3):242–7.
Peto J. That the effects of smoking should be measured in pack-years: misconceptions 4. Br J Cancer 2012; 107(3):406–7. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2012.97 PubMed DOI PMC
Arheart KL, Lee DJ, Fleming LE, LeBlanc WG, Dietz NA, McCollister KE, et al. Accuracy of self-reported smoking and secondhand smoke exposure in the US workforce: the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys. J Occup Environ Med 2008; 50(12):1414–20. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e318188b90a PubMed DOI
Conway DI, McMahon AD, Smith K, Taylor JC, McKinney PA. Socioeconomic factors influence selection and participation in a population-based case-control study of head and neck cancer in Scotland. J Clin Epidemiol 2008; 61(11):1187–93. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.12.012 PubMed DOI
Richiardi L, Boffetta P, Merletti F. Analysis of nonresponse bias in a population-based case–control study on lung cancer. J Clin Epidemiol 2002; 55(10):1033–40. PubMed
Brennan P, Buffler PA, Reynolds P, Wu AH, Wichmann HE, Agudo A, et al. Secondhand smoke exposure in adulthood and risk of lung cancer among never smokers: a pooled analysis of two large studies. Int J Cancer 2004; 109(1):125–31. doi: 10.1002/ijc.11682 PubMed DOI
Raaschou-Nielsen O, Andersen ZJ, Beelen R, Samoli E, Stafoggia M, Weinmayr G, et al. Air pollution and lung cancer incidence in 17 European cohorts: prospective analyses from the European Study of Cohorts for Air Pollution Effects (ESCAPE). Lancet Oncol 2013; 14(9):813–22. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70279-1 PubMed DOI
Richiardi L, Bellocco R, Zugna D. Mediation analysis in epidemiology: methods, interpretation and bias. Int J Epidemiol 2013; 42(5):1511–9. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyt127 PubMed DOI
Rushton L, Hutchings S, Brown T. The burden of cancer at work: estimation as the first step to prevention. Occup Environ Med 2008; 65(12):789–800. doi: 10.1136/oem.2007.037002 PubMed DOI
Menvielle G, Boshuizen H, Kunst AE, Vineis P, Dalton SO, Bergmann MM, et al. Occupational exposures contribute to educational inequalities in lung cancer incidence among men: Evidence from the EPIC prospective cohort study. Int J Cancer 2010; 126(8):1928–35. doi: 10.1002/ijc.24924 PubMed DOI PMC
Behrens T, Groß I, Siemiatycki J, Conway DI, Olsson AC, Stücker I, et al. Occupational prestige, social mobility in men and the association with lung cancer. BMC Cancer 2016; 16:395 doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2432-9 PubMed DOI PMC
Wadsworth ME. Health inequalities in the life course perspective. Soc Sci Med 1997; 44(6):859–69. PubMed
Hystad P, Carpiano RM, Demers PA, Johnson KC, Brauer M. Neighbourhood socioeconomic status and individual lung cancer risk: evaluating long-term exposure measures and mediating mechanisms. Soc Sci Med 2013; 97:95–103. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.08.005 PubMed DOI
Louwman WJ, van Lenthe FJ, Coebergh JW, Mackenbach JP. Behaviour partly explains educational differences in cancer incidence in the south-eastern Netherlands: the longitudinal GLOBE study. Eur J Cancer Prev 2004; 13(2):119–25. PubMed
Galobardes B. Shaw M, Lawlor DA, Lynch JW, Davey Smith G. Indicators of socioeconomic position (part 1). J Epidemiol Community Health 2006; 60(1):7–12. doi: 10.1136/jech.2004.023531 PubMed DOI PMC
Pukkala E, Martinsen JI, Lynge E, Gunnarsdottir HK, Sparén P, Tryggvadottir L, et al. Occupation and cancer—follow-up of 15 million people in five Nordic countries. Acta Oncol 2009; 48(5):646–790. doi: 10.1080/02841860902913546 PubMed DOI
Veglia F, Vineis P, Overvad K, Boeing H, Bergmann M, Trichopoulou A, et al. Occupational exposures, environmental tobacco smoke, and lung cancer. Epidemiology 2007; 18(6):769–75. PubMed
Robertson T, Batty GD, Der G, Green MJ, McGlynn LM, McIntyre A, et al. Is telomere length socially patterned? Evidence from the West of Scotland Twenty-07 Study. PLoS ONE 2012; 7(7):e41805 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041805 PubMed DOI PMC