Ability to recognize a risk of predation and react with adaptive antipredatory behavior can enhance fitness, but has some costs as well. Animals can either specifically react on the most dangerous predators (threat-sensitive avoidance) or they have safe but costly general wariness avoiding all potential predators. The level of threat may depend on the predator's foraging ecology and distribution with the prey with sympatric and specialist species being the most dangerous. We used 2 choice trials to investigate antipredatory behavior of captive born and wild-caught leopard geckos confronted with different snake predators from 2 families (Colubridae, Boidae) varying in foraging ecology and sympatric/allopatric distribution with the geckos. Predator-naïve subadult individuals have general wariness, explore both chemically and visually, and perform antipredatory postures toward a majority of snake predators regardless of their sympatry/allopatry or food specialization. The most exaggerated antipredatory postures in both subadult and adult geckos were toward 2 sympatric snake species, the spotted whip snake Hemorrhois ravergieri, an active forager, and the red sand boa Eryx johnii, a subterranean snake with a sit-and-wait strategy. In contrast, also subterranean but allopatric the Kenyan sand boa Eryx colubrinus did not elicit any antipredatory reaction. We conclude that the leopard gecko possesses an innate general antipredatory reaction to different species of snake predators, while a specific reaction to 2 particular sympatric species can be observed. Moreover, adult wild caught geckos show lower reactivity compared with the captive born ones, presumably due to an experience of a real predation event that can hardly be simulated under laboratory conditions.

Department of Zoology Faculty of Science Charles University Viničná 7 128 44 Prague Czech Republic and

National Institute of Mental Health Topolová 748 250 67 Klecany Czech Republic

See more in PubMed

Amo L, López P, Martín J, 2004a. Multiple predators and conflicting refuge use in the wall lizard

Amo L, López P, Martín J, Fox SF, 2004b. Chemosensory recognition and behavioral responses of wall lizards

Amo L, López P, Martín J, 2006. Can wall lizards combine chemical and visual cues to discriminate predatory from non-predatory snakes inside refuges? Ethology 112:478–484.

Balderas-Valdivia CJ, Ramírez-Bautista A, 2005. Aversive behavior of beaded lizard

Bealor MT, Krekorian OC, 2002. Chemosensory identification of lizard-eating snakes in the desert iguana

Bergmann P, Irschick DJ, 2006. Effects of temperature on maximum acceleration, deceleration and power output during vertical running in geckos. J Exp Biol 209:1404–1412. PubMed

Bragg WK, Fawcett JD, Bragg TB, Viets BE, 2000. Nest-site selection in two eublepharid gecko species with temperature-dependent sex determination and one with genotypic sex determination. Biol J Linn Soc 69:319–332.

Brock KM, Bednekoff PA, Pafilis P, Foufopoulos J, 2014. Evolution of antipredator behavior in an island lizard species PubMed

Burger J, Gochfeld M, 1990. Risk discrimination of direct versus tangential approach by basking black iguanas

Caro T, 2014. Antipredator deception in terrestrial vertebrates. Curr Zool 60:16–25.

Chivers DP, Wisenden BD, Smith RJF, 1996. Damselfly larvae learn to recognize predators from chemical cues in the predator’s diet. Anim Behav 52:315–320.

Cisterne A, Vanderduys EP, Pike DA, Schwarzkopf L, 2014. Wary invaders and clever natives: sympatric house geckos show disparate responses to predator scent. Behav Ecol 25:604–611.

Cooper WE, 1990. Chemical detection of predators by a lizard, the broad-headed skink

Cooper WE, 1999. Tradeoffs between courtship, fighting and antipredatory behavior by a lizard

Cooper WE, 2000. An adaptive difference in the relationship between foraging mode and response to prey chemicals by two congeneric scincid lizards. Ethology 106:193–206.

Dial BE, Schwenk K, 1996. Olfaction and predator detection in

Dial BE, Weldon PJ, Curtis B, 1989. Chemosensory identification of snake predators

Downes SJ, Adams M, 2001. Geographic variation in antisnake tactics: the evolution of scent-mediated behavior in a lizard. Evolution 55:605–615. PubMed

Downes S, Shine R, 1998. Sedentary snakes and gullible geckos: predator-prey coevolution in nocturnal rock-dwelling reptiles. Anim Behav 55:1373–1385. PubMed

Dugatkin LA, Godin JGJ, 1992. Prey approaching predators: a cost-benefit perspective. Ann Zool Fenn 29:233–252.

Durand J, Legrand A, Tort M, Thiney A, Michniewicz RJ, et al. , 2012. Effects of geographic isolation on anti-snakes responses in the wall lizard

Ferrari MCO, Brown MR, Pollock MS, Chivers DP, 2007. The paradox of risk assessment: comparing responses of fathead minnows to capture-released and diet-released alarm cues from two different predators. Chemoecology 17:157–161.

Ferrari MCO, Messier F, Chivers DP, 2008. Larval amphibians learn to match antipredator response intensity to temporal patterns of risk. Behav Ecol 19:980–983.

Ferrari MCO, Trowell JJ, Brown GE, Chivers DP, 2005. The role of learning in the development of threat-sensitive predator avoidance by fathead minnows. Anim Behav 70:777–784.

Flores D, Tousignant A, Crews D, 1994. Incubation temperature affects the behavior of adult leopard geckos PubMed

Hawkins LA, Magurran AE, Armstrong JD, 2007. Innate abilities to distinguish between predator species and cue concentration in Atlantic salmon. Anim Behav 73:1051–1057.

Head ML, Keogh JS, Doughty P, 2002. Experimental evidence of an age-specific shift in chemical detection of predators in a lizard. J Chem Ecol 28:541–554. PubMed

Helfman GS, 1989. Threat-sensitive predator avoidance in damselfish–trumpetfish interactions. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 24:47–58.

Khan MS, 2002

Labra A, Hoare M, 2015. Chemical recognition in a snake–lizard predator–prey system. Acta Ethol 18:173–179.

Landová E, Jancuchova-Laskova J, Musilova V, Kadochova S, Frynta D, 2013. Ontogenetic switch between alternative antipredatory strategies in the leopard gecko

Lima SL, Dill LM, 1990. Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus. Can J Zool 68:619–640.

Lloyd R, Alford RA, Schwarzkopf L, 2009. Chemical discrimination among predators by lizards: responses of three skink species to the odours of high- and low-threat varanid predators. Aust Ecol 34:50–54.

López P, Martín J, Barbosa A, 2000. Site familiarity affects antipredator behavior of the amphisbaenian

McCoy MW, Stier AC, Osenberg CV, 2012. Emergent effects of multiple predators on prey survival: the importance of depletion and the functional response. Ecol Lett 15:1449–1456. PubMed

Noldus Information Technology, 1993. Observer 3.0. Noldus, Wageningen: [cited 2016 April 28]. Available from: http://www.noldus.com.

R Core Team, 2013. R: A language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; [cited 2016 April 28]. Available from: http://www.R-project.org.

Sakata J, Crews D, 2003. Embryonic temperature shapes behavioral change following social experience in male leopard geckos

Seufer H, Kaverkin Y, Kirschner A, 2005. The Eyelash Geckos: Care, Breeding and Natural History. Germany: Kirschner & Seufer.

Sih A, Englund G, Wooster D, 1998. Emergent impacts of multiple predators on prey. Trends Ecol Evol 13:350–355. PubMed

Smith SM, 1975. Innate recognition of coral snake pattern by a possible avian predator. Science 187:759–760. PubMed

Van Damme R, Quick K, 2001. Use of predator chemical cues by three species of lacertid lizards (

Van Damme R, Bauwens D, Thoen C, Vanderstighelen D, Verheyen RF, 1995. Responses of naive lizards to predator chemical cues. J Herpetol 29:38–43.

Viets BE, Tousignant A, Ewert MA, Nelson CE, Crews D, 1993Temperature-dependent sex determination in the leopard gecko PubMed

Webb JK, Du WG, Pike DA, Shine R, 2009. Chemical cues from both dangerous and nondangerous snakes elicit antipredator behaviors from a nocturnal lizard. Anim Behav 77:1471–1478.

Webb JK, Pike DA, Shine R, 2010. Olfactory recognition of predators by nocturnal lizards: safety outweighs thermal benefits. Behav Ecol 21:72–77.

Whitaker R, Captain A, 2004. Snakes of India: the field guide. Chennai, India: Draco Books, 481.

Are vipers prototypic fear-evoking snakes? A cross-cultural comparison of Somalis and Czechs

The first description of dermal armour in snakes

Venomous snakes elicit stronger fear than nonvenomous ones: Psychophysiological response to snake images

A comparative study of growth: different body weight trajectories in three species of the genus Eublepharis and their hybrids