Disinfection aims at maximal inactivation of target organisms and the sustainable suppression of their regrowth. Whereas many disinfection efforts achieve efficient inactivation when the effect is measured directly after treatment, there are questions about the sustainability of this effect. One aspect is that the treated bacteria might recover and regain the ability to grow. In an environmental context, another question is how amenable surviving bacteria are to predation by omnipresent bacteriophages. Provisional data suggested that bacteria when subjected to sublethal heat stress might develop a phage-resistant phenotype. The result made us wonder about the susceptibility to phage-mediated lysis for bacteria exposed to a gradient of chlorine and UV-LED disinfection strengths. Whereas bacteria exposed to low sublethal chlorine doses still underwent phage-mediated lysis, the critical chlorine Ct of 0.5 mg min/L eliminated this susceptibility and induced phage resistance in the cells that survived treatment. In the case of UV, even the smallest tested dose of 2.8 mJ/cm2 abolished phage lysis leading to direct regrowth. Results suggest that bacteria surviving disinfection might have higher environmental survival chances directly after treatment compared to non-treated cells. A reason could possibly lie in their compromised metabolism that is essential for phage replication.

Cranfield Institute for Resilient Futures Cranfield University Cranfield Bedfordshire MK43 0AL UK

Cranfield Water Science Institute School of Water Environment and Energy Cranfield University Cranfield Bedfordshire MK43 0AL UK

Institute for Structural and Molecular Biology Department of Biological Sciences Birkbeck University of London Malet Street London WC1E 7HX UK

IWW Water Centre Moritzstraße 26 45476 Mülheim an der Ruhr Germany

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Water Res. 2006 Jan;40(1):3-22 PubMed

ISME J. 2014 May;8(5):1089-100 PubMed

Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001 Jul;67(7):3029-32 PubMed

Ann Microbiol. 2010 Mar;60(1):121-127 PubMed

J Appl Microbiol. 2006 Sep;101(3):732-41 PubMed

Cell. 2002 Jan 11;108(1):13-6 PubMed

J Gen Microbiol. 1991 Oct;137(10):2361-74 PubMed

Biosens Bioelectron. 2014 Feb 15;52:239-46 PubMed

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1979 Mar;37(3):633-41 PubMed

Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002 Mar;68(3):1025-32 PubMed

Biotechnol Prog. 2006 May-Jun;22(3):853-9 PubMed

PLoS Comput Biol. 2012;8(10):e1002746 PubMed

Environ Technol. 2017 Apr;38(7):891-900 PubMed

Nat Rev Microbiol. 2010 May;8(5):317-27 PubMed

Bacteriophage. 2012 Jan 1;2(1):50-54 PubMed

Water Environ Res. 2016 Oct;88(10):1192-229 PubMed

Anim Health Res Rev. 2011 Jun;12(1):15-23 PubMed

PLoS Genet. 2016 Jul 05;12(7):e1006134 PubMed