• This record comes from PubMed

Access to parks and physical activity: an eight country comparison

. 2017 Oct ; 27 () : 253-263. [epub] 20170825

Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Language English Country Germany Media print-electronic

Document type Journal Article

Grant support
R01 CA127296 NCI NIH HHS - United States
R01 HL067350 NHLBI NIH HHS - United States

Several systematic reviews have reported mixed associations between access to parks and physical activity, and suggest that this is due to inconsistencies in the study methods or differences across countries. An international study using consistent methods is needed to investigate the association between access to parks and physical activity. The International Physical Activity and Environment Network (IPEN) Adult Study is a multi-country cross-sectional study using a common design and consistent methods. Accelerometer, survey and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) data for 6,181 participants from 12 cities in 8 countries (Belgium, Brazil, Czech Republic, Denmark, Mexico, New Zealand, UK, USA) were used to estimate the strength and shape of associations of 11 measures of park access (1 perceived and 10 GIS-based measures) with accelerometer-based moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) and four types of self-reported leisure-time physical activity. Associations were estimated using generalized additive mixed models. More parks within 1 km from participants' homes were associated with greater leisure-time physical activity and accelerometer-measured MVPA. Respondents who lived in the neighborhoods with the most parks did on average 24 minutes more MVPA per week than those living in the neighborhoods with the lowest number of parks. Perceived proximity to a park was positively associated with multiple leisure-time physical activity outcomes. Associations were homogeneous across all cities studied. Living in neighborhoods with many parks could contribute with up to 1/6 of the recommended weekly Having multiple parks nearby was the strongest positive correlate of PA. To increase comparability and validity of park access measures, we recommend that researchers, planners and policy makers use the number of parks within 1 km travel distance of homes as an objective indicator for park access in relation to physical activity.

Center for Nutrition and Health Research National Institute of Public Health of Mexico Cuernavaca Mexico

Center for Sport Health and Exercise Research Staffordshire University Stoke on Trent UK

Department of Epidemiology Human Genetics and Environmental Sciences and Michael and Susan Dell Center for Healthy Living The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston School of Public Health Austin Regional Campus Austin TX USA

Department of Family Medicine and Public Health University of California San Diego USA

Department of Movement and Sport Sciences Ghent University Ghent Belgium

Federal University of Parana Curitiba Brazil

Health and Community Design Lab Schools of Population and Public Health and Community and Regional Planning University of British Columbia Vancouver Canada

Human Potential Centre Auckland University of Technology New Zealand

Institute for Health and Ageing Australian Catholic University Melbourne Victoria Australia

Institute of Active Lifestyle Faculty of Physical Culture Palacký University Czech Republic

Prevention Research Center Brown School Washington University in St Louis St Louis MS USA

Research Foundation Flanders Brussels Belgium

Research Unit for Active Living Department of Sport Science and Clinical Biomechanics University of Southern Denmark Odense Denmark

School of Nutrition and Health Promotion and Global Institute of Sustainability Arizona State University Tempe AZ USA

School of Public Health The University of Hong Kong Hong Kong China

Staffordshire University Stoke on Trent UK

See more in PubMed

Adams M, Frank L, Schipperijn J, Smith G, Chapman J, Christiansen L, Sallis J. International variation in neighborhood walkability, transit, and recreation environments using geographic information systems: the IPEN adult study. International Journal of Health Geographics. 2014;13(43):1–17. http://doi.org/10.1186/1476-072X-13-43. PubMed DOI PMC

Adams M, Ryan S, Kerr J, et al. Validation of the Neighborhood Environment Walkability Scale (NEWS) items using geographic information systems. J Phys Act Health. 2009;2009(6 Suppl 1):S113–S123. PubMed

Annerstedt van den Bosch M, Mudu P, Uscila V, Barrdahl M, Kulinkina A, Staatsen B, Egorov AI. Development of an urban green space indicator and the public health rationale. Scandinavian 2016 PubMed

Brownson RC, Hoehner CM, Day K, Forsyth A, Sallis JF. Measuring the built environment for physical activity: state of the science. American journal of preventive medicine. 2009;36(4):S99–S123. PubMed PMC

Burnham KP, Anderson DR. Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach. 2nd. New York (NY): Springer; 2002. p. 488.

Cain K. Accelerometer Scoring Protocol for the IPEN-Adult Study. San Diego (CA): University of California, San Diego; 2013. Available from: http://www.ipenproject.org/documents/methods_docs/IPEN_Protocol.pdf.

Cerin E, Cain K, Conway TL, van Dyck D, Hinckson E, Schipperijn J, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Owen N, Davey RC, Hino AAF, Mitas J, Orzanco-Garralda R, Salvo D, Sarmiento OL, Christiansen LB, Macfarlane DJ, Schofield G, Sallis J. Neighborhood environments and objectively measured physical activity in 11 countries. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 2014;46(12):2253–64. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000367. PubMed DOI PMC

Cerin E, Conway TL, Saelens BE, Frank LD, Sallis JF. Cross-validation of the factorial structure of the Neighborhood Environment Walkability Scale (NEWS) and its abbreviated form (NEWS-A) International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 2009;6:32. ://ijbnpa.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1479-5868-6-32. PubMed PMC

Cerin E, Leslie E, Owen N, Bauman A. An Australian version of the neighborhood environment walkability scale: validity evidence. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science. 2008;12(1):31–51.

Cohen DA, Ashwood JS, Scott MM, Overton A, Evenson KR, Staten LK, Catellier D. Public parks and physical activity among adolescent girls. Pediatrics. 2006;118(5):e1381–1389. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-1226. PubMed DOI PMC

Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjostrom M, Bauman AE, Booth ML, Ainsworth BE, Oja P. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35(8):1381–1395. doi: 10.1249/01.mss.0000078924.61453.fb. PubMed DOI

Dadvand P, Bartoll X, Basagaña X, Dalmau-Bueno A, Martinez D, Ambros A, Nieuwenhuijsen MJ. Green spaces and General Health: Roles of mental health status, social support, and physical activity. Environment International. 2016;91:161–167. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2016.02.029. PubMed DOI

Ekkel ED, de Vries S. Nearby green space and human health: Evaluating accessibility metrics. Landscape and Urban Planning. 2017;157:214–220. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.06.008. DOI

Fox J, Weisberg S. An R Companion to Applied Regression. 2nd. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2011. p. 450.

Frank LD, Sallis JF, Saelens BE, Leary L, Cain K, Conway TL, Hess PM. The development of a walkability index: application to the Neighborhood Quality of Life Study. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2010;44(13):924–33. http://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.2009.058701. PubMed DOI

Freedson PS, Melanson EL, Sirard J. Calibration of the Computer Science and Applications, Inc. accelerometer. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 1998;30(5):777–781. Retrieved from http://ovidsp.tx.ovid.com/sp-3.17.0a/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&PAGE=fulltext&D=ovft&AN=00005768-199805000-00021&NEWS=N&CSC=Y&CHANNEL=PubMed#image-gallery. PubMed

Gebel K, Bauman AE, Sugiyama T, Owen N. Mismatch between perceived and objectively assessed neighborhood walkability attributes: prospective relationships with walking and weight gain. Health & place. 2011;17(2):519–524. PubMed

Giles-Corti B, Broomhall MH, Knuiman M, Collins C, Douglas K, Ng K, Lange A, Donovan RJ. Increasing walking. How important is distance to, attractiveness, and size of public open space? American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2005;28(2S2):169–176. PubMed

Hartig T, Mitchell R, De Vries S, Frumkin H. Nature and health. Annual Review of Public Health. 2014;35:207–228. PubMed

Jáuregui A, Pratt M, Lamadrid-Figueroa H, Hernandez B, Rivera JA, Salvo D. Perceived Neighborhood Environment and Physical Activity: The International Physical Activity and Environment Network Adult Study in Mexico. Am J Prev Med. 2016a;51(2):271–279. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.03.026. PubMed DOI

Jáuregui A, Salvo D, Lamadrid-Figueroa H, Hernandez B, Rivera-Dommarco J, Pratt M. Perceived and Objective Measures of Neighborhood Environment for Physical Activity Among Mexican Adults, 2011. Preventing Chronic Disease. 2016b;13 PubMed PMC

Kaczynski AT, Besenyi GM, Stanis SA, Koohsari MJ, Oestman KB, Bergstrom R, Reis RS. Are park proximity and park features related to park use and park-based physical activity among adults? Variations by multiple socio-demographic characteristics. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2014;11:146. doi: 10.1186/s12966-014-0146-4. PubMed DOI PMC

Kaczynski AT, Henderson KA. Environmental correlates of physical activity: a review of evidence about parks and recreation. Leisure Sciences. 2007;29:315–354.

Kaczynski AT, Potwarka LR, Saelens BE. Association of park size, distance and features with physical activity in neighborhood parks. American Journal of Public Health. 2008;98:1451–1456. PubMed PMC

Kaczynski AT, Potwarka LR, Smale BJA, Havitz ME. Association of parkland proximity with neighborhood and park-based physical activity: variations by gender and age. Leisure Sciences. 2009;31:174–191.

Kaczynski AT, Schipperijn J, Hipp JA, Besenyi GM, Stanis SAW, Hughey SM, Wilcox S. ParkIndex: Development of a standardized metric of park access for research and planning. Preventive Medicine. 2016;87:110–114. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.02.012. PubMed DOI

Kerr J, Sallis JF, Owen N, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Cerin E, Sugiyama T, Reis R, Sarmiento O, Frömel K, Mitáš J, Troelsen J, Christiansen LB, Macfarlane D, Salvo D, Schofield G, Badland H, Guillen-Grima F, Aguinaga-Ontoso I, Davey R, Bauman A, Saelens B, Riddoch C, Ainsworth B, Pratt M, Schmidt T, Frank L, Adams M, Conway T, Cain K, Van Dyck D, Bracy N. Advancing science and policy through a coordinated international study of physical activity and built environments: IPEN adult methods. J Phys Act Health. 2013;10(4):581–601. PubMed

Lachowycz K, Jones AP. Greenspace and obesity: a systematic review of the evidence. Obesity reviews. 2011;12:e183–189. PubMed

Lackey KJ, Kaczynski AT. Correspondence of perceived vs. objective proximity to parks and their relationship to park-based physical activity. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2009;6:53. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-6-53. PubMed DOI PMC

Lee IM, Shiroma EJ, Lobelo F, Puska P, Blair SN, Katzmarzyk PT, Lancet Physical Activity Series Working G Effect of physical inactivity on major non-communicable diseases worldwide: an analysis of burden of disease and life expectancy. Lancet. 2012;380(9838):219–229. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61031-9. PubMed DOI PMC

Lindberg M, Schipperijn J. Active use of urban park facilities – Expectations versus reality. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 2015;14(4):909–918. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2015.08.007. DOI

McCormack GR, Cerin E, Leslie E, Du Toit L, Owen N. Objective Versus Perceived Walking Distances to Destinations: Correspondence and Predictive Validity. Environment and Behavior. 2008;40(3):401–425. doi: 10.1177/0013916507300560. DOI

R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing Vienna (Austria) R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2015. [cited 2015 Jun 8]. Available from: http://www.Rproject.org/

Rung AL, Mowen AJ, Broyles ST, Gustat J. The role of park conditions and features on park visitation and physical activity. J Phys Act Health. 2011;8(Suppl 2):S178–S87. PubMed

Saelens BE, Sallis JF, Black JB, Chen D. Neighborhood-based differences in physical activity: an environment scale evaluation. American journal of public health. 2003;93(9):1552–1558. PubMed PMC

Sallis JF, Bull FC, Guthold R, Heath GW, Inoue S, Oyeyemi AL, Perez LG, Richards J, Hallal P, for the Lancet Physical Activity Series 2 Executive Committee Progress in physical activity over the Olympic quadrennium. The Lancet. 2016a Jul;:31–42. PubMed

Sallis JF, Cervero RB, Ascher W, Henderson KA, Kraft MK, Kerr J. An ecological approach to creating active living communities. Annu Rev Public Health. 2006;27:297–322. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.27.021405.102100. PubMed DOI

Sallis JF, Cerin E, Conway TL, Adams MA, Frank LD, Pratt M, Salvo D, Schipperijn J, Smith G, Cain KL, Davey R, Kerr J, Lai PC, Mitas J, Reis R, Sarmiento OL, Schofield G, Troelsen J, Van Dyck D, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Owen N. Urban Environments in 14 Cities Worldwide Are Related to Physical Activity. The Lancet. 2016b http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01284-2. PubMed DOI PMC

Salvo D, Reis RS, Stein AD, Rivera J, Martorell R, Pratt M. Characteristics of the built environment in relation to objectively measured physical activity among Mexican adults, 2011. Preventing chronic disease. 2014;11 PubMed PMC

Schipperijn J, Bentsen P, Troelsen J, Toftager M, Stigsdotter UK. Associations between physical activity and characteristics of urban green space. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 2013;12:109–116.

Schipperijn J, Ekholm O, Stigsdotter U, Toftager M, Bentsen P, Kamper-Jørgensen F, Randrup TB. Factors influencing the use of green space – results from a Danish national representative survey. Landscape and Urban Planning. 2010;95(3):130–137.

Scott MM, Evenson KR, Cohen DA, Cox CE. Comparing perceived and objectively measured access to recreational facilities as predictors of physical activity in adolescent girls. Journal of Urban Health. 2007;84:346–359. PubMed PMC

Sugiyama T, Francis J, Middleton NJ, Owen N, Giles-Corti B. Associations Between Recreational Walking and Attractiveness, Size, and Proximity of Neighborhood Open Spaces. American Journal of Public Health. 2010;100(9):1752–1757. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.182006. 2010. PubMed DOI PMC

Sugiyama T, Leslie E, Giles-Corti B, Owen N. Associations of neighborhood greenness with physical and mental health: do walking, social coherence and local social interaction explain the relationships? J. Epidemiol. Community Health. 2008;62:e9. PubMed

Toftager M, Ekholm O, Schipperijn J, Stigsdotter UK, Bentsen P, Grønbæk M, Randrup TB, Kamper-Jørgensen F. Distance to green space and physical activity: a Danish national representative survey. Journal of Physical Activity and Health. 2011;8:741–749. PubMed

Wang D, Brown G, Liu Y. The physical and non-physical factors that influence perceived access to urban parks. Landscape and Urban Planning. 2015;133:53–66. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.09.007. DOI

World Health Organization (WHO) Global Recommendations On Physical Activity For Health. 2010 http://www.who.int/dietphysicalactivity/factsheet_adults/en/; accessed 22 July 2017. PubMed

World Health Organization (WHO) Global status report on noncommunicable diseases, 2014. 2014 http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/148114/1/9789241564854_eng.pdf?ua=1; accessed July 2017.

Wood S. Generalized Additive Models: An Introduction with R. Vol. 2006. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall; 2006. p. 392.

Find record

Citation metrics

Logged in users only

Archiving options

Loading data ...