Endoscopic gastric reduction with an endoluminal suturing device: a multicenter prospective trial with 1-year follow-up
Language English Country Germany Media print-electronic
Document type Clinical Trial, Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Video-Audio Media
PubMed
29906810
DOI
10.1055/a-0630-1224
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Gastroplasty adverse effects instrumentation MeSH
- Gastroscopy MeSH
- Weight Loss MeSH
- Body Mass Index MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Follow-Up Studies MeSH
- Obesity surgery MeSH
- Prospective Studies MeSH
- Suture Techniques adverse effects instrumentation MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Video-Audio Media MeSH
- Journal Article MeSH
- Clinical Trial MeSH
- Multicenter Study MeSH
BACKGROUND: Obesity is the pandemic disease of this century. Surgery is the only effective treatment but cannot be offered to every patient. Endoscopic sutured gastroplasty is a minimally invasive technique that may potentially fill the gap between surgery and behavioral therapy. In this study, we prospectively investigated the efficacy and safety of a novel suturing device. METHODS: After a pre-bariatric multidisciplinary work-up, class 1 and 2 obese patients were included. Using a simple triangulation platform, transmural sutures with serosa-to-serosa apposition were performed in the gastric cavity. Patients were followed according to the same routines as those performed for bariatric procedures. RESULTS: Between November 2015 and December 2016, 51 patients were included across three European Centers. Mean body mass index at baseline was 35.1 kg/m2 (SD 3.0). Excess weight loss and total body weight loss at 1 year were 29 % (SD 28) and 7.4 % (SD 7), respectively, for the whole cohort (45 patients). At follow-up gastroscopy, 88 % of sutures were still in place (30 patients). No severe adverse events were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic sutured gastroplasty using this novel device is safe and achieved weight loss results in line with criteria expected for these endoluminal techniques. Further prospective studies vs. placebo or nutritional support are needed.
Catholic University of Rome Rome Italy
Department of Gastroenterology Erasme Hospital Université Libre de Bruxelles Brussels Belgium
Faculty of Medicine University of Ostrava Ostrava Czech Republic
References provided by Crossref.org
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT02582229