A robust and widely applicable method for sampling of aquatic microbial biofilm and further sample processing is presented. The method is based on next-generation sequencing of V4-V5 variable regions of 16S rRNA gene and further statistical analysis of sequencing data, which could be useful not only to investigate taxonomic composition of biofilm bacterial consortia but also to assess aquatic ecosystem health. Five artificial materials commonly used for biofilm growth (glass, stainless steel, aluminum, polypropylene, polyethylene) were tested to determine the one giving most robust and reproducible results. The effect of used sampler material on total microbial composition was not statistically significant; however, the non-plastic materials (glass, metal) gave more stable outputs without irregularities among sample parallels. The bias of the method is assessed with respect to the employment of a non-quantitative step (PCR amplification) to obtain quantitative results (relative abundance of identified taxa). This aspect is often overlooked in ecological and medical studies. We document that sequencing of a mixture of three merged primary PCR reactions for each sample and further evaluation of median values from three technical replicates for each sample enables to overcome this bias and gives robust and repeatable results well distinguishing among sampling localities and seasons.

Faculty of Fisheries and Protection of Waters South Bohemian Research Center of Aquaculture and Biodiversity of Hydrocenoses University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice Vodnany Czech Republic

Institute of Microbiology of the Czech Academy of Sciences Videnska 1083 142 20 Prague 4 Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Nucleic Acids Res. 2014 Jan;42(Database issue):D643-8 PubMed

Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013 Mar;79(5):1459-72 PubMed

Front Microbiol. 2015 Oct 31;6:1216 PubMed

Nat Methods. 2013 Oct;10(10):996-8 PubMed

J Eukaryot Microbiol. 1999 Jul-Aug;46(4):327-38 PubMed

Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008 May;74(9):2659-68 PubMed

Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013 Mar;79(6):1897-905 PubMed

Water Sci Technol. 2012;65(10):1869-74 PubMed

FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2003 Feb 1;43(1):111-9 PubMed

J Mol Biol. 1990 Oct 5;215(3):403-10 PubMed

Arch Microbiol. 1995 Sep;164(3):165-72 PubMed

PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e40467 PubMed

Springerplus. 2016 Jun 21;5(1):822 PubMed

PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e57923 PubMed

PLoS One. 2014 Jun 23;9(6):e98485 PubMed

Bioinformatics. 2010 Oct 1;26(19):2460-1 PubMed

Res Microbiol. 2015 Dec;166(10):774-81 PubMed

Front Microbiol. 2015 May 18;6:454 PubMed

Nucleic Acids Res. 2013 Jan;41(Database issue):D590-6 PubMed

ISME J. 2012 Feb;6(2):248-58 PubMed

ISME J. 2012 Aug;6(8):1459-68 PubMed

J Microbiol Methods. 2015 Jan;108:103-11 PubMed

Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35(19):e130 PubMed

Water Res. 2015 Apr 1;72:145-53 PubMed

Nat Rev Microbiol. 2016 Apr;14(4):251-63 PubMed

Microb Ecol. 2004 May;47(4):316-28 PubMed