Performing and interpreting individual pharmacokinetic profiles in patients with Hemophilia A or B: Rationale and general considerations

. 2018 Jul ; 2 (3) : 535-548. [epub] 20180520

Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium electronic-ecollection

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, přehledy

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid30046759
Odkazy

PubMed 30046759
PubMed Central PMC6046594
DOI 10.1002/rth2.12106
PII: S2475-0379(22)01900-8
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje

OBJECTIVES: In a separate document, we have provided specific guidance on performing individual pharmacokinetic (PK) studies using limited samples in persons with hemophilia with the goal to optimize prophylaxis with clotting factor concentrates. This paper, intended for clinicians, aims to describe how to interpret and apply PK properties obtained in persons with hemophilia. METHODS: The members of the Working Party on population PK (PopPK) of the ISTH SSC Subcommittee on Factor VIII and IX and rare bleeding disorders, together with additional hemophilia and PK experts, completed a survey and ranking exercise whereby key areas of interest in the field were identified. The group had regular web conferences to refine the manuscript's scope and structure, taking into account comments from the external feedback to the earlier document. RESULTS: Many clinical decisions in hemophilia are based on some form of explicit or implicit PK assessment. Individual patient PK profiles can be analyzed through traditional or PopPK methods, with the latter providing the advantage of fewer samples needing to be collected on any prophylaxis regimen, and without the need the for a washout period. The most useful presentation of PK results for clinical decision making are a curve of the factor activity level over time, the time to achieve a certain activity level, or related parameters like half-life or exposure (AUC). Software platforms have been developed to deliver this information to clinicians at the point of care. Key characteristics of studies measuring average PK parameters were reviewed, outlining what makes a credible head-to-head comparison among different concentrates. Large data collections of PK and treatment outcomes currently ongoing will advance care in the future. CONCLUSIONS: Traditionally used to compare different concentrates, PK can support tailoring of hemophilia treatment by individual profiling, which is greatly simplified by adopting a PopPK/Bayesian method and limited sampling protocol.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Berntorp E, Astermark J, Baghaei F, et al. Treatment of haemophilia A and B and von Willebrand’s disease: summary and conclusions of a systematic review as part of a Swedish health‐technology assessment. Haemophilia. 2012;18:158–65. PubMed

Iorio A, Marchesini E, Marcucci M, Stobart K, Chan AK. Clotting factor concentrates given to prevent bleeding and bleeding‐related complications in people with hemophilia A or B. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011(9):CD003429. PubMed

Iorio A, Iserman E, Blanchette V, et al. Target plasma factor levels for personalized treatment in haemophilia: a Delphi consensus statement. Haemophilia. 2017;23:e170–9. PubMed

Ljung R, Fischer K, Carcao M, et al. Practical considerations in choosing a factor VIII prophylaxis regimen: role of clinical phenotype and trough levels. Thromb Haemost. 2016;115:913–20. PubMed

Carcao MD, Iorio A. Individualizing factor replacement therapy in severe hemophilia. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2015;41:864–71. PubMed

McEneny‐King A, Iorio A, Foster G, Edginton AN. The use of pharmacokinetics in dose individualization of factor VIII in the treatment of hemophilia A. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2016;12;11:1313–21. PubMed

Morfini M, Marchesini E, Paladino E, Santoro C, Zanon E, Iorio A. Pharmacokinetics of plasma‐derived vs. recombinant FVIII concentrates: a comparative study. Haemophilia. 2015;21:204–9. PubMed

Iorio A, McEneny‐King A, Keepanasseril A, Foster G, Edginton A. What is the role for population pharmacokinetics in hemophilia? Int J Pharmacokinetics. 2017;2;2:125–36.

Iorio A, Blanchette V, Blatny J, Collins P, Fischer K, Neufeld E. Estimating and interpreting the pharmacokinetic profiles of individual patients with hemophilia A or B using a population pharmacokinetic approach: communication from the SSC of the ISTH. J Thromb Haemost. 2017;15:2461–5. PubMed

Bjorkman S, Oh M, Spotts G, Schroth P, et al. Population pharmacokinetics of recombinant factor VIII: the relationships of pharmacokinetics to age and body weight. Blood. 2012;119:612–8. PubMed

McEneny‐King A, Chelle P, Henrard S, Hermans C, Iorio A, Edginton AN. Modeling of body weight metrics for effective and cost‐efficient conventional factor VIII dosing in hemophilia A prophylaxis. Pharmaceutics. 2017;9:E47. PubMed PMC

Vlot AJ, Mauser‐Bunschoten EP, Zarkova AG, et al. The half‐life of infused factor VIII is shorter in hemophiliac patients with blood group O than in those with blood group A. Thromb Haemost. 2000;83:65–9. PubMed

Nilsson IM, Hedner U, Ahlberg A. Haemophilia prophylaxis in Sweden. Acta Paediatr Scand. 1976;65:129–35. PubMed

Srivastava A, Brewer AK, Mauser‐Bunschoten EP, et al. Guidelines for the management of hemophilia. Haemophilia. 2013;19:e1–47. PubMed

de Moerloose P, Fischer K, Lambert T, et al. Recommendations for assessment, monitoring and follow‐up of patients with haemophilia. Haemophilia. 2012;18:319–25. PubMed

Hazendonk HC, Lock J, Mathot RA, et al. Perioperative treatment of hemophilia A patients: blood group O patients are at risk of bleeding complications. J Thromb Haemost. 2016;14:468–78. PubMed

Hazendonk H, Fijnvandraat K, Lock J, et al. A population pharmacokinetic model for perioperative dosing of factor VIII in hemophilia A patients. Haematologica. 2016;101:1159–69. PubMed PMC

Hazendonk HC, van Moort I, Fijnvandraat K, et al. The “OPTI‐CLOT” trial. A randomised controlled trial on periOperative PharmacokineTIc‐guided dosing of CLOTting factor concentrate in haemophilia A. Thromb Haemost. 2015;114:639–44. PubMed

Berntorp E, Shapiro A, Astermark J, et al. Inhibitor treatment in haemophilias A and B: summary statement for the 2006 international consensus conference. Haemophilia. 2006;12(Suppl 6):1–7. PubMed

Blanchette VS, Key NS, Ljung LR, et al. Definitions in hemophilia: communication from the SSC of the ISTH. J Thromb Haemost. 2014;12:1935–9. PubMed

Hay CR, DiMichele DM; International Immune Tolerance Study . The principal results of the International Immune Tolerance Study: a randomized dose comparison. Blood. 2012;119(6):1335–44. PubMed

Collins PW, Chalmers E, Hart DP, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of factor VIII and IX inhibitors in congenital haemophilia: (4th edition). UK Haemophilia Centre Doctors Organization. Br J Haematol. 2013;160:153–70. PubMed

Collins P, Chalmers E, Alamelu J, et al. First‐line immune tolerance induction for children with severe haemophilia A: a protocol from the UK Haemophilia Centre Doctors’ Organisation Inhibitor and Paediatric Working Parties. Haemophilia. 2017;23:654–9. PubMed

Preston FE, Kitchen S. Quality control and factor VIII assays. Haemophilia. 1998;4:651–3. PubMed

Bland JM, Altman DG. Applying the right statistics: analyses of measurement studies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003;22:85–93. PubMed

Hulley SB, Newman TB, Cummings SR. Planning the measurements: precision and accuracy In: Hulley SB, Cummings SR, Browner WS, Grady DG, Newman TB, editors. Designing Clinical Research, 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007: 37–50.

Gruppo RA, Brown D, Wilkes MM, Navickis RJ. Comparative effectiveness of full‐length and B‐domain deleted factor VIII for prophylaxis–a meta‐analysis. Haemophilia. 2003;9:251–60. PubMed

Santoro C, Iorio A, Ferrante F, et al. Performance of recalibrated ReFacto laboratory standard in the measurement of FVIII plasma concentration via the chromogenic and one‐stage assays after infusion of recalibrated ReFacto (B‐domain deleted recombinant factor VIII). Haemophilia. 2009;15:779–87. PubMed

Hubbard AR. Potency labeling of novel factor VIII and factor IX concentrates: past experience and current strategy. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2015;41:849–54. PubMed

Dodt J, Hubbard AR, Wicks SJ, et al. Potency determination of factor VIII and factor IX for new product labelling and postinfusion testing: challenges for caregivers and regulators. Haemophilia. 2015;21:543–9. PubMed

Wilmot HV, Hogwood J, Gray E. Recombinant factor IX: discrepancies between one‐stage clotting and chromogenic assays. Haemophilia. 2014;20:891–7. PubMed

Sommer JM, Buyue Y, Bardan S, et al. Comparative field study: impact of laboratory assay variability on the assessment of recombinant factor IX Fc fusion protein (rFIXFc) activity. Thromb Haemost. 2014;112:932–40. PubMed PMC

Young GB, Fischer K, Iorio A, et al.; on behalf of the International Prophylaxis Study Group (IPSG) . Laboratory assay measurement of modified clotting factor concentrates: a review of the literature and recommendations for practice, (Submitted). PubMed

Peyvandi F, Oldenburg J, Friedman KD. A critical appraisal of one‐stage and chromogenic assays of factor VIII activity. J Thromb Haemost. 2016;14:248–61. PubMed

Garmann D, McLeay S, Shah A, Vis P, Maas Enriquez M, Ploeger BA. Population pharmacokinetic characterization of BAY 81‐8973, a full‐length recombinant factor VIII: lessons learned—importance of including samples with factor VIII levels below the quantitation limit. Haemophilia. 2017;23:528–37. PubMed

Beal SL. Ways to fit a PK model with some data below the quantification limit. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2001;28:481–504. PubMed

Lissitchkov T, Rusen L, Georgiev P, et al. PK‐guided personalized prophylaxis with Nuwiq((R)) (human‐cl rhFVIII) in adults with severe haemophilia A. Haemophilia. 2017;23:697–704. PubMed

Pasca S, Milan M, Sarolo L, Zanon E. PK‐driven prophylaxis versus standard prophylaxis: When a tailored treatment may be a real and achievable cost‐saving approach in children with severe hemophilia A. Thromb Res. 2017;157:58–63. PubMed

Lee M, Schulman S, Ingerslev J. The design and analysis of pharmacokinetic studies of coagulation factors. ISTH Website. Available from https://c.ymcdn.com/sites/www.isth.org/resource/group/d4a6f49a-f4ec-450f-9e0f-7be9f0c2ab2e/official_communications/fviiipharmaco.pdf.

van Warmerdam LJ, ten Bokkel Huinink WW, Maes RA, Beijnen JH. Limited‐sampling models for anticancer agents. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 1994;120:427–33. PubMed

Sorensen BT, Stromgren A, Jakobsen P, Jakobsen A. A limited sampling method for estimation of the carboplatin area under the curve. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1993;31:324–7. PubMed

Garraffo R, Iliadis A, Cano JP, Dellamonica P, Lapalus P. Application of Bayesian estimation for the prediction of an appropriate dosage regimen of amikacin. J Pharm Sci. 1989;78:753–7. PubMed

Gaulier JM, Boulieu R, Fischer C, Mauguiere . Evaluation of a bayesian pharmacokinetic program for phenytoin concentration predictions in outpatient population. Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 1998;23:295–300. PubMed

Denaro CP, Ravenscroft PJ. Comparison of Sawchuk‐Zaske and bayesian forecasting for aminoglycosides in seriously ill patients. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1989;28:37–44. PubMed PMC

Bjorkman S, Collins P. Project on Factor VIIIFIXPotFVFIXS, Standardization Committee of The I. Measurement of factor VIII pharmacokinetics in routine clinical practice. J Thromb Haemost. 2013;11:180–2. PubMed

Ette EI, Williams PJ. Population pharmacokinetics I: background, concepts, and models. Ann Pharmacother. 2004;38:1702–6. PubMed

Holford NH, Buclin T. Safe and effective variability‐a criterion for dose individualization. Ther Drug Monit. 2012;34:565–8. PubMed

Iorio A, Keepanasseril A, Foster G, et al. Development of a Web‐Accessible Population Pharmacokinetic Service‐Hemophilia (WAPPS‐Hemo): Study Protocol. JMIR Res Protoc. 2016;5:e239. PubMed PMC

Dubois A, Gsteiger S, Balser S, et al. Pharmacokinetic similarity of biologics: analysis using nonlinear mixed‐effects modeling. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2012;91:234–42. PubMed PMC

Brekkan A, Berntorp E, Jensen K, Nielsen EI, Jonsson S. Population pharmacokinetics of plasma‐derived factor IX: procedures for dose individualization. J Thromb Haemost. 2016;14:724–32. PubMed

Iorio A, Fischer K, Blanchette V, et al. Tailoring treatment of haemophilia B: accounting for the distribution and clearance of standard and extended half‐life FIX concentrates. Thromb Haemost. 2017;117:1023–30. PubMed

Lock J, de Bekker‐Grob EW, Urhan G, et al. Facilitating the implementation of pharmacokinetic‐guided dosing of prophylaxis in haemophilia care by discrete choice experiment. Haemophilia. 2016;22:e1–10. PubMed

Den Uijl IE, Mauser Bunschoten EP, Roosendaal G, et al. Clinical severity of haemophilia A: does the classification of the 1950s still stand? Haemophilia. 2011;17:849–53. PubMed

Nestorov I, Neelakantan S, Ludden TM, Li S, Jiang H, Rogge M. Population pharmacokinetics of recombinant factor VIII Fc fusion protein. Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev. 2015;4:163–74. PubMed

Zhang Y, Roberts J, Bensen‐Kennedy D, et al. Population pharmacokinetics of a new long‐acting recombinant coagulation factor IX albumin fusion protein for patients with severe hemophilia B. J Thromb Haemost. 2016;14:2132–40. PubMed

Diao L, Li S, Ludden T, Gobburu J, Nestorov I, Jiang H. Population pharmacokinetic modelling of recombinant factor IX Fc fusion protein (rFIXFc) in patients with haemophilia B. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2014;53:467–77. PubMed PMC

Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, et al. GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence—indirectness. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:1303–10. PubMed

Goudemand J, Peynet J, Chambost H, et al. A cross‐over pharmacokinetic study of a double viral inactivated factor IX concentrate (15 nm filtration and SD) compared to a SD factor IX concentrate. Thromb Haemost. 1998;80:919–24. PubMed

Thomas DP, Hampton KK, Dasani H, et al. A cross‐over pharmacokinetic and thrombogenicity study of a prothrombin complex concentrate and a purified factor IX concentrate. Br J Haematol. 1994;87:782–8. PubMed

Ragni MV, Yabes JG, Fogarty PF, et al. Pilot randomized, non‐inferiority, cross‐over trial of once‐weekly vs. three times‐weekly recombinant factor VIII prophylaxis in adults with severe haemophilia A. Haemophilia. 2017;23:e43–6. PubMed PMC

Spira J, Plyushch O, Zozulya N, et al. Safety, pharmacokinetics and efficacy of factor VIIa formulated with PEGylated liposomes in haemophilia A patients with inhibitors to factor VIII—an open label, exploratory, cross‐over, phase I/II study. Haemophilia. 2010;16:910–8. PubMed

Suzuki A, Tomono Y, Korth‐Bradley JM. Population pharmacokinetic modelling of factor IX activity after administration of recombinant factor IX in patients with haemophilia B. Haemophilia. 2016;22:e359–66. PubMed

Bjorkman S, Berntorp E. Pharmacokinetics of coagulation factors: clinical relevance for patients with haemophilia. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2001;40:815–32. PubMed

Collins PW, Fischer K, Morfini M, Blanchette VS, Bjorkman S; International Prophylaxis Study Group Pharmacokinetics Expert Working Group . Implications of coagulation factor VIII and IX pharmacokinetics in the prophylactic treatment of haemophilia. Haemophilia. 2011;17:2–10. PubMed

Carlsson M, Bjorkman S, Berntorp E. Multidose pharmacokinetics of factor IX: implications for dosing in prophylaxis. Haemophilia. 1998;4:83–8. PubMed

Nejnovějších 20 citací...

Zobrazit více v
Medvik | PubMed

First experience of a hemophilia monitoring platform: florio HAEMO

. 2022 Feb ; 6 (2) : e12685. [epub] 20220313

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...