Sow stress levels and behavior and piglet performances in farrowing crates and farrowing pens with temporary crating
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
30102369
PubMed Central
PMC6247827
DOI
10.1093/jas/sky324
PII: 5068400
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- bydlení zvířat * MeSH
- chování zvířat * MeSH
- hmotnostní přírůstek MeSH
- hydrokortison analýza MeSH
- imunoglobulin G analýza MeSH
- laktace MeSH
- mléčné žlázy zvířat fyziologie MeSH
- náhodné rozdělení MeSH
- novorozená zvířata MeSH
- odstavení MeSH
- poporodní období MeSH
- prasata růst a vývoj fyziologie psychologie MeSH
- těhotenství MeSH
- tělesná hmotnost MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- těhotenství MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- Názvy látek
- hydrokortison MeSH
- imunoglobulin G MeSH
Farrowing pens with temporary crating have been developed as a compromise between conventional farrowing crates and pens to better accommodate the welfare of both sow and piglets during lactation. However, not much is known about the behavioral and physiological consequences of early removal of confinement on the sow and piglets during lactation. The aim of this study was to assess the effects on sow and piglet performance of temporary crating until 3-d postpartum at 2 times points, immediately after confinement removal and 25 d into lactation. Sows were crated from 5-d prepartum either to weaning (permanently crated-PC group; N =14) or to D3 (83.0 ± 1.3 h) postpartum (Temporarily crated - TC group N = 13). Sow postural changes, activity, cortisol and IgA concentrations, and piglet body weight gain and behavior were assessed on D4 and on D25 postpartum, whereas piglet mortality was assessed throughout lactation. Data were analyzed using PROC GLM and PROC GENMOD of SAS. On D4 postfarrowing, TC sows were more active (10.9% vs. 7.1%; SEM: 0.8; P = 0.002), rolled more frequently (21.3% vs. 14.4%; SEM: 1.6; P = 0.008), and had lower IgA concentrations (139.7 vs. 75.2 µg/mL; SEM: 20.3; P = 0.040) than PC sows. No effects of housing were found (P > 0.05) on standing-to-lying movement or cortisol concentrations. No differences for any variables were found (P > 0.05) on D25. Mortality, body weights, and activity levels at the udder or in the pen of pigs born to PC sows did not differ (P > 0.05) from those of piglets born to TC sows on D4 nor on D25. This study indicates that removal of confinement on the 4th-d postpartum may have had small short-term positive effects on sow behavior and stress levels (as measured by IgA), and that it did not impair piglets' behavior and performance during lactation. Therefore, this work suggests that temporary crating limited to the first 3-d postpartum might be a feasible alternative to improve welfare under intensive production conditions.
Department of Ethology Institute of Animal Science Prague Uhrineves Czech Republic
Department of Ethology Institute of Animal Science Prague Uhřiněves Czech Republic
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Baxter E. M., Lawrence A. B., and Edwards S. A.. 2011. Alternative farrowing systems: design criteria for farrowing systems based on the biological needs of sows and piglets. Animal 5:580–600. doi:10.1017/S1751731110002272 PubMed DOI
Biensen N. J., von Borell E. H., and Ford S. P.. 1996. Effects of space allocation and temperature on periparturient maternal behaviors, steroid concentrations, and piglet growth rates. J. Anim. Sci. 74:2641–2648. PubMed
Bozděchová B., Illmann G., Andersen I. L., Haman J., and Bhrlenbruch R.. 2014. Litter competition during nursings and its effect on sow response on Day 2 postpartum. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 150:9–16. doi:10.1016/ j.applanim.2013.10.006
Burn C. C. 2017. Bestial boredom: a biological perspective on animal boredom and suggestions or its scientific investigation. Anim. Behav. 130:141–151. doi:10.1016/ j.anbehav.2017.06.006
Chaloupková H., Illmann G., Neuhauserová K., Tománek M., and Valis L.. 2007. Preweaning housing effects on behavior and physiological measures in pigs during the suckling and fattening periods. J. Anim. Sci. 85:1741–1749. doi:10.2527/jas.2006-504 PubMed DOI
Chidgey K. L., Morel P. C. H., Stafford K. J., and Barugh I. W.. 2015. Sow and piglet productivity and sow reproductive performance in farrowing pens with temporary crating and farrowing crates on a commercial New Zealand pig farm. Livest. Sci. 173:87–94. doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2015.01.003
Chidgey K. L., Morel P. C. H., Stafford K. J., and Barugh I. W.. 2016a. The performance and behavior of gilts and their piglets is influenced by whether gilts were born and reared in farrowing crates or farrowing pens. Livest. Sci. 193: 51–57. doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2016.09.011
Chidgey K. L., Morel P. C. H., Stafford K. J., and Barugh I. W.. 2016b. Observations of sows and piglets housed in farrowing pens with temporary crating or farrowing crates on a commercial farm. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 176:12–18. doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2016.01.004
Condous P. C., Plush K. J., Tilbrook A. J., and van Wettere W. H.. 2016. Reducing sow confinement during farrowing and in early lactation increases piglet mortality. J. Anim. Sci. 94:3022–3029. doi:10.2527/jas.2015-0145 PubMed DOI
Cronin G. M., Barnett J. L., Hodge F. M., Smith J. A., and McCallum T. H.. 1991. The welfare of pigs in two farrowing/lactation environments: cortisol responses of sows. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 32:117–127. doi:10.1016/S0168-1591(05)80036-X
Damm B. I., Forkman B., and Pedersen L. J.. 2005. Lying down and rolling behaviour in sows in relation to piglet crushing. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 90:3–20. doi:10.1016/ j.applanim.2004.08.008
Danholt L., Moustsen V. A., Nielsen M. B. F., and Kristensen A. R.. 2011. Rolling behaviour of sows in relation to piglet crushing on sloped versus level floor pens. Livest. Sci. 141:59–68. doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2011.05.005
de Groot J., Ruis M. A., Scholten J. W., Koolhaas J. M., and Boersma W. J.. 2001. Long-term effects of social stress on antiviral immunity in pigs. Physiol. Behav. 73:145–158. doi:10.1016/S0168-1591(05)80036-X PubMed
Escribano D., Tvarijonaviciute A., Tecles F., and Cerón J. J.. 2015. Serum paraoxonase type-1 activity in pigs: assay validation and evolution after an induced experimental inflammation. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 163:210–215. doi:10.1016/j.vetimm.2014.12.002 PubMed DOI
Guhad F. A., and Hau J.. 1996. Salivary iga as a marker of social stress in rats. Neurosci. Lett. 216:137–140. doi:10.1016/0304-3940(96)13037-8 PubMed
Hales J., Moustsen V. A., Nielsen M. B., and Hansen C. F.. 2015. Temporary confinement of loose-housed hyperprolific sows reduces piglet mortality. J. Anim. Sci. 93:4079–4088. doi:10.2527/jas.2015-8973 PubMed DOI
Hales J., Moustsen V. A., Nielsen M. B. F., and Hansen C. F.. 2016. The effect of temporary confinement of hyperprolific sows in Sow Welfare and Piglet protection pens on sow behaviour and salivary cortisol concentrations. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 183:19–27. doi:10.1016/ j.applanim.2016.07.008
Harris M. J., and Gonyou H. W.. 1998. Increasing available space in a farrowing crate does not facilitate postural changes or maternal responses in gilts. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 59:285–296. doi:10.1016/S0168-1591(98)00142-7
Jarvis S., D’Eath R. B., Robson S. K., and Lawrence A. B.. 2006. The effect of confinement during lactation on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and behaviour of primiparous sows. Physiol. Behav. 87:345–352. doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2005.10.004 PubMed DOI
Johnson A. K., and Marchant-Forde R. M.. 2009. Welfare of pigs in the farrowing environment. In Marchant-Forde J. N. editor, The welfare of pigs. Springer Science + Business Media B.V, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 141–188.
Kilbride A. L., Mendl M., Statham P., Held S., Harris M., Cooper S., and Green L. E.. 2012. A cohort study of preweaning piglet mortality and farrowing accommodation on 112 commercial pig farms in England. Prev. Vet. Med. 104:281–291. doi:10.1016/j.prevetmed.2011.11.011 PubMed DOI
Lambertz C., Petig M., Elkmann A., and Gauly M.. 2015. Confinement of sows for different periods during lactation: effects on behaviour and lesions of sows and performance of piglets. Animal 9:1373–1378. doi:10.1017/S1751731115000889 PubMed DOI
Marchant J. N., Rudd A. R., Mendl M. T., Broom D. M., Meredith M. J., Corning S., and Simmins P. H.. 2000. Timing and causes of piglet mortality in alternative and conventional farrowing systems. Vet. Rec. 147:209–214. PubMed
Melišová M., Illmann G., Chaloupková H., and Bozděchová B.. 2014. Sow postural changes, responsiveness to piglet screams, and their impact on piglet mortality in pens and crates. J. Anim. Sci. 92:3064–3072. doi:10.2527/jas.2013-7340 PubMed DOI
Moustsen V. A., Hales J., Lahrmann H. P., Weber P. M., and Hansen C. F.. 2013. Confinement of lactating sows in crates for 4 days after farrowing reduces piglet mortality. Animal 7:648–654. doi:10.1017/S1751731112002170 PubMed DOI
Muneta Y., Minagawa Y., Nakane T., Shibahara T., Yoshikawa T., and Omata Y.. 2011. Interleukin-18 expression in pig salivary glands and salivary content changes during acute immobilization stress. Stress 14:549–556. doi:10.3109/10253890.2011.565392 PubMed DOI
Muneta Y., Yoshikawa T., Minagawa Y., Shibahara T., Maeda R., and Omata Y.. 2010. Salivary iga as a useful non-invasive marker for restraint stress in pigs. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 72:1295–1300. doi:10.1292/jvms.10-0009 PubMed
Oliviero C., Heinonen M., Valros A., Hälli O., and Peltoniemi O. A.. 2008. Effect of the environment on the physiology of the sow during late pregnancy, farrowing and early lactation. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 105:365–377. doi:10.1016/j.anireprosci.2007.03.015 PubMed DOI
Oostindjer M., Bolhuis J. E., Mendl M., Held S., Gerrits W., van den Brand H., and Kemp B.. 2010. Effects of environmental enrichment and loose housing of lactating sows on piglet performance before and after weaning. J. Anim. Sci. 88:3554–3562. doi:10.2527/jas.2010-2940 PubMed DOI
Pajor E. A., Kramer D. L. and Fraser D.. 2000. Regulation of contact with offspring by domestic sows: temporal patterns and individual variation. Ethol. 106:37–51. doi:10.1046/j.14390310.2000.00494.x
Pajor E. A., Weary D. M., Caceres C., Fraser D. and Kramer D. L.. 2002. Alternative housing for sows and litters: part 3. Effects of piglet diet quality and sow controlled housing on performance and behaviour. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 76:267–277. doi:10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00010-2
Singh C., Verdon M., Cronin G. M., and Hemsworth P. H.. 2017. The behaviour and welfare of sows and piglets in farrowing crates or lactation pens. Animal 11:1210–1221. doi:10.1017/S1751731116002573 PubMed DOI
Stabenow B., and Manteuffel G.. 2002. A better welfare for nursing sows without increased piglet loss applying peri-parturition short term crating. Arch. Tierz. Dummerstorf. 45:53–60.
Svobodová I., Chaloupková H., Končel R., Bartoš L., Hradecká L., and Jebavý L.. 2014. Cortisol and secretory immunoglobulin A response to stress in german shepherd dogs. PLoS ONE 9:e90820. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0090820 PubMed DOI PMC
Valros A., Rundgren M., Špinka M., Saloniemi H., Rydhmer L., Hultén F., Uvnäs-Moberg K., Tománek M., Krejcí P., and Algers B.. 2003. Metabolic state of the sow, nursing behaviour and milk production. Livest. Prod. Sci. 79:155–167. doi:10.1016/S0301-6226(02)00154-9
Weary D. M., Pajor E. A., Fraser D., and Honkanen A. M.. 1996. Sow body movements that crush piglets: a comparison between two types of farrowing accommodation. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 49:149–158. doi:10.1016/0168-1591(96)01042-8
Yin G., Liu H., Li X., Quan D. and Bao J.. 2016. Effect of farrowing environment on behaviour and physiology of primiparous sows with 35-day lactation. Intern. J. Appl. Res. Vet. Med. 14:159–169.
Review of Temporary Crating of Farrowing and Lactating Sows