Temporary crating (TC) provides lactating sows with the opportunity to move more freely after crate opening a few days after parturition. The aim of this paper was to evaluate whether TC gives overall welfare improvement when compared to permanent crating or free farrowing. This review shows that when pens with TC allow the sows to turn during the majority of time in the farrowing unit, it is the pen design and period of confinement in a crate within it that influence the extent to which different functional and motivated behaviors can be fulfilled. This review also indicates that there are at least short-term benefits to sows when confinement is reduced, as shown by reported increases in motivated behaviors such as exploration and interactions with piglets when not permanently crated. It remains unclear whether there are any longer-term beneficial effects (until or beyond weaning) due to the paucity of studies. Furthermore, it is uncertain whether the observed short-term benefits translate to other welfare indicators. Research findings indicate no reduction in the frequency of stereotypies or body lesions and do not provide a clear answer regarding sow stress response when released from confinement. Compared to free farrowing, TC appears beneficial for reducing piglet mortality. The impact of the time of onset of TC on the farrowing process and piglet mortality have been inconsistent. While confinement before farrowing prevents nest building behavior, consequences of this for sow physiology have been ambiguous. Confining the sow briefly after farrowing may be the best compromise, allowing the sow to perform motivated nest-building behavior, but the risks of crushing during the unconfined farrowing period may increase. Subsequent crate reopening seems to increase piglet mortality but only if done earlier than 3-5 days after farrowing. The review also provides methodological considerations, a proposal for consistent and accurate terminology when describing systems and highlights gaps of knowledge. In conclusion, TC is a step forward to better pig welfare compared to the farrowing crate, as it allows some freedom of movement for sows without impairing piglet welfare. However, more comprehensive research is needed to draw sound conclusions as to whether TC is a viable transition from permanent crating to free farrowing.

Animal Behaviour and Welfare Animal and Veterinary Sciences Group Scotland's Rural College Edinburgh United Kingdom

Animal Physiology Institute of Agricultural Sciences ETH Zürich Zürich Switzerland

Department of Ethology Institute of Animal Science Prague Czechia

Faculty of Agrobiology Food and Natural Resources Czech University of Life Sciences Prague Prague Czechia

School of Natural and Environmental Sciences Newcastle University Newcastle upon Tyne United Kingdom

SEGES Danish Pig Research Centre Copenhagen Denmark

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Baxter EM, Andersen IL, Edwards SA. Sow welfare in the farrowing crate and alternatives. In: Špinka M, editor. Advances in Pig Welfare. Cambridge: Elsevier Ltd., Woodhead Publishing; (2018). p. 27–72. 10.1016/B978-0-08-101012-9.00002-2 DOI

Oliviero C, Heinonen M, Valros A, Hlli O, Peltoniemi OAT. Effect of the environment on the physiology of the sow during late pregnancy, farrowing and early lactation. Anim Reprod Sci. (2008) 105:365–77. 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2007.03.015 PubMed DOI

Gu Z, Gao Y, Lin B, Zhong Z, Liu Z, Wang C, et al. . Impacts of a freedom farrowing pen design on sow behaviours and performance. Prevent Vet Med. (2011) 102:296–303. 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2011.08.001 PubMed DOI

Peltoniemi OAT, Oliviero C. Housing, management and environment during farrowing and early lactation. In: Farmer C, editor. The Gestating and Lactating Sow. Wageningen Academic Publishers (2015). p. 1–452. 10.3920/978-90-8686-803-2_10 DOI

Hales J, Moustsen VA, Nielsen MBF, Hansen CF. Higher preweaning mortality in free farrowing pens compared with farrowing crates in three commercial pig farms. Animal. (2014) 8:113–20. 10.1017/S1751731113001869 PubMed DOI

Pedersen LJ, Malmkvist J, Andersen HML. Housing of sows during farrowing: a review on pen design, welfare and productivity. In: Livestock Housing: Modern Management to Ensure Optimal Health and Welfare of Farm Animals. Wageningen Academic Publishers (2013). p. 93–111. 10.3920/978-90-8686-771-4_05 DOI

Vandresen B, Stadnick ECP, Hötzel MJ. Freedom to move versus piglet crushing: citizens' attitudes towards farrowing housing systems. In: Proceedings of the Global Virtual Meeting of the International Society for Applied Ethology (2020).

Weber R, Burla JB, Jossen M, Wechsler B. Excellent performance with larger litters in free-farrowing pens. Swiss Agri Res. (2020) 11:53–8. 10.34776/afs11-53e DOI

Andersson E, Frössling J, Engblom L, Algers B, Gunnarsson S. Impact of litter size on sow stayability in Swedish commercial piglet producing herds. Acta Vet Scand. (2015) 58:3. 10.1186/s13028-016-0213-8 PubMed DOI PMC

AHDB . 2019 Pig Cost of Production in Selected Countries. Kenilworth: Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board (2021). Available online at: https://ahdb.org.uk/knowledge-library/2019-pig-cost-of-production-in-selected-countries (accessed December 25, 2021).

Olsson AC, Botermans J, Englund JE. Piglet mortality - a parallel comparison between loose-housed and temporarily confined farrowing sows in the same herd. Acta Agric Scand A Anim Sci. (2018) 68:52–62. 10.1080/09064702.2018.1561934 DOI

Pig Research Centre . Action Plan Better Animal Welfare for Pigs. (2011). Available online at: https://en.fvm.dk/fileadmin/user_upload/FVM.dk/Dokumenter/Landbrug/Indsatser/Dyrevelfaerd_og_-transport/Svinehandlingsplan_engelsk_final.docx (accessed December 25, 2021).

Fink Hansen C. Change experiences by a Danish policy influencer. In: Virtual Workshop “Freedom in Farrowing and Lactation“: Overcoming Barriers, Facilitating Change (2021).

Baumgartner J. Country roundup. In: Virtual Workshop “Freedom in Farrowing and Lactation”: Overcoming Barriers, Facilitating Change (2021).

Baxter EM, Lawrence AB, Edwards SA. Alternative farrowing systems: design criteria for farrowing systems based on the biological needs of sow and piglets. Animal. (2011) 5:580–600. 10.1017/S1751731110002272 PubMed DOI

Caille ME, Meunier-SAlaün MC, Ramonet Y. Sows in loose farrowing system effects on performance and work conditions. Swine Days Res. (2010) 9–13.

Ceballos MC Góis KCR Parsons TD . The opening of a hinged farrowing crate improves lactating sows' welfare. Appl Anim Behav Sci. (2020) 230:105068. 10.1016/j.applanim.2020.105068 DOI

Ceballos MC, Rocha Gois KC, Parsons TD, Pierdon M. Impact of duration of farrowing crate closure on physical indicators of sow welfare and piglet mortality. Animals. (2021) 11:969. 10.3390/ani11040969 PubMed DOI PMC

Chidgey KL, Morel PC, Stafford KJ, Barugh IW. The performance and behaviour of gilts and their piglets is influenced by whether they were born and reared in farrowing crates or farrowing pens. Livest Sci. (2016) 193:51–7. 10.1016/j.livsci.2016.09.011 DOI

Chidgey KL, Morel PC, Stafford KJ, Barugh IW. Observations of sows and piglets housed in farrowing pens with temporary crating or farrowing crates on a commercial farm. Appl Anim Behav Sci. (2016) 176:12–8. 10.1016/j.applanim.2016.01.004 PubMed DOI

Chidgey KL, Morel PC, Stafford KJ, Barugh IW. Sow and piglet behavioral associations in farrowing pens with temporary crating and in farrowing crates. J Vet Behav. (2017) 10:91–101. 10.1016/j.jveb.2017.01.003 DOI

Chidgey KL, Morel PCH, Stafford KJ, Barugh IW. Sow and piglet productivity and sow reproductive performance in farrowing pens with temporary crating or farrowing crates on a commercial New Zealand pig farm. Livest Sci. (2015) 173:87–94. 10.1016/j.livsci.2015.01.003 DOI

Choi Y, Min Y, Kim Y, Jeong Y, Kim D, Kim J, et al. . Effects of loose farrowing facilities on reproductive performance in primiparous sows. J Anim Sic Technol. (2020) 62:218–26. 10.5187/jast.2020.62.2.218 PubMed DOI PMC

Condous PC, Plush KJ, Tilbrook AJ, van Wettere WHEJ. Reducing sow confinement during farrowing and in early lactation increases piglet mortality. J Anim Sci. (2016) 94:3022–9. 10.2527/jas.2015-0145 PubMed DOI

Farmer C, Devillers N, Widowski T, Massé D. Impacts of a modified farrowing pen design on sow and litter performances and air quality during two seasons. Livest Sci. (2006) 104:303–12. 10.1016/j.livsci.2006.04.010 DOI

Goumon S, Leszkowová I, Šimečková M, Illmann G. Sow stress levels and behavior and piglet performances in farrowing crates and farrowing pens with temporary crating. J Anim Sci. (2018) 96:4571–8. 10.1093/jas/sky324 PubMed DOI PMC

Hales J, Moustsen VA, Devreese AM, Nielsen MBF, Hansen CF. Comparable farrowing progress in confined and loose housed hyper-prolific sows. Livest Sci. (2015) 171:64–72. 10.1016/j.livsci.2014.11.009 DOI

Hales J, Moustsen VA, Nielsen MBF, Hansen CF. The effect of temporary confinement of hyperprolific sows in sow welfare and piglet protection pens on sow behaviour and salivary cortisol concentrations. Appl Anim Behav Sci. (2016) 183:19–27. 10.1016/j.applanim.2016.07.008 DOI

Hales J, Moustsen VA, Nielsen MB, Hansen CF. Temporary confinement of loose-housed hyperprolific sows reduces piglet mortality. J Anim Sci. (2015) 93:4079–88. 10.2527/jas.2015-8973 PubMed DOI

Hansen LU. Test of 10 Different Farrowing Pens for Loose-Housed Sows. SEGES Svine Produktion. Report No 1803. Copenhagen: SEGES Danish Pig Research Centre; (2018).

Hansen CF, Hales J, Weber PM, Edwards SA, Moustsen VA. Confinement of sows 24h before expected farrowing affects the performance of nest building behaviours but not progress of parturition. Appl Anim Behav Sci. (2017) 188:1–8. 10.1016/j.applanim.2017.01.003 DOI

Heidinger B, Stinglmayr J, Maschat K, Oberer M, Kuchling S, Baumgartner J. Summary of the Austrian Project “Pro-SAU”: Evaluation of Novel Farrowing Systems with Possibility for the Sow to Move. Copenhagen: SEGES Danish Pig Research Centre; (2018).

Höbel C, Klein S, Patzkéwitsch D, Reese S, Erhard M. A comparison of different farrowing systems. Part 2 Performance data and effects on the lying down behaviour of the sows and the activity of the piglets. Tierarztl Prax Ausg G Grosstiere Nutzt. (2018) 46:357–67. 10.15653/TPG-180484 PubMed DOI

Illmann G, Goumon S, Šimečková M, Leszkowová I. Effect of crate opening from day 3 postpartum to weaning on nursing and suckling behaviour in domestic pigs. Animal. (2019) 13:2018–24. 10.1017/S1751731118003750 PubMed DOI

Illmann G, Goumon S, Chaloupkov á H. Assessment of lying down behaviour in temporarily crated lactating sows. Animal. (2021) 15:100130. 10.1016/j.animal.2020.100130 PubMed DOI

Kinane O, Butler F, O'Driscoll K. Freedom to grow: improving sow welfare also benefits piglets. Animals. (2021) 11:1181. 10.3390/ani11041181 PubMed DOI PMC

King RL, Baxter EM, Matheson SM, Edwards SA. Sow free farrowing behaviour: experiential, seasonal and individual variation. Appl Anim Behav Sci. (2018) 208:14–21. 10.1016/j.applanim.2018.08.006 DOI

King RL, Baxter EM, Matheson SM, Edwards SA. Temporary crate opening procedure affects immediate post-opening piglet mortality and sow behaviour. Animal. (2019) 13:189–97. 10.1017/S1751731118000915 PubMed DOI

King RL, Baxter EM, Matheson SM, Edwards SA. Consistency is key: interactions of current and previous farrowing system on litter size and piglet mortality. Animal. (2019) 13:180–8. 10.1017/S1751731118000927 PubMed DOI

Lambertz C, Petig M, Elkmann A, Gauly M. Confinement of sows for different periods during lactation: effects on behaviour and lesions of sows and performance of piglets. Animal. (2015) 9:1373–8. 10.1017/S1751731115000889 PubMed DOI

Loftus L, Bell G, Padmore E, Atkinson S, Henworth A, Hoyle M. The effect of two different farrowing systems on sow behaviour, piglet behaviour mortality and growth. Appl Anim Behav Sci. (2020) 232:105102. 10.1016/j.applanim.2020.105102 DOI

Lohmeier RY, Gimberg-Henrici CGE, Burfeind O, Krieter J. Suckling behaviour and health parameters of sows and piglets in free-farrowing pens. Appl Anim Behav Sci. (2019) 211:25–32. 10.1016/j.applanim.2018.12.006 DOI

Mack LA, Rossini SP, Leventhal SJ, Parsons TD. Case study: differences in social behaviors and mortality among piglets housed in alternative lactational systems. Prof Anim Sci. (2017) 33:261–75. 10.15232/pas.2016-01564 DOI

Maschat K, Dolezal M, Leeb C, Heidinger B, Winckler C, Oczak M, et al. . Duration of confinement and pen-type affect health related measures of welfare in lactating sows. Anim Welf. (2020) 29:339–52. 10.7120/09627286.29.3.339 DOI

Morgan L, Meyer J, Novak S, Younis A, Ahmad WA, Raz T. Shortening sow restraint period during lactation improves production and decrease hair cortisol concentrations in sows and their piglets. Animal. (2021) 15:100082. 10.1016/j.animal.2020.100082 PubMed DOI

Moustsen VA, Hales J, Lahrmann HP, Weber PM, Hansen CF. Confinement of lactating sows in crates for 4 days after farrowing reduces piglet mortality. Animal. (2013) 7:648–54. 10.1017/S1751731112002170 PubMed DOI

Nowland TL, Ernest WH, van Wettere J, Plush KJ. Allowing sows to farrow unconfined has positive implications for sow and piglet welfare. Appl Anim Behav Sci. (2019) 221:104872. 10.1016/j.applanim.2019.104872 DOI

Oostindjer M, Bolhuis JE, Mendl M, Held S, Gerrits W, van den Brand., et al. . Effects of environmental enrichment and loose housing of lactating sows on piglet performance before and after weaning. J Anim Sci. (2010) 88:3554–62. 10.2527/jas.2010-2940 PubMed DOI

Pedersen ML, Moustsen VA, Nielsen MBF, Kristensen AR. Improved udder access prolongs duration of milk letdown and increases piglet weight gain. Livest Sci. (2011) 140:253–61. 10.1016/j.livsci.2011.04.001 DOI

Salaün C, Le Roux N, Vieuille C, Meunier-Salaün MC, Ramonet Y. Effect of housing system on lactating sows and piglets behaviour and on their performances before weaning. Swine days Res. (2004) 36:371–8.

Singh C, Verdon M, Cronin GM, Hemsworth PH. The behaviour and welfare of sows and piglets in farrowing crates or lactation pens. Animal. (2017) 11:1210–21. 10.1017/S1751731116002573 PubMed DOI

Spindler E, Klein S, Erhard M, Reese S, Patzkewitsch D. Field trial of an open pen – comparison of two different types of farrowing pens. Vet Pract Ausg G Large Anim Farm Anim. (2018) 46:283–90. 10.15653/TPG-180010 PubMed DOI

Verhovsek D, Troxler J, Baumgartner J. Peripartal behaviour and teat lesions of sows in farrowing crates and in a loose-housing system. Anim Welf. (2007) 16:273–6.

Glencorse D, Plush K, Hazel S, D'Souza D, Hebart M. Impact of non-confinement accommodation on farrowing performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis of farrowing crates versus pens. Animals. (2019) 9:957. 10.3390/ani9110957 PubMed DOI PMC

Moustsen VA, Lahrmann HP, d'Eath RB. Relationship between size and age of modern hyper-prolific crossbred sows. Livest Sci. (2011) 141:272–5. 10.1016/j.livsci.2011.06.008 DOI

Nielsen SE, Kristensen AR, Moustsen VA. Litter size of Danish crossbred sows increased without changes in sow body dimensions over a thirteen-year period. Livest Sci. (2018) 209:73–6. 10.1016/j.livsci.2018.01.015 DOI

Moustsen VA, Duus LK. Søers ”Rejse og Lægge sig” Bevægelse i Forskellige Farestier. Dansk Svine Produktion. Report No 733. Copenhagen: SEGES Danish Pig Research Centre; (2006).

Damm BI, Vestergaard KS, Schroder-Petersen DL, Ladewig J. The effects of branches on prepartum nest building in gilts with access to straw. Appl Anim Behav Sci. (2000) 69:113–24. 10.1016/S0168-1591(00)00122-2 PubMed DOI

Nannoni E„Aarnink AJA, Vermeer HH, Reimert I, Fels M, Bracke MBM. Soiling of pigs pens: a review of elimintive behaviour. Animals. (2020) 10:2025. 10.3390/ani10112025 PubMed DOI PMC

Moustsen VA, Poulsen HL. Pattegrises Dimensioner. Landsudvalget for Svin, Danske Slagterier. Report No 0432. Michael Conn P, editor. (2004).

Moustsen VA, Nielsen MBF. Dimensioner på 202 Danske Pattegrise Målt I En Besætning. SEGES Svine produktion. Report No 1727. Copenhagen: SEGES Danish Pig Research Centre; (2017).

Verdon M, Morrison RS, Rault JL. The welfare and productivity of sows and piglets in group lactation from 7, 10, or 14 d postpartum. J Anim Sci. (2020) 98:1–11. 10.1093/jas/skaa037 PubMed DOI PMC

Andersen IL, Vasdal G, Pedersen LJ. Nest building and posture changes and activity budgets of gilts housed in pens and crates. Appl Anim Behav Sci. (2014) 159:29–33. 10.1016/j.applanim.2014.07.002 DOI

Malmkvist J, Pedersen LJ, Kammersgaard TS, Jorgensen E. Influence of thermal environment on sows around farrowing and during the lactation period. J Ani Sci. (2012) 90:3186–99. 10.2527/jas.2011-4342 PubMed DOI

Martínez-Miró S, Tecles F, Ramón M, Escribano D, Hernández F, Madrid J, et al. . Causes, consequences and biomarkers of stress in swine: an update. BMC Vet Res. (2016) 12:171. 10.1186/s12917-016-0791-8 PubMed DOI PMC

Lawrence AB, Petherick JC, McLean KA, Deans LA, Chirnside J, Vaughan A, et al. . The effect of environment on behaviour, plasma cortisol and prolactin in parturient sows. Appl Anim Behav Sci. (1994) 39:313–30. 10.1016/0168-1591(94)90165-1 DOI

Pedersen LJ, Jensen T. Effects of late introduction of sows to two farrowing environments on the progress of farrowing and maternal behavior. J Anim Sci. (2008) 86:2730–7. 10.2527/jas.2007-0749 PubMed DOI

Lawrence AB, Petherick JC, McLean KA, Gilbert CL, Chapman C, Russell JA. Naloxone prevents interruption of parturition and increases plasma oxytocin following environmental disturbance in parturient sows. Physiol Behav. (1992) 52:917–23. 10.1016/0031-9384(92)90371-8 PubMed DOI

Yun J, Swan KM, Vienola K, Oliviero C, Peltoniemi O, Valros A. Effects of prepartum housing environment on abnormal behaviour, the farrowing process, and interactions with circulating oxytocin in sows. App Anim Behav Sci. (2015) 162:20–5. 10.1016/j.applanim.2014.11.006 DOI

Yun J, Valros A. Benefits of prepartum nest-building behaviour on parturition and lactation in sows – a review. Asian Austr J Anim Sci. (2015) 28:1519. 10.5713/ajas.15.0174 PubMed DOI PMC

Jarvis S, Lawrence AB, McLean KA, Deans L, Chirnside J, Calvert SK. The effect of environment on behavioural activity, ACTH. β-endorphin and cortisol in pre-farrowing gilts. Anim Sci. (1997) 65:465–72. 10.1017/S1357729800008663 DOI

Jarvis S, Lawrence AB, McLean KA, Chirnside J, Deans L, Calvert SK. The effect of environment on plasma cortisol and b-endorphin in the parturient pig and the involvement of endogenous opioids. Anim Reprod Sci. (1998) 52:139–51. 10.1016/S0378-4320(98)00090-6 PubMed DOI

Jarvis S, Van der Vegt BJ, Lawrence AB, McLean KA, Deans LA, Chirnside J, et al. . The effect of parity and environmental restriction on behavioural and physiological responses of pre-parturient pigs. Appl Anim Behav Sci. (2001) 71:203–16. 10.1016/S0168-1591(00)00183-0 PubMed DOI

Thodberg K, Jensen KH, Herskin MS. Nursing behaviour, postpartum activity and reactivity in sows: effects of farrowing environment, previous experience and temperament. Appl Anim Behav Sci. (2002) 77:53–76. 10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00023-0 DOI

Jarvis S, Calvert SK, Stevenson JS, Leeuwen N, Lawrence AB. Pituitary–adrenal activation in pre-parturient pigs (Sus scrofa) is associated with behavioural restriction due to lack of space rather than nesting substrate. Anim Welf. (2002) 11:371–84.

Yun J, Swan KM, Vienola K, Farmer C, Oliviero C, Peltoniemi O, et al. . Nest-building in sows. Effects of farrowing housing on hormonal modulation of maternal characteristics. App Anim Behav Sci. (2013) 148:77–84. 10.1016/j.applanim.2013.07.010 DOI

Stangel G, Jensen P. Behaviour of semi-naturally kept sows and piglets (except suckling) during 10 days postpartum. Appl Anim Behav Sci. (1991) 31:211–27. 10.1016/0168-1591(91)90006-J DOI

Jensen P, Redbo I. Behaviour during nest leaving in free-ranging domestic pigs. Appl Anim Behav Sci. (1987) 18:355–62. 10.1016/0168-1591(87)90229-2 DOI

Berensmann I, Klein S, Reese S, Erhard M, Patzkéwitsch D. A comparison of different farrowing systems. Part. 1: Effects on the activity of the sow. Tierarztl Prax Ausg G Grosstiere Nutzt. (2018) 46:291–7. 10.15653/TPG-180491 PubMed DOI

Illmann G, Hammerschmidt K, Špinka M, Tallet C. Calling by domestic piglets during simulated crushing and isolation: a signal of need? PLoS ONE. (2013) 8:e83529. 10.1371/journal.pone.0083529 PubMed DOI PMC

Marchant JN, Broom DM, Corning S. The influence of sow behaviour on piglet mortality due to crushing in an open farrowing system. Anim Sci. (2001) 72:19–28. 10.1017/S135772980005551X DOI

Melišov á M, Illmann G, Andersen IL, Vasdal G, Haman J. Can sow pre-lying communication or good piglet condition prevent piglets from getting crushed? Appl Anim Behav Sci. (2011) 134:121–9. 10.1016/j.applanim.2011.06.015 DOI

Ocepek M, Andersen I. Sow communication with piglets while being active is a good predictor of maternal skills, piglet survival and litter quality in three different breeds of domestic pigs (Sus scrofa domesticus). PLoS ONE. (2018) 13:e0206128. 10.1371/journal.pone.0206128 PubMed DOI PMC

Martin JE, Ison SH, Baxter EM. The influence of neonatal environment on piglet play behaviour and post-weaning social and cognitive development. Appl Anim Behav Sci. (2015) 163:69–79. 10.1016/j.applanim.2014.11.022 DOI

Baxter EM, Edwards SA. Optimising sow piglet welfare during farrowing lactation. In: Edwards SA, editor. Understanding the Behaviour and Improving the Welfare of Pigs. Burleigh Dodds (2021). p. 121–76. 10.19103/AS.2020.0081.04 PubMed DOI

Špinka M, Illmann G, Algers B, Štětková Z. The role of nursing frequency in milk production in domestic pig. J Anim Sci. (1997) 75:1223–8. 10.2527/1997.7551223x PubMed DOI

Špinka M, Illmann G, Haman J, Šimeček P, Šilerová J. Milk ejection solicitations and non-nutritive nursings: an honest signaling system of need in domestic pigs? Behav Ecol Sociobiol. (2011) 65:1447–57. 10.1007/s00265-011-1155-9 DOI

Arey DS, Sancha ES. Behaviour and productivity of sows and piglets in a family system and in farrowing crates. Appl Anim Behav Sci. (1996) 50:135–45. 10.1016/0168-1591(96)01075-1 DOI

Su G, Lund MS, Sorensen D. Selection for litter size at day five to improve litter size at weaning and piglet survivalrate. J Anim Sci. (2007) 85:1385–92. 10.2527/jas.2006-631 PubMed DOI

KilBride AL, Mendl M, Statham P, Held S, Harris M, Cooper S, et al. . A cohort study of preweaning piglet mortality and farrowing accommodation on 112 commercial pig farms in England. Prev Vet Med. (2012) 104:281–91. 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2011.11.011 PubMed DOI

Petrides JS, Mueller GP, Kalogeras KT, Chrousos GP, Gold PW, Deuster PA. Exercise-induced activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis: marked differences in the sensitivity to glucocorticoid suppression. J Clinic Endocrinol Metabol. (1994) 79:377–83. 10.1210/jcem.79.2.8045951 PubMed DOI

Cronin GM, Barnett JL, Hodge FM, Smith JA, McCallum TH. The welfare of pigs in two farrowing/lactation environments: cortisol responses of sows. Appl Anim Behav Sci. (1991) 32:117–27. 10.1016/S0168-1591(05)80036-X DOI

Biensen NJ, von Borell EH, Ford SP. Effects of space allocation and temperature on periparturient maternal behaviors, steroid concentrations, and piglet growth rates. J Anim Sci. (1996) 74:2641–8. 10.2527/1996.74112641x PubMed DOI

Jarvis S, D'Eath RB, Robson SK, Lawrence AB. The effect of confinement during lactation on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and behaviour of primiparous sows. Physiol Behav. (2006) 87:345–52. 10.1016/j.physbeh.2005.10.004 PubMed DOI

Yin G, Liu H, Li X, Quan D, Bao J. Effect of farrowing environment on behaviour and physiology of primiparous sows with 35-day lactation. Int J App Res Vet Sci. (2016) 14:31–7.

Drake A, Fraser D, Weary DM. Parent–offspring resource allocation in domestic pigs. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. (2008) 62:309–19. 10.1007/s00265-007-0418-y DOI

Wiechers DH, Brunner S, Herbrandt S, Kemper N, Fels M. Analysis of hair cortisol as an indicator of chronic stress in pigs in two different farrowing systems. Front Vet Sci. (2021) 8:605078. 10.3389/fvets.2021.605078 PubMed DOI PMC

Broom DM. Animal welfare: concepts and measurement. J Anim Sci. (1991) 69:4167–75. 10.2527/1991.69104167x PubMed DOI

Broom DM, Fraser AF. Domestic Animal Behaviour and Welfare. 5th ed. Wallingford: CABI; (2015). 10.1079/9781780645391.0000 DOI

Damm BI, Lisborg L, Vestergaard KS, Vanicek J. Nest-building, behavioural disturbances and heart rate in farrowing sows kept in crates and Schmid pens. Livest Prod Sci. (2003) 80:175–87. 10.1016/S0301-6226(02)00186-0 DOI

Hotzel MJ, Machado Filho LCP, Dalla Costa OA. Behaviour of pre-parturient sows housed in intensive outdoor or indoor systems. Pesq Agropec Brasil. (2005) 40:169–74. 10.1590/S0100-204X2005000200010 PubMed DOI

Rosvold EM, Kielland C, Ocepek M, Framstad T, Fredriksen B, Andersen-Ranberg I, et al. . Management routines influencing piglet survival in loose-housed sow herds. Livest Sci. (2017) 196:1–6. 10.1016/j.livsci.2016.12.001 DOI

Ask B, Dahl J, Nielsen MB, Moustsen V. Comment on: neonatal piglet traits of importance for survival in crates and indoor pens. J Anim Sci. (2012) 90:2879–81. 10.2527/jas.2011-4998 PubMed DOI

Damm BI, Pedersen LJ, Heiskqnen T, Nielsen NP. Long-stemmed straw as an additional nesting material in modified schmid pens in a commercial breeding unit: effects on sow behaviour, and on piglet mortality and growth. Appl Anim Behav Sci. (2005) 92:45–60. 10.1016/j.applanim.2004.10.013 DOI

Van de Weerd H, Ison S. Providing effective environmental enrichment to pigs: how far have we come. Animals. (2019) 9:254. 10.3390/ani9050254 PubMed DOI PMC

Romeo RD, Tang AC, Sullivan RM. Early life experiences: enduring behavioral, neurological and endocrinological consequences. In: Pfaff DW, Arnorld AP, Etgen AM, Fahrbach SE, Rubin RT. Hormones, Brain and Behavior. Academic Press (2009). p. 1975–2006. 10.1016/B978-008088783-8.00062-0 DOI

Langenhof MR, Komdeur J. Why and how the early-life environment affects development of coping behaviours. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. (2018) 72:1–32. 10.1007/s00265-018-2452-3 PubMed DOI PMC

Nordquist RE, Meijer E, van der Staay FJ, Arndt SS. Pigs as model species to investigate effects of early life events on later behavioral and neurological functions. In: Animal Models for the Study of Human Disease. Copenhagen: SEGES Danish Pig Research Centre, Academic Press. (2017). 10.1016/B978-0-12-809468-6.00039-5 DOI

Bolhuis JE, Schouten WGP, Schrama JW, Wiegant VM. Effects of rearing and housing environment on behaviour and performance of pigs with different coping characteristics. Appl Anim Behav Sci. (2006) 101:68–85. 10.1016/j.applanim.2006.01.001 DOI

van Dixhoorn ID, Reimert I, Middelkoop J, Bolhuis JE, Wisselink HJ, Koerkamp PWG, et al. . Enriched housing reduces disease susceptibility to co-infection with porcine reproductive and respiratory virus (PRRSV) and Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae (A. pleuropneumoniae) in young pigs. PLoS ONE. (2016) 11:e0161832. 10.1371/journal.pone.0161832 PubMed DOI PMC

Oostindjer M, van den Brand H, Kemp B, Bolhuis JE. Effects of environmental enrichment and loose housing of lactating sows on piglet behaviour before and after weaning. Appl Anim Behav Sci. (2011) 134:31–41. 10.1016/j.applanim.2011.06.011 PubMed DOI

Guy JH, Cain PJ, Seddon YM, Baxter EM, Edwards SA. Economic evaluation of high welfare indoor farrowing systems for pigs. Anim Welf. (2012) 21:19–24. 10.7120/096272812X13345905673520 PubMed DOI

Arellano PE, Pijoan C, Jacobson LD, Algers B. Stereotyped behaviour, social interactions and suckling pattern of pigs housed in groups or in single crates. Appl Anim Behav Sci. (1992) 35:157–66. 10.1016/0168-1591(92)90006-W DOI

Baxter EM, Lawrence AB, Edwards SA. Alternative farrowing accommodation: welfare and economic aspects of existing farrowing and lactation systems for pigs. Animal. (2012) 6:96–117. 10.1017/S1751731111001224 PubMed DOI

Transitioning from crates to free farrowing: A roadmap to navigate key decisions