Comparative Study on the Application of Mesenchymal Stromal Cells Combined with Tricalcium Phosphate Scaffold into Femoral Bone Defects
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu klinické zkoušky, fáze II, srovnávací studie, časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
30203687
PubMed Central
PMC6180724
DOI
10.1177/0963689718794918
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- bone defect, cell therapy, mesenchymal stromal cells, scaffold,
- MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- femur cytologie zranění fyziologie chirurgie MeSH
- fosforečnany vápenaté chemie terapeutické užití MeSH
- kostní náhrady chemie terapeutické užití MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mezenchymální kmenové buňky cytologie MeSH
- regenerace kostí * MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- tkáňové podpůrné struktury chemie MeSH
- transplantace mezenchymálních kmenových buněk metody MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- klinické zkoušky, fáze II MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- srovnávací studie MeSH
- Názvy látek
- beta-tricalcium phosphate MeSH Prohlížeč
- fosforečnany vápenaté MeSH
- kostní náhrady MeSH
This prospective study sought to evaluate the healing quality of implanted ultraporous β-tricalcium phosphate sown with expanded autologous mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) into femoral defects during revision hip arthroplasty. A total of 37 osseous defects in 37 patients were treated and evaluated concerning bone regeneration. Nineteen subjects received β-tricalcium phosphate graft material serving as a carrier of expanded autologous MSCs (the trial group A), nine subjects received β-tricalcium phosphate graft material only (the study group B) and nine subjects received cancellous allografts only (the control group C). Clinical and radiographic evaluations were scheduled at 6 weeks, 3, 6, and 12 months post-operatively, and performed at the most recent visit as well. All observed complications were recorded during follow-up to assess the use of an ultraporous β-tricalcium phosphate synthetic graft material combined with expanded MSCs in bone defect repair. The resulting data from participants with accomplished follow-up were processed and statistically evaluated with a Freeman-Halton modification of the Fischer's exact test, a P < 0.05 value was considered to be significant. Whereas no significant difference was observed between the trial group A with β-tricalcium phosphate synthetic graft material serving as a carrier of expanded autologous MSCs and control group C with cancellous impaction allografting in terms of the bone defect healing, significant differences were documented between the study group B with β-tricalcium phosphate graft material only and control group C. Regarding adverse effects, six serious events were recorded during the clinical trial with no causal relationship to the cell product. β-tricalcium phosphate synthetic graft material serving as a carrier of expanded autologous MSCs appears safe and promotes the healing of bone defects in a jeopardized and/or impaired microenvironment. This clinical trial was registered at the EU Clinical Trials Register before patient recruitment (Registration number: EudraCT number 2012-005599-33; Date of registration: 2013-02-04).
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery University Hospital Hradec Králové Czech Republic
Department of Radiology University Hospital Hradec Králové Czech Republic
Institute of Experimental Medicine Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic Prague Czech Republic
Tissue Bank University Hospital Hradec Králové Czech Republic
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Bozic KJ, Kurtz SM, Lau E, Ong K, Vail TP, Berry DJ. The epidemiology of revision total hip arthroplasty in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91(1):128–133. PubMed
Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(4):780–785. PubMed
Della Valle CJ, Paprosky WG. The femur in revision total hip arthroplasty evaluation and classicication. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;420:55–62. PubMed
Mayle RE, Paprosky WG. Masive bone loss. Allograft-prosthetic composites and beyond. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012;94(11):61–64. PubMed
Hartman C, Garvin K. Femoral fixation in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93(24):2311–2322. PubMed
Buttaro M, Araujo GS, Araujo ES, Comba F, Piccaluga F. Viability of impacted bone allografts under metal mesh at the calcar in revision surgery of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg.Br. 2008;90(2):228–231. PubMed
Board TN, Rooney P, Kearney JN, Kay PR. Impaction allografting in revision total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88(7):852–857. PubMed
Linder L. Cancellous impaction grafting in the human femur: histological and radiographic observations in 6 autopsy femurs and 8 biopsies. Acta Orthop Scand. 2000;71(6): 543–552. PubMed
Korompilias AV, Paschos NK, Lykissas MG, Kostas-Agnantis I, Vekris MD, Beris AE. Recent updates of surgical techniques and applications of free vascularized fibular graft in extremity and trunk reconstruction. Microsurgery. 2011;31(3):171–175. PubMed
Catagni MA, Guerreschi F, Lovisetti L. Distraction osteogenesis for bone repair in the 21st century: lessons learned. Injury. 2011;42(6):580–586. PubMed
Masquelet A, Begue T. The concept of induced membrane for reconstruction of long bone defects. Orthop Clin North Am. 2010;41(1):27–37. PubMed
Lammens J, Laumen A, Delport H, Vanlauwe J. The Pentaconcept in skeletal tissue engeneering. A combined approach for the repair of bone defects. Acta Orthop Belg. 2012;78(5):569–573. PubMed
Quarto R, Masrogiacomo M, Cancedda R, Kutepov SM, Mukhachev V, Lavroukov A, Kon E, Marcacci M. Repair of large bone defects with the use of autologous bone marrow stroma cells. N Eng J Med. 2001;344(5):385–386. PubMed
Marcacci M, Kon E, Moukhachev V, Kutepov S, Quarto R, Mastrogiacomo M, Cancedda R. Stem cells associated with macroporous bioceramics for long bone repair: 6-to 7-year outcome of a pilot clinical study. Tissue Eng. 2007;13(5):947–955. PubMed
Šponer P, Filip S, Kučera T, Brtková J, Urban K, Palička V, Kočí Z, Syka M, Bezrouk A, Syková E. Utilizing autologous multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells and β-tricalcium phosphate scaffold in human bone defects: a prospective, controlled feasibility trial. Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:2076061. PubMed PMC
Dominici M, Le Blanc K, Mueller I, Slaper-Cortenbach I, Marini F, Krause D, Deans R, Keating A, Prokop D, Horowitz E. Minimal criteria for defining multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells. The International Society for Cellular therapy position statement. Cytotherapy. 2006;8(4):315–317. PubMed
Gie GA, Linder L, Ling RS, Simon JP, Slooff TJ, Timperley AJ. Impacted cancellous allografts and cement for revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993;75(1):14–21. PubMed
Harris WH. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1969;51(4):737–755. PubMed
D’Antonio J, McCarthy JC, Bargar WL, Borden LS, Cappelo WN, Collis DK, Steinberg ME, Wedge JH. Classification of femoral abnormalities in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993;(296):133–139. PubMed
Brooker AE, Bowerman JW, Robinson RA, Riley LH. Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement. Incidence and a method of classification. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1973;55(8):1629–1632. PubMed
Freeman GH, Halton JH. Note on exact treatment of contingency, goodness of fit and other problems of significance. Biometrika. 1951;38(1–2):141–149. PubMed
Corten K, Macdonald S, Mccalden R, Bourne R, Naudie DR. Results of cemented femoral revisions for periprosthetic femoral fractures in the elderly. J Arthroplasty. 2012;27(2):220–225. PubMed
Noble PC, Alexander JW, Lindahl LJ, Yew DT, Granberry WM, Tullos HS. The anatomic basis of femoral design. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;235:148–165. PubMed
Weiss RJ, Beckman MO, Enocson A, Schmalholz A, Stark A. Minimum 5-year follow-up of a cementless, modular, tapered stem in hip revision arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2011;26(1):16–23. PubMed
Blom AW, Grimm B, Miles AW, Cunningham JL, Learmonth ID. Subsidence in impaction grafting: the effect of adding a ceramic bone graft extender to bone. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2002;216(4):265–270. PubMed
Levine B, Sporer S, Poggie R, Della Valle CJ, Jacobs JJ. Experimental and clinical performance of porous tantalumin orthopaedic surgery. Biomaterials. 2006;27(27):4671–4681. PubMed
Manassero M, Paquet J, Deschepper M, Viateau V, Retorillo J, Bensidhoum M, Logeart-Avramoglou D, Petite H. Comparison of survival and osteogenic ability of human mesenchymal stem cells in orthotopic and ectopic sites in mice. Tissue Eng Part A. 2016;22(5–6):534–544. PubMed
Park KS, Kim YS, Kim JH, Choi B, Kim SH, Tan AH, Lee MS, Kwon CH, Joh JW, Kim S, Kim KW. Trophic molecules derived from human mesenchymal stem cells enhance survival, function, and angiogenesis of isolated islets after transplantation. Transplantation. 2010;89(5):509–517. PubMed
Gnecchi M, Danieli P, Cervio E. Mesenchymal stem cell therapy for heart disease. Vasc Pharmacol. 2012;57(1):48–55. PubMed
Bortolotti F, Ukovich L, Razban V, Martinelli V, Ruozi G, Pelos B, Dore F, Giacca M, Zacchigna S. In vivo therapeutic potential of mesenchymal stromal cells depends on the source and the isolation procedure. Stem Cell Reports. 2015;4(3):332–339. PubMed PMC
Alberton GM, High WA, Morrey BF. Dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty: an analysis of risk factors and treatment options. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84–A(10):1788–1792. PubMed
Lamagni T. Epidemiology and burden of prosthetic joint infections. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2014;69(suppl 1):i5–i10. PubMed
Berstock JR, Beswick AD, Lenguerrand E, Whitehouse MR, Blom AW. Mortality after total hip replacement surgery: a systematic review. Bone Joint Res. 2014;3(6):175–182. PubMed PMC
Memtsoudis SG, Besculides MC, Gaber L, Liu S, Gonzáles Della Valle A. Risk factors for pulmonary embolism after hip and knee arthroplasty: a population-based study. Int Orthop. 2009;33(6):1739–1745. PubMed PMC
Mohamed NN, Barrett JA, Katz JN, Phillips CB, Losina E, Guadagnoli E, Harris WH, Poss R, Baron JA. Rates and outcomes of primary and revision total hip replacement in the United States medicare population. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85(1):27–32. PubMed
Beswick A, Blom AW. Bone graft substitutes in hip revision surgery: a comprehensive overview. Injury. 2011;42(2):S40–S46. PubMed
Amanatullah DF, Howard JL, Siman H, Trousdale RT, Mabry TM, Berry DJ. Revision total hip arthroplasty in patients with extensive proximal femoral bone loss using a fluted tapered modular femoral component. Bone Joint J. 2015;97(3):312–317. PubMed
Damron TA, Lisle J, Craig T, Wade M, Silbert W, Cohen H. Ultraporous β-tricalcium phosphate alone or combined with bone marrow aspirate for benign cavitary lesions. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95(2):158–166. PubMed
Roth TD, Maertz NA, Parr JA, Buckwalter KA, Choplin RH. CT of the hip prosthesis: appearance of components, fixation, and complications. Radiographics. 2012;32(4):1089–1107. PubMed
Nauth A, Schemitsch EH. Stem cells for the repair and regeneration of bone. Indian J Orthop. 2012;46:19–21. PubMed PMC