Understanding the effects of coppicing on forest ecosystems is important for progress towards sustainable forest management. A newly established coppicing experiment in a secondary temperate deciduous forest in the SE Czech Republic provides a rather unique insight into succession driven by canopy thinning in a forest still lacking species typical for forests established since long time ago. Herbaceous layer vegetation was monitored for four subsequent years in 2012-2015. We focused on the influence of canopy thinning intensity in two different forest types defined by dominant tree species (oak and lime). Our results showed that the opening of the canopy had immediate effects on herbaceous vegetation. Coverage, species richness and compositional patterns followed the coppicing intensity gradient. The dominant tree species had contrasting effects. Under oak, the reaction to coppicing was weak. Under lime, strong reaction both related to coppicing intensity and temporal development was observed. Herbs with short life cycle had the greatest contribution, but perennial grasses also began to increase their coverage after coppicing. Several invasive species, mostly short-lived herbs, emerged but are supposed to retreat as the succession will proceed. We conclude that coppice introduction to a secondary forest led to contrasting patterns related to dominant tree species. The marked difference was probably due to the slow sucession towards a future forest community saturated by species. This process may be now further diversified by coppicing management.

Department of Biology and Ecology Faculty of Science University of Ostrava Chittussiho 10 710 00 Ostrava Czech Republic

Department of Botany Faculty of Science Palacký University Šlechtitelů 27 783 71 Olomouc Czech Republic

Department of Vegetation Ecology Institute of Botany Czech Academy of Sciences Lidická 25 27 602 00 Brno Czech Republic

Institute of Botany and Zoology Faculty of Science Masaryk University Kotlářská 2 611 37 Brno Czech Republic

Ministry of the Environment of the Czech Republic Vršovická 1442 65 100 10 Praha 10 Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Ash JE, Barkham JP. Changes and variability in the field layer of a coppiced woodland in Norfolk, England. J Ecol. 1976;64:697–712.

Baeten L, Bauwens B, De Schrijver A, De Keersmaeker L, Van Calster H, Vandekerkhove K, Roelandt B, Beeckman H, Verheyen K. Herb layer changes (1954–2000) related to the conversion of coppice-with-standards forest and soil acidification. Appl Veg Sci. 2009;12:187–197.

Battles JJ, Shlisky AJ, Barrett RH, Heald RC, Allen-Diaz BH. The effects of forest management on plant species diversity in a Sierran conifer forest. For Ecol Manage. 2001;146:211–222.

Benes J, Cizek O, Dovala J, Konvicka M. Intensive game keeping, coppicing and butterflies: the story of Milovicky Wood, Czech Republic. For Ecol Manage. 2006;237:353–365.

Bernhardt-Römermann M, Ewald J. Einst zu wenig, heute zu viel: Stickstoff in Waldlebensgemeinschaften. Gefahrstoffe Reinhaltung der Luft. 2006;66:261–266.

Bobbink R, Hornung M, Roelofs JGM. The effects of air-borne nitrogen pollutants on species diversity in natural and semi-natural European vegetation. J Ecol. 1998;86:717–738.

Buckley GP, editor. Ecology and management of coppice woodlands. Chapman & Hall; London, UK: 1992.

Burgess M. Restoring abandoned coppice for birds: Few effects of conservation management on occupancy, fecundity and productivity of hole nesting birds. For Ecol Manage. 2014;330:205–217.

Burton JI, Zenner EK, Frelich LE, Cornett MW. Patterns of plant community structure within and among primary and second-growth northern hardwood forest stands. For Ecol Manage. 2009;258:2556–2568.

Calçada EA, Lenoir J, Plue J, Broeckx LS, Closset-Kopp D, Hermy M, Decocq G. Spatial patterns of water-deposited seeds control plant species richness and composition in riparian forest landscapes. Landsc Ecol. 2015;30:2133–2146.

Chytrý M, Tichý L, Holt J, Botta-Dukát Z. Determination of diagnostic species with statistical fidelity measures. J Veg Sci. 2002;13:79–90.

Coleman BD, Mares MA, Willig MR, Hsieh YH. Randomness, area, and species richness. Ecology. 1982;63:1121–1133.

Connell JH. Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs. Science. 1978;199:1302–1310. PubMed

Coyle JR, Halliday FW, Lopez BE, Palmquist KA, Wilfahrt PA, Hurlert AH. Using trait and phylogenetic diversity to evaluate the generality of the stress-dominance hypothesis in eastern North American tree communities. Ecography. 2014;37:814–826.

Decocq G, Aubert M, Dupont F, Alard D, Saguez R, Wattez-Franger A, De Foucault B, Delelis-Dusollier A, Bardat J. Plant diversity in a managed temperate deciduous forest: understorey response to two silvicultural systems. J Appl Ecol. 2004a;41:1065–1079.

Decocq G, Valentin B, Toussaint B, Hendoux F, Saguez R, Bardat J. Soil seed bank composition and diversity in a managed temperate deciduous forest. Biodivers Conserv. 2004b;13:2485–2509.

Dirnböck T, Grandin U, Bernhardt-Römermann M, Beudert B, Canullo R, Forsius M, Grabner M-T, Holmberg M, Kleemola S, Lundin L, Mirtl M, et al. Forest floor vegetation response to nitrogen deposition in Europe. Glob Change Biol. 2014;20:429–440. PubMed

Dodson EK, Peterson DW, Harrod RJ. Understory vegetation response to thinning and burning restoration treatments in dry conifer forests of the eastern Cascades, USA. For Ecol Manage. 2008;255:3130–3140.

Elemans M. Light, nutrients and the growth of herbaceous forest species. Acta Oecol. 2004;26:197–202.

Fuller RJ, Warren MS. Coppiced woodlands: their management for wildlife. Joint Nature Conservation Committee; Peterborough, UK: 1993.

Gilliam F. Introduction: The herbaceous layer – the forest between the trees. In: Gilliam F, editor. The herbaceous layer in forests of eastern North America. Oxford University Press; Oxford, UK: 2014. pp. 1–9.

Griffis KL, Crawford JA, Wagner MR, Moir WH. Understory response to management treatments in northern Arizona ponderosa pine forests. For Ecol Manage. 2001;146:239–245.

Grime JP. Plant strategies, vegetation processes, and ecosystem properties. John Wiley & Sons; New York, USA: 2006.

Grulich V. Red List of vascular plants of the Czech Republic. Preslia. 2012;84:631–645.

Hédl R, Kopecký M, Komárek J. Half a century of succession in a temperate oakwood: from species-rich community to mesic forest. Divers Distrib. 2010;16:267–276.

Hermy M, Honnay O, Firbank L, Grashof-Bokdam C, Lawesson JE. An ecological comparison between ancient and other forest plant species of Europe, and the implications for forest conservation. Biol Conserv. 1999;91:9–22.

Hermy M, Verheyen K. Legacies of the past in the present-day forest biodiversity: a review of past land-use effects on forest plant species composition and diversity. In: Nakashizuka T, editor. Sustainability and Diversity of Forest Ecosystems. Springer; Japan: 2007. pp. 361–371.

Hobbie SE. Plant species effects on nutrient cycling: revisiting litter feedbacks. Trends Ecol Evol. 2015;30:357–363. PubMed

Hölscher D, Schade E, Leuschner C. Effects of coppicing in temperate deciduous forests on ecosystem nutrient pools and soil fertility. Basic Appl Ecol. 2001;2:155–164.

Honnay O, Degroote B, Hermy M. Ancient-forest plant species in Western Belgium: a species list and possible ecological mechanisms. Belg J Bot. 1998;130:139–154.

Kirby KJ. Changes in the ground flora of a broadleaved wood within a clear fell, group fells and a coppiced block. Forestry. 1990;63:241–249.

Kirby KJ, Watkins C, editors. Europe's changing woods and forests: from wildwood to managed landscapes. CABI; Wallingford, UK: 2015.

Kopecký M, Hédl R, Szabó P. Non-random extinctions dominate plant community changes in abandoned coppices. J Appl Ecol. 2013;50:79–87. PubMed PMC

Kubát K, Hrouda L, Chrtek jun J, Kaplan Z, Kirschner J, Štěpánek J, editors. Klíč ke květeně České republiky [Key to the flora of the Czech Republic] Academia; Praha, Czech Republic: 2002.

Lindh BC. Flowering of understory herbs following thinning in the western Cascades, Oregon. For Ecol Manage. 2008;256:929–936.

Matthews JD. Silvicultural systems. Oxford University Press; Oxford, UK: 1991.

Matthews TJ, Borregaard MK, Ugland KI, Borges PAV, Rigal F, Cardoso P, Whittaker RJ. The gambin model provides a superior fit to species abundance distributions with a single free parameter: evidence, implementation and interpretation. Ecography. 2014;37:1002–1011.

Metzger F, Schultz J. Understory response to 50 years of management of a northern hardwood forest in Upper Michigan. Am Midl Nat. 1984;112:209–223.

Muys B. The influence of tree species on humus quality and nutrient availability on a regional scale (Flanders, Belgium) In: Nilsson LO, Hüttl RF, Johansson UT, editors. Nutrient Uptake and Cycling in Forest Ecosystems. Springer; Netherlands: 1995. pp. 649–660.

Newton AC. Forest ecology and conservation: a handbook of techniques. Oxford University Press; Oxford, UK: 2007.

Neirynck J, Mirtcheva S, Sioen G, Lust N. Impact of Tilia platyphyllos Scop., Fraxinus excelsior L., Acer pseudoplatanus L., Quercus robur L. and Fagus sylvatica L. on earthworm biomass and physico-chemical properties of a loamy topsoil. For Ecol Manage. 2000;133:275–286.

Pelíšek J. Stanovištní poměry pařezin v oblasti ČSR [Stand conditions in the coppices of the Czech Socialistic Republic] Lesnictví. 1957;3:85–108.

R Developement Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: 2014.

Rackham O. Ancient woodland, its history, vegetation and uses in England. Castlepoint Press; Colvend, Dalbeattie, UK: 2003.

Rackham O. Woodlands. Collins; London, UK: 2006.

Radtke A, Ambraß S, Zerbe S, Tonon G, Fontana V, Ammer C. Traditional coppice forest management drives the invasion of Ailanthus altissima and Robinia pseudoacacia into deciduous forests. For Ecol Manage. 2013;291:308–317.

Roscher C, Schumacher J, Gubsch M, Lipowsky A, Weigelt A, Buchmann A, Schmid B, Schulze E. Using Plant Functional Traits to Explain Diversity–Productivity Relationships. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:1–11. PubMed PMC

Savill P, Perrins C, Kirby K, Fisher N, editors. Wytham Woods: Oxford's ecological laboratory. Oxford University Press; Oxford, UK: 2010.

Shugart HH. A theory of forest dynamics: the ecological implications of forest succession models. Springer; New York, NY USA: 1984.

Spitzer L, Konvicka M, Benes J, Tropek R, Tuf IH, Tufova J. Does closure of traditionally managed open woodlands threaten epigeic invertebrates? Effects of coppicing and high deer densities. Biol Conserv. 2008;141:827–837.

Szabó P, Müllerová J, Suchánková S, Kotačka M. Intensive woodland management in the Middle Ages: spatial modelling based on archival data. J Hist Geogr. 2015;48:1–10. PubMed PMC

Ter Braak CJF, Šmilauer P. Canoco reference manual and user's guide: software for ordination, version 5.0. Microcomputer Power; Ithaca, USA: 2012.

Thysell DR, Carey AB. Manipulation of density of Pseudotsuga menziesii canopies: preliminary effects on understory vegetation. Can J Forest Res. 2001;31:1513–1525.

Thompson K, Bakker JP, Bekker RM, Hodgson JG. Ecological correlates of seed persistence in soil in the north-west European flora. J Ecol. 1998;86:163–169.

Tichý L. JUICE, software for vegetation classification. J Veg Sci. 2002;13:451–453.

Tilman D. Secondary succession and the pattern of plant dominance along experimental nitrogen gradients. Ecol Monogr. 1987;57:189–214.

Van Calster H, Baeten L, De Schrijver A, De Keersmaeker L, Rogister JE, Verheyen K, Hermy M. Management driven changes (1967–2005) in soil acidity and the understorey plant community following conversion of a coppice-with-standards forest. For Ecol Manage. 2007;241:258–271.

Van Calster H, Baeten L, Verheyen K, De Keersmaeker L, Dekeyser S, Rogister JE, Hermy M. Diverging effects of overstorey conversion scenarios on the understorey vegetation in a former coppice-with-standards forest. For Ecol Manage. 2008a;256:519–528.

Van Calster H, Chevalier R, Wyngene B, Archaux F, Verheyen K, Hermy M. Long-term seed bank dynamics in a temperate forest under conversion from coppice-with-standards to high forest management. Appl Veg Sci. 2008b;11:251–260.

Vesterdal L, Schmidt IK, Callesen I, Nilsson LO, Gundersen P. Carbon and nitrogen in forest floor and mineral soil under six common European tree species. For Ecol Manage. 2008;255:35–48.

Vild O, Roleček J, Hédl R, Kopecký M, Utinek D. Experimental restoration of coppice-with-standards: Response of understorey vegetation from the conservation perspective. For Ecol Manage. 2013;310:234–241. PubMed PMC

Warren MS, Thomas JA. Butterfly responses to coppicing. In: Buckley GP, editor. Ecology and management of coppice woodlands. Chapman & Hall; London, UK: 1992. pp. 249–270.

West DC, Shugart HH, Botkin DF. Forest succession: concepts and application. Springer-Verlag; New York, USA: 2012.

Patterns of functional diversity of two trophic groups after canopy thinning in an abandoned coppice