Hydrogen atom abstraction (HAA) reactions are cornerstones of chemistry. Various (metallo)enzymes performing the HAA catalysis evolved in nature and inspired the rational development of multiple synthetic catalysts. Still, the factors determining their catalytic efficiency are not fully understood. Herein, we define the simple thermodynamic factor η by employing two thermodynamic cycles: one for an oxidant (catalyst), along with its reduced, protonated, and hydrogenated form; and one for the substrate, along with its oxidized, deprotonated, and dehydrogenated form. It is demonstrated that η reflects the propensity of the substrate and catalyst for (a)synchronicity in concerted H+/e- transfers. As such, it significantly contributes to the activation energies of the HAA reactions, in addition to a classical thermodynamic (Bell-Evans-Polanyi) effect. In an attempt to understand the physicochemical interpretation of η, we discovered an elegant link between η and reorganization energy λ from Marcus theory. We discovered computationally that for a homologous set of HAA reactions, λ reaches its maximum for the lowest |η|, which then corresponds to the most synchronous HAA mechanism. This immediately implies that among HAA processes with the same reaction free energy, ΔG0, the highest barrier (≡ΔG≠) is expected for the most synchronous proton-coupled electron (i.e., hydrogen) transfer. As proof of concept, redox and acidobasic properties of nonheme FeIVO complexes are correlated with activation free energies for HAA from C-H and O-H bonds. We believe that the reported findings may represent a powerful concept in designing new HAA catalysts.

Institute of Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry Czech Academy of Sciences Prague 6 16000 Czech Republic

J Heyrovský Institute of Physical Chemistry Czech Academy of Sciences Prague 8 18223 Czech Republic

J Heyrovský Institute of Physical Chemistry Czech Academy of Sciences Prague 8 18223 Czech Republic;

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Warren JJ, Tronic TA, Mayer JM. Thermochemistry of proton-coupled electron transfer reagents and its implications. Chem Rev. 2010;110:6961–7001. PubMed PMC

Huynh MHV, Meyer TJ. Proton-coupled electron transfer. Chem Rev. 2007;107:5004–5064. PubMed PMC

Rokob TA, et al. Mono- and binuclear non-heme iron chemistry from a theoretical perspective. J Biol Inorg Chem. 2016;21:619–644. PubMed

Krebs C, Galonić Fujimori D, Walsh CT, Bollinger JM., Jr Non-heme Fe(IV)-oxo intermediates. Acc Chem Res. 2007;40:484–492. PubMed PMC

Migliore A, Polizzi NF, Therien MJ, Beratan DN. Biochemistry and theory of proton-coupled electron transfer. Chem Rev. 2014;114:3381–3465. PubMed PMC

Mayer JM, Hrovat DA, Thomas JL, Borden WT. Proton-coupled electron transfer versus hydrogen atom transfer in benzyl/toluene, methoxyl/methanol, and phenoxyl/phenol self-exchange reactions. J Am Chem Soc. 2002;124:11142–11147. PubMed

Sirjoosingh A, Hammes-Schiffer S. Proton-coupled electron transfer versus hydrogen atom transfer: Generation of charge-localized diabatic states. J Phys Chem A. 2011;115:2367–2377. PubMed

Hammes-Schiffer S, Stuchebrukhov AA. Theory of coupled electron and proton transfer reactions. Chem Rev. 2010;110:6939–6960. PubMed PMC

Mayer JM. A simple Marcus-theory type model for hydrogen atom transfer/proton-coupled electron transfer. J Phys Chem Lett. 2011;2:1481–1489. PubMed PMC

Tishchenko O, Truhlar DG, Ceulemans A, Nguyen MT. A unified perspective on the hydrogen atom transfer and proton-coupled electron transfer mechanisms in terms of topographic features of the ground and excited potential energy surfaces as exemplified by the reaction between phenol and radicals. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:7000–7010. PubMed

Mandal D, et al. How does tunneling contribute to counterintuitive H-abstraction reactivity of nonheme Fe(IV)O oxidants with alkanes? J Am Chem Soc. 2015;137:722–733. PubMed

Kwon YH, et al. Determination of spin inversion probability, H-tunneling correction, and regioselectivity in the two-state reactivity of nonheme iron(IV)-oxo complexes. J Phys Chem Lett. 2015;6:1472–1476. PubMed

Mandal D, Mallick D, Shaik S. Kinetic isotope effect determination probes the spin of the transition state, its stereochemistry, and its ligand sphere in hydrogen abstraction reactions of oxoiron(IV) complexes. Acc Chem Res. 2018;51:107–117. PubMed

Minakata D, Crittenden J. Linear free energy relationships between aqueous phase hydroxyl radical reaction rate constants and free energy of activation. Environ Sci Technol. 2011;45:3479–3486. PubMed

Warren JJ, Mayer JM. Application of the Marcus cross relation to hydrogen atom transfer/proton-coupled electron transfer reactions. In: Formosinho S, Barroso M, editors. Proton Coupled Electron Transfer: A Carrefour of Chemical Reactivity Traditions. Royal Soc Chem; Cambridge, UK: 2012. pp. 1–31.

Bell RP. The theory of reactions involving proton transfers. Proc R Soc Lond A. 1936;154:414–429.

Evans MG, Polanyi M. Inertia and driving force of chemical reactions. Trans Faraday Soc. 1938;34:11–24.

Le C, Liang Y, Evans RW, Li X, MacMillan DWC. Selective sp3 C-H alkylation via polarity-match-based cross-coupling. Nature. 2017;547:79–83. PubMed PMC

Tedder JM. Which factors determine the reactivity and regioselectivity of free radical substitution and addition reactions? Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 1982;21:401–410.

Paul V, Roberts BP. Polarity reversal catalysis of hydrogen atom abstraction reactions. J Chem Soc Chem Commun. 1987;17:1322–1324.

Roberts BP. Polarity-reversal catalysis of hydrogen-atom abstraction reactions: Concepts and applications in organic chemistry. Chem Soc Rev. 1998;28:25–35.

Puri M, Que L., Jr Toward the synthesis of more reactive S = 2 non-heme oxoiron(IV) complexes. Acc Chem Res. 2015;48:2443–2452. PubMed PMC

Sastri CV, et al. Axial ligand tuning of a nonheme iron(IV)-oxo unit for hydrogen atom abstraction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:19181–19186. PubMed PMC

England J, et al. An ultra-stable oxoiron(IV) complex and its blue conjugate base. Chem Sci (Camb) 2014;5:1204–1215. PubMed PMC

Bigelow JO, et al. Oxoiron(IV) tetramethylcyclam complexes with axial carboxylate ligands: Effect of tethering the carboxylate on reactivity. Inorg Chem. 2017;56:3287–3301. PubMed

Bím D, Rulíšek L, Srnec M. Computational electrochemistry as a reliable probe of experimentally elusive mononuclear non-heme iron species. J Phys Chem C. 2018;122:10773–10782.

Yosca TH, et al. Iron(IV)hydroxide pK(a) and the role of thiolate ligation in C-H bond activation by cytochrome P450. Science. 2013;342:825–829. PubMed PMC

Mayer JM. Understanding hydrogen atom transfer: From bond strengths to Marcus theory. Acc Chem Res. 2011;44:36–46. PubMed PMC

Kwon E, Cho K-B, Hong S, Nam W. Mechanistic insight into the hydroxylation of alkanes by a nonheme iron(V)-oxo complex. Chem Commun (Camb) 2014;50:5572–5575. PubMed

Ghosh M, et al. Formation of a room temperature stable Fe(V)(O) complex: Reactivity toward unactivated C-H bonds. J Am Chem Soc. 2014;136:9524–9527. PubMed PMC

Xue X-S, Ji P, Zhou B, Cheng J-P. The essential role of bond energetics in C-H activation/functionalization. Chem Rev. 2017;117:8622–8648. PubMed

Barham JP, John MP, Murphy JA. Contra-thermodynamic hydrogen atom abstraction in the selective C-H functionalization of trialkylamine N-CH3 groups. J Am Chem Soc. 2016;138:15482–15487. PubMed

O’Reilly RJ, et al. Hydrogen abstraction by chlorine atom from amino acids: Remarkable influence of polar effects on regioselectivity. J Am Chem Soc. 2011;133:16553–16559. PubMed

Warren JJ, Mayer JM. Predicting organic hydrogen atom transfer rate constants using the Marcus cross relation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107:5282–5287. PubMed PMC

Radical ligand transfer: mechanism and reactivity governed by three-component thermodynamics