Time-Integrative Passive sampling combined with TOxicity Profiling (TIPTOP): an effect-based strategy for cost-effective chemical water quality assessment
Jazyk angličtina Země Nizozemsko Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
30296657
DOI
10.1016/j.etap.2018.09.005
PII: S1382-6689(18)30380-6
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- River Meuse, River Rhine, Speedisk, in vitro bioassay, in vivo bioassay, multiple substance potentially affected fraction of species (msPAF), priority compounds, silicone rubber, species-sensitivity distribution (SSD), toxic pressure, wastewater treatment plant (WWTP),
- MeSH
- androgeny analýza toxicita MeSH
- biotest MeSH
- chemické látky znečišťující vodu analýza toxicita MeSH
- estrogeny analýza toxicita MeSH
- kvalita vody MeSH
- monitorování životního prostředí metody MeSH
- mutageny analýza toxicita MeSH
- řeky chemie MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Nizozemsko MeSH
- Názvy látek
- androgeny MeSH
- chemické látky znečišťující vodu MeSH
- estrogeny MeSH
- mutageny MeSH
This study aimed at demonstrating that effect-based monitoring with passive sampling followed by toxicity profiling is more protective and cost-effective than the current chemical water quality assessment strategy consisting of compound-by-compound chemical analysis of selected substances in grab samples. Passive samplers were deployed in the Dutch river delta and in WWTP effluents. Their extracts were tested in a battery of bioassays and chemically analyzed to obtain toxicity and chemical profiles, respectively. Chemical concentrations in water were retrieved from publicly available databases. Seven different strategies were used to interpret the chemical and toxicity profiles in terms of ecological risk. They all indicated that the river sampling locations were relatively clean. Chemical-based monitoring resulted for many substances in measurements below detection limit and could only explain <20% of the observed in vitro toxicity. Effect-based monitoring yielded more informative conclusions as it allowed for ranking the sampling sites and for estimating a margin-of-exposure towards chronic effect ranges. Effect-based monitoring was also cheaper and more cost-effective (i.e. yielding more information per euro spent). Based on its identified strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT), a future strategy for effect-based monitoring has been proposed.
Deltares Utrecht The Netherlands
Deltares Utrecht The Netherlands; Recetox Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic
Department Environment and Health Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam The Netherlands
National Institute for Public Health and the Environment Bilthoven The Netherlands
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
Passive sampling and benchmarking to rank HOC levels in the aquatic environment
