• This record comes from PubMed

Impact of midazolam vs. saline on effect size estimates in controlled trials of ketamine as a rapid-acting antidepressant

. 2019 Jun ; 44 (7) : 1233-1238. [epub] 20190117

Language English Country England, Great Britain Media print-electronic

Document type Journal Article, Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Grant support
K12 HS023000 AHRQ HHS - United States
L30 MH111000 NIMH NIH HHS - United States
UL1 TR001863 NCATS NIH HHS - United States
K12HS023000 U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) - International

Links

PubMed 30653192
PubMed Central PMC6785710
DOI 10.1038/s41386-019-0317-8
PII: 10.1038/s41386-019-0317-8
Knihovny.cz E-resources

The goal of this study was to infer the effectiveness of midazolam as a comparator in preserving the blind in ketamine studies for mood disorders through patient-level analyses of efficacy trial outcomes. In this integrative data analysis (k = 9, N = 367 patients with mood disorders), clinical outcomes were compared across four groups: ketamine (midazolam-controlled), ketamine (saline-controlled), midazolam, and saline. Ketamine doses ranged from 0.5 to 0.54 mg/kg and midazolam doses ranged from 0.02 to 0.045 mg/kg. The baseline-to-Day 1 effect size was d = 0.7 (95% CI: 0.4-0.9) for ketamine (midazolam) versus midazolam and d = 1.8 (95% CI: 1.4-2.2) for ketamine (saline) versus saline. The effect of ketamine relative to control was larger in saline-controlled studies than in midazolam-controlled studies (t(276) = 2.32, p = 0.02). This was driven by a comparatively larger effect under midazolam than saline (t(111) = 5.40, p < 0.0001), whereas there was no difference between ketamine (midazolam) versus ketamine (saline) (t(177) = 0.65, p = 0.51). Model-estimated rates of response (with 95% CI) yielded similar results: ketamine (midazolam), 45% (34-56%); ketamine (saline), 46% (34-58%); midazolam, 18% (6-30%); saline, 1% (0-11%). The response rate for ketamine was higher than the control condition for both saline (t(353) = 7.41, p < 0.0001) and midazolam (t(353) = 4.59, p < 0.0001). Studies that used midazolam as a comparator yielded smaller effects of ketamine than those which used saline, which was accounted for by greater improvement following midazolam compared to saline.

See more in PubMed

Murrough JW, Iosifescu DV, Chang LC, Al Jurdi RK, Green CE, Perez AM, et al. Antidepressant efficacy of ketamine in treatment-resistant major depression: a two-site randomized controlled trial. Am J Psychiatry. 2013;170:1134–42. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2013.13030392. PubMed DOI PMC

Perlis RH, Ostacher M, Fava M, Nierenberg AA, Sachs GS, Rosenbaum JF. Assuring that double-blind is blind. Am J Psychiatry. 2010;167:250–2. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2009.09060820. PubMed DOI

Wilkinson ST, Ballard ED, Bloch MH, Mathew SJ, Murrough JW, Feder A, et al. The effect of a single dose of intravenous ketamine on suicidal ideation: a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis. Am J Psychiatry. 2018;175:150–8. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2017.17040472. PubMed DOI PMC

Nugent AC, Ballard ED, Gould TD, Park LT, Moaddel R, Brutsche NE, et al. Ketamine has distinct electrophysiological and behavioral effects in depressed and healthy subjects. Mol Psychiatry. 2018;8:1. PubMed PMC

Zarate CA, Jr., Singh JB, Carlson PJ, Brutsche NE, Ameli R, Luckenbaugh DA, et al. A randomized trial of an N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist in treatment-resistant major depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006;63:856–64. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.63.8.856. PubMed DOI

Zarate CA, Jr, Brutsche NE, Ibrahim L, Franco-Chaves J, Diazgranados N, Cravchik A, et al. Replication of ketamine’s antidepressant efficacy in bipolar depression: a randomized controlled add-on trial. Biol Psychiatry. 2012;71:939–46. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2011.12.010. PubMed DOI PMC

Diazgranados N, Ibrahim L, Brutsche NE, Newberg A, Kronstein P, Khalife S, et al. A randomized add-on trial of an N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist in treatment-resistant bipolar depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2010;67:793–802. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.90. PubMed DOI PMC

Carmody TJ, Rush AJ, Bernstein I, Warden D, Brannan S, Burnham D, et al. The Montgomery Asberg and the Hamilton ratings of depression: a comparison of measures. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2006;16:601–11. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2006.04.008. PubMed DOI PMC

Berman RM, Cappiello A, Anand A, Oren DA, Heninger GR, Charney DS, et al. Antidepressant effects of ketamine in depressed patients. Biol Psychiatry. 2000;47:351–4. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3223(99)00230-9. PubMed DOI

Grunebaum MF, Ellis SP, Keilp JG, Moitra VK, Cooper TB, Marver JE, et al. Ketamine versus midazolam in bipolar depression with suicidal thoughts: a pilot midazolam-controlled randomized clinical trial. Bipolar Disord. 2017;19:176–83. doi: 10.1111/bdi.12487. PubMed DOI

Grunebaum MF, Galfalvy HC, Choo TH, Keilp JG, Moitra VK, Parris MS, et al. Ketamine for rapid reduction of suicidal thoughts in major depression: a midazolam-controlled randomized clinical trial. Am J Psychiatry. 2018;175:327–35. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2017.17060647. PubMed DOI PMC

Valentine GW, Mason GF, Gomez R, Fasula M, Watzl J, Pittman B, et al. The antidepressant effect of ketamine is not associated with changes in occipital amino acid neurotransmitter content as measured by [(1)H]-MRS. Psychiatry Res. 2011;191:122–7. doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2010.10.009. PubMed DOI PMC

Murrough JW, Soleimani L, DeWilde KE, Collins KA, Lapidus KA, Iacoviello BM, et al. Ketamine for rapid reduction of suicidal ideation: a randomized controlled trial. Psychol Med. 2015;45:3571–80. doi: 10.1017/S0033291715001506. PubMed DOI

Domino EF, Chodoff P, Corssen G. Pharmacologic effects of CI-581, Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1965;6:279–91. doi: 10.1002/cpt196563279. PubMed DOI

Dakwar E, Anerella C, Hart CL, Levin FR, Mathew SJ, Nunes EV. Therapeutic infusions of ketamine: do the psychoactive effects matter? Drug Alcohol Depend. 2014;136:153–7. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2013.12.019. PubMed DOI PMC

Rickels K, Feighner JP, Smith WT. Alprazolam, amitriptyline, doxepin, and placebo in the treatment of depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1985;42:134–41. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1985.01790250028004. PubMed DOI

Fava M, Freeman MP, Flynn M, Judge H, Hoeppner BB, Cusin C, et al. Double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging trial of intravenous ketamine as adjunctive therapy in treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Mol Psychiatry. 2018; 10.1038/s41380-018-0256-5. [Epub ahead of print]. PubMed PMC

Sanacora G, Johnson MR, Khan A, Atkinson SD, Riesenberg RR, Schronen JP, et al. Adjunctive Lanicemine (AZD6765) in patients with major depressive disorder and history of inadequate response to antidepressants: a randomized, placebo-controlled study. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2017;42:844–53. doi: 10.1038/npp.2016.224. PubMed DOI PMC

Sanacora G, Smith MA, Pathak S, Su HL, Boeijinga PH, McCarthy DJ, et al. Lanicemine: a low-trapping NMDA channel blocker produces sustained antidepressant efficacy with minimal psychotomimetic adverse effects. Mol Psychiatry. 2014;19:978–85. doi: 10.1038/mp.2013.130. PubMed DOI PMC

Zarate CA, Jr., Mathews D, Ibrahim L, Chaves JF, Marquardt C, Ukoh I, et al. A randomized trial of a low-trapping nonselective N-methyl-D-aspartate channel blocker in major depression. Biol Psychiatry. 2013;74:257–64. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2012.10.019. PubMed DOI PMC

Walsh BT, Seidman SN, Sysko R, Gould M. Placebo response in studies of major depression: variable, substantial, and growing. JAMA. 2002;287:1840–7. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.14.1840. PubMed DOI

Dunlop BW, Thase ME, Wun CC, Fayyad R, Guico-Pabia CJ, Musgnung J, et al. A meta-analysis of factors impacting detection of antidepressant efficacy in clinical trials: the importance of academic sites. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2012;37:2830–6. doi: 10.1038/npp.2012.153. PubMed DOI PMC

Canuso Carla M., Singh Jaskaran B., Fedgchin Maggie, Alphs Larry, Lane Rosanne, Lim Pilar, Pinter Christine, Hough David, Sanacora Gerard, Manji Husseini, Drevets Wayne C. Efficacy and Safety of Intranasal Esketamine for the Rapid Reduction of Symptoms of Depression and Suicidality in Patients at Imminent Risk for Suicide: Results of a Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study. American Journal of Psychiatry. 2018;175(7):620–630. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2018.17060720. PubMed DOI

Daly EJ, Singh JB, Fedgchin M, Cooper K, Lim P, Shelton RC, et al. Efficacy and safety of intranasal esketamine adjunctive to oral antidepressant therapy in treatment-resistant depression: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatry. 2018;75:139–48. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.3739. PubMed DOI PMC

Petty F, Trivedi MH, Fulton M, Rush AJ. Benzodiazepines as antidepressants: does GABA play a role in depression? Biol Psychiatry. 1995;38:578–91. doi: 10.1016/0006-3223(95)00049-7. PubMed DOI

Sos P, Klirova M, Novak T, Kohutova B, Horacek J, Palenicek T. Relationship of ketamineʼs antidepressant and psychotomimetic effects in unipolar depression. Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2013;34:287–93. PubMed

Hu Y.-D., Xiang Y.-T., Fang J.-X., Zu S., Sha S., Shi H., Ungvari G. S., Correll C. U., Chiu H. F. K., Xue Y., Tian T.-F., Wu A.-S., Ma X., Wang G. Single i.v. ketamine augmentation of newly initiated escitalopram for major depression: results from a randomized, placebo-controlled 4-week study. Psychological Medicine. 2015;46(3):623–635. doi: 10.1017/S0033291715002159. PubMed DOI

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...